What are the Characteristics of the Ring $mathbf F_p[X]/g$ (mod $g$, $g$ is non-irreducible)?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
4
down vote

favorite












$f(x)$ is a primitive polynomial of degree $m$ over a field $mathbf F_p^m$. As such, $mathbf F_p^m[x]/f(x)$ forms a ring, with addition and multiplication ($mkern-4mubmod f(x)$), and furthermore is a field since $f(x)$ is irreducible. Call it $F$



Now, replace $f(x)$ with $g(x)$, a non-primitive, non-irreducible polynomial of degree $m$ over $mathbf F_p^m$ and where $g(0) = 1$. Call it $G$. I am having trouble finding information on line or referred to about the characteristics of such a $g$ or the algebraic structure of $G$ (a ring?). This is probably because I don't know the right terminology and keywords regarding these to search by. Fields and Rings are new to me.



Some questions I have are (assume $m > 2$):



  1. There are a finite number of elements in $G$ (because it is modulo $g$), but it doesn't form a field. What is it called? A "finite-ring"?

EDIT removed prior questions about cycle.



  1. For any non-zero $alpha in F$, $exists n > 0$ such that $alpha^n = 1$. This is not true for all $alpha in G$. Can we easily determine the ones that do have such an $n$?

  2. For any non-zero $alpha in F$, the powers of $alpha$ form a closed group under multiplication. Again, not true $G$. In $G exists alpha$ whose powers never equal 1, so they cannot form a group (no multiplicative identity). And when $g(x)$ is allowed to have factors with multiplicity > 1, $exists alpha in G$ such that $alpha^k = 0, k ge |alpha|$. However, there $exists alpha in G$ that do have powers that form cyclic multiplicative groups. Can we easily determine which ones they are?

Can you point me to a link or a paper (or even just the proper terms to use for searching) that discusses more about this non-irreducible case?







share|cite|improve this question

















  • 2




    Why should there be a finite number of elements in the ring?
    – Bernard
    Aug 1 at 21:37






  • 1




    What do you mean by a "cycle"?
    – Robert Lewis
    Aug 1 at 22:02






  • 1




    But $mathbf F[x]/(g)$ isn't finite, unless $mathbf F$ itself is: $mathbf R[x]/(x^2+1)simeq mathbf C$ is the simplest counter-example.
    – Bernard
    Aug 1 at 23:06






  • 2




    By the Chinese remainder theorem, it is an artinian $F$-algebra. If $g$ has no multiple irreducible factors (.i.e; if the algebra is a reduced ring), it is a product of field extensions of $F$. For the rest, I can't tell: I don't know what you call a ‘cycle’ here.
    – Bernard
    Aug 1 at 23:19






  • 1




    @Bernard has put his finger on the solution to the problem. When $g$ has an irreducible factor with multiplicity $>1$, there will be nilpotents in the resulting ring. Try $mathbf F[x]/((x-a)^m)$, for instance, the simplest case of this.
    – Lubin
    Aug 2 at 0:28














up vote
4
down vote

favorite












$f(x)$ is a primitive polynomial of degree $m$ over a field $mathbf F_p^m$. As such, $mathbf F_p^m[x]/f(x)$ forms a ring, with addition and multiplication ($mkern-4mubmod f(x)$), and furthermore is a field since $f(x)$ is irreducible. Call it $F$



Now, replace $f(x)$ with $g(x)$, a non-primitive, non-irreducible polynomial of degree $m$ over $mathbf F_p^m$ and where $g(0) = 1$. Call it $G$. I am having trouble finding information on line or referred to about the characteristics of such a $g$ or the algebraic structure of $G$ (a ring?). This is probably because I don't know the right terminology and keywords regarding these to search by. Fields and Rings are new to me.



Some questions I have are (assume $m > 2$):



  1. There are a finite number of elements in $G$ (because it is modulo $g$), but it doesn't form a field. What is it called? A "finite-ring"?

EDIT removed prior questions about cycle.



  1. For any non-zero $alpha in F$, $exists n > 0$ such that $alpha^n = 1$. This is not true for all $alpha in G$. Can we easily determine the ones that do have such an $n$?

  2. For any non-zero $alpha in F$, the powers of $alpha$ form a closed group under multiplication. Again, not true $G$. In $G exists alpha$ whose powers never equal 1, so they cannot form a group (no multiplicative identity). And when $g(x)$ is allowed to have factors with multiplicity > 1, $exists alpha in G$ such that $alpha^k = 0, k ge |alpha|$. However, there $exists alpha in G$ that do have powers that form cyclic multiplicative groups. Can we easily determine which ones they are?

Can you point me to a link or a paper (or even just the proper terms to use for searching) that discusses more about this non-irreducible case?







share|cite|improve this question

















  • 2




    Why should there be a finite number of elements in the ring?
    – Bernard
    Aug 1 at 21:37






  • 1




    What do you mean by a "cycle"?
    – Robert Lewis
    Aug 1 at 22:02






  • 1




    But $mathbf F[x]/(g)$ isn't finite, unless $mathbf F$ itself is: $mathbf R[x]/(x^2+1)simeq mathbf C$ is the simplest counter-example.
    – Bernard
    Aug 1 at 23:06






  • 2




    By the Chinese remainder theorem, it is an artinian $F$-algebra. If $g$ has no multiple irreducible factors (.i.e; if the algebra is a reduced ring), it is a product of field extensions of $F$. For the rest, I can't tell: I don't know what you call a ‘cycle’ here.
    – Bernard
    Aug 1 at 23:19






  • 1




    @Bernard has put his finger on the solution to the problem. When $g$ has an irreducible factor with multiplicity $>1$, there will be nilpotents in the resulting ring. Try $mathbf F[x]/((x-a)^m)$, for instance, the simplest case of this.
    – Lubin
    Aug 2 at 0:28












up vote
4
down vote

favorite









up vote
4
down vote

favorite











$f(x)$ is a primitive polynomial of degree $m$ over a field $mathbf F_p^m$. As such, $mathbf F_p^m[x]/f(x)$ forms a ring, with addition and multiplication ($mkern-4mubmod f(x)$), and furthermore is a field since $f(x)$ is irreducible. Call it $F$



Now, replace $f(x)$ with $g(x)$, a non-primitive, non-irreducible polynomial of degree $m$ over $mathbf F_p^m$ and where $g(0) = 1$. Call it $G$. I am having trouble finding information on line or referred to about the characteristics of such a $g$ or the algebraic structure of $G$ (a ring?). This is probably because I don't know the right terminology and keywords regarding these to search by. Fields and Rings are new to me.



Some questions I have are (assume $m > 2$):



  1. There are a finite number of elements in $G$ (because it is modulo $g$), but it doesn't form a field. What is it called? A "finite-ring"?

EDIT removed prior questions about cycle.



  1. For any non-zero $alpha in F$, $exists n > 0$ such that $alpha^n = 1$. This is not true for all $alpha in G$. Can we easily determine the ones that do have such an $n$?

  2. For any non-zero $alpha in F$, the powers of $alpha$ form a closed group under multiplication. Again, not true $G$. In $G exists alpha$ whose powers never equal 1, so they cannot form a group (no multiplicative identity). And when $g(x)$ is allowed to have factors with multiplicity > 1, $exists alpha in G$ such that $alpha^k = 0, k ge |alpha|$. However, there $exists alpha in G$ that do have powers that form cyclic multiplicative groups. Can we easily determine which ones they are?

Can you point me to a link or a paper (or even just the proper terms to use for searching) that discusses more about this non-irreducible case?







share|cite|improve this question













$f(x)$ is a primitive polynomial of degree $m$ over a field $mathbf F_p^m$. As such, $mathbf F_p^m[x]/f(x)$ forms a ring, with addition and multiplication ($mkern-4mubmod f(x)$), and furthermore is a field since $f(x)$ is irreducible. Call it $F$



Now, replace $f(x)$ with $g(x)$, a non-primitive, non-irreducible polynomial of degree $m$ over $mathbf F_p^m$ and where $g(0) = 1$. Call it $G$. I am having trouble finding information on line or referred to about the characteristics of such a $g$ or the algebraic structure of $G$ (a ring?). This is probably because I don't know the right terminology and keywords regarding these to search by. Fields and Rings are new to me.



Some questions I have are (assume $m > 2$):



  1. There are a finite number of elements in $G$ (because it is modulo $g$), but it doesn't form a field. What is it called? A "finite-ring"?

EDIT removed prior questions about cycle.



  1. For any non-zero $alpha in F$, $exists n > 0$ such that $alpha^n = 1$. This is not true for all $alpha in G$. Can we easily determine the ones that do have such an $n$?

  2. For any non-zero $alpha in F$, the powers of $alpha$ form a closed group under multiplication. Again, not true $G$. In $G exists alpha$ whose powers never equal 1, so they cannot form a group (no multiplicative identity). And when $g(x)$ is allowed to have factors with multiplicity > 1, $exists alpha in G$ such that $alpha^k = 0, k ge |alpha|$. However, there $exists alpha in G$ that do have powers that form cyclic multiplicative groups. Can we easily determine which ones they are?

Can you point me to a link or a paper (or even just the proper terms to use for searching) that discusses more about this non-irreducible case?









share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Aug 6 at 18:59
























asked Aug 1 at 21:32









Les

1214




1214







  • 2




    Why should there be a finite number of elements in the ring?
    – Bernard
    Aug 1 at 21:37






  • 1




    What do you mean by a "cycle"?
    – Robert Lewis
    Aug 1 at 22:02






  • 1




    But $mathbf F[x]/(g)$ isn't finite, unless $mathbf F$ itself is: $mathbf R[x]/(x^2+1)simeq mathbf C$ is the simplest counter-example.
    – Bernard
    Aug 1 at 23:06






  • 2




    By the Chinese remainder theorem, it is an artinian $F$-algebra. If $g$ has no multiple irreducible factors (.i.e; if the algebra is a reduced ring), it is a product of field extensions of $F$. For the rest, I can't tell: I don't know what you call a ‘cycle’ here.
    – Bernard
    Aug 1 at 23:19






  • 1




    @Bernard has put his finger on the solution to the problem. When $g$ has an irreducible factor with multiplicity $>1$, there will be nilpotents in the resulting ring. Try $mathbf F[x]/((x-a)^m)$, for instance, the simplest case of this.
    – Lubin
    Aug 2 at 0:28












  • 2




    Why should there be a finite number of elements in the ring?
    – Bernard
    Aug 1 at 21:37






  • 1




    What do you mean by a "cycle"?
    – Robert Lewis
    Aug 1 at 22:02






  • 1




    But $mathbf F[x]/(g)$ isn't finite, unless $mathbf F$ itself is: $mathbf R[x]/(x^2+1)simeq mathbf C$ is the simplest counter-example.
    – Bernard
    Aug 1 at 23:06






  • 2




    By the Chinese remainder theorem, it is an artinian $F$-algebra. If $g$ has no multiple irreducible factors (.i.e; if the algebra is a reduced ring), it is a product of field extensions of $F$. For the rest, I can't tell: I don't know what you call a ‘cycle’ here.
    – Bernard
    Aug 1 at 23:19






  • 1




    @Bernard has put his finger on the solution to the problem. When $g$ has an irreducible factor with multiplicity $>1$, there will be nilpotents in the resulting ring. Try $mathbf F[x]/((x-a)^m)$, for instance, the simplest case of this.
    – Lubin
    Aug 2 at 0:28







2




2




Why should there be a finite number of elements in the ring?
– Bernard
Aug 1 at 21:37




Why should there be a finite number of elements in the ring?
– Bernard
Aug 1 at 21:37




1




1




What do you mean by a "cycle"?
– Robert Lewis
Aug 1 at 22:02




What do you mean by a "cycle"?
– Robert Lewis
Aug 1 at 22:02




1




1




But $mathbf F[x]/(g)$ isn't finite, unless $mathbf F$ itself is: $mathbf R[x]/(x^2+1)simeq mathbf C$ is the simplest counter-example.
– Bernard
Aug 1 at 23:06




But $mathbf F[x]/(g)$ isn't finite, unless $mathbf F$ itself is: $mathbf R[x]/(x^2+1)simeq mathbf C$ is the simplest counter-example.
– Bernard
Aug 1 at 23:06




2




2




By the Chinese remainder theorem, it is an artinian $F$-algebra. If $g$ has no multiple irreducible factors (.i.e; if the algebra is a reduced ring), it is a product of field extensions of $F$. For the rest, I can't tell: I don't know what you call a ‘cycle’ here.
– Bernard
Aug 1 at 23:19




By the Chinese remainder theorem, it is an artinian $F$-algebra. If $g$ has no multiple irreducible factors (.i.e; if the algebra is a reduced ring), it is a product of field extensions of $F$. For the rest, I can't tell: I don't know what you call a ‘cycle’ here.
– Bernard
Aug 1 at 23:19




1




1




@Bernard has put his finger on the solution to the problem. When $g$ has an irreducible factor with multiplicity $>1$, there will be nilpotents in the resulting ring. Try $mathbf F[x]/((x-a)^m)$, for instance, the simplest case of this.
– Lubin
Aug 2 at 0:28




@Bernard has put his finger on the solution to the problem. When $g$ has an irreducible factor with multiplicity $>1$, there will be nilpotents in the resulting ring. Try $mathbf F[x]/((x-a)^m)$, for instance, the simplest case of this.
– Lubin
Aug 2 at 0:28















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2869542%2fwhat-are-the-characteristics-of-the-ring-mathbf-f-px-g-mod-g-g-is-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest



































active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes










 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2869542%2fwhat-are-the-characteristics-of-the-ring-mathbf-f-px-g-mod-g-g-is-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?

Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon