Why is the set of all Real Upper Triangular Square matrices not a vector space?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












My textbook indicates that the set of all upper triangular n ✕ n matrices is a real vector space, but the set of all upper triangular square matrices is not a real vector space.



Why is there a difference between the two? Shouldn't the upper triangular square matrix set also be a vector space?




linear-algebra matrices vector-spaces




share|cite|improve this question





















  • I did. I used the exact same phrasing of the question from the online course I'm taking. I attached pictures to demonstrate my point.
    – Shayan Hemmati
    Aug 6 at 21:16










  • did the pictures provide any clarity or still a typo?
    – Shayan Hemmati
    Aug 6 at 21:19










  • Perfect! thank you for clarification
    – Shayan Hemmati
    Aug 6 at 21:23










  • Pjonin gave a good explanation, of course for the second one if we are dealing with square matrices of different size then "the set of all upper triangular square matrices is not a real vector space" is true of course!
    – gimusi
    Aug 6 at 21:28














up vote
1
down vote

favorite












My textbook indicates that the set of all upper triangular n ✕ n matrices is a real vector space, but the set of all upper triangular square matrices is not a real vector space.



Why is there a difference between the two? Shouldn't the upper triangular square matrix set also be a vector space?




linear-algebra matrices vector-spaces




share|cite|improve this question





















  • I did. I used the exact same phrasing of the question from the online course I'm taking. I attached pictures to demonstrate my point.
    – Shayan Hemmati
    Aug 6 at 21:16










  • did the pictures provide any clarity or still a typo?
    – Shayan Hemmati
    Aug 6 at 21:19










  • Perfect! thank you for clarification
    – Shayan Hemmati
    Aug 6 at 21:23










  • Pjonin gave a good explanation, of course for the second one if we are dealing with square matrices of different size then "the set of all upper triangular square matrices is not a real vector space" is true of course!
    – gimusi
    Aug 6 at 21:28












up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











My textbook indicates that the set of all upper triangular n ✕ n matrices is a real vector space, but the set of all upper triangular square matrices is not a real vector space.



Why is there a difference between the two? Shouldn't the upper triangular square matrix set also be a vector space?




linear-algebra matrices vector-spaces




share|cite|improve this question













My textbook indicates that the set of all upper triangular n ✕ n matrices is a real vector space, but the set of all upper triangular square matrices is not a real vector space.



Why is there a difference between the two? Shouldn't the upper triangular square matrix set also be a vector space?





linear-algebra matrices vector-spaces





share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Aug 6 at 21:53









Arnaud Mortier

19.2k22159




19.2k22159









asked Aug 6 at 21:03









Shayan Hemmati

263




263











  • I did. I used the exact same phrasing of the question from the online course I'm taking. I attached pictures to demonstrate my point.
    – Shayan Hemmati
    Aug 6 at 21:16










  • did the pictures provide any clarity or still a typo?
    – Shayan Hemmati
    Aug 6 at 21:19










  • Perfect! thank you for clarification
    – Shayan Hemmati
    Aug 6 at 21:23










  • Pjonin gave a good explanation, of course for the second one if we are dealing with square matrices of different size then "the set of all upper triangular square matrices is not a real vector space" is true of course!
    – gimusi
    Aug 6 at 21:28
















  • I did. I used the exact same phrasing of the question from the online course I'm taking. I attached pictures to demonstrate my point.
    – Shayan Hemmati
    Aug 6 at 21:16










  • did the pictures provide any clarity or still a typo?
    – Shayan Hemmati
    Aug 6 at 21:19










  • Perfect! thank you for clarification
    – Shayan Hemmati
    Aug 6 at 21:23










  • Pjonin gave a good explanation, of course for the second one if we are dealing with square matrices of different size then "the set of all upper triangular square matrices is not a real vector space" is true of course!
    – gimusi
    Aug 6 at 21:28















I did. I used the exact same phrasing of the question from the online course I'm taking. I attached pictures to demonstrate my point.
– Shayan Hemmati
Aug 6 at 21:16




I did. I used the exact same phrasing of the question from the online course I'm taking. I attached pictures to demonstrate my point.
– Shayan Hemmati
Aug 6 at 21:16












did the pictures provide any clarity or still a typo?
– Shayan Hemmati
Aug 6 at 21:19




did the pictures provide any clarity or still a typo?
– Shayan Hemmati
Aug 6 at 21:19












Perfect! thank you for clarification
– Shayan Hemmati
Aug 6 at 21:23




Perfect! thank you for clarification
– Shayan Hemmati
Aug 6 at 21:23












Pjonin gave a good explanation, of course for the second one if we are dealing with square matrices of different size then "the set of all upper triangular square matrices is not a real vector space" is true of course!
– gimusi
Aug 6 at 21:28




Pjonin gave a good explanation, of course for the second one if we are dealing with square matrices of different size then "the set of all upper triangular square matrices is not a real vector space" is true of course!
– gimusi
Aug 6 at 21:28










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote













I guess what they mean is that you need to precise that they must be the same size and that you can’t have a vectorial space of matrices of size p and of size n.



But that’s quite unclear.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Yes of course! I did'n consider that but that must be the reason.
    – gimusi
    Aug 6 at 21:26










Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2874311%2fwhy-is-the-set-of-all-real-upper-triangular-square-matrices-not-a-vector-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

















1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
3
down vote













I guess what they mean is that you need to precise that they must be the same size and that you can’t have a vectorial space of matrices of size p and of size n.



But that’s quite unclear.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Yes of course! I did'n consider that but that must be the reason.
    – gimusi
    Aug 6 at 21:26














up vote
3
down vote













I guess what they mean is that you need to precise that they must be the same size and that you can’t have a vectorial space of matrices of size p and of size n.



But that’s quite unclear.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Yes of course! I did'n consider that but that must be the reason.
    – gimusi
    Aug 6 at 21:26












up vote
3
down vote










up vote
3
down vote









I guess what they mean is that you need to precise that they must be the same size and that you can’t have a vectorial space of matrices of size p and of size n.



But that’s quite unclear.






share|cite|improve this answer













I guess what they mean is that you need to precise that they must be the same size and that you can’t have a vectorial space of matrices of size p and of size n.



But that’s quite unclear.







share|cite|improve this answer













share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer











answered Aug 6 at 21:25









Pjonin

3206




3206











  • Yes of course! I did'n consider that but that must be the reason.
    – gimusi
    Aug 6 at 21:26
















  • Yes of course! I did'n consider that but that must be the reason.
    – gimusi
    Aug 6 at 21:26















Yes of course! I did'n consider that but that must be the reason.
– gimusi
Aug 6 at 21:26




Yes of course! I did'n consider that but that must be the reason.
– gimusi
Aug 6 at 21:26












 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2874311%2fwhy-is-the-set-of-all-real-upper-triangular-square-matrices-not-a-vector-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest
































































Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

Image
Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 5 down vote favorite 1 Here is the problem: For what $n$ is it possible to color the edges and diagonals of an $n$-side regular polygon with $dfracbinomn23$ colors, such that you use every color exactly three times and for every color the three segments (edges or diagonals) with that color form a triangle? Trivially $nequiv 0 text or 1 pmod3$. I can also prove that if the statement is true for $k$ than it is true for $3k$ as well. How to finish? Please help! Thanks combinatorial-geometry share | cite | improve this question edited Aug 6 at 21:57 alcana 118 4 asked Aug 6 at 21:15 Leo Gardner 356 11 Even assuming "polyhpn" in the title is a typo for polygon , it is unclear what you mean by "the edges and sides". Aren't the side of a regular polygon the same as the edges? A regular $n$-sided polygon has $n$ edges. – hardmath Aug 6 at 21:20 3 $n$ ne
Read more

Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?

Image
Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 2 down vote favorite We are studying adjoints in class, and I was curious if there is a relationship between the determinant of matrix A, and the determinant of the adjoint of matrix A? I assume there would be a relationship because finding the adjoint requires creating a cofactor matrix and then transposing it. linear-algebra determinant adjoint-operators share | cite | improve this question asked Nov 17 '17 at 17:32 CluelessCoder 32 5 For a square matrix $A$ of order $n$, we have $A(operatornameadj A)=(operatornameadj A)A=|A|I_n$ where $I_n$ is the identity matrix of order $n$. This should tell you about the determinant of the adjoint in terms of that of $A$ (use multiplicative property and other elementary properties of determinants). – Prasun Biswas Nov 17 '17 at 17:35 1 @CluelessCoder: see here: math.stackexchange.com/questions/516127/… – Hector Blandin Nov 17 &
Read more

What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

Image
Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 2 down vote favorite What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalized tilt? I've noticed that in most equations given to represent a cone, there is no parameter which defines the tilt of the cone in 3D space and that most of them have their point at the origin $(0,0,0)$ - I was wondering if anyone could give me a more generalized cone equation for a cone in any position in 3D space 3d share | cite | improve this question edited Jul 25 '16 at 0:05 ervx 9,425 3 13 36 asked Jul 24 '16 at 15:38 Charlene 11 2 2 Welcome to Math.SE! Could you please explain a few things to help people give an answer useful to you: 1. What do you mean by "generalized tilt"? 2. Are you asking about a right circular cone? Does the angle at the vertex matter? 3. What form of answer (implicit, parametric...?) are you looking for? 4. If this is homework, what tools do you have available, an
Read more