Sets of measure zero and smooth functions

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












I want to prove:




Let $U$ be an open subset of $mathbbR^n$ and $F:Uto mathbbR^n$ a $C^infty$ function. Let $S$ be a subset of $U$ of zero-measure. Then $F(S)$ has zero-measure.




Proof



We can find a countable open cover of $U$, say $mathfrakB$, such that for every $Vin mathfrakB$ we have $overlineVsubseteq U$, and $V$ is an open ball.



Since countable union of subsets of zero-measure has zero-measure, then it is sufficient to prove that $F(Scap V)$ has zero-measure for every $V in mathfrakB$.



We can suppose that $S subseteq V$.



Since $S$ has zero-measure, for every $epsilon >0$ there is $R_j$ countable family of $n-$cubes such that $$Ssubseteqbigcup_j R_j, quad textand quadsum_j textVol(R_j)<epsilon$$



Let $l_j>0$ be the lenght of the side of the $n-$cube $R_j$. We can inscribe $R_j$ in an open ball $B_j$ of radius $r_j=sqrtnfracl_j2$.



Since $F$ is $C^1$ in $overlineV$, then $F$ is Lipschitz in $overlineV$, i.e. there is $c>0$ such that $$lVert F(x)-F(y)rVert leq c lVert x-y rVert$$ for every $x,y in overlineV$.




My book says that we can inscribe $F(B_j)$ in an open ball, say $B'_j$, of radius $r'_j=cr_j$.



My objections are:



1) I don't know if $B_jsubseteq U$ (right?), so I should write $F(B_jcap U)$.



2) If I want to use the Lipschitz of $F$ than I should write $F(B_j cap overlineV)$, right?



3) I don't know if the center of $B_j$ lies in $overlineV$ (right?), so shouldn't be $r'_j=2cr_j$?



Take $x in B_jcap overlineV$ and let $B'_j$ be the $n-$open ball of center $F(x)$ and radius $r'_j=2cr_j$. If $y$ is any point in $B_jcap overlineV$ then we have $lVert x-y rVert <2 r_j$ and then $$lVert F(x)-F(y)rVert leq c lVert x-y rVert <2cr_j$$ so $F(y)in B_j'$, so $F(B_j cap overlineV) subseteq B_j'$. Or is there any way in which it is true that we can inscribe $F(B_j)$ (or, better, $F(B_j cap overlineV)$) in an open ball of radius $r'_j=cr_j$?




For the sake of completeness I will finish the proof.



We can inscribe $B'_j$ in an open $n-$ cube $R'_j$ with length of the side $l'_j=2r'_j=4cr_j=2cl_jsqrtn$. Then we have $$F(S)subseteq bigcup_j R'_j quad textand quad sum_J textVol (R'_j)<2^n c^n n^n/2epsilon $$







share|cite|improve this question





















  • It's "measure" not "misure"
    – zhw.
    4 hours ago














up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












I want to prove:




Let $U$ be an open subset of $mathbbR^n$ and $F:Uto mathbbR^n$ a $C^infty$ function. Let $S$ be a subset of $U$ of zero-measure. Then $F(S)$ has zero-measure.




Proof



We can find a countable open cover of $U$, say $mathfrakB$, such that for every $Vin mathfrakB$ we have $overlineVsubseteq U$, and $V$ is an open ball.



Since countable union of subsets of zero-measure has zero-measure, then it is sufficient to prove that $F(Scap V)$ has zero-measure for every $V in mathfrakB$.



We can suppose that $S subseteq V$.



Since $S$ has zero-measure, for every $epsilon >0$ there is $R_j$ countable family of $n-$cubes such that $$Ssubseteqbigcup_j R_j, quad textand quadsum_j textVol(R_j)<epsilon$$



Let $l_j>0$ be the lenght of the side of the $n-$cube $R_j$. We can inscribe $R_j$ in an open ball $B_j$ of radius $r_j=sqrtnfracl_j2$.



Since $F$ is $C^1$ in $overlineV$, then $F$ is Lipschitz in $overlineV$, i.e. there is $c>0$ such that $$lVert F(x)-F(y)rVert leq c lVert x-y rVert$$ for every $x,y in overlineV$.




My book says that we can inscribe $F(B_j)$ in an open ball, say $B'_j$, of radius $r'_j=cr_j$.



My objections are:



1) I don't know if $B_jsubseteq U$ (right?), so I should write $F(B_jcap U)$.



2) If I want to use the Lipschitz of $F$ than I should write $F(B_j cap overlineV)$, right?



3) I don't know if the center of $B_j$ lies in $overlineV$ (right?), so shouldn't be $r'_j=2cr_j$?



Take $x in B_jcap overlineV$ and let $B'_j$ be the $n-$open ball of center $F(x)$ and radius $r'_j=2cr_j$. If $y$ is any point in $B_jcap overlineV$ then we have $lVert x-y rVert <2 r_j$ and then $$lVert F(x)-F(y)rVert leq c lVert x-y rVert <2cr_j$$ so $F(y)in B_j'$, so $F(B_j cap overlineV) subseteq B_j'$. Or is there any way in which it is true that we can inscribe $F(B_j)$ (or, better, $F(B_j cap overlineV)$) in an open ball of radius $r'_j=cr_j$?




For the sake of completeness I will finish the proof.



We can inscribe $B'_j$ in an open $n-$ cube $R'_j$ with length of the side $l'_j=2r'_j=4cr_j=2cl_jsqrtn$. Then we have $$F(S)subseteq bigcup_j R'_j quad textand quad sum_J textVol (R'_j)<2^n c^n n^n/2epsilon $$







share|cite|improve this question





















  • It's "measure" not "misure"
    – zhw.
    4 hours ago












up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1






1





I want to prove:




Let $U$ be an open subset of $mathbbR^n$ and $F:Uto mathbbR^n$ a $C^infty$ function. Let $S$ be a subset of $U$ of zero-measure. Then $F(S)$ has zero-measure.




Proof



We can find a countable open cover of $U$, say $mathfrakB$, such that for every $Vin mathfrakB$ we have $overlineVsubseteq U$, and $V$ is an open ball.



Since countable union of subsets of zero-measure has zero-measure, then it is sufficient to prove that $F(Scap V)$ has zero-measure for every $V in mathfrakB$.



We can suppose that $S subseteq V$.



Since $S$ has zero-measure, for every $epsilon >0$ there is $R_j$ countable family of $n-$cubes such that $$Ssubseteqbigcup_j R_j, quad textand quadsum_j textVol(R_j)<epsilon$$



Let $l_j>0$ be the lenght of the side of the $n-$cube $R_j$. We can inscribe $R_j$ in an open ball $B_j$ of radius $r_j=sqrtnfracl_j2$.



Since $F$ is $C^1$ in $overlineV$, then $F$ is Lipschitz in $overlineV$, i.e. there is $c>0$ such that $$lVert F(x)-F(y)rVert leq c lVert x-y rVert$$ for every $x,y in overlineV$.




My book says that we can inscribe $F(B_j)$ in an open ball, say $B'_j$, of radius $r'_j=cr_j$.



My objections are:



1) I don't know if $B_jsubseteq U$ (right?), so I should write $F(B_jcap U)$.



2) If I want to use the Lipschitz of $F$ than I should write $F(B_j cap overlineV)$, right?



3) I don't know if the center of $B_j$ lies in $overlineV$ (right?), so shouldn't be $r'_j=2cr_j$?



Take $x in B_jcap overlineV$ and let $B'_j$ be the $n-$open ball of center $F(x)$ and radius $r'_j=2cr_j$. If $y$ is any point in $B_jcap overlineV$ then we have $lVert x-y rVert <2 r_j$ and then $$lVert F(x)-F(y)rVert leq c lVert x-y rVert <2cr_j$$ so $F(y)in B_j'$, so $F(B_j cap overlineV) subseteq B_j'$. Or is there any way in which it is true that we can inscribe $F(B_j)$ (or, better, $F(B_j cap overlineV)$) in an open ball of radius $r'_j=cr_j$?




For the sake of completeness I will finish the proof.



We can inscribe $B'_j$ in an open $n-$ cube $R'_j$ with length of the side $l'_j=2r'_j=4cr_j=2cl_jsqrtn$. Then we have $$F(S)subseteq bigcup_j R'_j quad textand quad sum_J textVol (R'_j)<2^n c^n n^n/2epsilon $$







share|cite|improve this question













I want to prove:




Let $U$ be an open subset of $mathbbR^n$ and $F:Uto mathbbR^n$ a $C^infty$ function. Let $S$ be a subset of $U$ of zero-measure. Then $F(S)$ has zero-measure.




Proof



We can find a countable open cover of $U$, say $mathfrakB$, such that for every $Vin mathfrakB$ we have $overlineVsubseteq U$, and $V$ is an open ball.



Since countable union of subsets of zero-measure has zero-measure, then it is sufficient to prove that $F(Scap V)$ has zero-measure for every $V in mathfrakB$.



We can suppose that $S subseteq V$.



Since $S$ has zero-measure, for every $epsilon >0$ there is $R_j$ countable family of $n-$cubes such that $$Ssubseteqbigcup_j R_j, quad textand quadsum_j textVol(R_j)<epsilon$$



Let $l_j>0$ be the lenght of the side of the $n-$cube $R_j$. We can inscribe $R_j$ in an open ball $B_j$ of radius $r_j=sqrtnfracl_j2$.



Since $F$ is $C^1$ in $overlineV$, then $F$ is Lipschitz in $overlineV$, i.e. there is $c>0$ such that $$lVert F(x)-F(y)rVert leq c lVert x-y rVert$$ for every $x,y in overlineV$.




My book says that we can inscribe $F(B_j)$ in an open ball, say $B'_j$, of radius $r'_j=cr_j$.



My objections are:



1) I don't know if $B_jsubseteq U$ (right?), so I should write $F(B_jcap U)$.



2) If I want to use the Lipschitz of $F$ than I should write $F(B_j cap overlineV)$, right?



3) I don't know if the center of $B_j$ lies in $overlineV$ (right?), so shouldn't be $r'_j=2cr_j$?



Take $x in B_jcap overlineV$ and let $B'_j$ be the $n-$open ball of center $F(x)$ and radius $r'_j=2cr_j$. If $y$ is any point in $B_jcap overlineV$ then we have $lVert x-y rVert <2 r_j$ and then $$lVert F(x)-F(y)rVert leq c lVert x-y rVert <2cr_j$$ so $F(y)in B_j'$, so $F(B_j cap overlineV) subseteq B_j'$. Or is there any way in which it is true that we can inscribe $F(B_j)$ (or, better, $F(B_j cap overlineV)$) in an open ball of radius $r'_j=cr_j$?




For the sake of completeness I will finish the proof.



We can inscribe $B'_j$ in an open $n-$ cube $R'_j$ with length of the side $l'_j=2r'_j=4cr_j=2cl_jsqrtn$. Then we have $$F(S)subseteq bigcup_j R'_j quad textand quad sum_J textVol (R'_j)<2^n c^n n^n/2epsilon $$









share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 12 mins ago
























asked 5 hours ago









Minato

16910




16910











  • It's "measure" not "misure"
    – zhw.
    4 hours ago
















  • It's "measure" not "misure"
    – zhw.
    4 hours ago















It's "measure" not "misure"
– zhw.
4 hours ago




It's "measure" not "misure"
– zhw.
4 hours ago















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2873138%2fsets-of-measure-zero-and-smooth-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest



































active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes










 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2873138%2fsets-of-measure-zero-and-smooth-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?