Is it appropriate to say that mathematicians “discovered a new shape” with the scutoid? [on hold]

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
-1
down vote

favorite












Scientists discovered new shape scutoid while studying epithelial cells. epithelial cells view from outside Before it was considered that they have shape of prisma but then they realized some curves in the shape that can't be made by combining prismas. So they had to have mathematicians involved in process and mathematicians discovered that shapes of these cells weren't prismas but scutoids scutoids. And of course there appeared many articles with title "Mathematicians discovered new shape". And "Discover of new shape" does not make any sense to me.




Is this the proper way of saying this? Did somebody discover the triangle too? Isn't it easy to draw an unnamed shape and name it? What is the difference?





geometry




share|cite|improve this question













put on hold as unclear what you're asking by amWhy, Lord Shark the Unknown, Arnaud Mortier, Shaun, Leucippus 10 hours ago


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.


















    up vote
    -1
    down vote

    favorite












    Scientists discovered new shape scutoid while studying epithelial cells. epithelial cells view from outside Before it was considered that they have shape of prisma but then they realized some curves in the shape that can't be made by combining prismas. So they had to have mathematicians involved in process and mathematicians discovered that shapes of these cells weren't prismas but scutoids scutoids. And of course there appeared many articles with title "Mathematicians discovered new shape". And "Discover of new shape" does not make any sense to me.




    Is this the proper way of saying this? Did somebody discover the triangle too? Isn't it easy to draw an unnamed shape and name it? What is the difference?





    geometry




    share|cite|improve this question













    put on hold as unclear what you're asking by amWhy, Lord Shark the Unknown, Arnaud Mortier, Shaun, Leucippus 10 hours ago


    Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
















      up vote
      -1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      -1
      down vote

      favorite











      Scientists discovered new shape scutoid while studying epithelial cells. epithelial cells view from outside Before it was considered that they have shape of prisma but then they realized some curves in the shape that can't be made by combining prismas. So they had to have mathematicians involved in process and mathematicians discovered that shapes of these cells weren't prismas but scutoids scutoids. And of course there appeared many articles with title "Mathematicians discovered new shape". And "Discover of new shape" does not make any sense to me.




      Is this the proper way of saying this? Did somebody discover the triangle too? Isn't it easy to draw an unnamed shape and name it? What is the difference?





      geometry




      share|cite|improve this question













      Scientists discovered new shape scutoid while studying epithelial cells. epithelial cells view from outside Before it was considered that they have shape of prisma but then they realized some curves in the shape that can't be made by combining prismas. So they had to have mathematicians involved in process and mathematicians discovered that shapes of these cells weren't prismas but scutoids scutoids. And of course there appeared many articles with title "Mathematicians discovered new shape". And "Discover of new shape" does not make any sense to me.




      Is this the proper way of saying this? Did somebody discover the triangle too? Isn't it easy to draw an unnamed shape and name it? What is the difference?






      geometry





      share|cite|improve this question












      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 7 hours ago









      Blue

      43.6k868141




      43.6k868141









      asked 10 hours ago









      Ramil Huseynov

      21




      21




      put on hold as unclear what you're asking by amWhy, Lord Shark the Unknown, Arnaud Mortier, Shaun, Leucippus 10 hours ago


      Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.






      put on hold as unclear what you're asking by amWhy, Lord Shark the Unknown, Arnaud Mortier, Shaun, Leucippus 10 hours ago


      Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.



























          active

          oldest

          votes






















          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes

          Comments

          Post a Comment

          Popular posts from this blog

          Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

          Image
          Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 5 down vote favorite 1 Here is the problem: For what $n$ is it possible to color the edges and diagonals of an $n$-side regular polygon with $dfracbinomn23$ colors, such that you use every color exactly three times and for every color the three segments (edges or diagonals) with that color form a triangle? Trivially $nequiv 0 text or 1 pmod3$. I can also prove that if the statement is true for $k$ than it is true for $3k$ as well. How to finish? Please help! Thanks combinatorial-geometry share | cite | improve this question edited Aug 6 at 21:57 alcana 118 4 asked Aug 6 at 21:15 Leo Gardner 356 11 Even assuming "polyhpn" in the title is a typo for polygon , it is unclear what you mean by "the edges and sides". Aren't the side of a regular polygon the same as the edges? A regular $n$-sided polygon has $n$ edges. – hardmath Aug 6 at 21:20 3 $n$ ne
          Read more

          Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?

          Image
          Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 2 down vote favorite We are studying adjoints in class, and I was curious if there is a relationship between the determinant of matrix A, and the determinant of the adjoint of matrix A? I assume there would be a relationship because finding the adjoint requires creating a cofactor matrix and then transposing it. linear-algebra determinant adjoint-operators share | cite | improve this question asked Nov 17 '17 at 17:32 CluelessCoder 32 5 For a square matrix $A$ of order $n$, we have $A(operatornameadj A)=(operatornameadj A)A=|A|I_n$ where $I_n$ is the identity matrix of order $n$. This should tell you about the determinant of the adjoint in terms of that of $A$ (use multiplicative property and other elementary properties of determinants). – Prasun Biswas Nov 17 '17 at 17:35 1 @CluelessCoder: see here: math.stackexchange.com/questions/516127/… – Hector Blandin Nov 17 &
          Read more

          What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

          Image
          Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 2 down vote favorite What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalized tilt? I've noticed that in most equations given to represent a cone, there is no parameter which defines the tilt of the cone in 3D space and that most of them have their point at the origin $(0,0,0)$ - I was wondering if anyone could give me a more generalized cone equation for a cone in any position in 3D space 3d share | cite | improve this question edited Jul 25 '16 at 0:05 ervx 9,425 3 13 36 asked Jul 24 '16 at 15:38 Charlene 11 2 2 Welcome to Math.SE! Could you please explain a few things to help people give an answer useful to you: 1. What do you mean by "generalized tilt"? 2. Are you asking about a right circular cone? Does the angle at the vertex matter? 3. What form of answer (implicit, parametric...?) are you looking for? 4. If this is homework, what tools do you have available, an
          Read more