The extension of the tensor product of two operators

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1












Let $E$, $F$ be two complex Hilbert spaces and $mathcalL(E)$ (resp. $mathcalL(F)$) be the algebra of all bounded linear operators on $E$ (resp. $F$).



The algebraic tensor product of $E$ and $F$ is given by
$$E otimes F:=leftxi=sum_i=1^dv_iotimes w_i:;din mathbbN^*,;;v_iin E,;;w_iin F
right.$$



In $E otimes F$, we define
$$
langle xi,etarangle=sum_i=1^nsum_j=1^m langle x_i,z_jrangle_1langle y_i ,t_jrangle_2,
$$
for $xi=displaystylesum_i=1^nx_iotimes y_iin E otimes F$ and $eta=displaystylesum_j=1^mz_jotimes w_jin E otimes F$.



The above sesquilinear form is an inner product in $E otimes F$.



It is well known that $(E otimes F,langlecdot,cdotrangle)$ is not a complete space. Let $E widehatotimes F$ be the completion of $E otimes F$ under the inner product $langlecdot,cdotrangle$.



If $Tin mathcalL(E)$ and $Sin mathcalL(F)$, then the tensor product of $T$ and $S$ is denoted $Totimes S$ and defined as
$$big(Totimes Sbig)bigg(sum_k=1^d x_kotimes y_kbigg)=sum_k=1^dTx_k otimes Sy_k,;;forall,sum_k=1^d x_kotimes y_kin E otimes F,$$
which lies in $mathcalL(E otimes F)$. The extension of $Totimes S$ over the Hilbert space $E widehatotimes F$, denoted by $T widehatotimes S$, is the tensor product of $T$ and $S$ on the tensor product space, which lies in $mathcalL(EwidehatotimesF)$.



Let $operatornameIm X$ and $overlineoperatornameIm X$ denote respectively the range of an operator $X$ and the closure of its range.




Let $T,Min mathcalL(E)$ and $S,Nin mathcalL(F)$. If $operatornameIm (T)subseteq overlineoperatornameIm (M)$ and $operatornameIm SsubseteqoverlineoperatornameIm (N)$. I want to show that
$$operatornameIm(T widehatotimes S)subseteq overlineoperatornameIm(M widehatotimes N).$$




Note that I show that
$$overlineoperatornameIm MotimesoverlineoperatornameIm NsubseteqoverlineoperatornameIm(M otimes N).$$







share|cite|improve this question























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    Let $E$, $F$ be two complex Hilbert spaces and $mathcalL(E)$ (resp. $mathcalL(F)$) be the algebra of all bounded linear operators on $E$ (resp. $F$).



    The algebraic tensor product of $E$ and $F$ is given by
    $$E otimes F:=leftxi=sum_i=1^dv_iotimes w_i:;din mathbbN^*,;;v_iin E,;;w_iin F
    right.$$



    In $E otimes F$, we define
    $$
    langle xi,etarangle=sum_i=1^nsum_j=1^m langle x_i,z_jrangle_1langle y_i ,t_jrangle_2,
    $$
    for $xi=displaystylesum_i=1^nx_iotimes y_iin E otimes F$ and $eta=displaystylesum_j=1^mz_jotimes w_jin E otimes F$.



    The above sesquilinear form is an inner product in $E otimes F$.



    It is well known that $(E otimes F,langlecdot,cdotrangle)$ is not a complete space. Let $E widehatotimes F$ be the completion of $E otimes F$ under the inner product $langlecdot,cdotrangle$.



    If $Tin mathcalL(E)$ and $Sin mathcalL(F)$, then the tensor product of $T$ and $S$ is denoted $Totimes S$ and defined as
    $$big(Totimes Sbig)bigg(sum_k=1^d x_kotimes y_kbigg)=sum_k=1^dTx_k otimes Sy_k,;;forall,sum_k=1^d x_kotimes y_kin E otimes F,$$
    which lies in $mathcalL(E otimes F)$. The extension of $Totimes S$ over the Hilbert space $E widehatotimes F$, denoted by $T widehatotimes S$, is the tensor product of $T$ and $S$ on the tensor product space, which lies in $mathcalL(EwidehatotimesF)$.



    Let $operatornameIm X$ and $overlineoperatornameIm X$ denote respectively the range of an operator $X$ and the closure of its range.




    Let $T,Min mathcalL(E)$ and $S,Nin mathcalL(F)$. If $operatornameIm (T)subseteq overlineoperatornameIm (M)$ and $operatornameIm SsubseteqoverlineoperatornameIm (N)$. I want to show that
    $$operatornameIm(T widehatotimes S)subseteq overlineoperatornameIm(M widehatotimes N).$$




    Note that I show that
    $$overlineoperatornameIm MotimesoverlineoperatornameIm NsubseteqoverlineoperatornameIm(M otimes N).$$







    share|cite|improve this question





















      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      Let $E$, $F$ be two complex Hilbert spaces and $mathcalL(E)$ (resp. $mathcalL(F)$) be the algebra of all bounded linear operators on $E$ (resp. $F$).



      The algebraic tensor product of $E$ and $F$ is given by
      $$E otimes F:=leftxi=sum_i=1^dv_iotimes w_i:;din mathbbN^*,;;v_iin E,;;w_iin F
      right.$$



      In $E otimes F$, we define
      $$
      langle xi,etarangle=sum_i=1^nsum_j=1^m langle x_i,z_jrangle_1langle y_i ,t_jrangle_2,
      $$
      for $xi=displaystylesum_i=1^nx_iotimes y_iin E otimes F$ and $eta=displaystylesum_j=1^mz_jotimes w_jin E otimes F$.



      The above sesquilinear form is an inner product in $E otimes F$.



      It is well known that $(E otimes F,langlecdot,cdotrangle)$ is not a complete space. Let $E widehatotimes F$ be the completion of $E otimes F$ under the inner product $langlecdot,cdotrangle$.



      If $Tin mathcalL(E)$ and $Sin mathcalL(F)$, then the tensor product of $T$ and $S$ is denoted $Totimes S$ and defined as
      $$big(Totimes Sbig)bigg(sum_k=1^d x_kotimes y_kbigg)=sum_k=1^dTx_k otimes Sy_k,;;forall,sum_k=1^d x_kotimes y_kin E otimes F,$$
      which lies in $mathcalL(E otimes F)$. The extension of $Totimes S$ over the Hilbert space $E widehatotimes F$, denoted by $T widehatotimes S$, is the tensor product of $T$ and $S$ on the tensor product space, which lies in $mathcalL(EwidehatotimesF)$.



      Let $operatornameIm X$ and $overlineoperatornameIm X$ denote respectively the range of an operator $X$ and the closure of its range.




      Let $T,Min mathcalL(E)$ and $S,Nin mathcalL(F)$. If $operatornameIm (T)subseteq overlineoperatornameIm (M)$ and $operatornameIm SsubseteqoverlineoperatornameIm (N)$. I want to show that
      $$operatornameIm(T widehatotimes S)subseteq overlineoperatornameIm(M widehatotimes N).$$




      Note that I show that
      $$overlineoperatornameIm MotimesoverlineoperatornameIm NsubseteqoverlineoperatornameIm(M otimes N).$$







      share|cite|improve this question











      Let $E$, $F$ be two complex Hilbert spaces and $mathcalL(E)$ (resp. $mathcalL(F)$) be the algebra of all bounded linear operators on $E$ (resp. $F$).



      The algebraic tensor product of $E$ and $F$ is given by
      $$E otimes F:=leftxi=sum_i=1^dv_iotimes w_i:;din mathbbN^*,;;v_iin E,;;w_iin F
      right.$$



      In $E otimes F$, we define
      $$
      langle xi,etarangle=sum_i=1^nsum_j=1^m langle x_i,z_jrangle_1langle y_i ,t_jrangle_2,
      $$
      for $xi=displaystylesum_i=1^nx_iotimes y_iin E otimes F$ and $eta=displaystylesum_j=1^mz_jotimes w_jin E otimes F$.



      The above sesquilinear form is an inner product in $E otimes F$.



      It is well known that $(E otimes F,langlecdot,cdotrangle)$ is not a complete space. Let $E widehatotimes F$ be the completion of $E otimes F$ under the inner product $langlecdot,cdotrangle$.



      If $Tin mathcalL(E)$ and $Sin mathcalL(F)$, then the tensor product of $T$ and $S$ is denoted $Totimes S$ and defined as
      $$big(Totimes Sbig)bigg(sum_k=1^d x_kotimes y_kbigg)=sum_k=1^dTx_k otimes Sy_k,;;forall,sum_k=1^d x_kotimes y_kin E otimes F,$$
      which lies in $mathcalL(E otimes F)$. The extension of $Totimes S$ over the Hilbert space $E widehatotimes F$, denoted by $T widehatotimes S$, is the tensor product of $T$ and $S$ on the tensor product space, which lies in $mathcalL(EwidehatotimesF)$.



      Let $operatornameIm X$ and $overlineoperatornameIm X$ denote respectively the range of an operator $X$ and the closure of its range.




      Let $T,Min mathcalL(E)$ and $S,Nin mathcalL(F)$. If $operatornameIm (T)subseteq overlineoperatornameIm (M)$ and $operatornameIm SsubseteqoverlineoperatornameIm (N)$. I want to show that
      $$operatornameIm(T widehatotimes S)subseteq overlineoperatornameIm(M widehatotimes N).$$




      Note that I show that
      $$overlineoperatornameIm MotimesoverlineoperatornameIm NsubseteqoverlineoperatornameIm(M otimes N).$$









      share|cite|improve this question










      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question









      asked yesterday









      Student

      2,4802524




      2,4802524




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          Firstly, it is immediate that $$operatornameIm(T otimes S) = operatornameIm(T) otimes operatornameIm(S) subseteqoverlineoperatornameIm(M)otimes overlineoperatornameIm(N) subseteq overlineoperatornameIm(Motimes N)$$
          and so $overlineoperatornameIm(T otimes S) subseteq overlineoperatornameIm(Motimes N)$



          Now, $operatornameIm(T otimes S) = T hat otimes S (E otimes F)$. But $T hat otimes S$ is a continuous map on $E hat otimes F$ and so $$T hat otimes S(E hat otimes F) = T hat otimes S( overlineE otimes F) subseteq overlineT hat otimes S(E otimes F).$$
          Therefore $operatornameIm(T hat otimes S) subseteq overlineoperatornameIm(Totimes S) subseteq overlineoperatornameIm(Motimes N)$






          share|cite|improve this answer





















            Your Answer




            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: false,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );








             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2872041%2fthe-extension-of-the-tensor-product-of-two-operators%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest






























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            1
            down vote



            accepted










            Firstly, it is immediate that $$operatornameIm(T otimes S) = operatornameIm(T) otimes operatornameIm(S) subseteqoverlineoperatornameIm(M)otimes overlineoperatornameIm(N) subseteq overlineoperatornameIm(Motimes N)$$
            and so $overlineoperatornameIm(T otimes S) subseteq overlineoperatornameIm(Motimes N)$



            Now, $operatornameIm(T otimes S) = T hat otimes S (E otimes F)$. But $T hat otimes S$ is a continuous map on $E hat otimes F$ and so $$T hat otimes S(E hat otimes F) = T hat otimes S( overlineE otimes F) subseteq overlineT hat otimes S(E otimes F).$$
            Therefore $operatornameIm(T hat otimes S) subseteq overlineoperatornameIm(Totimes S) subseteq overlineoperatornameIm(Motimes N)$






            share|cite|improve this answer

























              up vote
              1
              down vote



              accepted










              Firstly, it is immediate that $$operatornameIm(T otimes S) = operatornameIm(T) otimes operatornameIm(S) subseteqoverlineoperatornameIm(M)otimes overlineoperatornameIm(N) subseteq overlineoperatornameIm(Motimes N)$$
              and so $overlineoperatornameIm(T otimes S) subseteq overlineoperatornameIm(Motimes N)$



              Now, $operatornameIm(T otimes S) = T hat otimes S (E otimes F)$. But $T hat otimes S$ is a continuous map on $E hat otimes F$ and so $$T hat otimes S(E hat otimes F) = T hat otimes S( overlineE otimes F) subseteq overlineT hat otimes S(E otimes F).$$
              Therefore $operatornameIm(T hat otimes S) subseteq overlineoperatornameIm(Totimes S) subseteq overlineoperatornameIm(Motimes N)$






              share|cite|improve this answer























                up vote
                1
                down vote



                accepted







                up vote
                1
                down vote



                accepted






                Firstly, it is immediate that $$operatornameIm(T otimes S) = operatornameIm(T) otimes operatornameIm(S) subseteqoverlineoperatornameIm(M)otimes overlineoperatornameIm(N) subseteq overlineoperatornameIm(Motimes N)$$
                and so $overlineoperatornameIm(T otimes S) subseteq overlineoperatornameIm(Motimes N)$



                Now, $operatornameIm(T otimes S) = T hat otimes S (E otimes F)$. But $T hat otimes S$ is a continuous map on $E hat otimes F$ and so $$T hat otimes S(E hat otimes F) = T hat otimes S( overlineE otimes F) subseteq overlineT hat otimes S(E otimes F).$$
                Therefore $operatornameIm(T hat otimes S) subseteq overlineoperatornameIm(Totimes S) subseteq overlineoperatornameIm(Motimes N)$






                share|cite|improve this answer













                Firstly, it is immediate that $$operatornameIm(T otimes S) = operatornameIm(T) otimes operatornameIm(S) subseteqoverlineoperatornameIm(M)otimes overlineoperatornameIm(N) subseteq overlineoperatornameIm(Motimes N)$$
                and so $overlineoperatornameIm(T otimes S) subseteq overlineoperatornameIm(Motimes N)$



                Now, $operatornameIm(T otimes S) = T hat otimes S (E otimes F)$. But $T hat otimes S$ is a continuous map on $E hat otimes F$ and so $$T hat otimes S(E hat otimes F) = T hat otimes S( overlineE otimes F) subseteq overlineT hat otimes S(E otimes F).$$
                Therefore $operatornameIm(T hat otimes S) subseteq overlineoperatornameIm(Totimes S) subseteq overlineoperatornameIm(Motimes N)$







                share|cite|improve this answer













                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer











                answered 6 hours ago









                Rhys Steele

                5,4151727




                5,4151727






















                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded


























                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2872041%2fthe-extension-of-the-tensor-product-of-two-operators%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest













































































                    Comments

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

                    Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?

                    Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon