Calculating the series $1/8+1/88+1/888+…$
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
7
down vote
favorite
I wonder whether this series is calculable or not.
Attempt:
$S=1/8+1/88+1/888+....=dfrac18displaystylesum_k=0^inftydfrac1sum_n=0^k10^n$
where $$displaystylesum_n=0^k10^n=dfrac10^k+1-19$$
then
$S=dfrac98displaystylesum_k=0^inftydfrac110^k+1-1$
I have tried to calculate $displaystylesum_k=0^Kdfrac110^k+1-1$ for finite values but I failed.
What methods can we try?
sequences-and-series
 |Â
show 3 more comments
up vote
7
down vote
favorite
I wonder whether this series is calculable or not.
Attempt:
$S=1/8+1/88+1/888+....=dfrac18displaystylesum_k=0^inftydfrac1sum_n=0^k10^n$
where $$displaystylesum_n=0^k10^n=dfrac10^k+1-19$$
then
$S=dfrac98displaystylesum_k=0^inftydfrac110^k+1-1$
I have tried to calculate $displaystylesum_k=0^Kdfrac110^k+1-1$ for finite values but I failed.
What methods can we try?
sequences-and-series
by the way I am sure this series is convergent since we can compare it with p series, edit :or just using ratio test
– user2312512851
Aug 1 at 8:07
I have seen once a theorem that we cannot sometimes calculate indefinite integrals in forms of elementary functions, are there any theorem for series?
– user2312512851
Aug 1 at 8:11
WolframAlpha doesn't give an elementary answer, so chances are there isn't one. There are simplifications that WA misses, though, so we can't be certain.
– Arthur
Aug 1 at 8:23
This is not an easy series to calculate. In fact we need a basic knowledge of what is called the "Polygamma function"
– Von Neumann
Aug 1 at 8:23
The sum $$s(z):=sum_n=0^infty,frac1z^n-1text for z>1$$ involves the $q$-polygamma function $psi^(0)_q$ with $q:=frac1z$. WolframAlpha gives $$s(z)=fraclnleft(fraczz-1right)-psi^(0)_frac1z(1)ln(z)text for z>1,.$$ See mathworld.wolfram.com/q-PolygammaFunction.html.
– Batominovski
Aug 1 at 8:28
 |Â
show 3 more comments
up vote
7
down vote
favorite
up vote
7
down vote
favorite
I wonder whether this series is calculable or not.
Attempt:
$S=1/8+1/88+1/888+....=dfrac18displaystylesum_k=0^inftydfrac1sum_n=0^k10^n$
where $$displaystylesum_n=0^k10^n=dfrac10^k+1-19$$
then
$S=dfrac98displaystylesum_k=0^inftydfrac110^k+1-1$
I have tried to calculate $displaystylesum_k=0^Kdfrac110^k+1-1$ for finite values but I failed.
What methods can we try?
sequences-and-series
I wonder whether this series is calculable or not.
Attempt:
$S=1/8+1/88+1/888+....=dfrac18displaystylesum_k=0^inftydfrac1sum_n=0^k10^n$
where $$displaystylesum_n=0^k10^n=dfrac10^k+1-19$$
then
$S=dfrac98displaystylesum_k=0^inftydfrac110^k+1-1$
I have tried to calculate $displaystylesum_k=0^Kdfrac110^k+1-1$ for finite values but I failed.
What methods can we try?
sequences-and-series
asked Aug 1 at 8:05
user2312512851
1,134521
1,134521
by the way I am sure this series is convergent since we can compare it with p series, edit :or just using ratio test
– user2312512851
Aug 1 at 8:07
I have seen once a theorem that we cannot sometimes calculate indefinite integrals in forms of elementary functions, are there any theorem for series?
– user2312512851
Aug 1 at 8:11
WolframAlpha doesn't give an elementary answer, so chances are there isn't one. There are simplifications that WA misses, though, so we can't be certain.
– Arthur
Aug 1 at 8:23
This is not an easy series to calculate. In fact we need a basic knowledge of what is called the "Polygamma function"
– Von Neumann
Aug 1 at 8:23
The sum $$s(z):=sum_n=0^infty,frac1z^n-1text for z>1$$ involves the $q$-polygamma function $psi^(0)_q$ with $q:=frac1z$. WolframAlpha gives $$s(z)=fraclnleft(fraczz-1right)-psi^(0)_frac1z(1)ln(z)text for z>1,.$$ See mathworld.wolfram.com/q-PolygammaFunction.html.
– Batominovski
Aug 1 at 8:28
 |Â
show 3 more comments
by the way I am sure this series is convergent since we can compare it with p series, edit :or just using ratio test
– user2312512851
Aug 1 at 8:07
I have seen once a theorem that we cannot sometimes calculate indefinite integrals in forms of elementary functions, are there any theorem for series?
– user2312512851
Aug 1 at 8:11
WolframAlpha doesn't give an elementary answer, so chances are there isn't one. There are simplifications that WA misses, though, so we can't be certain.
– Arthur
Aug 1 at 8:23
This is not an easy series to calculate. In fact we need a basic knowledge of what is called the "Polygamma function"
– Von Neumann
Aug 1 at 8:23
The sum $$s(z):=sum_n=0^infty,frac1z^n-1text for z>1$$ involves the $q$-polygamma function $psi^(0)_q$ with $q:=frac1z$. WolframAlpha gives $$s(z)=fraclnleft(fraczz-1right)-psi^(0)_frac1z(1)ln(z)text for z>1,.$$ See mathworld.wolfram.com/q-PolygammaFunction.html.
– Batominovski
Aug 1 at 8:28
by the way I am sure this series is convergent since we can compare it with p series, edit :or just using ratio test
– user2312512851
Aug 1 at 8:07
by the way I am sure this series is convergent since we can compare it with p series, edit :or just using ratio test
– user2312512851
Aug 1 at 8:07
I have seen once a theorem that we cannot sometimes calculate indefinite integrals in forms of elementary functions, are there any theorem for series?
– user2312512851
Aug 1 at 8:11
I have seen once a theorem that we cannot sometimes calculate indefinite integrals in forms of elementary functions, are there any theorem for series?
– user2312512851
Aug 1 at 8:11
WolframAlpha doesn't give an elementary answer, so chances are there isn't one. There are simplifications that WA misses, though, so we can't be certain.
– Arthur
Aug 1 at 8:23
WolframAlpha doesn't give an elementary answer, so chances are there isn't one. There are simplifications that WA misses, though, so we can't be certain.
– Arthur
Aug 1 at 8:23
This is not an easy series to calculate. In fact we need a basic knowledge of what is called the "Polygamma function"
– Von Neumann
Aug 1 at 8:23
This is not an easy series to calculate. In fact we need a basic knowledge of what is called the "Polygamma function"
– Von Neumann
Aug 1 at 8:23
The sum $$s(z):=sum_n=0^infty,frac1z^n-1text for z>1$$ involves the $q$-polygamma function $psi^(0)_q$ with $q:=frac1z$. WolframAlpha gives $$s(z)=fraclnleft(fraczz-1right)-psi^(0)_frac1z(1)ln(z)text for z>1,.$$ See mathworld.wolfram.com/q-PolygammaFunction.html.
– Batominovski
Aug 1 at 8:28
The sum $$s(z):=sum_n=0^infty,frac1z^n-1text for z>1$$ involves the $q$-polygamma function $psi^(0)_q$ with $q:=frac1z$. WolframAlpha gives $$s(z)=fraclnleft(fraczz-1right)-psi^(0)_frac1z(1)ln(z)text for z>1,.$$ See mathworld.wolfram.com/q-PolygammaFunction.html.
– Batominovski
Aug 1 at 8:28
 |Â
show 3 more comments
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
$$displaystylesum_k=0^Kdfrac110^k+1-1=-1-K+fracpsi _10^(0)(K+2)-psi _10^(0)(1)log (10)$$ where appears the generalized PolyGamma function.
It is not surprising that you have problems with it.
Edit
If $K to infty$, the limit is
$$S=-frac9 16
log (10)left(2 psi _10^(0)(1)+log left(frac8110right)right)approx 0.13761477385452509205$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
$$frac18+frac188+frac1888+dotsm = frac18left( 1+frac111+frac1111+dotsm right) =
frac98sum_n=1^infty fracx^n1-x^n iff x= frac110$$
Where $sum_n=1^infty fracx^n1-x^n$ Is the Lambert series for the sequence given by $a_n = 1$
For this specific case we have:
$$
S=frac98sum_n=1^infty fracx^n1-x^n =frac98left(fraclogleft(1-xright)+psi_x^(0)(1)log(x)right)
$$
That gives us:
$$S=frac98left(fraclogleft(frac910right)+psi_frac110^(0)(1)log(frac110)right)=0.137614773854525092047481887706797505400431...$$
Where $psi_x^(y)(z)$ is the generalized PolyGamma function
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
I will extend the answer soon, but in the meanwhile I throw the rock and I give you the direct answer:
$$frac18 sum_k = 0^+infty frac110^k + 1 = frac18frac-log left(frac109right)+psi _frac110^(0)left(-fraci pi log (10)right)log (10)$$
Where $psi _frac110^(0)$ is the above mentioned PolyGamma generalized function.
1
The sign is wrong? Shouldn't it be $frac110^k-1$ instead?
– Batominovski
Aug 1 at 8:29
1
I think Batominovski is right since Von Neumann's series like 1/8(1/11+1/101+1/1001+.....
– user2312512851
Aug 1 at 14:10
add a comment |Â
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
$$displaystylesum_k=0^Kdfrac110^k+1-1=-1-K+fracpsi _10^(0)(K+2)-psi _10^(0)(1)log (10)$$ where appears the generalized PolyGamma function.
It is not surprising that you have problems with it.
Edit
If $K to infty$, the limit is
$$S=-frac9 16
log (10)left(2 psi _10^(0)(1)+log left(frac8110right)right)approx 0.13761477385452509205$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
$$displaystylesum_k=0^Kdfrac110^k+1-1=-1-K+fracpsi _10^(0)(K+2)-psi _10^(0)(1)log (10)$$ where appears the generalized PolyGamma function.
It is not surprising that you have problems with it.
Edit
If $K to infty$, the limit is
$$S=-frac9 16
log (10)left(2 psi _10^(0)(1)+log left(frac8110right)right)approx 0.13761477385452509205$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
up vote
4
down vote
$$displaystylesum_k=0^Kdfrac110^k+1-1=-1-K+fracpsi _10^(0)(K+2)-psi _10^(0)(1)log (10)$$ where appears the generalized PolyGamma function.
It is not surprising that you have problems with it.
Edit
If $K to infty$, the limit is
$$S=-frac9 16
log (10)left(2 psi _10^(0)(1)+log left(frac8110right)right)approx 0.13761477385452509205$$
$$displaystylesum_k=0^Kdfrac110^k+1-1=-1-K+fracpsi _10^(0)(K+2)-psi _10^(0)(1)log (10)$$ where appears the generalized PolyGamma function.
It is not surprising that you have problems with it.
Edit
If $K to infty$, the limit is
$$S=-frac9 16
log (10)left(2 psi _10^(0)(1)+log left(frac8110right)right)approx 0.13761477385452509205$$
edited Aug 3 at 7:26
answered Aug 1 at 8:31
Claude Leibovici
111k1054126
111k1054126
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
$$frac18+frac188+frac1888+dotsm = frac18left( 1+frac111+frac1111+dotsm right) =
frac98sum_n=1^infty fracx^n1-x^n iff x= frac110$$
Where $sum_n=1^infty fracx^n1-x^n$ Is the Lambert series for the sequence given by $a_n = 1$
For this specific case we have:
$$
S=frac98sum_n=1^infty fracx^n1-x^n =frac98left(fraclogleft(1-xright)+psi_x^(0)(1)log(x)right)
$$
That gives us:
$$S=frac98left(fraclogleft(frac910right)+psi_frac110^(0)(1)log(frac110)right)=0.137614773854525092047481887706797505400431...$$
Where $psi_x^(y)(z)$ is the generalized PolyGamma function
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
$$frac18+frac188+frac1888+dotsm = frac18left( 1+frac111+frac1111+dotsm right) =
frac98sum_n=1^infty fracx^n1-x^n iff x= frac110$$
Where $sum_n=1^infty fracx^n1-x^n$ Is the Lambert series for the sequence given by $a_n = 1$
For this specific case we have:
$$
S=frac98sum_n=1^infty fracx^n1-x^n =frac98left(fraclogleft(1-xright)+psi_x^(0)(1)log(x)right)
$$
That gives us:
$$S=frac98left(fraclogleft(frac910right)+psi_frac110^(0)(1)log(frac110)right)=0.137614773854525092047481887706797505400431...$$
Where $psi_x^(y)(z)$ is the generalized PolyGamma function
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
$$frac18+frac188+frac1888+dotsm = frac18left( 1+frac111+frac1111+dotsm right) =
frac98sum_n=1^infty fracx^n1-x^n iff x= frac110$$
Where $sum_n=1^infty fracx^n1-x^n$ Is the Lambert series for the sequence given by $a_n = 1$
For this specific case we have:
$$
S=frac98sum_n=1^infty fracx^n1-x^n =frac98left(fraclogleft(1-xright)+psi_x^(0)(1)log(x)right)
$$
That gives us:
$$S=frac98left(fraclogleft(frac910right)+psi_frac110^(0)(1)log(frac110)right)=0.137614773854525092047481887706797505400431...$$
Where $psi_x^(y)(z)$ is the generalized PolyGamma function
$$frac18+frac188+frac1888+dotsm = frac18left( 1+frac111+frac1111+dotsm right) =
frac98sum_n=1^infty fracx^n1-x^n iff x= frac110$$
Where $sum_n=1^infty fracx^n1-x^n$ Is the Lambert series for the sequence given by $a_n = 1$
For this specific case we have:
$$
S=frac98sum_n=1^infty fracx^n1-x^n =frac98left(fraclogleft(1-xright)+psi_x^(0)(1)log(x)right)
$$
That gives us:
$$S=frac98left(fraclogleft(frac910right)+psi_frac110^(0)(1)log(frac110)right)=0.137614773854525092047481887706797505400431...$$
Where $psi_x^(y)(z)$ is the generalized PolyGamma function
answered Aug 3 at 10:29
MarioE
486
486
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
I will extend the answer soon, but in the meanwhile I throw the rock and I give you the direct answer:
$$frac18 sum_k = 0^+infty frac110^k + 1 = frac18frac-log left(frac109right)+psi _frac110^(0)left(-fraci pi log (10)right)log (10)$$
Where $psi _frac110^(0)$ is the above mentioned PolyGamma generalized function.
1
The sign is wrong? Shouldn't it be $frac110^k-1$ instead?
– Batominovski
Aug 1 at 8:29
1
I think Batominovski is right since Von Neumann's series like 1/8(1/11+1/101+1/1001+.....
– user2312512851
Aug 1 at 14:10
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
I will extend the answer soon, but in the meanwhile I throw the rock and I give you the direct answer:
$$frac18 sum_k = 0^+infty frac110^k + 1 = frac18frac-log left(frac109right)+psi _frac110^(0)left(-fraci pi log (10)right)log (10)$$
Where $psi _frac110^(0)$ is the above mentioned PolyGamma generalized function.
1
The sign is wrong? Shouldn't it be $frac110^k-1$ instead?
– Batominovski
Aug 1 at 8:29
1
I think Batominovski is right since Von Neumann's series like 1/8(1/11+1/101+1/1001+.....
– user2312512851
Aug 1 at 14:10
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
I will extend the answer soon, but in the meanwhile I throw the rock and I give you the direct answer:
$$frac18 sum_k = 0^+infty frac110^k + 1 = frac18frac-log left(frac109right)+psi _frac110^(0)left(-fraci pi log (10)right)log (10)$$
Where $psi _frac110^(0)$ is the above mentioned PolyGamma generalized function.
I will extend the answer soon, but in the meanwhile I throw the rock and I give you the direct answer:
$$frac18 sum_k = 0^+infty frac110^k + 1 = frac18frac-log left(frac109right)+psi _frac110^(0)left(-fraci pi log (10)right)log (10)$$
Where $psi _frac110^(0)$ is the above mentioned PolyGamma generalized function.
answered Aug 1 at 8:24


Von Neumann
15.9k72443
15.9k72443
1
The sign is wrong? Shouldn't it be $frac110^k-1$ instead?
– Batominovski
Aug 1 at 8:29
1
I think Batominovski is right since Von Neumann's series like 1/8(1/11+1/101+1/1001+.....
– user2312512851
Aug 1 at 14:10
add a comment |Â
1
The sign is wrong? Shouldn't it be $frac110^k-1$ instead?
– Batominovski
Aug 1 at 8:29
1
I think Batominovski is right since Von Neumann's series like 1/8(1/11+1/101+1/1001+.....
– user2312512851
Aug 1 at 14:10
1
1
The sign is wrong? Shouldn't it be $frac110^k-1$ instead?
– Batominovski
Aug 1 at 8:29
The sign is wrong? Shouldn't it be $frac110^k-1$ instead?
– Batominovski
Aug 1 at 8:29
1
1
I think Batominovski is right since Von Neumann's series like 1/8(1/11+1/101+1/1001+.....
– user2312512851
Aug 1 at 14:10
I think Batominovski is right since Von Neumann's series like 1/8(1/11+1/101+1/1001+.....
– user2312512851
Aug 1 at 14:10
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2868824%2fcalculating-the-series-1-81-881-888%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
by the way I am sure this series is convergent since we can compare it with p series, edit :or just using ratio test
– user2312512851
Aug 1 at 8:07
I have seen once a theorem that we cannot sometimes calculate indefinite integrals in forms of elementary functions, are there any theorem for series?
– user2312512851
Aug 1 at 8:11
WolframAlpha doesn't give an elementary answer, so chances are there isn't one. There are simplifications that WA misses, though, so we can't be certain.
– Arthur
Aug 1 at 8:23
This is not an easy series to calculate. In fact we need a basic knowledge of what is called the "Polygamma function"
– Von Neumann
Aug 1 at 8:23
The sum $$s(z):=sum_n=0^infty,frac1z^n-1text for z>1$$ involves the $q$-polygamma function $psi^(0)_q$ with $q:=frac1z$. WolframAlpha gives $$s(z)=fraclnleft(fraczz-1right)-psi^(0)_frac1z(1)ln(z)text for z>1,.$$ See mathworld.wolfram.com/q-PolygammaFunction.html.
– Batominovski
Aug 1 at 8:28