Upper central series, semidirect products and a lifting property (argument verification)

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












Let $G$ be a profinite group, and define the lifting property: $(*_p)$ For every extension $1 to P to E to W to 1$ where $E$ is finite and $P$ is a $p$-group and for every surjective morphism $fcolon G to W$ there is a surjective extension $f'colon G to E$.



Suppose $G$ satisfies $(*_p)$ in the following two cases:



  • (i) Every subgroup of $E$ which projects onto $W$ is equal to $E$.

  • (ii) $P$ is abelian and killed by $p$, and $E$ is isomorphic to the semidirect product $P rtimes W$

Then, I want to prove that $G$ satisfies the general case. My progress so far was taking the long upper central series $P_i$ for $P$ (with $P_0 = 1$ and $P_n = P$ for some $n in mathbbN$), and noticing that we have surjections $$E = E/P_0 to E/P_1 to cdots to E/P_n-1 to E/P_n = E/P = W to 1$$
with kernels $P_i/P_i-1$ that are abelian groups killed by $p$. If we have the lifting property for the extension $$1 to P_n/P_n-1 to E/P_n-1 to W to 1$$ then we have it for the general case. I'm not sure how can I use (i) and (ii) now.. If $p notmid |W|$ than (ii) easily applies, but that need not be the case.



For context, this is part of exercise 1 in section 3.4 of chapter 1 in Serre's Galois Cohomology.




PROGRESS I know how to reduce the problem a little using (i). Using the reductions as before, we can suppose that $P$ is abelian and killed by $p$. It is a known fact that $P$ has a minimal subgroup complement $K$ in $E$: $PK = E$ and for any $L leq K$ s.t. $PL = E$ we have $L = K$. But this means that the extension $$1 to P cap K to K to W to 1$$ satisfies (i), and thus we have a surjective extension of $fcolon G to W$ to $tildefcolon G to K$. How can we use (ii) now to lift it to $E$?



FINAL STRETCH We can suppose (WLOG by the remarks above, I guess) that $P = mathbbZ/pmathbbZ$. We have the minimal complement $K$ and a lifting $tildefcolon G to K$ of $fcolon G to W$. If $K neq E$ then the intersection $K cap P$ cannot equal $P$ and we must therefore have $K cap P = 1$, proving that there is an isomorphism $E = P rtimes K$. Then, we apply (ii) to get a lifting $f'colon G to E$. I am just unsure about reducing to $mathbbZ/pmathbbZ$...



Actually, maybe the reduction isn't even necessary... if $K neq E$ then $K cap P$ must be a proper subgroup of $P$. But it is a normal subgroup of $E$, and by the minimality of $P$ it must be trivial!







share|cite|improve this question





















  • The saga continues on: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2868366/…
    – Henrique Augusto Souza
    Jul 31 at 18:57














up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












Let $G$ be a profinite group, and define the lifting property: $(*_p)$ For every extension $1 to P to E to W to 1$ where $E$ is finite and $P$ is a $p$-group and for every surjective morphism $fcolon G to W$ there is a surjective extension $f'colon G to E$.



Suppose $G$ satisfies $(*_p)$ in the following two cases:



  • (i) Every subgroup of $E$ which projects onto $W$ is equal to $E$.

  • (ii) $P$ is abelian and killed by $p$, and $E$ is isomorphic to the semidirect product $P rtimes W$

Then, I want to prove that $G$ satisfies the general case. My progress so far was taking the long upper central series $P_i$ for $P$ (with $P_0 = 1$ and $P_n = P$ for some $n in mathbbN$), and noticing that we have surjections $$E = E/P_0 to E/P_1 to cdots to E/P_n-1 to E/P_n = E/P = W to 1$$
with kernels $P_i/P_i-1$ that are abelian groups killed by $p$. If we have the lifting property for the extension $$1 to P_n/P_n-1 to E/P_n-1 to W to 1$$ then we have it for the general case. I'm not sure how can I use (i) and (ii) now.. If $p notmid |W|$ than (ii) easily applies, but that need not be the case.



For context, this is part of exercise 1 in section 3.4 of chapter 1 in Serre's Galois Cohomology.




PROGRESS I know how to reduce the problem a little using (i). Using the reductions as before, we can suppose that $P$ is abelian and killed by $p$. It is a known fact that $P$ has a minimal subgroup complement $K$ in $E$: $PK = E$ and for any $L leq K$ s.t. $PL = E$ we have $L = K$. But this means that the extension $$1 to P cap K to K to W to 1$$ satisfies (i), and thus we have a surjective extension of $fcolon G to W$ to $tildefcolon G to K$. How can we use (ii) now to lift it to $E$?



FINAL STRETCH We can suppose (WLOG by the remarks above, I guess) that $P = mathbbZ/pmathbbZ$. We have the minimal complement $K$ and a lifting $tildefcolon G to K$ of $fcolon G to W$. If $K neq E$ then the intersection $K cap P$ cannot equal $P$ and we must therefore have $K cap P = 1$, proving that there is an isomorphism $E = P rtimes K$. Then, we apply (ii) to get a lifting $f'colon G to E$. I am just unsure about reducing to $mathbbZ/pmathbbZ$...



Actually, maybe the reduction isn't even necessary... if $K neq E$ then $K cap P$ must be a proper subgroup of $P$. But it is a normal subgroup of $E$, and by the minimality of $P$ it must be trivial!







share|cite|improve this question





















  • The saga continues on: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2868366/…
    – Henrique Augusto Souza
    Jul 31 at 18:57












up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1






1





Let $G$ be a profinite group, and define the lifting property: $(*_p)$ For every extension $1 to P to E to W to 1$ where $E$ is finite and $P$ is a $p$-group and for every surjective morphism $fcolon G to W$ there is a surjective extension $f'colon G to E$.



Suppose $G$ satisfies $(*_p)$ in the following two cases:



  • (i) Every subgroup of $E$ which projects onto $W$ is equal to $E$.

  • (ii) $P$ is abelian and killed by $p$, and $E$ is isomorphic to the semidirect product $P rtimes W$

Then, I want to prove that $G$ satisfies the general case. My progress so far was taking the long upper central series $P_i$ for $P$ (with $P_0 = 1$ and $P_n = P$ for some $n in mathbbN$), and noticing that we have surjections $$E = E/P_0 to E/P_1 to cdots to E/P_n-1 to E/P_n = E/P = W to 1$$
with kernels $P_i/P_i-1$ that are abelian groups killed by $p$. If we have the lifting property for the extension $$1 to P_n/P_n-1 to E/P_n-1 to W to 1$$ then we have it for the general case. I'm not sure how can I use (i) and (ii) now.. If $p notmid |W|$ than (ii) easily applies, but that need not be the case.



For context, this is part of exercise 1 in section 3.4 of chapter 1 in Serre's Galois Cohomology.




PROGRESS I know how to reduce the problem a little using (i). Using the reductions as before, we can suppose that $P$ is abelian and killed by $p$. It is a known fact that $P$ has a minimal subgroup complement $K$ in $E$: $PK = E$ and for any $L leq K$ s.t. $PL = E$ we have $L = K$. But this means that the extension $$1 to P cap K to K to W to 1$$ satisfies (i), and thus we have a surjective extension of $fcolon G to W$ to $tildefcolon G to K$. How can we use (ii) now to lift it to $E$?



FINAL STRETCH We can suppose (WLOG by the remarks above, I guess) that $P = mathbbZ/pmathbbZ$. We have the minimal complement $K$ and a lifting $tildefcolon G to K$ of $fcolon G to W$. If $K neq E$ then the intersection $K cap P$ cannot equal $P$ and we must therefore have $K cap P = 1$, proving that there is an isomorphism $E = P rtimes K$. Then, we apply (ii) to get a lifting $f'colon G to E$. I am just unsure about reducing to $mathbbZ/pmathbbZ$...



Actually, maybe the reduction isn't even necessary... if $K neq E$ then $K cap P$ must be a proper subgroup of $P$. But it is a normal subgroup of $E$, and by the minimality of $P$ it must be trivial!







share|cite|improve this question













Let $G$ be a profinite group, and define the lifting property: $(*_p)$ For every extension $1 to P to E to W to 1$ where $E$ is finite and $P$ is a $p$-group and for every surjective morphism $fcolon G to W$ there is a surjective extension $f'colon G to E$.



Suppose $G$ satisfies $(*_p)$ in the following two cases:



  • (i) Every subgroup of $E$ which projects onto $W$ is equal to $E$.

  • (ii) $P$ is abelian and killed by $p$, and $E$ is isomorphic to the semidirect product $P rtimes W$

Then, I want to prove that $G$ satisfies the general case. My progress so far was taking the long upper central series $P_i$ for $P$ (with $P_0 = 1$ and $P_n = P$ for some $n in mathbbN$), and noticing that we have surjections $$E = E/P_0 to E/P_1 to cdots to E/P_n-1 to E/P_n = E/P = W to 1$$
with kernels $P_i/P_i-1$ that are abelian groups killed by $p$. If we have the lifting property for the extension $$1 to P_n/P_n-1 to E/P_n-1 to W to 1$$ then we have it for the general case. I'm not sure how can I use (i) and (ii) now.. If $p notmid |W|$ than (ii) easily applies, but that need not be the case.



For context, this is part of exercise 1 in section 3.4 of chapter 1 in Serre's Galois Cohomology.




PROGRESS I know how to reduce the problem a little using (i). Using the reductions as before, we can suppose that $P$ is abelian and killed by $p$. It is a known fact that $P$ has a minimal subgroup complement $K$ in $E$: $PK = E$ and for any $L leq K$ s.t. $PL = E$ we have $L = K$. But this means that the extension $$1 to P cap K to K to W to 1$$ satisfies (i), and thus we have a surjective extension of $fcolon G to W$ to $tildefcolon G to K$. How can we use (ii) now to lift it to $E$?



FINAL STRETCH We can suppose (WLOG by the remarks above, I guess) that $P = mathbbZ/pmathbbZ$. We have the minimal complement $K$ and a lifting $tildefcolon G to K$ of $fcolon G to W$. If $K neq E$ then the intersection $K cap P$ cannot equal $P$ and we must therefore have $K cap P = 1$, proving that there is an isomorphism $E = P rtimes K$. Then, we apply (ii) to get a lifting $f'colon G to E$. I am just unsure about reducing to $mathbbZ/pmathbbZ$...



Actually, maybe the reduction isn't even necessary... if $K neq E$ then $K cap P$ must be a proper subgroup of $P$. But it is a normal subgroup of $E$, and by the minimality of $P$ it must be trivial!









share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 31 at 16:30
























asked Jul 31 at 13:13









Henrique Augusto Souza

1,226314




1,226314











  • The saga continues on: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2868366/…
    – Henrique Augusto Souza
    Jul 31 at 18:57
















  • The saga continues on: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2868366/…
    – Henrique Augusto Souza
    Jul 31 at 18:57















The saga continues on: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2868366/…
– Henrique Augusto Souza
Jul 31 at 18:57




The saga continues on: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2868366/…
– Henrique Augusto Souza
Jul 31 at 18:57















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2868031%2fupper-central-series-semidirect-products-and-a-lifting-property-argument-verif%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest



































active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes










 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2868031%2fupper-central-series-semidirect-products-and-a-lifting-property-argument-verif%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?

Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?