Upper central series, semidirect products and a lifting property (argument verification)
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Let $G$ be a profinite group, and define the lifting property: $(*_p)$ For every extension $1 to P to E to W to 1$ where $E$ is finite and $P$ is a $p$-group and for every surjective morphism $fcolon G to W$ there is a surjective extension $f'colon G to E$.
Suppose $G$ satisfies $(*_p)$ in the following two cases:
- (i) Every subgroup of $E$ which projects onto $W$ is equal to $E$.
- (ii) $P$ is abelian and killed by $p$, and $E$ is isomorphic to the semidirect product $P rtimes W$
Then, I want to prove that $G$ satisfies the general case. My progress so far was taking the long upper central series $P_i$ for $P$ (with $P_0 = 1$ and $P_n = P$ for some $n in mathbbN$), and noticing that we have surjections $$E = E/P_0 to E/P_1 to cdots to E/P_n-1 to E/P_n = E/P = W to 1$$
with kernels $P_i/P_i-1$ that are abelian groups killed by $p$. If we have the lifting property for the extension $$1 to P_n/P_n-1 to E/P_n-1 to W to 1$$ then we have it for the general case. I'm not sure how can I use (i) and (ii) now.. If $p notmid |W|$ than (ii) easily applies, but that need not be the case.
For context, this is part of exercise 1 in section 3.4 of chapter 1 in Serre's Galois Cohomology.
PROGRESS I know how to reduce the problem a little using (i). Using the reductions as before, we can suppose that $P$ is abelian and killed by $p$. It is a known fact that $P$ has a minimal subgroup complement $K$ in $E$: $PK = E$ and for any $L leq K$ s.t. $PL = E$ we have $L = K$. But this means that the extension $$1 to P cap K to K to W to 1$$ satisfies (i), and thus we have a surjective extension of $fcolon G to W$ to $tildefcolon G to K$. How can we use (ii) now to lift it to $E$?
FINAL STRETCH We can suppose (WLOG by the remarks above, I guess) that $P = mathbbZ/pmathbbZ$. We have the minimal complement $K$ and a lifting $tildefcolon G to K$ of $fcolon G to W$. If $K neq E$ then the intersection $K cap P$ cannot equal $P$ and we must therefore have $K cap P = 1$, proving that there is an isomorphism $E = P rtimes K$. Then, we apply (ii) to get a lifting $f'colon G to E$. I am just unsure about reducing to $mathbbZ/pmathbbZ$...
Actually, maybe the reduction isn't even necessary... if $K neq E$ then $K cap P$ must be a proper subgroup of $P$. But it is a normal subgroup of $E$, and by the minimality of $P$ it must be trivial!
proof-verification p-groups semidirect-product profinite-groups group-extensions
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Let $G$ be a profinite group, and define the lifting property: $(*_p)$ For every extension $1 to P to E to W to 1$ where $E$ is finite and $P$ is a $p$-group and for every surjective morphism $fcolon G to W$ there is a surjective extension $f'colon G to E$.
Suppose $G$ satisfies $(*_p)$ in the following two cases:
- (i) Every subgroup of $E$ which projects onto $W$ is equal to $E$.
- (ii) $P$ is abelian and killed by $p$, and $E$ is isomorphic to the semidirect product $P rtimes W$
Then, I want to prove that $G$ satisfies the general case. My progress so far was taking the long upper central series $P_i$ for $P$ (with $P_0 = 1$ and $P_n = P$ for some $n in mathbbN$), and noticing that we have surjections $$E = E/P_0 to E/P_1 to cdots to E/P_n-1 to E/P_n = E/P = W to 1$$
with kernels $P_i/P_i-1$ that are abelian groups killed by $p$. If we have the lifting property for the extension $$1 to P_n/P_n-1 to E/P_n-1 to W to 1$$ then we have it for the general case. I'm not sure how can I use (i) and (ii) now.. If $p notmid |W|$ than (ii) easily applies, but that need not be the case.
For context, this is part of exercise 1 in section 3.4 of chapter 1 in Serre's Galois Cohomology.
PROGRESS I know how to reduce the problem a little using (i). Using the reductions as before, we can suppose that $P$ is abelian and killed by $p$. It is a known fact that $P$ has a minimal subgroup complement $K$ in $E$: $PK = E$ and for any $L leq K$ s.t. $PL = E$ we have $L = K$. But this means that the extension $$1 to P cap K to K to W to 1$$ satisfies (i), and thus we have a surjective extension of $fcolon G to W$ to $tildefcolon G to K$. How can we use (ii) now to lift it to $E$?
FINAL STRETCH We can suppose (WLOG by the remarks above, I guess) that $P = mathbbZ/pmathbbZ$. We have the minimal complement $K$ and a lifting $tildefcolon G to K$ of $fcolon G to W$. If $K neq E$ then the intersection $K cap P$ cannot equal $P$ and we must therefore have $K cap P = 1$, proving that there is an isomorphism $E = P rtimes K$. Then, we apply (ii) to get a lifting $f'colon G to E$. I am just unsure about reducing to $mathbbZ/pmathbbZ$...
Actually, maybe the reduction isn't even necessary... if $K neq E$ then $K cap P$ must be a proper subgroup of $P$. But it is a normal subgroup of $E$, and by the minimality of $P$ it must be trivial!
proof-verification p-groups semidirect-product profinite-groups group-extensions
The saga continues on: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2868366/â¦
â Henrique Augusto Souza
Jul 31 at 18:57
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Let $G$ be a profinite group, and define the lifting property: $(*_p)$ For every extension $1 to P to E to W to 1$ where $E$ is finite and $P$ is a $p$-group and for every surjective morphism $fcolon G to W$ there is a surjective extension $f'colon G to E$.
Suppose $G$ satisfies $(*_p)$ in the following two cases:
- (i) Every subgroup of $E$ which projects onto $W$ is equal to $E$.
- (ii) $P$ is abelian and killed by $p$, and $E$ is isomorphic to the semidirect product $P rtimes W$
Then, I want to prove that $G$ satisfies the general case. My progress so far was taking the long upper central series $P_i$ for $P$ (with $P_0 = 1$ and $P_n = P$ for some $n in mathbbN$), and noticing that we have surjections $$E = E/P_0 to E/P_1 to cdots to E/P_n-1 to E/P_n = E/P = W to 1$$
with kernels $P_i/P_i-1$ that are abelian groups killed by $p$. If we have the lifting property for the extension $$1 to P_n/P_n-1 to E/P_n-1 to W to 1$$ then we have it for the general case. I'm not sure how can I use (i) and (ii) now.. If $p notmid |W|$ than (ii) easily applies, but that need not be the case.
For context, this is part of exercise 1 in section 3.4 of chapter 1 in Serre's Galois Cohomology.
PROGRESS I know how to reduce the problem a little using (i). Using the reductions as before, we can suppose that $P$ is abelian and killed by $p$. It is a known fact that $P$ has a minimal subgroup complement $K$ in $E$: $PK = E$ and for any $L leq K$ s.t. $PL = E$ we have $L = K$. But this means that the extension $$1 to P cap K to K to W to 1$$ satisfies (i), and thus we have a surjective extension of $fcolon G to W$ to $tildefcolon G to K$. How can we use (ii) now to lift it to $E$?
FINAL STRETCH We can suppose (WLOG by the remarks above, I guess) that $P = mathbbZ/pmathbbZ$. We have the minimal complement $K$ and a lifting $tildefcolon G to K$ of $fcolon G to W$. If $K neq E$ then the intersection $K cap P$ cannot equal $P$ and we must therefore have $K cap P = 1$, proving that there is an isomorphism $E = P rtimes K$. Then, we apply (ii) to get a lifting $f'colon G to E$. I am just unsure about reducing to $mathbbZ/pmathbbZ$...
Actually, maybe the reduction isn't even necessary... if $K neq E$ then $K cap P$ must be a proper subgroup of $P$. But it is a normal subgroup of $E$, and by the minimality of $P$ it must be trivial!
proof-verification p-groups semidirect-product profinite-groups group-extensions
Let $G$ be a profinite group, and define the lifting property: $(*_p)$ For every extension $1 to P to E to W to 1$ where $E$ is finite and $P$ is a $p$-group and for every surjective morphism $fcolon G to W$ there is a surjective extension $f'colon G to E$.
Suppose $G$ satisfies $(*_p)$ in the following two cases:
- (i) Every subgroup of $E$ which projects onto $W$ is equal to $E$.
- (ii) $P$ is abelian and killed by $p$, and $E$ is isomorphic to the semidirect product $P rtimes W$
Then, I want to prove that $G$ satisfies the general case. My progress so far was taking the long upper central series $P_i$ for $P$ (with $P_0 = 1$ and $P_n = P$ for some $n in mathbbN$), and noticing that we have surjections $$E = E/P_0 to E/P_1 to cdots to E/P_n-1 to E/P_n = E/P = W to 1$$
with kernels $P_i/P_i-1$ that are abelian groups killed by $p$. If we have the lifting property for the extension $$1 to P_n/P_n-1 to E/P_n-1 to W to 1$$ then we have it for the general case. I'm not sure how can I use (i) and (ii) now.. If $p notmid |W|$ than (ii) easily applies, but that need not be the case.
For context, this is part of exercise 1 in section 3.4 of chapter 1 in Serre's Galois Cohomology.
PROGRESS I know how to reduce the problem a little using (i). Using the reductions as before, we can suppose that $P$ is abelian and killed by $p$. It is a known fact that $P$ has a minimal subgroup complement $K$ in $E$: $PK = E$ and for any $L leq K$ s.t. $PL = E$ we have $L = K$. But this means that the extension $$1 to P cap K to K to W to 1$$ satisfies (i), and thus we have a surjective extension of $fcolon G to W$ to $tildefcolon G to K$. How can we use (ii) now to lift it to $E$?
FINAL STRETCH We can suppose (WLOG by the remarks above, I guess) that $P = mathbbZ/pmathbbZ$. We have the minimal complement $K$ and a lifting $tildefcolon G to K$ of $fcolon G to W$. If $K neq E$ then the intersection $K cap P$ cannot equal $P$ and we must therefore have $K cap P = 1$, proving that there is an isomorphism $E = P rtimes K$. Then, we apply (ii) to get a lifting $f'colon G to E$. I am just unsure about reducing to $mathbbZ/pmathbbZ$...
Actually, maybe the reduction isn't even necessary... if $K neq E$ then $K cap P$ must be a proper subgroup of $P$. But it is a normal subgroup of $E$, and by the minimality of $P$ it must be trivial!
proof-verification p-groups semidirect-product profinite-groups group-extensions
edited Jul 31 at 16:30
asked Jul 31 at 13:13
Henrique Augusto Souza
1,226314
1,226314
The saga continues on: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2868366/â¦
â Henrique Augusto Souza
Jul 31 at 18:57
add a comment |Â
The saga continues on: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2868366/â¦
â Henrique Augusto Souza
Jul 31 at 18:57
The saga continues on: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2868366/â¦
â Henrique Augusto Souza
Jul 31 at 18:57
The saga continues on: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2868366/â¦
â Henrique Augusto Souza
Jul 31 at 18:57
add a comment |Â
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2868031%2fupper-central-series-semidirect-products-and-a-lifting-property-argument-verif%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
The saga continues on: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2868366/â¦
â Henrique Augusto Souza
Jul 31 at 18:57