Curvature the same in G2 continuity

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












In G2-continuous splines(connected curves), people say the curvature is the same at the junction point. In case of C2-continuous splines it is clear because;



$ kappa := fracc' times c'' c' $
, and C2-continuity requires C1-continuity at the same time by construction.
Then $ c'_1(t_0)=c'_2(t_0), ,, and ,, c''_1(t_0) = c''_2(t_0)
,, holds, , thus, $
$ ,, kappa_0(t_0) = kappa_1(t_0) ,, must ,, hold. $



But in case of G2-continuity, the identity of the curvature is not obvious. Rather than just saying that's the definition, is there a clear derivation to show it?



Thanks :)







share|cite|improve this question

























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    In G2-continuous splines(connected curves), people say the curvature is the same at the junction point. In case of C2-continuous splines it is clear because;



    $ kappa := fracc' times c'' c' $
    , and C2-continuity requires C1-continuity at the same time by construction.
    Then $ c'_1(t_0)=c'_2(t_0), ,, and ,, c''_1(t_0) = c''_2(t_0)
    ,, holds, , thus, $
    $ ,, kappa_0(t_0) = kappa_1(t_0) ,, must ,, hold. $



    But in case of G2-continuity, the identity of the curvature is not obvious. Rather than just saying that's the definition, is there a clear derivation to show it?



    Thanks :)







    share|cite|improve this question























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      In G2-continuous splines(connected curves), people say the curvature is the same at the junction point. In case of C2-continuous splines it is clear because;



      $ kappa := fracc' times c'' c' $
      , and C2-continuity requires C1-continuity at the same time by construction.
      Then $ c'_1(t_0)=c'_2(t_0), ,, and ,, c''_1(t_0) = c''_2(t_0)
      ,, holds, , thus, $
      $ ,, kappa_0(t_0) = kappa_1(t_0) ,, must ,, hold. $



      But in case of G2-continuity, the identity of the curvature is not obvious. Rather than just saying that's the definition, is there a clear derivation to show it?



      Thanks :)







      share|cite|improve this question













      In G2-continuous splines(connected curves), people say the curvature is the same at the junction point. In case of C2-continuous splines it is clear because;



      $ kappa := fracc' times c'' c' $
      , and C2-continuity requires C1-continuity at the same time by construction.
      Then $ c'_1(t_0)=c'_2(t_0), ,, and ,, c''_1(t_0) = c''_2(t_0)
      ,, holds, , thus, $
      $ ,, kappa_0(t_0) = kappa_1(t_0) ,, must ,, hold. $



      But in case of G2-continuity, the identity of the curvature is not obvious. Rather than just saying that's the definition, is there a clear derivation to show it?



      Thanks :)









      share|cite|improve this question












      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jul 31 at 10:39









      John Ma

      37.5k93669




      37.5k93669









      asked Jul 31 at 10:17









      Robin

      1396




      1396

























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );








           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2867900%2fcurvature-the-same-in-g2-continuity%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest



































          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes










           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


























           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2867900%2fcurvature-the-same-in-g2-continuity%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          Comments

          Popular posts from this blog

          What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

          Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?

          Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon