Concerning the existence of a divergent monotone sequence with a Cauchy subsequence.
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Is my argument correct?
Proposition. There is no divergent monotone sequence with a Cauchy subsequence.
Proof. Assume that we have a divergent monotone sequence $(a_n)$ with a Cauchy sequence $(a_n_k)$, from theorem $textbf2.6.3$ we know that there exists an $M>0$ such that $|a_n_k|<M,forall kinmathbfN$.
We now examine the case where $(a_n)$ is increasing, the case where $(a_n)$ is decreasing will be handled similarly. Let $rinmathbfN$, evidently $rleq n_r$ but then $a_rleq a_n_r$ and since $a_n_rleq |a_n_r|leq M$ consequently $a_rleq M$, implying that $(a_n)$ is bounded, but $(a_n)$ cannot be bounded since this together with $(a_n)$ being increasing would imply $(a_n)$ is convergent by theorem $textbf2.4.1$.
$blacksquare$
Note:
$textbf2.6.3$ All Cauchy sequences are bounded.
$textbf2.4.1$ All bounded monotone sequeces are convergent.
real-analysis sequences-and-series proof-verification cauchy-sequences
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Is my argument correct?
Proposition. There is no divergent monotone sequence with a Cauchy subsequence.
Proof. Assume that we have a divergent monotone sequence $(a_n)$ with a Cauchy sequence $(a_n_k)$, from theorem $textbf2.6.3$ we know that there exists an $M>0$ such that $|a_n_k|<M,forall kinmathbfN$.
We now examine the case where $(a_n)$ is increasing, the case where $(a_n)$ is decreasing will be handled similarly. Let $rinmathbfN$, evidently $rleq n_r$ but then $a_rleq a_n_r$ and since $a_n_rleq |a_n_r|leq M$ consequently $a_rleq M$, implying that $(a_n)$ is bounded, but $(a_n)$ cannot be bounded since this together with $(a_n)$ being increasing would imply $(a_n)$ is convergent by theorem $textbf2.4.1$.
$blacksquare$
Note:
$textbf2.6.3$ All Cauchy sequences are bounded.
$textbf2.4.1$ All bounded monotone sequeces are convergent.
real-analysis sequences-and-series proof-verification cauchy-sequences
Correct! Good job. And yes, you showed that there is no such thing.
– A. Pongrácz
Jul 31 at 18:13
@DavidC.Ullrich that was indeed my intention what would you say is wrong?
– Atif Farooq
Jul 31 at 18:14
The statement. Say "there is no"...
– A. Pongrácz
Jul 31 at 18:15
@A.Pongrácz Thanks corrections made
– Atif Farooq
Jul 31 at 18:16
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Is my argument correct?
Proposition. There is no divergent monotone sequence with a Cauchy subsequence.
Proof. Assume that we have a divergent monotone sequence $(a_n)$ with a Cauchy sequence $(a_n_k)$, from theorem $textbf2.6.3$ we know that there exists an $M>0$ such that $|a_n_k|<M,forall kinmathbfN$.
We now examine the case where $(a_n)$ is increasing, the case where $(a_n)$ is decreasing will be handled similarly. Let $rinmathbfN$, evidently $rleq n_r$ but then $a_rleq a_n_r$ and since $a_n_rleq |a_n_r|leq M$ consequently $a_rleq M$, implying that $(a_n)$ is bounded, but $(a_n)$ cannot be bounded since this together with $(a_n)$ being increasing would imply $(a_n)$ is convergent by theorem $textbf2.4.1$.
$blacksquare$
Note:
$textbf2.6.3$ All Cauchy sequences are bounded.
$textbf2.4.1$ All bounded monotone sequeces are convergent.
real-analysis sequences-and-series proof-verification cauchy-sequences
Is my argument correct?
Proposition. There is no divergent monotone sequence with a Cauchy subsequence.
Proof. Assume that we have a divergent monotone sequence $(a_n)$ with a Cauchy sequence $(a_n_k)$, from theorem $textbf2.6.3$ we know that there exists an $M>0$ such that $|a_n_k|<M,forall kinmathbfN$.
We now examine the case where $(a_n)$ is increasing, the case where $(a_n)$ is decreasing will be handled similarly. Let $rinmathbfN$, evidently $rleq n_r$ but then $a_rleq a_n_r$ and since $a_n_rleq |a_n_r|leq M$ consequently $a_rleq M$, implying that $(a_n)$ is bounded, but $(a_n)$ cannot be bounded since this together with $(a_n)$ being increasing would imply $(a_n)$ is convergent by theorem $textbf2.4.1$.
$blacksquare$
Note:
$textbf2.6.3$ All Cauchy sequences are bounded.
$textbf2.4.1$ All bounded monotone sequeces are convergent.
real-analysis sequences-and-series proof-verification cauchy-sequences
edited Jul 31 at 18:16
asked Jul 31 at 18:00


Atif Farooq
2,7352824
2,7352824
Correct! Good job. And yes, you showed that there is no such thing.
– A. Pongrácz
Jul 31 at 18:13
@DavidC.Ullrich that was indeed my intention what would you say is wrong?
– Atif Farooq
Jul 31 at 18:14
The statement. Say "there is no"...
– A. Pongrácz
Jul 31 at 18:15
@A.Pongrácz Thanks corrections made
– Atif Farooq
Jul 31 at 18:16
add a comment |Â
Correct! Good job. And yes, you showed that there is no such thing.
– A. Pongrácz
Jul 31 at 18:13
@DavidC.Ullrich that was indeed my intention what would you say is wrong?
– Atif Farooq
Jul 31 at 18:14
The statement. Say "there is no"...
– A. Pongrácz
Jul 31 at 18:15
@A.Pongrácz Thanks corrections made
– Atif Farooq
Jul 31 at 18:16
Correct! Good job. And yes, you showed that there is no such thing.
– A. Pongrácz
Jul 31 at 18:13
Correct! Good job. And yes, you showed that there is no such thing.
– A. Pongrácz
Jul 31 at 18:13
@DavidC.Ullrich that was indeed my intention what would you say is wrong?
– Atif Farooq
Jul 31 at 18:14
@DavidC.Ullrich that was indeed my intention what would you say is wrong?
– Atif Farooq
Jul 31 at 18:14
The statement. Say "there is no"...
– A. Pongrácz
Jul 31 at 18:15
The statement. Say "there is no"...
– A. Pongrácz
Jul 31 at 18:15
@A.Pongrácz Thanks corrections made
– Atif Farooq
Jul 31 at 18:16
@A.Pongrácz Thanks corrections made
– Atif Farooq
Jul 31 at 18:16
add a comment |Â
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2868305%2fconcerning-the-existence-of-a-divergent-monotone-sequence-with-a-cauchy-subseque%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Correct! Good job. And yes, you showed that there is no such thing.
– A. Pongrácz
Jul 31 at 18:13
@DavidC.Ullrich that was indeed my intention what would you say is wrong?
– Atif Farooq
Jul 31 at 18:14
The statement. Say "there is no"...
– A. Pongrácz
Jul 31 at 18:15
@A.Pongrácz Thanks corrections made
– Atif Farooq
Jul 31 at 18:16