Constructing a continuous path between two matrices

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
5
down vote

favorite
1












Let $A_1, A_2 in GL_n(mathbb R)$ be two fixed matrices with eigenvalues lying on the open left half plane of $mathbb C$, i.e., with negative real parts and $A_1 neq A_2$. We may assume $A_1, A_2$ are diagonalizable if necessary. Let $(A_1)_alpha$ and $(A_2)_beta$ be the corresponding matrix that scales the eigenvalues by $alpha in mathbb R$ and $beta in mathbb R$ respectively. That is if $(lambda_1, dots, lambda_n)$ are eigenvalues of $A_1$, then $(alpha lambda_1, dots, alpha lambda_n)$ are eigenvalues of $(A_1)_alpha$.



I am wondering whether it is possible to construct a continuous path $gamma: [0,1] to GL_n(mathbb R)$ with eigenvalues all lying on the left half plane along the path: by choosing a sequence of nonzero real numbers, $(alpha_n)$ and $(beta_n)$, $gamma$ is piecewise linear. For example, suppose there exist some finite sequences $(alpha_1, dots, alpha_k)$ and $(beta_1, dots, beta_l)$, then the path would be
beginalign*
A_1 xrightarrow (A_1)_alpha_1 xrightarrow dots xrightarrow (A_1)_alpha_k xrightarrow (A_2)_beta_1 xrightarrow dots xrightarrow (A_2)_beta_l xrightarrow A_2.
endalign*
In between, each arrow stands for a convex path. Assume we can construct a continuous path between $A$ and $(A)_alpha$.



If we take a convex combination of $A_1, A_2$, i.e., $A(t) = (1-t)A_1 + tA_2$. Then $det(A(t))$ is a nonconstant polynomial in $t$ and has at most $n$ zeros. Intuitively I am thinking of taking the path until we meet a singular point of $t$ (by continuity, all eigenvalues should stay in the left half plane) and change path to some $(A_1)_alpha$ and doing this repeatedly. Not sure whether this will work.



p.s. The reason for my consideration was because I need to guarantee certain matrix structure along the path. I have worked out scaling eigenvalues can be done within the structure of interest.







share|cite|improve this question





















  • I don't get your $A_alpha$. How is it defined exactly? Is is simply $alpha A$?
    – user2520938
    Aug 1 at 22:34











  • @user2520938: $(A)_alpha$ has eigenvalues which are a factor of eigenvalues of $A$. $(A)_alpha neq alpha A$ in general.
    – user9527
    Aug 1 at 22:39










  • But that is not uniquely defined.... You need to be more specific
    – user2520938
    Aug 1 at 22:39











  • Yes. As I commented at the end, $A_1, A_2$ has some special structure and I would like to construct a path within this structure. I figured out we can scale eigenvalues within the structure.
    – user9527
    Aug 1 at 22:43






  • 1




    So you have a set of matrices $M$. You know that if $Ain M$, then for any $ainmathbb R$ there exists a matrix $A_ain M$ whose eigenvalues are $a$ times those of $A$, and which can be connected to $A$ via a continuous path in $M$. You want to know if this is enough to prove that $A_1$ and $A_2$ (which are in $M$) can be path-connected?
    – Jack M
    Aug 2 at 8:04














up vote
5
down vote

favorite
1












Let $A_1, A_2 in GL_n(mathbb R)$ be two fixed matrices with eigenvalues lying on the open left half plane of $mathbb C$, i.e., with negative real parts and $A_1 neq A_2$. We may assume $A_1, A_2$ are diagonalizable if necessary. Let $(A_1)_alpha$ and $(A_2)_beta$ be the corresponding matrix that scales the eigenvalues by $alpha in mathbb R$ and $beta in mathbb R$ respectively. That is if $(lambda_1, dots, lambda_n)$ are eigenvalues of $A_1$, then $(alpha lambda_1, dots, alpha lambda_n)$ are eigenvalues of $(A_1)_alpha$.



I am wondering whether it is possible to construct a continuous path $gamma: [0,1] to GL_n(mathbb R)$ with eigenvalues all lying on the left half plane along the path: by choosing a sequence of nonzero real numbers, $(alpha_n)$ and $(beta_n)$, $gamma$ is piecewise linear. For example, suppose there exist some finite sequences $(alpha_1, dots, alpha_k)$ and $(beta_1, dots, beta_l)$, then the path would be
beginalign*
A_1 xrightarrow (A_1)_alpha_1 xrightarrow dots xrightarrow (A_1)_alpha_k xrightarrow (A_2)_beta_1 xrightarrow dots xrightarrow (A_2)_beta_l xrightarrow A_2.
endalign*
In between, each arrow stands for a convex path. Assume we can construct a continuous path between $A$ and $(A)_alpha$.



If we take a convex combination of $A_1, A_2$, i.e., $A(t) = (1-t)A_1 + tA_2$. Then $det(A(t))$ is a nonconstant polynomial in $t$ and has at most $n$ zeros. Intuitively I am thinking of taking the path until we meet a singular point of $t$ (by continuity, all eigenvalues should stay in the left half plane) and change path to some $(A_1)_alpha$ and doing this repeatedly. Not sure whether this will work.



p.s. The reason for my consideration was because I need to guarantee certain matrix structure along the path. I have worked out scaling eigenvalues can be done within the structure of interest.







share|cite|improve this question





















  • I don't get your $A_alpha$. How is it defined exactly? Is is simply $alpha A$?
    – user2520938
    Aug 1 at 22:34











  • @user2520938: $(A)_alpha$ has eigenvalues which are a factor of eigenvalues of $A$. $(A)_alpha neq alpha A$ in general.
    – user9527
    Aug 1 at 22:39










  • But that is not uniquely defined.... You need to be more specific
    – user2520938
    Aug 1 at 22:39











  • Yes. As I commented at the end, $A_1, A_2$ has some special structure and I would like to construct a path within this structure. I figured out we can scale eigenvalues within the structure.
    – user9527
    Aug 1 at 22:43






  • 1




    So you have a set of matrices $M$. You know that if $Ain M$, then for any $ainmathbb R$ there exists a matrix $A_ain M$ whose eigenvalues are $a$ times those of $A$, and which can be connected to $A$ via a continuous path in $M$. You want to know if this is enough to prove that $A_1$ and $A_2$ (which are in $M$) can be path-connected?
    – Jack M
    Aug 2 at 8:04












up vote
5
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
5
down vote

favorite
1






1





Let $A_1, A_2 in GL_n(mathbb R)$ be two fixed matrices with eigenvalues lying on the open left half plane of $mathbb C$, i.e., with negative real parts and $A_1 neq A_2$. We may assume $A_1, A_2$ are diagonalizable if necessary. Let $(A_1)_alpha$ and $(A_2)_beta$ be the corresponding matrix that scales the eigenvalues by $alpha in mathbb R$ and $beta in mathbb R$ respectively. That is if $(lambda_1, dots, lambda_n)$ are eigenvalues of $A_1$, then $(alpha lambda_1, dots, alpha lambda_n)$ are eigenvalues of $(A_1)_alpha$.



I am wondering whether it is possible to construct a continuous path $gamma: [0,1] to GL_n(mathbb R)$ with eigenvalues all lying on the left half plane along the path: by choosing a sequence of nonzero real numbers, $(alpha_n)$ and $(beta_n)$, $gamma$ is piecewise linear. For example, suppose there exist some finite sequences $(alpha_1, dots, alpha_k)$ and $(beta_1, dots, beta_l)$, then the path would be
beginalign*
A_1 xrightarrow (A_1)_alpha_1 xrightarrow dots xrightarrow (A_1)_alpha_k xrightarrow (A_2)_beta_1 xrightarrow dots xrightarrow (A_2)_beta_l xrightarrow A_2.
endalign*
In between, each arrow stands for a convex path. Assume we can construct a continuous path between $A$ and $(A)_alpha$.



If we take a convex combination of $A_1, A_2$, i.e., $A(t) = (1-t)A_1 + tA_2$. Then $det(A(t))$ is a nonconstant polynomial in $t$ and has at most $n$ zeros. Intuitively I am thinking of taking the path until we meet a singular point of $t$ (by continuity, all eigenvalues should stay in the left half plane) and change path to some $(A_1)_alpha$ and doing this repeatedly. Not sure whether this will work.



p.s. The reason for my consideration was because I need to guarantee certain matrix structure along the path. I have worked out scaling eigenvalues can be done within the structure of interest.







share|cite|improve this question













Let $A_1, A_2 in GL_n(mathbb R)$ be two fixed matrices with eigenvalues lying on the open left half plane of $mathbb C$, i.e., with negative real parts and $A_1 neq A_2$. We may assume $A_1, A_2$ are diagonalizable if necessary. Let $(A_1)_alpha$ and $(A_2)_beta$ be the corresponding matrix that scales the eigenvalues by $alpha in mathbb R$ and $beta in mathbb R$ respectively. That is if $(lambda_1, dots, lambda_n)$ are eigenvalues of $A_1$, then $(alpha lambda_1, dots, alpha lambda_n)$ are eigenvalues of $(A_1)_alpha$.



I am wondering whether it is possible to construct a continuous path $gamma: [0,1] to GL_n(mathbb R)$ with eigenvalues all lying on the left half plane along the path: by choosing a sequence of nonzero real numbers, $(alpha_n)$ and $(beta_n)$, $gamma$ is piecewise linear. For example, suppose there exist some finite sequences $(alpha_1, dots, alpha_k)$ and $(beta_1, dots, beta_l)$, then the path would be
beginalign*
A_1 xrightarrow (A_1)_alpha_1 xrightarrow dots xrightarrow (A_1)_alpha_k xrightarrow (A_2)_beta_1 xrightarrow dots xrightarrow (A_2)_beta_l xrightarrow A_2.
endalign*
In between, each arrow stands for a convex path. Assume we can construct a continuous path between $A$ and $(A)_alpha$.



If we take a convex combination of $A_1, A_2$, i.e., $A(t) = (1-t)A_1 + tA_2$. Then $det(A(t))$ is a nonconstant polynomial in $t$ and has at most $n$ zeros. Intuitively I am thinking of taking the path until we meet a singular point of $t$ (by continuity, all eigenvalues should stay in the left half plane) and change path to some $(A_1)_alpha$ and doing this repeatedly. Not sure whether this will work.



p.s. The reason for my consideration was because I need to guarantee certain matrix structure along the path. I have worked out scaling eigenvalues can be done within the structure of interest.









share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Aug 1 at 23:07
























asked Aug 1 at 20:40









user9527

923524




923524











  • I don't get your $A_alpha$. How is it defined exactly? Is is simply $alpha A$?
    – user2520938
    Aug 1 at 22:34











  • @user2520938: $(A)_alpha$ has eigenvalues which are a factor of eigenvalues of $A$. $(A)_alpha neq alpha A$ in general.
    – user9527
    Aug 1 at 22:39










  • But that is not uniquely defined.... You need to be more specific
    – user2520938
    Aug 1 at 22:39











  • Yes. As I commented at the end, $A_1, A_2$ has some special structure and I would like to construct a path within this structure. I figured out we can scale eigenvalues within the structure.
    – user9527
    Aug 1 at 22:43






  • 1




    So you have a set of matrices $M$. You know that if $Ain M$, then for any $ainmathbb R$ there exists a matrix $A_ain M$ whose eigenvalues are $a$ times those of $A$, and which can be connected to $A$ via a continuous path in $M$. You want to know if this is enough to prove that $A_1$ and $A_2$ (which are in $M$) can be path-connected?
    – Jack M
    Aug 2 at 8:04
















  • I don't get your $A_alpha$. How is it defined exactly? Is is simply $alpha A$?
    – user2520938
    Aug 1 at 22:34











  • @user2520938: $(A)_alpha$ has eigenvalues which are a factor of eigenvalues of $A$. $(A)_alpha neq alpha A$ in general.
    – user9527
    Aug 1 at 22:39










  • But that is not uniquely defined.... You need to be more specific
    – user2520938
    Aug 1 at 22:39











  • Yes. As I commented at the end, $A_1, A_2$ has some special structure and I would like to construct a path within this structure. I figured out we can scale eigenvalues within the structure.
    – user9527
    Aug 1 at 22:43






  • 1




    So you have a set of matrices $M$. You know that if $Ain M$, then for any $ainmathbb R$ there exists a matrix $A_ain M$ whose eigenvalues are $a$ times those of $A$, and which can be connected to $A$ via a continuous path in $M$. You want to know if this is enough to prove that $A_1$ and $A_2$ (which are in $M$) can be path-connected?
    – Jack M
    Aug 2 at 8:04















I don't get your $A_alpha$. How is it defined exactly? Is is simply $alpha A$?
– user2520938
Aug 1 at 22:34





I don't get your $A_alpha$. How is it defined exactly? Is is simply $alpha A$?
– user2520938
Aug 1 at 22:34













@user2520938: $(A)_alpha$ has eigenvalues which are a factor of eigenvalues of $A$. $(A)_alpha neq alpha A$ in general.
– user9527
Aug 1 at 22:39




@user2520938: $(A)_alpha$ has eigenvalues which are a factor of eigenvalues of $A$. $(A)_alpha neq alpha A$ in general.
– user9527
Aug 1 at 22:39












But that is not uniquely defined.... You need to be more specific
– user2520938
Aug 1 at 22:39





But that is not uniquely defined.... You need to be more specific
– user2520938
Aug 1 at 22:39













Yes. As I commented at the end, $A_1, A_2$ has some special structure and I would like to construct a path within this structure. I figured out we can scale eigenvalues within the structure.
– user9527
Aug 1 at 22:43




Yes. As I commented at the end, $A_1, A_2$ has some special structure and I would like to construct a path within this structure. I figured out we can scale eigenvalues within the structure.
– user9527
Aug 1 at 22:43




1




1




So you have a set of matrices $M$. You know that if $Ain M$, then for any $ainmathbb R$ there exists a matrix $A_ain M$ whose eigenvalues are $a$ times those of $A$, and which can be connected to $A$ via a continuous path in $M$. You want to know if this is enough to prove that $A_1$ and $A_2$ (which are in $M$) can be path-connected?
– Jack M
Aug 2 at 8:04




So you have a set of matrices $M$. You know that if $Ain M$, then for any $ainmathbb R$ there exists a matrix $A_ain M$ whose eigenvalues are $a$ times those of $A$, and which can be connected to $A$ via a continuous path in $M$. You want to know if this is enough to prove that $A_1$ and $A_2$ (which are in $M$) can be path-connected?
– Jack M
Aug 2 at 8:04















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2869498%2fconstructing-a-continuous-path-between-two-matrices%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest



































active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes










 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2869498%2fconstructing-a-continuous-path-between-two-matrices%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?