Is there a notation for the operator $(fracpartialpartial u_x,fracpartialpartial u_y)^T$?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I know that the operator $nabla$ denotes
$$
nabla = beginpmatrix fracpartialpartial x \ fracpartialpartial y endpmatrix
$$



Is there some kind of similar notation to denote



$$
A = beginpmatrix fracpartialpartial u_x \ fracpartialpartial u_y endpmatrix
$$



where $u_x = fracpartialpartial x u$, likewise $u_y$. Here $u$ denotes some differentiable function in $Omega subset mathbbR^2$.







share|cite|improve this question





















  • Like the gradient on the fibre of the tangent bundle?
    – Troy Woo
    Aug 1 at 9:28






  • 1




    I'm not exactly sure what you're asking, but the directional derivative along a vector field $mathbf v = (v_x, v_y)$ is usually denoted $(mathbf v cdot nabla)$, which means $v_x fracpartialpartial x + v_y fracpartialpartial y$. This is used to define the material derivative in continuum mechanics.
    – Rahul
    Aug 1 at 9:30











  • @Rahul, No, I'm looking for a shorthand for $$A = fracpartialpartial x fracpartialpartial v_x + fracpartialpartial y fracpartialpartial v_y$$
    – user8469759
    Aug 1 at 9:35














up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I know that the operator $nabla$ denotes
$$
nabla = beginpmatrix fracpartialpartial x \ fracpartialpartial y endpmatrix
$$



Is there some kind of similar notation to denote



$$
A = beginpmatrix fracpartialpartial u_x \ fracpartialpartial u_y endpmatrix
$$



where $u_x = fracpartialpartial x u$, likewise $u_y$. Here $u$ denotes some differentiable function in $Omega subset mathbbR^2$.







share|cite|improve this question





















  • Like the gradient on the fibre of the tangent bundle?
    – Troy Woo
    Aug 1 at 9:28






  • 1




    I'm not exactly sure what you're asking, but the directional derivative along a vector field $mathbf v = (v_x, v_y)$ is usually denoted $(mathbf v cdot nabla)$, which means $v_x fracpartialpartial x + v_y fracpartialpartial y$. This is used to define the material derivative in continuum mechanics.
    – Rahul
    Aug 1 at 9:30











  • @Rahul, No, I'm looking for a shorthand for $$A = fracpartialpartial x fracpartialpartial v_x + fracpartialpartial y fracpartialpartial v_y$$
    – user8469759
    Aug 1 at 9:35












up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I know that the operator $nabla$ denotes
$$
nabla = beginpmatrix fracpartialpartial x \ fracpartialpartial y endpmatrix
$$



Is there some kind of similar notation to denote



$$
A = beginpmatrix fracpartialpartial u_x \ fracpartialpartial u_y endpmatrix
$$



where $u_x = fracpartialpartial x u$, likewise $u_y$. Here $u$ denotes some differentiable function in $Omega subset mathbbR^2$.







share|cite|improve this question













I know that the operator $nabla$ denotes
$$
nabla = beginpmatrix fracpartialpartial x \ fracpartialpartial y endpmatrix
$$



Is there some kind of similar notation to denote



$$
A = beginpmatrix fracpartialpartial u_x \ fracpartialpartial u_y endpmatrix
$$



where $u_x = fracpartialpartial x u$, likewise $u_y$. Here $u$ denotes some differentiable function in $Omega subset mathbbR^2$.









share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Aug 1 at 17:06
























asked Aug 1 at 9:22









user8469759

1,4271513




1,4271513











  • Like the gradient on the fibre of the tangent bundle?
    – Troy Woo
    Aug 1 at 9:28






  • 1




    I'm not exactly sure what you're asking, but the directional derivative along a vector field $mathbf v = (v_x, v_y)$ is usually denoted $(mathbf v cdot nabla)$, which means $v_x fracpartialpartial x + v_y fracpartialpartial y$. This is used to define the material derivative in continuum mechanics.
    – Rahul
    Aug 1 at 9:30











  • @Rahul, No, I'm looking for a shorthand for $$A = fracpartialpartial x fracpartialpartial v_x + fracpartialpartial y fracpartialpartial v_y$$
    – user8469759
    Aug 1 at 9:35
















  • Like the gradient on the fibre of the tangent bundle?
    – Troy Woo
    Aug 1 at 9:28






  • 1




    I'm not exactly sure what you're asking, but the directional derivative along a vector field $mathbf v = (v_x, v_y)$ is usually denoted $(mathbf v cdot nabla)$, which means $v_x fracpartialpartial x + v_y fracpartialpartial y$. This is used to define the material derivative in continuum mechanics.
    – Rahul
    Aug 1 at 9:30











  • @Rahul, No, I'm looking for a shorthand for $$A = fracpartialpartial x fracpartialpartial v_x + fracpartialpartial y fracpartialpartial v_y$$
    – user8469759
    Aug 1 at 9:35















Like the gradient on the fibre of the tangent bundle?
– Troy Woo
Aug 1 at 9:28




Like the gradient on the fibre of the tangent bundle?
– Troy Woo
Aug 1 at 9:28




1




1




I'm not exactly sure what you're asking, but the directional derivative along a vector field $mathbf v = (v_x, v_y)$ is usually denoted $(mathbf v cdot nabla)$, which means $v_x fracpartialpartial x + v_y fracpartialpartial y$. This is used to define the material derivative in continuum mechanics.
– Rahul
Aug 1 at 9:30





I'm not exactly sure what you're asking, but the directional derivative along a vector field $mathbf v = (v_x, v_y)$ is usually denoted $(mathbf v cdot nabla)$, which means $v_x fracpartialpartial x + v_y fracpartialpartial y$. This is used to define the material derivative in continuum mechanics.
– Rahul
Aug 1 at 9:30













@Rahul, No, I'm looking for a shorthand for $$A = fracpartialpartial x fracpartialpartial v_x + fracpartialpartial y fracpartialpartial v_y$$
– user8469759
Aug 1 at 9:35




@Rahul, No, I'm looking for a shorthand for $$A = fracpartialpartial x fracpartialpartial v_x + fracpartialpartial y fracpartialpartial v_y$$
– user8469759
Aug 1 at 9:35










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote













It is fairly common to use the notation $nabla_mathbfu$ for gradient with respect to the velocity field. An alternative notation is $partial/partialmathbfu$ so that the usual gradient is written as $partial/partialmathbfx$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • If I applied $nabla_bfu f$ wouldn't I get $langle nabla f, bfu rangle $?
    – user8469759
    Aug 1 at 9:41











  • No, you should get $hate_xpartial f/partial u_x + hate_ypartial f/partial u_y$ in two dimensions.
    – Amey Joshi
    Aug 1 at 9:43










  • But couldn't $nabla_bfu$ be confused with the directional derivative?
    – user8469759
    Aug 1 at 9:45










  • I did mean the directional derivative. I gave an analog of the nabla operator. If it is not a directional derivative with respect to a velocity field, why would want to write it as a vector. Can you possible write an expression in a long form that you want to write in a compact notation?
    – Amey Joshi
    Aug 1 at 9:49










  • Euler Lagrange equations are an example. I want ti write to gradient wrt a different basis I think (instead of the canonical basis I'd use the velocity field I think).
    – user8469759
    Aug 1 at 9:52










Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2868880%2fis-there-a-notation-for-the-operator-frac-partial-partial-u-x-frac-part%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
1
down vote













It is fairly common to use the notation $nabla_mathbfu$ for gradient with respect to the velocity field. An alternative notation is $partial/partialmathbfu$ so that the usual gradient is written as $partial/partialmathbfx$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • If I applied $nabla_bfu f$ wouldn't I get $langle nabla f, bfu rangle $?
    – user8469759
    Aug 1 at 9:41











  • No, you should get $hate_xpartial f/partial u_x + hate_ypartial f/partial u_y$ in two dimensions.
    – Amey Joshi
    Aug 1 at 9:43










  • But couldn't $nabla_bfu$ be confused with the directional derivative?
    – user8469759
    Aug 1 at 9:45










  • I did mean the directional derivative. I gave an analog of the nabla operator. If it is not a directional derivative with respect to a velocity field, why would want to write it as a vector. Can you possible write an expression in a long form that you want to write in a compact notation?
    – Amey Joshi
    Aug 1 at 9:49










  • Euler Lagrange equations are an example. I want ti write to gradient wrt a different basis I think (instead of the canonical basis I'd use the velocity field I think).
    – user8469759
    Aug 1 at 9:52














up vote
1
down vote













It is fairly common to use the notation $nabla_mathbfu$ for gradient with respect to the velocity field. An alternative notation is $partial/partialmathbfu$ so that the usual gradient is written as $partial/partialmathbfx$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • If I applied $nabla_bfu f$ wouldn't I get $langle nabla f, bfu rangle $?
    – user8469759
    Aug 1 at 9:41











  • No, you should get $hate_xpartial f/partial u_x + hate_ypartial f/partial u_y$ in two dimensions.
    – Amey Joshi
    Aug 1 at 9:43










  • But couldn't $nabla_bfu$ be confused with the directional derivative?
    – user8469759
    Aug 1 at 9:45










  • I did mean the directional derivative. I gave an analog of the nabla operator. If it is not a directional derivative with respect to a velocity field, why would want to write it as a vector. Can you possible write an expression in a long form that you want to write in a compact notation?
    – Amey Joshi
    Aug 1 at 9:49










  • Euler Lagrange equations are an example. I want ti write to gradient wrt a different basis I think (instead of the canonical basis I'd use the velocity field I think).
    – user8469759
    Aug 1 at 9:52












up vote
1
down vote










up vote
1
down vote









It is fairly common to use the notation $nabla_mathbfu$ for gradient with respect to the velocity field. An alternative notation is $partial/partialmathbfu$ so that the usual gradient is written as $partial/partialmathbfx$.






share|cite|improve this answer













It is fairly common to use the notation $nabla_mathbfu$ for gradient with respect to the velocity field. An alternative notation is $partial/partialmathbfu$ so that the usual gradient is written as $partial/partialmathbfx$.







share|cite|improve this answer













share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer











answered Aug 1 at 9:40









Amey Joshi

579210




579210











  • If I applied $nabla_bfu f$ wouldn't I get $langle nabla f, bfu rangle $?
    – user8469759
    Aug 1 at 9:41











  • No, you should get $hate_xpartial f/partial u_x + hate_ypartial f/partial u_y$ in two dimensions.
    – Amey Joshi
    Aug 1 at 9:43










  • But couldn't $nabla_bfu$ be confused with the directional derivative?
    – user8469759
    Aug 1 at 9:45










  • I did mean the directional derivative. I gave an analog of the nabla operator. If it is not a directional derivative with respect to a velocity field, why would want to write it as a vector. Can you possible write an expression in a long form that you want to write in a compact notation?
    – Amey Joshi
    Aug 1 at 9:49










  • Euler Lagrange equations are an example. I want ti write to gradient wrt a different basis I think (instead of the canonical basis I'd use the velocity field I think).
    – user8469759
    Aug 1 at 9:52
















  • If I applied $nabla_bfu f$ wouldn't I get $langle nabla f, bfu rangle $?
    – user8469759
    Aug 1 at 9:41











  • No, you should get $hate_xpartial f/partial u_x + hate_ypartial f/partial u_y$ in two dimensions.
    – Amey Joshi
    Aug 1 at 9:43










  • But couldn't $nabla_bfu$ be confused with the directional derivative?
    – user8469759
    Aug 1 at 9:45










  • I did mean the directional derivative. I gave an analog of the nabla operator. If it is not a directional derivative with respect to a velocity field, why would want to write it as a vector. Can you possible write an expression in a long form that you want to write in a compact notation?
    – Amey Joshi
    Aug 1 at 9:49










  • Euler Lagrange equations are an example. I want ti write to gradient wrt a different basis I think (instead of the canonical basis I'd use the velocity field I think).
    – user8469759
    Aug 1 at 9:52















If I applied $nabla_bfu f$ wouldn't I get $langle nabla f, bfu rangle $?
– user8469759
Aug 1 at 9:41





If I applied $nabla_bfu f$ wouldn't I get $langle nabla f, bfu rangle $?
– user8469759
Aug 1 at 9:41













No, you should get $hate_xpartial f/partial u_x + hate_ypartial f/partial u_y$ in two dimensions.
– Amey Joshi
Aug 1 at 9:43




No, you should get $hate_xpartial f/partial u_x + hate_ypartial f/partial u_y$ in two dimensions.
– Amey Joshi
Aug 1 at 9:43












But couldn't $nabla_bfu$ be confused with the directional derivative?
– user8469759
Aug 1 at 9:45




But couldn't $nabla_bfu$ be confused with the directional derivative?
– user8469759
Aug 1 at 9:45












I did mean the directional derivative. I gave an analog of the nabla operator. If it is not a directional derivative with respect to a velocity field, why would want to write it as a vector. Can you possible write an expression in a long form that you want to write in a compact notation?
– Amey Joshi
Aug 1 at 9:49




I did mean the directional derivative. I gave an analog of the nabla operator. If it is not a directional derivative with respect to a velocity field, why would want to write it as a vector. Can you possible write an expression in a long form that you want to write in a compact notation?
– Amey Joshi
Aug 1 at 9:49












Euler Lagrange equations are an example. I want ti write to gradient wrt a different basis I think (instead of the canonical basis I'd use the velocity field I think).
– user8469759
Aug 1 at 9:52




Euler Lagrange equations are an example. I want ti write to gradient wrt a different basis I think (instead of the canonical basis I'd use the velocity field I think).
– user8469759
Aug 1 at 9:52












 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2868880%2fis-there-a-notation-for-the-operator-frac-partial-partial-u-x-frac-part%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?