Is there a notation for the operator $(fracpartialpartial u_x,fracpartialpartial u_y)^T$?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I know that the operator $nabla$ denotes
$$
nabla = beginpmatrix fracpartialpartial x \ fracpartialpartial y endpmatrix
$$
Is there some kind of similar notation to denote
$$
A = beginpmatrix fracpartialpartial u_x \ fracpartialpartial u_y endpmatrix
$$
where $u_x = fracpartialpartial x u$, likewise $u_y$. Here $u$ denotes some differentiable function in $Omega subset mathbbR^2$.
calculus notation vector-analysis
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I know that the operator $nabla$ denotes
$$
nabla = beginpmatrix fracpartialpartial x \ fracpartialpartial y endpmatrix
$$
Is there some kind of similar notation to denote
$$
A = beginpmatrix fracpartialpartial u_x \ fracpartialpartial u_y endpmatrix
$$
where $u_x = fracpartialpartial x u$, likewise $u_y$. Here $u$ denotes some differentiable function in $Omega subset mathbbR^2$.
calculus notation vector-analysis
Like the gradient on the fibre of the tangent bundle?
– Troy Woo
Aug 1 at 9:28
1
I'm not exactly sure what you're asking, but the directional derivative along a vector field $mathbf v = (v_x, v_y)$ is usually denoted $(mathbf v cdot nabla)$, which means $v_x fracpartialpartial x + v_y fracpartialpartial y$. This is used to define the material derivative in continuum mechanics.
– Rahul
Aug 1 at 9:30
@Rahul, No, I'm looking for a shorthand for $$A = fracpartialpartial x fracpartialpartial v_x + fracpartialpartial y fracpartialpartial v_y$$
– user8469759
Aug 1 at 9:35
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I know that the operator $nabla$ denotes
$$
nabla = beginpmatrix fracpartialpartial x \ fracpartialpartial y endpmatrix
$$
Is there some kind of similar notation to denote
$$
A = beginpmatrix fracpartialpartial u_x \ fracpartialpartial u_y endpmatrix
$$
where $u_x = fracpartialpartial x u$, likewise $u_y$. Here $u$ denotes some differentiable function in $Omega subset mathbbR^2$.
calculus notation vector-analysis
I know that the operator $nabla$ denotes
$$
nabla = beginpmatrix fracpartialpartial x \ fracpartialpartial y endpmatrix
$$
Is there some kind of similar notation to denote
$$
A = beginpmatrix fracpartialpartial u_x \ fracpartialpartial u_y endpmatrix
$$
where $u_x = fracpartialpartial x u$, likewise $u_y$. Here $u$ denotes some differentiable function in $Omega subset mathbbR^2$.
calculus notation vector-analysis
edited Aug 1 at 17:06
asked Aug 1 at 9:22
user8469759
1,4271513
1,4271513
Like the gradient on the fibre of the tangent bundle?
– Troy Woo
Aug 1 at 9:28
1
I'm not exactly sure what you're asking, but the directional derivative along a vector field $mathbf v = (v_x, v_y)$ is usually denoted $(mathbf v cdot nabla)$, which means $v_x fracpartialpartial x + v_y fracpartialpartial y$. This is used to define the material derivative in continuum mechanics.
– Rahul
Aug 1 at 9:30
@Rahul, No, I'm looking for a shorthand for $$A = fracpartialpartial x fracpartialpartial v_x + fracpartialpartial y fracpartialpartial v_y$$
– user8469759
Aug 1 at 9:35
add a comment |Â
Like the gradient on the fibre of the tangent bundle?
– Troy Woo
Aug 1 at 9:28
1
I'm not exactly sure what you're asking, but the directional derivative along a vector field $mathbf v = (v_x, v_y)$ is usually denoted $(mathbf v cdot nabla)$, which means $v_x fracpartialpartial x + v_y fracpartialpartial y$. This is used to define the material derivative in continuum mechanics.
– Rahul
Aug 1 at 9:30
@Rahul, No, I'm looking for a shorthand for $$A = fracpartialpartial x fracpartialpartial v_x + fracpartialpartial y fracpartialpartial v_y$$
– user8469759
Aug 1 at 9:35
Like the gradient on the fibre of the tangent bundle?
– Troy Woo
Aug 1 at 9:28
Like the gradient on the fibre of the tangent bundle?
– Troy Woo
Aug 1 at 9:28
1
1
I'm not exactly sure what you're asking, but the directional derivative along a vector field $mathbf v = (v_x, v_y)$ is usually denoted $(mathbf v cdot nabla)$, which means $v_x fracpartialpartial x + v_y fracpartialpartial y$. This is used to define the material derivative in continuum mechanics.
– Rahul
Aug 1 at 9:30
I'm not exactly sure what you're asking, but the directional derivative along a vector field $mathbf v = (v_x, v_y)$ is usually denoted $(mathbf v cdot nabla)$, which means $v_x fracpartialpartial x + v_y fracpartialpartial y$. This is used to define the material derivative in continuum mechanics.
– Rahul
Aug 1 at 9:30
@Rahul, No, I'm looking for a shorthand for $$A = fracpartialpartial x fracpartialpartial v_x + fracpartialpartial y fracpartialpartial v_y$$
– user8469759
Aug 1 at 9:35
@Rahul, No, I'm looking for a shorthand for $$A = fracpartialpartial x fracpartialpartial v_x + fracpartialpartial y fracpartialpartial v_y$$
– user8469759
Aug 1 at 9:35
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
It is fairly common to use the notation $nabla_mathbfu$ for gradient with respect to the velocity field. An alternative notation is $partial/partialmathbfu$ so that the usual gradient is written as $partial/partialmathbfx$.
If I applied $nabla_bfu f$ wouldn't I get $langle nabla f, bfu rangle $?
– user8469759
Aug 1 at 9:41
No, you should get $hate_xpartial f/partial u_x + hate_ypartial f/partial u_y$ in two dimensions.
– Amey Joshi
Aug 1 at 9:43
But couldn't $nabla_bfu$ be confused with the directional derivative?
– user8469759
Aug 1 at 9:45
I did mean the directional derivative. I gave an analog of the nabla operator. If it is not a directional derivative with respect to a velocity field, why would want to write it as a vector. Can you possible write an expression in a long form that you want to write in a compact notation?
– Amey Joshi
Aug 1 at 9:49
Euler Lagrange equations are an example. I want ti write to gradient wrt a different basis I think (instead of the canonical basis I'd use the velocity field I think).
– user8469759
Aug 1 at 9:52
 |Â
show 4 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
It is fairly common to use the notation $nabla_mathbfu$ for gradient with respect to the velocity field. An alternative notation is $partial/partialmathbfu$ so that the usual gradient is written as $partial/partialmathbfx$.
If I applied $nabla_bfu f$ wouldn't I get $langle nabla f, bfu rangle $?
– user8469759
Aug 1 at 9:41
No, you should get $hate_xpartial f/partial u_x + hate_ypartial f/partial u_y$ in two dimensions.
– Amey Joshi
Aug 1 at 9:43
But couldn't $nabla_bfu$ be confused with the directional derivative?
– user8469759
Aug 1 at 9:45
I did mean the directional derivative. I gave an analog of the nabla operator. If it is not a directional derivative with respect to a velocity field, why would want to write it as a vector. Can you possible write an expression in a long form that you want to write in a compact notation?
– Amey Joshi
Aug 1 at 9:49
Euler Lagrange equations are an example. I want ti write to gradient wrt a different basis I think (instead of the canonical basis I'd use the velocity field I think).
– user8469759
Aug 1 at 9:52
 |Â
show 4 more comments
up vote
1
down vote
It is fairly common to use the notation $nabla_mathbfu$ for gradient with respect to the velocity field. An alternative notation is $partial/partialmathbfu$ so that the usual gradient is written as $partial/partialmathbfx$.
If I applied $nabla_bfu f$ wouldn't I get $langle nabla f, bfu rangle $?
– user8469759
Aug 1 at 9:41
No, you should get $hate_xpartial f/partial u_x + hate_ypartial f/partial u_y$ in two dimensions.
– Amey Joshi
Aug 1 at 9:43
But couldn't $nabla_bfu$ be confused with the directional derivative?
– user8469759
Aug 1 at 9:45
I did mean the directional derivative. I gave an analog of the nabla operator. If it is not a directional derivative with respect to a velocity field, why would want to write it as a vector. Can you possible write an expression in a long form that you want to write in a compact notation?
– Amey Joshi
Aug 1 at 9:49
Euler Lagrange equations are an example. I want ti write to gradient wrt a different basis I think (instead of the canonical basis I'd use the velocity field I think).
– user8469759
Aug 1 at 9:52
 |Â
show 4 more comments
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
It is fairly common to use the notation $nabla_mathbfu$ for gradient with respect to the velocity field. An alternative notation is $partial/partialmathbfu$ so that the usual gradient is written as $partial/partialmathbfx$.
It is fairly common to use the notation $nabla_mathbfu$ for gradient with respect to the velocity field. An alternative notation is $partial/partialmathbfu$ so that the usual gradient is written as $partial/partialmathbfx$.
answered Aug 1 at 9:40
Amey Joshi
579210
579210
If I applied $nabla_bfu f$ wouldn't I get $langle nabla f, bfu rangle $?
– user8469759
Aug 1 at 9:41
No, you should get $hate_xpartial f/partial u_x + hate_ypartial f/partial u_y$ in two dimensions.
– Amey Joshi
Aug 1 at 9:43
But couldn't $nabla_bfu$ be confused with the directional derivative?
– user8469759
Aug 1 at 9:45
I did mean the directional derivative. I gave an analog of the nabla operator. If it is not a directional derivative with respect to a velocity field, why would want to write it as a vector. Can you possible write an expression in a long form that you want to write in a compact notation?
– Amey Joshi
Aug 1 at 9:49
Euler Lagrange equations are an example. I want ti write to gradient wrt a different basis I think (instead of the canonical basis I'd use the velocity field I think).
– user8469759
Aug 1 at 9:52
 |Â
show 4 more comments
If I applied $nabla_bfu f$ wouldn't I get $langle nabla f, bfu rangle $?
– user8469759
Aug 1 at 9:41
No, you should get $hate_xpartial f/partial u_x + hate_ypartial f/partial u_y$ in two dimensions.
– Amey Joshi
Aug 1 at 9:43
But couldn't $nabla_bfu$ be confused with the directional derivative?
– user8469759
Aug 1 at 9:45
I did mean the directional derivative. I gave an analog of the nabla operator. If it is not a directional derivative with respect to a velocity field, why would want to write it as a vector. Can you possible write an expression in a long form that you want to write in a compact notation?
– Amey Joshi
Aug 1 at 9:49
Euler Lagrange equations are an example. I want ti write to gradient wrt a different basis I think (instead of the canonical basis I'd use the velocity field I think).
– user8469759
Aug 1 at 9:52
If I applied $nabla_bfu f$ wouldn't I get $langle nabla f, bfu rangle $?
– user8469759
Aug 1 at 9:41
If I applied $nabla_bfu f$ wouldn't I get $langle nabla f, bfu rangle $?
– user8469759
Aug 1 at 9:41
No, you should get $hate_xpartial f/partial u_x + hate_ypartial f/partial u_y$ in two dimensions.
– Amey Joshi
Aug 1 at 9:43
No, you should get $hate_xpartial f/partial u_x + hate_ypartial f/partial u_y$ in two dimensions.
– Amey Joshi
Aug 1 at 9:43
But couldn't $nabla_bfu$ be confused with the directional derivative?
– user8469759
Aug 1 at 9:45
But couldn't $nabla_bfu$ be confused with the directional derivative?
– user8469759
Aug 1 at 9:45
I did mean the directional derivative. I gave an analog of the nabla operator. If it is not a directional derivative with respect to a velocity field, why would want to write it as a vector. Can you possible write an expression in a long form that you want to write in a compact notation?
– Amey Joshi
Aug 1 at 9:49
I did mean the directional derivative. I gave an analog of the nabla operator. If it is not a directional derivative with respect to a velocity field, why would want to write it as a vector. Can you possible write an expression in a long form that you want to write in a compact notation?
– Amey Joshi
Aug 1 at 9:49
Euler Lagrange equations are an example. I want ti write to gradient wrt a different basis I think (instead of the canonical basis I'd use the velocity field I think).
– user8469759
Aug 1 at 9:52
Euler Lagrange equations are an example. I want ti write to gradient wrt a different basis I think (instead of the canonical basis I'd use the velocity field I think).
– user8469759
Aug 1 at 9:52
 |Â
show 4 more comments
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2868880%2fis-there-a-notation-for-the-operator-frac-partial-partial-u-x-frac-part%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Like the gradient on the fibre of the tangent bundle?
– Troy Woo
Aug 1 at 9:28
1
I'm not exactly sure what you're asking, but the directional derivative along a vector field $mathbf v = (v_x, v_y)$ is usually denoted $(mathbf v cdot nabla)$, which means $v_x fracpartialpartial x + v_y fracpartialpartial y$. This is used to define the material derivative in continuum mechanics.
– Rahul
Aug 1 at 9:30
@Rahul, No, I'm looking for a shorthand for $$A = fracpartialpartial x fracpartialpartial v_x + fracpartialpartial y fracpartialpartial v_y$$
– user8469759
Aug 1 at 9:35