Motivation for the Basel problem

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
3
down vote

favorite
3












I realized that I know of several ways how to prove that $sum_n=1^inftyfrac1n^2=fracpi^26$, but I have no idea why I would want to know the
answer in the first place.



Answers I have found by myself:



  • the probability of two integers chosen at random to be prime to each other is $frac6pi^2$. The proof is
    understandable by a smart undergraduate. This is the kind of motivation I am looking for.

  • by the inverse square law of sound, a line of cars blowing their horns at a car stopped in a one lane road will sound $fracpi^26$ louder than a single car. Or similarly, intensity of traffic lights on a long road at night,...

  • destructive testing of $n$ wooden beams will break on average $H_n=1+frac12+frac13+ldots+frac1n$ beams with a variance of $H_n-sum_k=1^nfrac1k^2$.

  • $zeta(2)=fracpi^26$ is all over quantum mechanics. The simplest, most understandable example I have found is Johnson-Nyquist noise. Still, there is a lot
    of physics background required to figure it out, so this does not satisfy me much.

Are there any other good reason why to compute $zeta(2)$ ? Why were Mengoli, Euler and other mathematicians from the Enlightenment interested in the answer ? Any application in physics, chemistry, economics,... ? As far as I am concerned, the closer to reality, the better.



Thanks in advance for any help.







share|cite|improve this question





















  • I don't know the history but I suspect Euler and others wanted to know the value of $zeta(2)$ out of mere curiosity - they knew the series converged. Euler knew the relationship between $zeta$ and the primes. Of course not the quantum mechanics.
    – Ethan Bolker
    Aug 1 at 11:35











  • After the geometric series and the Leibniz series for $piover2$ and $log 2$ this is the next simplest series you could think of. It is natural to come up with this problem.
    – Christian Blatter
    Aug 5 at 13:06














up vote
3
down vote

favorite
3












I realized that I know of several ways how to prove that $sum_n=1^inftyfrac1n^2=fracpi^26$, but I have no idea why I would want to know the
answer in the first place.



Answers I have found by myself:



  • the probability of two integers chosen at random to be prime to each other is $frac6pi^2$. The proof is
    understandable by a smart undergraduate. This is the kind of motivation I am looking for.

  • by the inverse square law of sound, a line of cars blowing their horns at a car stopped in a one lane road will sound $fracpi^26$ louder than a single car. Or similarly, intensity of traffic lights on a long road at night,...

  • destructive testing of $n$ wooden beams will break on average $H_n=1+frac12+frac13+ldots+frac1n$ beams with a variance of $H_n-sum_k=1^nfrac1k^2$.

  • $zeta(2)=fracpi^26$ is all over quantum mechanics. The simplest, most understandable example I have found is Johnson-Nyquist noise. Still, there is a lot
    of physics background required to figure it out, so this does not satisfy me much.

Are there any other good reason why to compute $zeta(2)$ ? Why were Mengoli, Euler and other mathematicians from the Enlightenment interested in the answer ? Any application in physics, chemistry, economics,... ? As far as I am concerned, the closer to reality, the better.



Thanks in advance for any help.







share|cite|improve this question





















  • I don't know the history but I suspect Euler and others wanted to know the value of $zeta(2)$ out of mere curiosity - they knew the series converged. Euler knew the relationship between $zeta$ and the primes. Of course not the quantum mechanics.
    – Ethan Bolker
    Aug 1 at 11:35











  • After the geometric series and the Leibniz series for $piover2$ and $log 2$ this is the next simplest series you could think of. It is natural to come up with this problem.
    – Christian Blatter
    Aug 5 at 13:06












up vote
3
down vote

favorite
3









up vote
3
down vote

favorite
3






3





I realized that I know of several ways how to prove that $sum_n=1^inftyfrac1n^2=fracpi^26$, but I have no idea why I would want to know the
answer in the first place.



Answers I have found by myself:



  • the probability of two integers chosen at random to be prime to each other is $frac6pi^2$. The proof is
    understandable by a smart undergraduate. This is the kind of motivation I am looking for.

  • by the inverse square law of sound, a line of cars blowing their horns at a car stopped in a one lane road will sound $fracpi^26$ louder than a single car. Or similarly, intensity of traffic lights on a long road at night,...

  • destructive testing of $n$ wooden beams will break on average $H_n=1+frac12+frac13+ldots+frac1n$ beams with a variance of $H_n-sum_k=1^nfrac1k^2$.

  • $zeta(2)=fracpi^26$ is all over quantum mechanics. The simplest, most understandable example I have found is Johnson-Nyquist noise. Still, there is a lot
    of physics background required to figure it out, so this does not satisfy me much.

Are there any other good reason why to compute $zeta(2)$ ? Why were Mengoli, Euler and other mathematicians from the Enlightenment interested in the answer ? Any application in physics, chemistry, economics,... ? As far as I am concerned, the closer to reality, the better.



Thanks in advance for any help.







share|cite|improve this question













I realized that I know of several ways how to prove that $sum_n=1^inftyfrac1n^2=fracpi^26$, but I have no idea why I would want to know the
answer in the first place.



Answers I have found by myself:



  • the probability of two integers chosen at random to be prime to each other is $frac6pi^2$. The proof is
    understandable by a smart undergraduate. This is the kind of motivation I am looking for.

  • by the inverse square law of sound, a line of cars blowing their horns at a car stopped in a one lane road will sound $fracpi^26$ louder than a single car. Or similarly, intensity of traffic lights on a long road at night,...

  • destructive testing of $n$ wooden beams will break on average $H_n=1+frac12+frac13+ldots+frac1n$ beams with a variance of $H_n-sum_k=1^nfrac1k^2$.

  • $zeta(2)=fracpi^26$ is all over quantum mechanics. The simplest, most understandable example I have found is Johnson-Nyquist noise. Still, there is a lot
    of physics background required to figure it out, so this does not satisfy me much.

Are there any other good reason why to compute $zeta(2)$ ? Why were Mengoli, Euler and other mathematicians from the Enlightenment interested in the answer ? Any application in physics, chemistry, economics,... ? As far as I am concerned, the closer to reality, the better.



Thanks in advance for any help.









share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Aug 1 at 13:40
























asked Aug 1 at 11:31









Dan Odare

162




162











  • I don't know the history but I suspect Euler and others wanted to know the value of $zeta(2)$ out of mere curiosity - they knew the series converged. Euler knew the relationship between $zeta$ and the primes. Of course not the quantum mechanics.
    – Ethan Bolker
    Aug 1 at 11:35











  • After the geometric series and the Leibniz series for $piover2$ and $log 2$ this is the next simplest series you could think of. It is natural to come up with this problem.
    – Christian Blatter
    Aug 5 at 13:06
















  • I don't know the history but I suspect Euler and others wanted to know the value of $zeta(2)$ out of mere curiosity - they knew the series converged. Euler knew the relationship between $zeta$ and the primes. Of course not the quantum mechanics.
    – Ethan Bolker
    Aug 1 at 11:35











  • After the geometric series and the Leibniz series for $piover2$ and $log 2$ this is the next simplest series you could think of. It is natural to come up with this problem.
    – Christian Blatter
    Aug 5 at 13:06















I don't know the history but I suspect Euler and others wanted to know the value of $zeta(2)$ out of mere curiosity - they knew the series converged. Euler knew the relationship between $zeta$ and the primes. Of course not the quantum mechanics.
– Ethan Bolker
Aug 1 at 11:35





I don't know the history but I suspect Euler and others wanted to know the value of $zeta(2)$ out of mere curiosity - they knew the series converged. Euler knew the relationship between $zeta$ and the primes. Of course not the quantum mechanics.
– Ethan Bolker
Aug 1 at 11:35













After the geometric series and the Leibniz series for $piover2$ and $log 2$ this is the next simplest series you could think of. It is natural to come up with this problem.
– Christian Blatter
Aug 5 at 13:06




After the geometric series and the Leibniz series for $piover2$ and $log 2$ this is the next simplest series you could think of. It is natural to come up with this problem.
– Christian Blatter
Aug 5 at 13:06










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote













I know two other problem involving this identity.



$1.$ The probability of integers chosen at random to be square-free is $frac6pi^2$. The proof is similar to the first problem you mentioned.



$2.$ Parisi conjecture, which is not a conjecture anymore. It's about finding minimum weighted matching in bipartite graphs. You may find a script about that here.



But most of all I recommend to read this article by Raymond Ayoub about Euler and $zeta$-function.






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );








     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2868981%2fmotivation-for-the-basel-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    1
    down vote













    I know two other problem involving this identity.



    $1.$ The probability of integers chosen at random to be square-free is $frac6pi^2$. The proof is similar to the first problem you mentioned.



    $2.$ Parisi conjecture, which is not a conjecture anymore. It's about finding minimum weighted matching in bipartite graphs. You may find a script about that here.



    But most of all I recommend to read this article by Raymond Ayoub about Euler and $zeta$-function.






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      I know two other problem involving this identity.



      $1.$ The probability of integers chosen at random to be square-free is $frac6pi^2$. The proof is similar to the first problem you mentioned.



      $2.$ Parisi conjecture, which is not a conjecture anymore. It's about finding minimum weighted matching in bipartite graphs. You may find a script about that here.



      But most of all I recommend to read this article by Raymond Ayoub about Euler and $zeta$-function.






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        1
        down vote










        up vote
        1
        down vote









        I know two other problem involving this identity.



        $1.$ The probability of integers chosen at random to be square-free is $frac6pi^2$. The proof is similar to the first problem you mentioned.



        $2.$ Parisi conjecture, which is not a conjecture anymore. It's about finding minimum weighted matching in bipartite graphs. You may find a script about that here.



        But most of all I recommend to read this article by Raymond Ayoub about Euler and $zeta$-function.






        share|cite|improve this answer













        I know two other problem involving this identity.



        $1.$ The probability of integers chosen at random to be square-free is $frac6pi^2$. The proof is similar to the first problem you mentioned.



        $2.$ Parisi conjecture, which is not a conjecture anymore. It's about finding minimum weighted matching in bipartite graphs. You may find a script about that here.



        But most of all I recommend to read this article by Raymond Ayoub about Euler and $zeta$-function.







        share|cite|improve this answer













        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer











        answered Aug 5 at 12:57









        Leila

        3,37942755




        3,37942755






















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


























             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2868981%2fmotivation-for-the-basel-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            Comments

            Popular posts from this blog

            What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

            Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

            Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?