Number of equations and variables in a Linear Programming problem
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Why in every Linear Programming problem in standard form it's assumed that $mleq n$ (where m are the rows and n the columns of the A matrix) ?
Thanks
linear-programming
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Why in every Linear Programming problem in standard form it's assumed that $mleq n$ (where m are the rows and n the columns of the A matrix) ?
Thanks
linear-programming
if m> n then how will you solve for the extra (m-n) variables then you can only obtain the solution in form of the left variables
– James
Aug 1 at 14:32
The missing information in your question is that the "m" equations have to be independent . If this is the case the necceassry condition that the equation system has a solution is $mleq n$ If they are independent and $m>n$ no solution exists.
– callculus
Aug 1 at 14:55
@James You probably mean $m<n$.
– callculus
Aug 1 at 15:58
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Why in every Linear Programming problem in standard form it's assumed that $mleq n$ (where m are the rows and n the columns of the A matrix) ?
Thanks
linear-programming
Why in every Linear Programming problem in standard form it's assumed that $mleq n$ (where m are the rows and n the columns of the A matrix) ?
Thanks
linear-programming
asked Aug 1 at 14:20
Koinos
485
485
if m> n then how will you solve for the extra (m-n) variables then you can only obtain the solution in form of the left variables
– James
Aug 1 at 14:32
The missing information in your question is that the "m" equations have to be independent . If this is the case the necceassry condition that the equation system has a solution is $mleq n$ If they are independent and $m>n$ no solution exists.
– callculus
Aug 1 at 14:55
@James You probably mean $m<n$.
– callculus
Aug 1 at 15:58
add a comment |Â
if m> n then how will you solve for the extra (m-n) variables then you can only obtain the solution in form of the left variables
– James
Aug 1 at 14:32
The missing information in your question is that the "m" equations have to be independent . If this is the case the necceassry condition that the equation system has a solution is $mleq n$ If they are independent and $m>n$ no solution exists.
– callculus
Aug 1 at 14:55
@James You probably mean $m<n$.
– callculus
Aug 1 at 15:58
if m> n then how will you solve for the extra (m-n) variables then you can only obtain the solution in form of the left variables
– James
Aug 1 at 14:32
if m> n then how will you solve for the extra (m-n) variables then you can only obtain the solution in form of the left variables
– James
Aug 1 at 14:32
The missing information in your question is that the "m" equations have to be independent . If this is the case the necceassry condition that the equation system has a solution is $mleq n$ If they are independent and $m>n$ no solution exists.
– callculus
Aug 1 at 14:55
The missing information in your question is that the "m" equations have to be independent . If this is the case the necceassry condition that the equation system has a solution is $mleq n$ If they are independent and $m>n$ no solution exists.
– callculus
Aug 1 at 14:55
@James You probably mean $m<n$.
– callculus
Aug 1 at 15:58
@James You probably mean $m<n$.
– callculus
Aug 1 at 15:58
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
If $m>n$, it means there are redundancy in the constraints of which you can reduce the number of linear equations, hence it suffices to only focus on the case where $m le n$.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Each equality constraint may be used to eliminate one variable, so the standard problem consists only of inequality constraints. Each has a slack or surplus variable added to convert it to an equality, so the number of variables n always exceeds the number of constraints m.
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
If $m>n$, it means there are redundancy in the constraints of which you can reduce the number of linear equations, hence it suffices to only focus on the case where $m le n$.
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
If $m>n$, it means there are redundancy in the constraints of which you can reduce the number of linear equations, hence it suffices to only focus on the case where $m le n$.
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
If $m>n$, it means there are redundancy in the constraints of which you can reduce the number of linear equations, hence it suffices to only focus on the case where $m le n$.
If $m>n$, it means there are redundancy in the constraints of which you can reduce the number of linear equations, hence it suffices to only focus on the case where $m le n$.
answered Aug 1 at 14:30


Siong Thye Goh
76.7k134794
76.7k134794
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Each equality constraint may be used to eliminate one variable, so the standard problem consists only of inequality constraints. Each has a slack or surplus variable added to convert it to an equality, so the number of variables n always exceeds the number of constraints m.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Each equality constraint may be used to eliminate one variable, so the standard problem consists only of inequality constraints. Each has a slack or surplus variable added to convert it to an equality, so the number of variables n always exceeds the number of constraints m.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Each equality constraint may be used to eliminate one variable, so the standard problem consists only of inequality constraints. Each has a slack or surplus variable added to convert it to an equality, so the number of variables n always exceeds the number of constraints m.
Each equality constraint may be used to eliminate one variable, so the standard problem consists only of inequality constraints. Each has a slack or surplus variable added to convert it to an equality, so the number of variables n always exceeds the number of constraints m.
answered Aug 2 at 21:00
GarryB
1
1
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2869126%2fnumber-of-equations-and-variables-in-a-linear-programming-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
if m> n then how will you solve for the extra (m-n) variables then you can only obtain the solution in form of the left variables
– James
Aug 1 at 14:32
The missing information in your question is that the "m" equations have to be independent . If this is the case the necceassry condition that the equation system has a solution is $mleq n$ If they are independent and $m>n$ no solution exists.
– callculus
Aug 1 at 14:55
@James You probably mean $m<n$.
– callculus
Aug 1 at 15:58