Partial derivatives: Prove $fracdx_2dx_1=-fracMU_1MU_2$
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
This is actually an economics question but it involves partial derivatives, so I thought it would be better to ask it here.
Let $u(x_1, x_2)$ be a function of 2 variables.
Let $displaystyle MU_1=fracpartial upartial x_1$ and $displaystyle MU_2=fracpartial upartial x_2$.
Suppose $u(x_1, x_2)=c$ for some constant $c$, show that $displaystylefracdx_2dx_1=-fracMU_1MU_2$.
partial-derivative
add a comment |Â
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
This is actually an economics question but it involves partial derivatives, so I thought it would be better to ask it here.
Let $u(x_1, x_2)$ be a function of 2 variables.
Let $displaystyle MU_1=fracpartial upartial x_1$ and $displaystyle MU_2=fracpartial upartial x_2$.
Suppose $u(x_1, x_2)=c$ for some constant $c$, show that $displaystylefracdx_2dx_1=-fracMU_1MU_2$.
partial-derivative
What have you worked out so far ?
– Ahmad Bazzi
Jul 31 at 19:58
1
Do you know Dini's theorem?
– edo1998
Jul 31 at 20:05
1
Is $x_2$ defined as solution to $u(x_1, x_2(x_1))=c$ for some constant $c$
– Rumpelstiltskin
Jul 31 at 20:15
@Adam Oops, I forgot about the $c$. I've edited my post.
– Thomas
Jul 31 at 20:35
1
It's called the implicit function theorem, which is also apparently called Dini's theorem in Italy, which explains edo1998's comment
– Rumpelstiltskin
Jul 31 at 21:11
add a comment |Â
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
This is actually an economics question but it involves partial derivatives, so I thought it would be better to ask it here.
Let $u(x_1, x_2)$ be a function of 2 variables.
Let $displaystyle MU_1=fracpartial upartial x_1$ and $displaystyle MU_2=fracpartial upartial x_2$.
Suppose $u(x_1, x_2)=c$ for some constant $c$, show that $displaystylefracdx_2dx_1=-fracMU_1MU_2$.
partial-derivative
This is actually an economics question but it involves partial derivatives, so I thought it would be better to ask it here.
Let $u(x_1, x_2)$ be a function of 2 variables.
Let $displaystyle MU_1=fracpartial upartial x_1$ and $displaystyle MU_2=fracpartial upartial x_2$.
Suppose $u(x_1, x_2)=c$ for some constant $c$, show that $displaystylefracdx_2dx_1=-fracMU_1MU_2$.
partial-derivative
edited Jul 31 at 20:37
asked Jul 31 at 19:53
Thomas
574313
574313
What have you worked out so far ?
– Ahmad Bazzi
Jul 31 at 19:58
1
Do you know Dini's theorem?
– edo1998
Jul 31 at 20:05
1
Is $x_2$ defined as solution to $u(x_1, x_2(x_1))=c$ for some constant $c$
– Rumpelstiltskin
Jul 31 at 20:15
@Adam Oops, I forgot about the $c$. I've edited my post.
– Thomas
Jul 31 at 20:35
1
It's called the implicit function theorem, which is also apparently called Dini's theorem in Italy, which explains edo1998's comment
– Rumpelstiltskin
Jul 31 at 21:11
add a comment |Â
What have you worked out so far ?
– Ahmad Bazzi
Jul 31 at 19:58
1
Do you know Dini's theorem?
– edo1998
Jul 31 at 20:05
1
Is $x_2$ defined as solution to $u(x_1, x_2(x_1))=c$ for some constant $c$
– Rumpelstiltskin
Jul 31 at 20:15
@Adam Oops, I forgot about the $c$. I've edited my post.
– Thomas
Jul 31 at 20:35
1
It's called the implicit function theorem, which is also apparently called Dini's theorem in Italy, which explains edo1998's comment
– Rumpelstiltskin
Jul 31 at 21:11
What have you worked out so far ?
– Ahmad Bazzi
Jul 31 at 19:58
What have you worked out so far ?
– Ahmad Bazzi
Jul 31 at 19:58
1
1
Do you know Dini's theorem?
– edo1998
Jul 31 at 20:05
Do you know Dini's theorem?
– edo1998
Jul 31 at 20:05
1
1
Is $x_2$ defined as solution to $u(x_1, x_2(x_1))=c$ for some constant $c$
– Rumpelstiltskin
Jul 31 at 20:15
Is $x_2$ defined as solution to $u(x_1, x_2(x_1))=c$ for some constant $c$
– Rumpelstiltskin
Jul 31 at 20:15
@Adam Oops, I forgot about the $c$. I've edited my post.
– Thomas
Jul 31 at 20:35
@Adam Oops, I forgot about the $c$. I've edited my post.
– Thomas
Jul 31 at 20:35
1
1
It's called the implicit function theorem, which is also apparently called Dini's theorem in Italy, which explains edo1998's comment
– Rumpelstiltskin
Jul 31 at 21:11
It's called the implicit function theorem, which is also apparently called Dini's theorem in Italy, which explains edo1998's comment
– Rumpelstiltskin
Jul 31 at 21:11
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
I think I've got it!
Consider the equation $u(x_1, x_2)=c$. Let $x_2=f(x_1)$.
Then $u$ is a differentiable function of $x_1$ (only).
$displaystylefracdudx_1=fracpartial upartial x_1fracdx_1dx_1+fracpartial upartial x_2fracdx_2dx_1$
Since $u$ is a constant function of $x_1$ (only), $displaystylefracdudx_1=0$.
So, $displaystyle 0=MU_1cdot 1+MU_2fracdx_2dx_1$
$displaystyleimplies MU_2fracdx_2dx_1=-MU_1$
$displaystylefracdx_2dx_1=frac-MU_1MU_2$
QED
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
I think I've got it!
Consider the equation $u(x_1, x_2)=c$. Let $x_2=f(x_1)$.
Then $u$ is a differentiable function of $x_1$ (only).
$displaystylefracdudx_1=fracpartial upartial x_1fracdx_1dx_1+fracpartial upartial x_2fracdx_2dx_1$
Since $u$ is a constant function of $x_1$ (only), $displaystylefracdudx_1=0$.
So, $displaystyle 0=MU_1cdot 1+MU_2fracdx_2dx_1$
$displaystyleimplies MU_2fracdx_2dx_1=-MU_1$
$displaystylefracdx_2dx_1=frac-MU_1MU_2$
QED
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
I think I've got it!
Consider the equation $u(x_1, x_2)=c$. Let $x_2=f(x_1)$.
Then $u$ is a differentiable function of $x_1$ (only).
$displaystylefracdudx_1=fracpartial upartial x_1fracdx_1dx_1+fracpartial upartial x_2fracdx_2dx_1$
Since $u$ is a constant function of $x_1$ (only), $displaystylefracdudx_1=0$.
So, $displaystyle 0=MU_1cdot 1+MU_2fracdx_2dx_1$
$displaystyleimplies MU_2fracdx_2dx_1=-MU_1$
$displaystylefracdx_2dx_1=frac-MU_1MU_2$
QED
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
I think I've got it!
Consider the equation $u(x_1, x_2)=c$. Let $x_2=f(x_1)$.
Then $u$ is a differentiable function of $x_1$ (only).
$displaystylefracdudx_1=fracpartial upartial x_1fracdx_1dx_1+fracpartial upartial x_2fracdx_2dx_1$
Since $u$ is a constant function of $x_1$ (only), $displaystylefracdudx_1=0$.
So, $displaystyle 0=MU_1cdot 1+MU_2fracdx_2dx_1$
$displaystyleimplies MU_2fracdx_2dx_1=-MU_1$
$displaystylefracdx_2dx_1=frac-MU_1MU_2$
QED
I think I've got it!
Consider the equation $u(x_1, x_2)=c$. Let $x_2=f(x_1)$.
Then $u$ is a differentiable function of $x_1$ (only).
$displaystylefracdudx_1=fracpartial upartial x_1fracdx_1dx_1+fracpartial upartial x_2fracdx_2dx_1$
Since $u$ is a constant function of $x_1$ (only), $displaystylefracdudx_1=0$.
So, $displaystyle 0=MU_1cdot 1+MU_2fracdx_2dx_1$
$displaystyleimplies MU_2fracdx_2dx_1=-MU_1$
$displaystylefracdx_2dx_1=frac-MU_1MU_2$
QED
edited Jul 31 at 22:17
answered Jul 31 at 21:01
Thomas
574313
574313
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2868423%2fpartial-derivatives-prove-fracdx-2dx-1-fracmu-1mu-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
What have you worked out so far ?
– Ahmad Bazzi
Jul 31 at 19:58
1
Do you know Dini's theorem?
– edo1998
Jul 31 at 20:05
1
Is $x_2$ defined as solution to $u(x_1, x_2(x_1))=c$ for some constant $c$
– Rumpelstiltskin
Jul 31 at 20:15
@Adam Oops, I forgot about the $c$. I've edited my post.
– Thomas
Jul 31 at 20:35
1
It's called the implicit function theorem, which is also apparently called Dini's theorem in Italy, which explains edo1998's comment
– Rumpelstiltskin
Jul 31 at 21:11