Partial derivatives: Prove $fracdx_2dx_1=-fracMU_1MU_2$

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
-1
down vote

favorite












This is actually an economics question but it involves partial derivatives, so I thought it would be better to ask it here.



Let $u(x_1, x_2)$ be a function of 2 variables.



Let $displaystyle MU_1=fracpartial upartial x_1$ and $displaystyle MU_2=fracpartial upartial x_2$.



Suppose $u(x_1, x_2)=c$ for some constant $c$, show that $displaystylefracdx_2dx_1=-fracMU_1MU_2$.







share|cite|improve this question





















  • What have you worked out so far ?
    – Ahmad Bazzi
    Jul 31 at 19:58






  • 1




    Do you know Dini's theorem?
    – edo1998
    Jul 31 at 20:05






  • 1




    Is $x_2$ defined as solution to $u(x_1, x_2(x_1))=c$ for some constant $c$
    – Rumpelstiltskin
    Jul 31 at 20:15










  • @Adam Oops, I forgot about the $c$. I've edited my post.
    – Thomas
    Jul 31 at 20:35






  • 1




    It's called the implicit function theorem, which is also apparently called Dini's theorem in Italy, which explains edo1998's comment
    – Rumpelstiltskin
    Jul 31 at 21:11















up vote
-1
down vote

favorite












This is actually an economics question but it involves partial derivatives, so I thought it would be better to ask it here.



Let $u(x_1, x_2)$ be a function of 2 variables.



Let $displaystyle MU_1=fracpartial upartial x_1$ and $displaystyle MU_2=fracpartial upartial x_2$.



Suppose $u(x_1, x_2)=c$ for some constant $c$, show that $displaystylefracdx_2dx_1=-fracMU_1MU_2$.







share|cite|improve this question





















  • What have you worked out so far ?
    – Ahmad Bazzi
    Jul 31 at 19:58






  • 1




    Do you know Dini's theorem?
    – edo1998
    Jul 31 at 20:05






  • 1




    Is $x_2$ defined as solution to $u(x_1, x_2(x_1))=c$ for some constant $c$
    – Rumpelstiltskin
    Jul 31 at 20:15










  • @Adam Oops, I forgot about the $c$. I've edited my post.
    – Thomas
    Jul 31 at 20:35






  • 1




    It's called the implicit function theorem, which is also apparently called Dini's theorem in Italy, which explains edo1998's comment
    – Rumpelstiltskin
    Jul 31 at 21:11













up vote
-1
down vote

favorite









up vote
-1
down vote

favorite











This is actually an economics question but it involves partial derivatives, so I thought it would be better to ask it here.



Let $u(x_1, x_2)$ be a function of 2 variables.



Let $displaystyle MU_1=fracpartial upartial x_1$ and $displaystyle MU_2=fracpartial upartial x_2$.



Suppose $u(x_1, x_2)=c$ for some constant $c$, show that $displaystylefracdx_2dx_1=-fracMU_1MU_2$.







share|cite|improve this question













This is actually an economics question but it involves partial derivatives, so I thought it would be better to ask it here.



Let $u(x_1, x_2)$ be a function of 2 variables.



Let $displaystyle MU_1=fracpartial upartial x_1$ and $displaystyle MU_2=fracpartial upartial x_2$.



Suppose $u(x_1, x_2)=c$ for some constant $c$, show that $displaystylefracdx_2dx_1=-fracMU_1MU_2$.









share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 31 at 20:37
























asked Jul 31 at 19:53









Thomas

574313




574313











  • What have you worked out so far ?
    – Ahmad Bazzi
    Jul 31 at 19:58






  • 1




    Do you know Dini's theorem?
    – edo1998
    Jul 31 at 20:05






  • 1




    Is $x_2$ defined as solution to $u(x_1, x_2(x_1))=c$ for some constant $c$
    – Rumpelstiltskin
    Jul 31 at 20:15










  • @Adam Oops, I forgot about the $c$. I've edited my post.
    – Thomas
    Jul 31 at 20:35






  • 1




    It's called the implicit function theorem, which is also apparently called Dini's theorem in Italy, which explains edo1998's comment
    – Rumpelstiltskin
    Jul 31 at 21:11

















  • What have you worked out so far ?
    – Ahmad Bazzi
    Jul 31 at 19:58






  • 1




    Do you know Dini's theorem?
    – edo1998
    Jul 31 at 20:05






  • 1




    Is $x_2$ defined as solution to $u(x_1, x_2(x_1))=c$ for some constant $c$
    – Rumpelstiltskin
    Jul 31 at 20:15










  • @Adam Oops, I forgot about the $c$. I've edited my post.
    – Thomas
    Jul 31 at 20:35






  • 1




    It's called the implicit function theorem, which is also apparently called Dini's theorem in Italy, which explains edo1998's comment
    – Rumpelstiltskin
    Jul 31 at 21:11
















What have you worked out so far ?
– Ahmad Bazzi
Jul 31 at 19:58




What have you worked out so far ?
– Ahmad Bazzi
Jul 31 at 19:58




1




1




Do you know Dini's theorem?
– edo1998
Jul 31 at 20:05




Do you know Dini's theorem?
– edo1998
Jul 31 at 20:05




1




1




Is $x_2$ defined as solution to $u(x_1, x_2(x_1))=c$ for some constant $c$
– Rumpelstiltskin
Jul 31 at 20:15




Is $x_2$ defined as solution to $u(x_1, x_2(x_1))=c$ for some constant $c$
– Rumpelstiltskin
Jul 31 at 20:15












@Adam Oops, I forgot about the $c$. I've edited my post.
– Thomas
Jul 31 at 20:35




@Adam Oops, I forgot about the $c$. I've edited my post.
– Thomas
Jul 31 at 20:35




1




1




It's called the implicit function theorem, which is also apparently called Dini's theorem in Italy, which explains edo1998's comment
– Rumpelstiltskin
Jul 31 at 21:11





It's called the implicit function theorem, which is also apparently called Dini's theorem in Italy, which explains edo1998's comment
– Rumpelstiltskin
Jul 31 at 21:11











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote













I think I've got it!



Consider the equation $u(x_1, x_2)=c$. Let $x_2=f(x_1)$.



Then $u$ is a differentiable function of $x_1$ (only).



$displaystylefracdudx_1=fracpartial upartial x_1fracdx_1dx_1+fracpartial upartial x_2fracdx_2dx_1$



Since $u$ is a constant function of $x_1$ (only), $displaystylefracdudx_1=0$.



So, $displaystyle 0=MU_1cdot 1+MU_2fracdx_2dx_1$



$displaystyleimplies MU_2fracdx_2dx_1=-MU_1$



$displaystylefracdx_2dx_1=frac-MU_1MU_2$



QED






share|cite|improve this answer























    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );








     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2868423%2fpartial-derivatives-prove-fracdx-2dx-1-fracmu-1mu-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    0
    down vote













    I think I've got it!



    Consider the equation $u(x_1, x_2)=c$. Let $x_2=f(x_1)$.



    Then $u$ is a differentiable function of $x_1$ (only).



    $displaystylefracdudx_1=fracpartial upartial x_1fracdx_1dx_1+fracpartial upartial x_2fracdx_2dx_1$



    Since $u$ is a constant function of $x_1$ (only), $displaystylefracdudx_1=0$.



    So, $displaystyle 0=MU_1cdot 1+MU_2fracdx_2dx_1$



    $displaystyleimplies MU_2fracdx_2dx_1=-MU_1$



    $displaystylefracdx_2dx_1=frac-MU_1MU_2$



    QED






    share|cite|improve this answer



























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      I think I've got it!



      Consider the equation $u(x_1, x_2)=c$. Let $x_2=f(x_1)$.



      Then $u$ is a differentiable function of $x_1$ (only).



      $displaystylefracdudx_1=fracpartial upartial x_1fracdx_1dx_1+fracpartial upartial x_2fracdx_2dx_1$



      Since $u$ is a constant function of $x_1$ (only), $displaystylefracdudx_1=0$.



      So, $displaystyle 0=MU_1cdot 1+MU_2fracdx_2dx_1$



      $displaystyleimplies MU_2fracdx_2dx_1=-MU_1$



      $displaystylefracdx_2dx_1=frac-MU_1MU_2$



      QED






      share|cite|improve this answer

























        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        I think I've got it!



        Consider the equation $u(x_1, x_2)=c$. Let $x_2=f(x_1)$.



        Then $u$ is a differentiable function of $x_1$ (only).



        $displaystylefracdudx_1=fracpartial upartial x_1fracdx_1dx_1+fracpartial upartial x_2fracdx_2dx_1$



        Since $u$ is a constant function of $x_1$ (only), $displaystylefracdudx_1=0$.



        So, $displaystyle 0=MU_1cdot 1+MU_2fracdx_2dx_1$



        $displaystyleimplies MU_2fracdx_2dx_1=-MU_1$



        $displaystylefracdx_2dx_1=frac-MU_1MU_2$



        QED






        share|cite|improve this answer















        I think I've got it!



        Consider the equation $u(x_1, x_2)=c$. Let $x_2=f(x_1)$.



        Then $u$ is a differentiable function of $x_1$ (only).



        $displaystylefracdudx_1=fracpartial upartial x_1fracdx_1dx_1+fracpartial upartial x_2fracdx_2dx_1$



        Since $u$ is a constant function of $x_1$ (only), $displaystylefracdudx_1=0$.



        So, $displaystyle 0=MU_1cdot 1+MU_2fracdx_2dx_1$



        $displaystyleimplies MU_2fracdx_2dx_1=-MU_1$



        $displaystylefracdx_2dx_1=frac-MU_1MU_2$



        QED







        share|cite|improve this answer















        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Jul 31 at 22:17


























        answered Jul 31 at 21:01









        Thomas

        574313




        574313






















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


























             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2868423%2fpartial-derivatives-prove-fracdx-2dx-1-fracmu-1mu-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            Comments

            Popular posts from this blog

            What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

            Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

            Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?