BO(-) example in Weiss Calculus

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












I'nm reading Orthogonal Calculus by Michael Weiss, and trying to understand example 2.7, concerning the derivatives of the functor $BO$, which sends a (finite dimensional) inner product space to the classifying space of its orthogonal group.



My question concerns the homotopy equivalence between the homotopy fiber of the map
$$
BO(V) to BO(Voplus BbbR)
$$
and $O(BbbR oplus V)/ O(V)$, and the subsequent homotopy equivalence of this, and the one-point compactificiation of $V$.



By guess for the first one is to use the fact that $BO(V) = Gr(dim V, BbbR^infty)$, where $Gr$ denotes the Grassmannian manifold, and that there is fibre sequence
$$
O(V) to Vr(dim V, BbbR^infty) to Gr(dim V+1, BbbR^infty)
$$
where $Vr$ denotes the Steifel manifold (which is contractible).



Although, I'm not overly sure how this helps.



I'm clueless on the second on currently.



Any references or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.







share|cite|improve this question

























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite












    I'nm reading Orthogonal Calculus by Michael Weiss, and trying to understand example 2.7, concerning the derivatives of the functor $BO$, which sends a (finite dimensional) inner product space to the classifying space of its orthogonal group.



    My question concerns the homotopy equivalence between the homotopy fiber of the map
    $$
    BO(V) to BO(Voplus BbbR)
    $$
    and $O(BbbR oplus V)/ O(V)$, and the subsequent homotopy equivalence of this, and the one-point compactificiation of $V$.



    By guess for the first one is to use the fact that $BO(V) = Gr(dim V, BbbR^infty)$, where $Gr$ denotes the Grassmannian manifold, and that there is fibre sequence
    $$
    O(V) to Vr(dim V, BbbR^infty) to Gr(dim V+1, BbbR^infty)
    $$
    where $Vr$ denotes the Steifel manifold (which is contractible).



    Although, I'm not overly sure how this helps.



    I'm clueless on the second on currently.



    Any references or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.







    share|cite|improve this question























      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite











      I'nm reading Orthogonal Calculus by Michael Weiss, and trying to understand example 2.7, concerning the derivatives of the functor $BO$, which sends a (finite dimensional) inner product space to the classifying space of its orthogonal group.



      My question concerns the homotopy equivalence between the homotopy fiber of the map
      $$
      BO(V) to BO(Voplus BbbR)
      $$
      and $O(BbbR oplus V)/ O(V)$, and the subsequent homotopy equivalence of this, and the one-point compactificiation of $V$.



      By guess for the first one is to use the fact that $BO(V) = Gr(dim V, BbbR^infty)$, where $Gr$ denotes the Grassmannian manifold, and that there is fibre sequence
      $$
      O(V) to Vr(dim V, BbbR^infty) to Gr(dim V+1, BbbR^infty)
      $$
      where $Vr$ denotes the Steifel manifold (which is contractible).



      Although, I'm not overly sure how this helps.



      I'm clueless on the second on currently.



      Any references or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.







      share|cite|improve this question













      I'nm reading Orthogonal Calculus by Michael Weiss, and trying to understand example 2.7, concerning the derivatives of the functor $BO$, which sends a (finite dimensional) inner product space to the classifying space of its orthogonal group.



      My question concerns the homotopy equivalence between the homotopy fiber of the map
      $$
      BO(V) to BO(Voplus BbbR)
      $$
      and $O(BbbR oplus V)/ O(V)$, and the subsequent homotopy equivalence of this, and the one-point compactificiation of $V$.



      By guess for the first one is to use the fact that $BO(V) = Gr(dim V, BbbR^infty)$, where $Gr$ denotes the Grassmannian manifold, and that there is fibre sequence
      $$
      O(V) to Vr(dim V, BbbR^infty) to Gr(dim V+1, BbbR^infty)
      $$
      where $Vr$ denotes the Steifel manifold (which is contractible).



      Although, I'm not overly sure how this helps.



      I'm clueless on the second on currently.



      Any references or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.









      share|cite|improve this question












      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jul 26 at 21:48
























      asked Jul 26 at 19:57









      AlgTop

      1113




      1113




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote













          I haven't looked at the paper in a while, but I think you want



          $$F^(1)(V)simeq hofibleft(BO(V)rightarrow BO(VoplusmathbbR)right)$$



          without the loop functor, rather than with it, since we want $m=0$ in Proposition 2.2. (Here I'm using Weiss's notation of $F(V)=BO(V)$ from the Example 2.7.)



          Then the map in the definition of $F^(1)$ is just the map induced by the incusion $O(V)hookrightarrow O(VoplusmathbbR)$ so clearly



          $$F^(1)(V)simeq O(VoplusmathbbR)/O(V).$$



          Now by definition $O(VoplusmathbbR)$ acts transitively on the unit sphere $S(VoplusmathbbR)$ of length one vectors in $VoplusmathbbR$, and the stabiliser of the line $mathbbR$ is exactly $O(V)$. Hence $O(VoplusmathbbR)/O(V)cong S(VoplusmathbbR)$. Finally applying stereographic projection we get $S(VoplusmathbbR)cong S^V$ (see, for instance, the nlab page https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/representation+sphere). Therefore



          $$F^(1)(V)simeq S^V$$



          as claimed.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Why is it clear that the homotopy fiber of the map induced by inclusion is $O(V oplus BbbR)/O(V)$?
            – AlgTop
            Jul 26 at 21:48






          • 1




            Since we have a fibration sequence $O(V)hookrightarrow O(VoplusmathbbR)rightarrow O(Voplus mathbbR)/O(V)$, and the map $BO(V)rightarrow BO(VoplusmathbbR)$, of which $F^(1)$ is the homotopy fibre, is exactly a delooping of the first map in this sequence.
            – Tyrone
            Jul 27 at 9:27











          • Thanks for the help! Do you happen to know of any places where I can read about homotopy fibers of this kind?
            – AlgTop
            Jul 27 at 18:49










          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );








           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2863758%2fbo-example-in-weiss-calculus%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          1
          down vote













          I haven't looked at the paper in a while, but I think you want



          $$F^(1)(V)simeq hofibleft(BO(V)rightarrow BO(VoplusmathbbR)right)$$



          without the loop functor, rather than with it, since we want $m=0$ in Proposition 2.2. (Here I'm using Weiss's notation of $F(V)=BO(V)$ from the Example 2.7.)



          Then the map in the definition of $F^(1)$ is just the map induced by the incusion $O(V)hookrightarrow O(VoplusmathbbR)$ so clearly



          $$F^(1)(V)simeq O(VoplusmathbbR)/O(V).$$



          Now by definition $O(VoplusmathbbR)$ acts transitively on the unit sphere $S(VoplusmathbbR)$ of length one vectors in $VoplusmathbbR$, and the stabiliser of the line $mathbbR$ is exactly $O(V)$. Hence $O(VoplusmathbbR)/O(V)cong S(VoplusmathbbR)$. Finally applying stereographic projection we get $S(VoplusmathbbR)cong S^V$ (see, for instance, the nlab page https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/representation+sphere). Therefore



          $$F^(1)(V)simeq S^V$$



          as claimed.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Why is it clear that the homotopy fiber of the map induced by inclusion is $O(V oplus BbbR)/O(V)$?
            – AlgTop
            Jul 26 at 21:48






          • 1




            Since we have a fibration sequence $O(V)hookrightarrow O(VoplusmathbbR)rightarrow O(Voplus mathbbR)/O(V)$, and the map $BO(V)rightarrow BO(VoplusmathbbR)$, of which $F^(1)$ is the homotopy fibre, is exactly a delooping of the first map in this sequence.
            – Tyrone
            Jul 27 at 9:27











          • Thanks for the help! Do you happen to know of any places where I can read about homotopy fibers of this kind?
            – AlgTop
            Jul 27 at 18:49














          up vote
          1
          down vote













          I haven't looked at the paper in a while, but I think you want



          $$F^(1)(V)simeq hofibleft(BO(V)rightarrow BO(VoplusmathbbR)right)$$



          without the loop functor, rather than with it, since we want $m=0$ in Proposition 2.2. (Here I'm using Weiss's notation of $F(V)=BO(V)$ from the Example 2.7.)



          Then the map in the definition of $F^(1)$ is just the map induced by the incusion $O(V)hookrightarrow O(VoplusmathbbR)$ so clearly



          $$F^(1)(V)simeq O(VoplusmathbbR)/O(V).$$



          Now by definition $O(VoplusmathbbR)$ acts transitively on the unit sphere $S(VoplusmathbbR)$ of length one vectors in $VoplusmathbbR$, and the stabiliser of the line $mathbbR$ is exactly $O(V)$. Hence $O(VoplusmathbbR)/O(V)cong S(VoplusmathbbR)$. Finally applying stereographic projection we get $S(VoplusmathbbR)cong S^V$ (see, for instance, the nlab page https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/representation+sphere). Therefore



          $$F^(1)(V)simeq S^V$$



          as claimed.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Why is it clear that the homotopy fiber of the map induced by inclusion is $O(V oplus BbbR)/O(V)$?
            – AlgTop
            Jul 26 at 21:48






          • 1




            Since we have a fibration sequence $O(V)hookrightarrow O(VoplusmathbbR)rightarrow O(Voplus mathbbR)/O(V)$, and the map $BO(V)rightarrow BO(VoplusmathbbR)$, of which $F^(1)$ is the homotopy fibre, is exactly a delooping of the first map in this sequence.
            – Tyrone
            Jul 27 at 9:27











          • Thanks for the help! Do you happen to know of any places where I can read about homotopy fibers of this kind?
            – AlgTop
            Jul 27 at 18:49












          up vote
          1
          down vote










          up vote
          1
          down vote









          I haven't looked at the paper in a while, but I think you want



          $$F^(1)(V)simeq hofibleft(BO(V)rightarrow BO(VoplusmathbbR)right)$$



          without the loop functor, rather than with it, since we want $m=0$ in Proposition 2.2. (Here I'm using Weiss's notation of $F(V)=BO(V)$ from the Example 2.7.)



          Then the map in the definition of $F^(1)$ is just the map induced by the incusion $O(V)hookrightarrow O(VoplusmathbbR)$ so clearly



          $$F^(1)(V)simeq O(VoplusmathbbR)/O(V).$$



          Now by definition $O(VoplusmathbbR)$ acts transitively on the unit sphere $S(VoplusmathbbR)$ of length one vectors in $VoplusmathbbR$, and the stabiliser of the line $mathbbR$ is exactly $O(V)$. Hence $O(VoplusmathbbR)/O(V)cong S(VoplusmathbbR)$. Finally applying stereographic projection we get $S(VoplusmathbbR)cong S^V$ (see, for instance, the nlab page https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/representation+sphere). Therefore



          $$F^(1)(V)simeq S^V$$



          as claimed.






          share|cite|improve this answer













          I haven't looked at the paper in a while, but I think you want



          $$F^(1)(V)simeq hofibleft(BO(V)rightarrow BO(VoplusmathbbR)right)$$



          without the loop functor, rather than with it, since we want $m=0$ in Proposition 2.2. (Here I'm using Weiss's notation of $F(V)=BO(V)$ from the Example 2.7.)



          Then the map in the definition of $F^(1)$ is just the map induced by the incusion $O(V)hookrightarrow O(VoplusmathbbR)$ so clearly



          $$F^(1)(V)simeq O(VoplusmathbbR)/O(V).$$



          Now by definition $O(VoplusmathbbR)$ acts transitively on the unit sphere $S(VoplusmathbbR)$ of length one vectors in $VoplusmathbbR$, and the stabiliser of the line $mathbbR$ is exactly $O(V)$. Hence $O(VoplusmathbbR)/O(V)cong S(VoplusmathbbR)$. Finally applying stereographic projection we get $S(VoplusmathbbR)cong S^V$ (see, for instance, the nlab page https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/representation+sphere). Therefore



          $$F^(1)(V)simeq S^V$$



          as claimed.







          share|cite|improve this answer













          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer











          answered Jul 26 at 20:51









          Tyrone

          3,23611025




          3,23611025











          • Why is it clear that the homotopy fiber of the map induced by inclusion is $O(V oplus BbbR)/O(V)$?
            – AlgTop
            Jul 26 at 21:48






          • 1




            Since we have a fibration sequence $O(V)hookrightarrow O(VoplusmathbbR)rightarrow O(Voplus mathbbR)/O(V)$, and the map $BO(V)rightarrow BO(VoplusmathbbR)$, of which $F^(1)$ is the homotopy fibre, is exactly a delooping of the first map in this sequence.
            – Tyrone
            Jul 27 at 9:27











          • Thanks for the help! Do you happen to know of any places where I can read about homotopy fibers of this kind?
            – AlgTop
            Jul 27 at 18:49
















          • Why is it clear that the homotopy fiber of the map induced by inclusion is $O(V oplus BbbR)/O(V)$?
            – AlgTop
            Jul 26 at 21:48






          • 1




            Since we have a fibration sequence $O(V)hookrightarrow O(VoplusmathbbR)rightarrow O(Voplus mathbbR)/O(V)$, and the map $BO(V)rightarrow BO(VoplusmathbbR)$, of which $F^(1)$ is the homotopy fibre, is exactly a delooping of the first map in this sequence.
            – Tyrone
            Jul 27 at 9:27











          • Thanks for the help! Do you happen to know of any places where I can read about homotopy fibers of this kind?
            – AlgTop
            Jul 27 at 18:49















          Why is it clear that the homotopy fiber of the map induced by inclusion is $O(V oplus BbbR)/O(V)$?
          – AlgTop
          Jul 26 at 21:48




          Why is it clear that the homotopy fiber of the map induced by inclusion is $O(V oplus BbbR)/O(V)$?
          – AlgTop
          Jul 26 at 21:48




          1




          1




          Since we have a fibration sequence $O(V)hookrightarrow O(VoplusmathbbR)rightarrow O(Voplus mathbbR)/O(V)$, and the map $BO(V)rightarrow BO(VoplusmathbbR)$, of which $F^(1)$ is the homotopy fibre, is exactly a delooping of the first map in this sequence.
          – Tyrone
          Jul 27 at 9:27





          Since we have a fibration sequence $O(V)hookrightarrow O(VoplusmathbbR)rightarrow O(Voplus mathbbR)/O(V)$, and the map $BO(V)rightarrow BO(VoplusmathbbR)$, of which $F^(1)$ is the homotopy fibre, is exactly a delooping of the first map in this sequence.
          – Tyrone
          Jul 27 at 9:27













          Thanks for the help! Do you happen to know of any places where I can read about homotopy fibers of this kind?
          – AlgTop
          Jul 27 at 18:49




          Thanks for the help! Do you happen to know of any places where I can read about homotopy fibers of this kind?
          – AlgTop
          Jul 27 at 18:49












           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


























           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2863758%2fbo-example-in-weiss-calculus%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          Comments

          Popular posts from this blog

          What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

          Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?

          Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon