What can we say about invertible matrix $P$ under a condition that $A=PAP^-1$?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
5
down vote

favorite
1












Given an integral matrix $A$, we shall consider the set $$PAP^-1=A.$$
We can check that the set is a group under the matrix multiplication.



Can we say something algebraic for $P$? I am considering the concept of commutator to find some property for $P$. If you have another viewpoint or some comment, can you give it to me?




linear-algebra abstract-algebra inverse




share|cite|improve this question

















  • 6




    You can say that $A$ and $P$ commute.
    – Bernard
    Jul 26 at 15:58










  • What do you mean by an "integral matrix"?
    – xarles
    Jul 28 at 20:38










  • I meant a matrix whose entries are integers!
    – kswim
    Jul 29 at 16:12














up vote
5
down vote

favorite
1












Given an integral matrix $A$, we shall consider the set $$PAP^-1=A.$$
We can check that the set is a group under the matrix multiplication.



Can we say something algebraic for $P$? I am considering the concept of commutator to find some property for $P$. If you have another viewpoint or some comment, can you give it to me?




linear-algebra abstract-algebra inverse




share|cite|improve this question

















  • 6




    You can say that $A$ and $P$ commute.
    – Bernard
    Jul 26 at 15:58










  • What do you mean by an "integral matrix"?
    – xarles
    Jul 28 at 20:38










  • I meant a matrix whose entries are integers!
    – kswim
    Jul 29 at 16:12












up vote
5
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
5
down vote

favorite
1






1





Given an integral matrix $A$, we shall consider the set $$PAP^-1=A.$$
We can check that the set is a group under the matrix multiplication.



Can we say something algebraic for $P$? I am considering the concept of commutator to find some property for $P$. If you have another viewpoint or some comment, can you give it to me?




linear-algebra abstract-algebra inverse




share|cite|improve this question













Given an integral matrix $A$, we shall consider the set $$PAP^-1=A.$$
We can check that the set is a group under the matrix multiplication.



Can we say something algebraic for $P$? I am considering the concept of commutator to find some property for $P$. If you have another viewpoint or some comment, can you give it to me?





linear-algebra abstract-algebra inverse





share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 27 at 5:02









user26857

38.7k123678




38.7k123678









asked Jul 26 at 15:49









kswim

1427




1427







  • 6




    You can say that $A$ and $P$ commute.
    – Bernard
    Jul 26 at 15:58










  • What do you mean by an "integral matrix"?
    – xarles
    Jul 28 at 20:38










  • I meant a matrix whose entries are integers!
    – kswim
    Jul 29 at 16:12












  • 6




    You can say that $A$ and $P$ commute.
    – Bernard
    Jul 26 at 15:58










  • What do you mean by an "integral matrix"?
    – xarles
    Jul 28 at 20:38










  • I meant a matrix whose entries are integers!
    – kswim
    Jul 29 at 16:12







6




6




You can say that $A$ and $P$ commute.
– Bernard
Jul 26 at 15:58




You can say that $A$ and $P$ commute.
– Bernard
Jul 26 at 15:58












What do you mean by an "integral matrix"?
– xarles
Jul 28 at 20:38




What do you mean by an "integral matrix"?
– xarles
Jul 28 at 20:38












I meant a matrix whose entries are integers!
– kswim
Jul 29 at 16:12




I meant a matrix whose entries are integers!
– kswim
Jul 29 at 16:12










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote













Since you ask for something algebraic, the following is some more information that just commuting.



Let $mathbbF$ be a field. Denote by $C_A = AB=BA$ the centralizer of a matrix $A$. See also a neat way by Amritanshu Prasad to find the vector space dimension of $C_A$ over $mathbbF$. Denote by $G_A= AP=PA$. Then $G_A=Pin C_A$.



If we treat $mathbbF^n$ as a $mathbbF[x]$-module $M^A$ given by $xcdot v=Av$, then by the structure theorem for finitely generated modules over PID, we may write
$$
M^Asimeq bigopluslimits_p mathopopluslimits_i mathbbF[x]/(p^lambda_p,i),
$$
where $p$ runs over irreducible factor of the characteristic polynomial of $A$ and $lambda_p,i>0$ is the powers of $p$ appearing on the $p$-primary part of $M^A$. Then the centralizer of $A$ can be written as an $mathbbF[x]$-module endomorphism algebra
$
mathrmEnd_mathbbF[x](M^A).
$



Then we need invertible matrices in $
mathrmEnd_mathbbF[x](M^A).
$



In case when $mathbbF$ is a finite field, a method of obtaining such matrices $Pin G_A$ is outlined in Theorem 1.10.7 of Enumerative Combinatorics I. This method general and also applies when $mathbbF$ is not a finite field.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Do you have another literature in your mind about the centralizer of a matrix over an infinite field?
    – kswim
    Aug 3 at 18:50










  • I do not have another literature in my mind. For the centralizer of a matrix over an infinite field, the process of finding basis vectors work the same as in the finite field case.
    – i707107
    Aug 3 at 20:06










Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2863530%2fwhat-can-we-say-about-invertible-matrix-p-under-a-condition-that-a-pap-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

















1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
1
down vote













Since you ask for something algebraic, the following is some more information that just commuting.



Let $mathbbF$ be a field. Denote by $C_A = AB=BA$ the centralizer of a matrix $A$. See also a neat way by Amritanshu Prasad to find the vector space dimension of $C_A$ over $mathbbF$. Denote by $G_A= AP=PA$. Then $G_A=Pin C_A$.



If we treat $mathbbF^n$ as a $mathbbF[x]$-module $M^A$ given by $xcdot v=Av$, then by the structure theorem for finitely generated modules over PID, we may write
$$
M^Asimeq bigopluslimits_p mathopopluslimits_i mathbbF[x]/(p^lambda_p,i),
$$
where $p$ runs over irreducible factor of the characteristic polynomial of $A$ and $lambda_p,i>0$ is the powers of $p$ appearing on the $p$-primary part of $M^A$. Then the centralizer of $A$ can be written as an $mathbbF[x]$-module endomorphism algebra
$
mathrmEnd_mathbbF[x](M^A).
$



Then we need invertible matrices in $
mathrmEnd_mathbbF[x](M^A).
$



In case when $mathbbF$ is a finite field, a method of obtaining such matrices $Pin G_A$ is outlined in Theorem 1.10.7 of Enumerative Combinatorics I. This method general and also applies when $mathbbF$ is not a finite field.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Do you have another literature in your mind about the centralizer of a matrix over an infinite field?
    – kswim
    Aug 3 at 18:50










  • I do not have another literature in my mind. For the centralizer of a matrix over an infinite field, the process of finding basis vectors work the same as in the finite field case.
    – i707107
    Aug 3 at 20:06














up vote
1
down vote













Since you ask for something algebraic, the following is some more information that just commuting.



Let $mathbbF$ be a field. Denote by $C_A = AB=BA$ the centralizer of a matrix $A$. See also a neat way by Amritanshu Prasad to find the vector space dimension of $C_A$ over $mathbbF$. Denote by $G_A= AP=PA$. Then $G_A=Pin C_A$.



If we treat $mathbbF^n$ as a $mathbbF[x]$-module $M^A$ given by $xcdot v=Av$, then by the structure theorem for finitely generated modules over PID, we may write
$$
M^Asimeq bigopluslimits_p mathopopluslimits_i mathbbF[x]/(p^lambda_p,i),
$$
where $p$ runs over irreducible factor of the characteristic polynomial of $A$ and $lambda_p,i>0$ is the powers of $p$ appearing on the $p$-primary part of $M^A$. Then the centralizer of $A$ can be written as an $mathbbF[x]$-module endomorphism algebra
$
mathrmEnd_mathbbF[x](M^A).
$



Then we need invertible matrices in $
mathrmEnd_mathbbF[x](M^A).
$



In case when $mathbbF$ is a finite field, a method of obtaining such matrices $Pin G_A$ is outlined in Theorem 1.10.7 of Enumerative Combinatorics I. This method general and also applies when $mathbbF$ is not a finite field.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Do you have another literature in your mind about the centralizer of a matrix over an infinite field?
    – kswim
    Aug 3 at 18:50










  • I do not have another literature in my mind. For the centralizer of a matrix over an infinite field, the process of finding basis vectors work the same as in the finite field case.
    – i707107
    Aug 3 at 20:06












up vote
1
down vote










up vote
1
down vote









Since you ask for something algebraic, the following is some more information that just commuting.



Let $mathbbF$ be a field. Denote by $C_A = AB=BA$ the centralizer of a matrix $A$. See also a neat way by Amritanshu Prasad to find the vector space dimension of $C_A$ over $mathbbF$. Denote by $G_A= AP=PA$. Then $G_A=Pin C_A$.



If we treat $mathbbF^n$ as a $mathbbF[x]$-module $M^A$ given by $xcdot v=Av$, then by the structure theorem for finitely generated modules over PID, we may write
$$
M^Asimeq bigopluslimits_p mathopopluslimits_i mathbbF[x]/(p^lambda_p,i),
$$
where $p$ runs over irreducible factor of the characteristic polynomial of $A$ and $lambda_p,i>0$ is the powers of $p$ appearing on the $p$-primary part of $M^A$. Then the centralizer of $A$ can be written as an $mathbbF[x]$-module endomorphism algebra
$
mathrmEnd_mathbbF[x](M^A).
$



Then we need invertible matrices in $
mathrmEnd_mathbbF[x](M^A).
$



In case when $mathbbF$ is a finite field, a method of obtaining such matrices $Pin G_A$ is outlined in Theorem 1.10.7 of Enumerative Combinatorics I. This method general and also applies when $mathbbF$ is not a finite field.






share|cite|improve this answer













Since you ask for something algebraic, the following is some more information that just commuting.



Let $mathbbF$ be a field. Denote by $C_A = AB=BA$ the centralizer of a matrix $A$. See also a neat way by Amritanshu Prasad to find the vector space dimension of $C_A$ over $mathbbF$. Denote by $G_A= AP=PA$. Then $G_A=Pin C_A$.



If we treat $mathbbF^n$ as a $mathbbF[x]$-module $M^A$ given by $xcdot v=Av$, then by the structure theorem for finitely generated modules over PID, we may write
$$
M^Asimeq bigopluslimits_p mathopopluslimits_i mathbbF[x]/(p^lambda_p,i),
$$
where $p$ runs over irreducible factor of the characteristic polynomial of $A$ and $lambda_p,i>0$ is the powers of $p$ appearing on the $p$-primary part of $M^A$. Then the centralizer of $A$ can be written as an $mathbbF[x]$-module endomorphism algebra
$
mathrmEnd_mathbbF[x](M^A).
$



Then we need invertible matrices in $
mathrmEnd_mathbbF[x](M^A).
$



In case when $mathbbF$ is a finite field, a method of obtaining such matrices $Pin G_A$ is outlined in Theorem 1.10.7 of Enumerative Combinatorics I. This method general and also applies when $mathbbF$ is not a finite field.







share|cite|improve this answer













share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer











answered Jul 28 at 15:39









i707107

11.2k21241




11.2k21241











  • Do you have another literature in your mind about the centralizer of a matrix over an infinite field?
    – kswim
    Aug 3 at 18:50










  • I do not have another literature in my mind. For the centralizer of a matrix over an infinite field, the process of finding basis vectors work the same as in the finite field case.
    – i707107
    Aug 3 at 20:06
















  • Do you have another literature in your mind about the centralizer of a matrix over an infinite field?
    – kswim
    Aug 3 at 18:50










  • I do not have another literature in my mind. For the centralizer of a matrix over an infinite field, the process of finding basis vectors work the same as in the finite field case.
    – i707107
    Aug 3 at 20:06















Do you have another literature in your mind about the centralizer of a matrix over an infinite field?
– kswim
Aug 3 at 18:50




Do you have another literature in your mind about the centralizer of a matrix over an infinite field?
– kswim
Aug 3 at 18:50












I do not have another literature in my mind. For the centralizer of a matrix over an infinite field, the process of finding basis vectors work the same as in the finite field case.
– i707107
Aug 3 at 20:06




I do not have another literature in my mind. For the centralizer of a matrix over an infinite field, the process of finding basis vectors work the same as in the finite field case.
– i707107
Aug 3 at 20:06












 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2863530%2fwhat-can-we-say-about-invertible-matrix-p-under-a-condition-that-a-pap-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest
































































Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

Image
Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 5 down vote favorite 1 Here is the problem: For what $n$ is it possible to color the edges and diagonals of an $n$-side regular polygon with $dfracbinomn23$ colors, such that you use every color exactly three times and for every color the three segments (edges or diagonals) with that color form a triangle? Trivially $nequiv 0 text or 1 pmod3$. I can also prove that if the statement is true for $k$ than it is true for $3k$ as well. How to finish? Please help! Thanks combinatorial-geometry share | cite | improve this question edited Aug 6 at 21:57 alcana 118 4 asked Aug 6 at 21:15 Leo Gardner 356 11 Even assuming "polyhpn" in the title is a typo for polygon , it is unclear what you mean by "the edges and sides". Aren't the side of a regular polygon the same as the edges? A regular $n$-sided polygon has $n$ edges. – hardmath Aug 6 at 21:20 3 $n$ ne
Read more

Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?

Image
Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 2 down vote favorite We are studying adjoints in class, and I was curious if there is a relationship between the determinant of matrix A, and the determinant of the adjoint of matrix A? I assume there would be a relationship because finding the adjoint requires creating a cofactor matrix and then transposing it. linear-algebra determinant adjoint-operators share | cite | improve this question asked Nov 17 '17 at 17:32 CluelessCoder 32 5 For a square matrix $A$ of order $n$, we have $A(operatornameadj A)=(operatornameadj A)A=|A|I_n$ where $I_n$ is the identity matrix of order $n$. This should tell you about the determinant of the adjoint in terms of that of $A$ (use multiplicative property and other elementary properties of determinants). – Prasun Biswas Nov 17 '17 at 17:35 1 @CluelessCoder: see here: math.stackexchange.com/questions/516127/… – Hector Blandin Nov 17 &
Read more

What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

Image
Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 2 down vote favorite What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalized tilt? I've noticed that in most equations given to represent a cone, there is no parameter which defines the tilt of the cone in 3D space and that most of them have their point at the origin $(0,0,0)$ - I was wondering if anyone could give me a more generalized cone equation for a cone in any position in 3D space 3d share | cite | improve this question edited Jul 25 '16 at 0:05 ervx 9,425 3 13 36 asked Jul 24 '16 at 15:38 Charlene 11 2 2 Welcome to Math.SE! Could you please explain a few things to help people give an answer useful to you: 1. What do you mean by "generalized tilt"? 2. Are you asking about a right circular cone? Does the angle at the vertex matter? 3. What form of answer (implicit, parametric...?) are you looking for? 4. If this is homework, what tools do you have available, an
Read more