Check my Proof Please (Complex Analysis)

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
3
down vote

favorite












Question: Let $f$ be an analytic function in an open set $U$. Let $V = z in mathbbC : overlinez in U$. Define $g$ on $V$ by $g(z) = overlinef(overlinez)$. Show that $g$ is analytic on $V$ without using the fact that $g$ is holomorphic.



Proof Attempt: Choose $z_0 in V$. Then $overlinez_0 in U$. Since $f$ is analytic on $U$, there is an $r > 0$ and a sequence of complex numbers $a_n_n = 0^infty$ such that for $overlinez in D(overlinez_0, r)$, we have
$$f(overlinez) = sum_n = 0^infty a_n(overlinez - overlinez_0)^n$$
It follows that
$$g(z) = overlinef(overlinez) = sum_n = 0^infty overlinea_n(z - z_0)^n$$
for all $z in D(z_0, r)$. Thus, $g$ is analytic on $V$.







share|cite|improve this question

























    up vote
    3
    down vote

    favorite












    Question: Let $f$ be an analytic function in an open set $U$. Let $V = z in mathbbC : overlinez in U$. Define $g$ on $V$ by $g(z) = overlinef(overlinez)$. Show that $g$ is analytic on $V$ without using the fact that $g$ is holomorphic.



    Proof Attempt: Choose $z_0 in V$. Then $overlinez_0 in U$. Since $f$ is analytic on $U$, there is an $r > 0$ and a sequence of complex numbers $a_n_n = 0^infty$ such that for $overlinez in D(overlinez_0, r)$, we have
    $$f(overlinez) = sum_n = 0^infty a_n(overlinez - overlinez_0)^n$$
    It follows that
    $$g(z) = overlinef(overlinez) = sum_n = 0^infty overlinea_n(z - z_0)^n$$
    for all $z in D(z_0, r)$. Thus, $g$ is analytic on $V$.







    share|cite|improve this question























      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite











      Question: Let $f$ be an analytic function in an open set $U$. Let $V = z in mathbbC : overlinez in U$. Define $g$ on $V$ by $g(z) = overlinef(overlinez)$. Show that $g$ is analytic on $V$ without using the fact that $g$ is holomorphic.



      Proof Attempt: Choose $z_0 in V$. Then $overlinez_0 in U$. Since $f$ is analytic on $U$, there is an $r > 0$ and a sequence of complex numbers $a_n_n = 0^infty$ such that for $overlinez in D(overlinez_0, r)$, we have
      $$f(overlinez) = sum_n = 0^infty a_n(overlinez - overlinez_0)^n$$
      It follows that
      $$g(z) = overlinef(overlinez) = sum_n = 0^infty overlinea_n(z - z_0)^n$$
      for all $z in D(z_0, r)$. Thus, $g$ is analytic on $V$.







      share|cite|improve this question













      Question: Let $f$ be an analytic function in an open set $U$. Let $V = z in mathbbC : overlinez in U$. Define $g$ on $V$ by $g(z) = overlinef(overlinez)$. Show that $g$ is analytic on $V$ without using the fact that $g$ is holomorphic.



      Proof Attempt: Choose $z_0 in V$. Then $overlinez_0 in U$. Since $f$ is analytic on $U$, there is an $r > 0$ and a sequence of complex numbers $a_n_n = 0^infty$ such that for $overlinez in D(overlinez_0, r)$, we have
      $$f(overlinez) = sum_n = 0^infty a_n(overlinez - overlinez_0)^n$$
      It follows that
      $$g(z) = overlinef(overlinez) = sum_n = 0^infty overlinea_n(z - z_0)^n$$
      for all $z in D(z_0, r)$. Thus, $g$ is analytic on $V$.









      share|cite|improve this question












      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jul 26 at 20:33









      egreg

      164k1180187




      164k1180187









      asked Jul 26 at 19:13









      Bobo

      244




      244




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          Since conjugation is a homeomorphism, $V$ is open.



          Let $cin V$; then $barcin U$, so there is an $r>0$ such that $D(barc,r)subseteq U$ and $f$ can be written as
          $$
          f(z)=sum_n=0^inftya_n(z-barc)^n tag1
          $$
          for every $zin D(barc,r)$. Therefore
          $$
          f(barz)=sum_n=0^inftya_n(barz-barc)^n
          $$
          for every $zinoverlineD(barc,r)=D(c,r)$.



          The convergence is absolute on $D(barc,s)$, for every $0<s<r$, so it is not restrictive to assume the series $(1)$ is absolutely convergent on $D(barc,r)$ (by using $r/2$ instead of $r$).



          Then the series
          $$
          sum_n=0^inftyoverlinea_n(z-c)^n
          $$
          is absolutely convergent on $overlineD(barc,r)=D(c,r)$, so it defines an analytic function over this disk. Since
          $$
          sum_n=0^inftyoverlinea_n(z-c)^n=
          overlinesum_n=0^inftya_n(barz-barc)^n=
          overlinef(barz)
          $$
          we are done.




          Your idea is good, but the convergence of the final series should be mentioned.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • This might be a bad question, but what allows us to conclude that the power series expansion is still valid outside of the disk of convergence? That is, does the power series expansion for f still hold if /overlinez /notin D(c, r)?
            – Bobo
            Jul 26 at 23:56











          • @Bobo The function $g$ admits a power series expansion in a neighborhood of each of its points, which is the same as saying $g$ is analytic. It is generally false that the same power series expansion holds in the whole domain of the function, consider for instance $f(z)=1/(1+z^2)$.
            – egreg
            Jul 27 at 6:50











          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );








           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2863717%2fcheck-my-proof-please-complex-analysis%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          Since conjugation is a homeomorphism, $V$ is open.



          Let $cin V$; then $barcin U$, so there is an $r>0$ such that $D(barc,r)subseteq U$ and $f$ can be written as
          $$
          f(z)=sum_n=0^inftya_n(z-barc)^n tag1
          $$
          for every $zin D(barc,r)$. Therefore
          $$
          f(barz)=sum_n=0^inftya_n(barz-barc)^n
          $$
          for every $zinoverlineD(barc,r)=D(c,r)$.



          The convergence is absolute on $D(barc,s)$, for every $0<s<r$, so it is not restrictive to assume the series $(1)$ is absolutely convergent on $D(barc,r)$ (by using $r/2$ instead of $r$).



          Then the series
          $$
          sum_n=0^inftyoverlinea_n(z-c)^n
          $$
          is absolutely convergent on $overlineD(barc,r)=D(c,r)$, so it defines an analytic function over this disk. Since
          $$
          sum_n=0^inftyoverlinea_n(z-c)^n=
          overlinesum_n=0^inftya_n(barz-barc)^n=
          overlinef(barz)
          $$
          we are done.




          Your idea is good, but the convergence of the final series should be mentioned.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • This might be a bad question, but what allows us to conclude that the power series expansion is still valid outside of the disk of convergence? That is, does the power series expansion for f still hold if /overlinez /notin D(c, r)?
            – Bobo
            Jul 26 at 23:56











          • @Bobo The function $g$ admits a power series expansion in a neighborhood of each of its points, which is the same as saying $g$ is analytic. It is generally false that the same power series expansion holds in the whole domain of the function, consider for instance $f(z)=1/(1+z^2)$.
            – egreg
            Jul 27 at 6:50















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          Since conjugation is a homeomorphism, $V$ is open.



          Let $cin V$; then $barcin U$, so there is an $r>0$ such that $D(barc,r)subseteq U$ and $f$ can be written as
          $$
          f(z)=sum_n=0^inftya_n(z-barc)^n tag1
          $$
          for every $zin D(barc,r)$. Therefore
          $$
          f(barz)=sum_n=0^inftya_n(barz-barc)^n
          $$
          for every $zinoverlineD(barc,r)=D(c,r)$.



          The convergence is absolute on $D(barc,s)$, for every $0<s<r$, so it is not restrictive to assume the series $(1)$ is absolutely convergent on $D(barc,r)$ (by using $r/2$ instead of $r$).



          Then the series
          $$
          sum_n=0^inftyoverlinea_n(z-c)^n
          $$
          is absolutely convergent on $overlineD(barc,r)=D(c,r)$, so it defines an analytic function over this disk. Since
          $$
          sum_n=0^inftyoverlinea_n(z-c)^n=
          overlinesum_n=0^inftya_n(barz-barc)^n=
          overlinef(barz)
          $$
          we are done.




          Your idea is good, but the convergence of the final series should be mentioned.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • This might be a bad question, but what allows us to conclude that the power series expansion is still valid outside of the disk of convergence? That is, does the power series expansion for f still hold if /overlinez /notin D(c, r)?
            – Bobo
            Jul 26 at 23:56











          • @Bobo The function $g$ admits a power series expansion in a neighborhood of each of its points, which is the same as saying $g$ is analytic. It is generally false that the same power series expansion holds in the whole domain of the function, consider for instance $f(z)=1/(1+z^2)$.
            – egreg
            Jul 27 at 6:50













          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted






          Since conjugation is a homeomorphism, $V$ is open.



          Let $cin V$; then $barcin U$, so there is an $r>0$ such that $D(barc,r)subseteq U$ and $f$ can be written as
          $$
          f(z)=sum_n=0^inftya_n(z-barc)^n tag1
          $$
          for every $zin D(barc,r)$. Therefore
          $$
          f(barz)=sum_n=0^inftya_n(barz-barc)^n
          $$
          for every $zinoverlineD(barc,r)=D(c,r)$.



          The convergence is absolute on $D(barc,s)$, for every $0<s<r$, so it is not restrictive to assume the series $(1)$ is absolutely convergent on $D(barc,r)$ (by using $r/2$ instead of $r$).



          Then the series
          $$
          sum_n=0^inftyoverlinea_n(z-c)^n
          $$
          is absolutely convergent on $overlineD(barc,r)=D(c,r)$, so it defines an analytic function over this disk. Since
          $$
          sum_n=0^inftyoverlinea_n(z-c)^n=
          overlinesum_n=0^inftya_n(barz-barc)^n=
          overlinef(barz)
          $$
          we are done.




          Your idea is good, but the convergence of the final series should be mentioned.






          share|cite|improve this answer













          Since conjugation is a homeomorphism, $V$ is open.



          Let $cin V$; then $barcin U$, so there is an $r>0$ such that $D(barc,r)subseteq U$ and $f$ can be written as
          $$
          f(z)=sum_n=0^inftya_n(z-barc)^n tag1
          $$
          for every $zin D(barc,r)$. Therefore
          $$
          f(barz)=sum_n=0^inftya_n(barz-barc)^n
          $$
          for every $zinoverlineD(barc,r)=D(c,r)$.



          The convergence is absolute on $D(barc,s)$, for every $0<s<r$, so it is not restrictive to assume the series $(1)$ is absolutely convergent on $D(barc,r)$ (by using $r/2$ instead of $r$).



          Then the series
          $$
          sum_n=0^inftyoverlinea_n(z-c)^n
          $$
          is absolutely convergent on $overlineD(barc,r)=D(c,r)$, so it defines an analytic function over this disk. Since
          $$
          sum_n=0^inftyoverlinea_n(z-c)^n=
          overlinesum_n=0^inftya_n(barz-barc)^n=
          overlinef(barz)
          $$
          we are done.




          Your idea is good, but the convergence of the final series should be mentioned.







          share|cite|improve this answer













          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer











          answered Jul 26 at 22:28









          egreg

          164k1180187




          164k1180187











          • This might be a bad question, but what allows us to conclude that the power series expansion is still valid outside of the disk of convergence? That is, does the power series expansion for f still hold if /overlinez /notin D(c, r)?
            – Bobo
            Jul 26 at 23:56











          • @Bobo The function $g$ admits a power series expansion in a neighborhood of each of its points, which is the same as saying $g$ is analytic. It is generally false that the same power series expansion holds in the whole domain of the function, consider for instance $f(z)=1/(1+z^2)$.
            – egreg
            Jul 27 at 6:50

















          • This might be a bad question, but what allows us to conclude that the power series expansion is still valid outside of the disk of convergence? That is, does the power series expansion for f still hold if /overlinez /notin D(c, r)?
            – Bobo
            Jul 26 at 23:56











          • @Bobo The function $g$ admits a power series expansion in a neighborhood of each of its points, which is the same as saying $g$ is analytic. It is generally false that the same power series expansion holds in the whole domain of the function, consider for instance $f(z)=1/(1+z^2)$.
            – egreg
            Jul 27 at 6:50
















          This might be a bad question, but what allows us to conclude that the power series expansion is still valid outside of the disk of convergence? That is, does the power series expansion for f still hold if /overlinez /notin D(c, r)?
          – Bobo
          Jul 26 at 23:56





          This might be a bad question, but what allows us to conclude that the power series expansion is still valid outside of the disk of convergence? That is, does the power series expansion for f still hold if /overlinez /notin D(c, r)?
          – Bobo
          Jul 26 at 23:56













          @Bobo The function $g$ admits a power series expansion in a neighborhood of each of its points, which is the same as saying $g$ is analytic. It is generally false that the same power series expansion holds in the whole domain of the function, consider for instance $f(z)=1/(1+z^2)$.
          – egreg
          Jul 27 at 6:50





          @Bobo The function $g$ admits a power series expansion in a neighborhood of each of its points, which is the same as saying $g$ is analytic. It is generally false that the same power series expansion holds in the whole domain of the function, consider for instance $f(z)=1/(1+z^2)$.
          – egreg
          Jul 27 at 6:50













           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


























           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2863717%2fcheck-my-proof-please-complex-analysis%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          Comments

          Popular posts from this blog

          What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

          Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?

          Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon