On The Shape Of Trig Graphs To A Precalc Student

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












I want to know why 3 types of trig graphs have the shape that they do:



  1. Secant graphs. Why would $dfrac 1cos theta$ result in a graph like this? I get the cosine graph - it makes sense when you compare it to a unit circle. But I don't understand it at the same level for secant graphs. Can someone please explain why the secant graph is shaped like that given it's equation?


  2. Cosecant graphs. Same as above.


  3. Cotangent graphs. Why would $dfrac 1tan theta$ cause the tangent graph to flip? Because when you look at a cotangent graph, it's basically a reflected tangent graph. Why would $dfrac 1cos theta$ create a graph that looks like that?


Can you please give the explanation for why the graphs are shaped like that not too rigorously, and at the level of a Precalculus student who hasn't learnt Calculus yet? Thank you.







share|cite|improve this question





















  • When $cos(theta) = pm 1$, then $sec(theta) = pm 1$. When $cos(theta) = 0$, then $sec(theta)$ is undefined---this implies the possible existence of an asymptote (you need limits to confirm this, and that is usually a topic for the end of pre-calc, or for calculus). Between the ones and the asymptotes, the cosine function either increases or decreases monotonically, so the secant function will have the same behaviour, only in the opposite direction. This can be made rigorous without calculus (though calculus makes it easier).
    – Xander Henderson
    Jul 26 at 14:31










  • That being said, I think that this is a question which might be more appropriate for the Mathematics Educators SE.
    – Xander Henderson
    Jul 26 at 14:32











  • @XanderHenderson I'm not an educator though; I'm a student. But yeah, thanks for the response. Last thing though, what about for cotangent graphs? Why would it be a perfect reversal of tangent graph?
    – Ethan Chan
    Jul 26 at 14:35










  • Because $tan(dfracpi2-x) = cot(x)$
    – steven gregory
    Jul 26 at 15:16










  • " Can someone please explain why the secant graph is shaped like that given it's equation? " Can you explain why you don't understand it? It's $frac 1cos x$ and as $cos x$ is periodic from 0 to 1 to 0 to -1 back to 0, It's reciprical will be periodic from $+infty$ to $1$ back to $infty$then an axis jump to $-infty$ up to $-1$ and back down. .... And that is exactly what it does do. So from my point of view $frac 1cos x$ exactly as I expect others would expect it to do. So ... I'm confused why you are confused.
    – fleablood
    Jul 26 at 16:03















up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












I want to know why 3 types of trig graphs have the shape that they do:



  1. Secant graphs. Why would $dfrac 1cos theta$ result in a graph like this? I get the cosine graph - it makes sense when you compare it to a unit circle. But I don't understand it at the same level for secant graphs. Can someone please explain why the secant graph is shaped like that given it's equation?


  2. Cosecant graphs. Same as above.


  3. Cotangent graphs. Why would $dfrac 1tan theta$ cause the tangent graph to flip? Because when you look at a cotangent graph, it's basically a reflected tangent graph. Why would $dfrac 1cos theta$ create a graph that looks like that?


Can you please give the explanation for why the graphs are shaped like that not too rigorously, and at the level of a Precalculus student who hasn't learnt Calculus yet? Thank you.







share|cite|improve this question





















  • When $cos(theta) = pm 1$, then $sec(theta) = pm 1$. When $cos(theta) = 0$, then $sec(theta)$ is undefined---this implies the possible existence of an asymptote (you need limits to confirm this, and that is usually a topic for the end of pre-calc, or for calculus). Between the ones and the asymptotes, the cosine function either increases or decreases monotonically, so the secant function will have the same behaviour, only in the opposite direction. This can be made rigorous without calculus (though calculus makes it easier).
    – Xander Henderson
    Jul 26 at 14:31










  • That being said, I think that this is a question which might be more appropriate for the Mathematics Educators SE.
    – Xander Henderson
    Jul 26 at 14:32











  • @XanderHenderson I'm not an educator though; I'm a student. But yeah, thanks for the response. Last thing though, what about for cotangent graphs? Why would it be a perfect reversal of tangent graph?
    – Ethan Chan
    Jul 26 at 14:35










  • Because $tan(dfracpi2-x) = cot(x)$
    – steven gregory
    Jul 26 at 15:16










  • " Can someone please explain why the secant graph is shaped like that given it's equation? " Can you explain why you don't understand it? It's $frac 1cos x$ and as $cos x$ is periodic from 0 to 1 to 0 to -1 back to 0, It's reciprical will be periodic from $+infty$ to $1$ back to $infty$then an axis jump to $-infty$ up to $-1$ and back down. .... And that is exactly what it does do. So from my point of view $frac 1cos x$ exactly as I expect others would expect it to do. So ... I'm confused why you are confused.
    – fleablood
    Jul 26 at 16:03













up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1






1





I want to know why 3 types of trig graphs have the shape that they do:



  1. Secant graphs. Why would $dfrac 1cos theta$ result in a graph like this? I get the cosine graph - it makes sense when you compare it to a unit circle. But I don't understand it at the same level for secant graphs. Can someone please explain why the secant graph is shaped like that given it's equation?


  2. Cosecant graphs. Same as above.


  3. Cotangent graphs. Why would $dfrac 1tan theta$ cause the tangent graph to flip? Because when you look at a cotangent graph, it's basically a reflected tangent graph. Why would $dfrac 1cos theta$ create a graph that looks like that?


Can you please give the explanation for why the graphs are shaped like that not too rigorously, and at the level of a Precalculus student who hasn't learnt Calculus yet? Thank you.







share|cite|improve this question













I want to know why 3 types of trig graphs have the shape that they do:



  1. Secant graphs. Why would $dfrac 1cos theta$ result in a graph like this? I get the cosine graph - it makes sense when you compare it to a unit circle. But I don't understand it at the same level for secant graphs. Can someone please explain why the secant graph is shaped like that given it's equation?


  2. Cosecant graphs. Same as above.


  3. Cotangent graphs. Why would $dfrac 1tan theta$ cause the tangent graph to flip? Because when you look at a cotangent graph, it's basically a reflected tangent graph. Why would $dfrac 1cos theta$ create a graph that looks like that?


Can you please give the explanation for why the graphs are shaped like that not too rigorously, and at the level of a Precalculus student who hasn't learnt Calculus yet? Thank you.









share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 26 at 15:56









bjcolby15

7921616




7921616









asked Jul 26 at 14:25









Ethan Chan

608322




608322











  • When $cos(theta) = pm 1$, then $sec(theta) = pm 1$. When $cos(theta) = 0$, then $sec(theta)$ is undefined---this implies the possible existence of an asymptote (you need limits to confirm this, and that is usually a topic for the end of pre-calc, or for calculus). Between the ones and the asymptotes, the cosine function either increases or decreases monotonically, so the secant function will have the same behaviour, only in the opposite direction. This can be made rigorous without calculus (though calculus makes it easier).
    – Xander Henderson
    Jul 26 at 14:31










  • That being said, I think that this is a question which might be more appropriate for the Mathematics Educators SE.
    – Xander Henderson
    Jul 26 at 14:32











  • @XanderHenderson I'm not an educator though; I'm a student. But yeah, thanks for the response. Last thing though, what about for cotangent graphs? Why would it be a perfect reversal of tangent graph?
    – Ethan Chan
    Jul 26 at 14:35










  • Because $tan(dfracpi2-x) = cot(x)$
    – steven gregory
    Jul 26 at 15:16










  • " Can someone please explain why the secant graph is shaped like that given it's equation? " Can you explain why you don't understand it? It's $frac 1cos x$ and as $cos x$ is periodic from 0 to 1 to 0 to -1 back to 0, It's reciprical will be periodic from $+infty$ to $1$ back to $infty$then an axis jump to $-infty$ up to $-1$ and back down. .... And that is exactly what it does do. So from my point of view $frac 1cos x$ exactly as I expect others would expect it to do. So ... I'm confused why you are confused.
    – fleablood
    Jul 26 at 16:03

















  • When $cos(theta) = pm 1$, then $sec(theta) = pm 1$. When $cos(theta) = 0$, then $sec(theta)$ is undefined---this implies the possible existence of an asymptote (you need limits to confirm this, and that is usually a topic for the end of pre-calc, or for calculus). Between the ones and the asymptotes, the cosine function either increases or decreases monotonically, so the secant function will have the same behaviour, only in the opposite direction. This can be made rigorous without calculus (though calculus makes it easier).
    – Xander Henderson
    Jul 26 at 14:31










  • That being said, I think that this is a question which might be more appropriate for the Mathematics Educators SE.
    – Xander Henderson
    Jul 26 at 14:32











  • @XanderHenderson I'm not an educator though; I'm a student. But yeah, thanks for the response. Last thing though, what about for cotangent graphs? Why would it be a perfect reversal of tangent graph?
    – Ethan Chan
    Jul 26 at 14:35










  • Because $tan(dfracpi2-x) = cot(x)$
    – steven gregory
    Jul 26 at 15:16










  • " Can someone please explain why the secant graph is shaped like that given it's equation? " Can you explain why you don't understand it? It's $frac 1cos x$ and as $cos x$ is periodic from 0 to 1 to 0 to -1 back to 0, It's reciprical will be periodic from $+infty$ to $1$ back to $infty$then an axis jump to $-infty$ up to $-1$ and back down. .... And that is exactly what it does do. So from my point of view $frac 1cos x$ exactly as I expect others would expect it to do. So ... I'm confused why you are confused.
    – fleablood
    Jul 26 at 16:03
















When $cos(theta) = pm 1$, then $sec(theta) = pm 1$. When $cos(theta) = 0$, then $sec(theta)$ is undefined---this implies the possible existence of an asymptote (you need limits to confirm this, and that is usually a topic for the end of pre-calc, or for calculus). Between the ones and the asymptotes, the cosine function either increases or decreases monotonically, so the secant function will have the same behaviour, only in the opposite direction. This can be made rigorous without calculus (though calculus makes it easier).
– Xander Henderson
Jul 26 at 14:31




When $cos(theta) = pm 1$, then $sec(theta) = pm 1$. When $cos(theta) = 0$, then $sec(theta)$ is undefined---this implies the possible existence of an asymptote (you need limits to confirm this, and that is usually a topic for the end of pre-calc, or for calculus). Between the ones and the asymptotes, the cosine function either increases or decreases monotonically, so the secant function will have the same behaviour, only in the opposite direction. This can be made rigorous without calculus (though calculus makes it easier).
– Xander Henderson
Jul 26 at 14:31












That being said, I think that this is a question which might be more appropriate for the Mathematics Educators SE.
– Xander Henderson
Jul 26 at 14:32





That being said, I think that this is a question which might be more appropriate for the Mathematics Educators SE.
– Xander Henderson
Jul 26 at 14:32













@XanderHenderson I'm not an educator though; I'm a student. But yeah, thanks for the response. Last thing though, what about for cotangent graphs? Why would it be a perfect reversal of tangent graph?
– Ethan Chan
Jul 26 at 14:35




@XanderHenderson I'm not an educator though; I'm a student. But yeah, thanks for the response. Last thing though, what about for cotangent graphs? Why would it be a perfect reversal of tangent graph?
– Ethan Chan
Jul 26 at 14:35












Because $tan(dfracpi2-x) = cot(x)$
– steven gregory
Jul 26 at 15:16




Because $tan(dfracpi2-x) = cot(x)$
– steven gregory
Jul 26 at 15:16












" Can someone please explain why the secant graph is shaped like that given it's equation? " Can you explain why you don't understand it? It's $frac 1cos x$ and as $cos x$ is periodic from 0 to 1 to 0 to -1 back to 0, It's reciprical will be periodic from $+infty$ to $1$ back to $infty$then an axis jump to $-infty$ up to $-1$ and back down. .... And that is exactly what it does do. So from my point of view $frac 1cos x$ exactly as I expect others would expect it to do. So ... I'm confused why you are confused.
– fleablood
Jul 26 at 16:03





" Can someone please explain why the secant graph is shaped like that given it's equation? " Can you explain why you don't understand it? It's $frac 1cos x$ and as $cos x$ is periodic from 0 to 1 to 0 to -1 back to 0, It's reciprical will be periodic from $+infty$ to $1$ back to $infty$then an axis jump to $-infty$ up to $-1$ and back down. .... And that is exactly what it does do. So from my point of view $frac 1cos x$ exactly as I expect others would expect it to do. So ... I'm confused why you are confused.
– fleablood
Jul 26 at 16:03











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote













consider how behavior in a graph of $f(x)$ will affect behavior in a graph $frac 1 f(x)$. For values where $0 < f(x) < 1$ then we will have $infty > frac 1f(x)$, with little changes from $teensy$ to $frac 12 teensy$ resulting in huge stretches from $huge$ to $2 times huge$. And if $f(x)$ goes through from $teensy$ to $0$ to $-teensy$ then $frac 1f(x)$ will get asymptotic to infinity, be infinite(undefined) at a point, and jump to "negative infinity" and then imediate start reducing to more moderate negative values as $f(x)$ because more siginificant negative values.



If $1 < f(x)$ we will have $1 > frac 1f(x) > 0$ and if $f(x)$ grows blithely huge toward $huge$, $double-huge$ and $huge^2$ then $frac 1f(x)$ will tend to flatline toward $0$.



So bearing that in mind:



$cos x$ is periodic from $0$ to $1$ back down $0$ and and to $-1$ to $0$ to $1$ etc. and $frac 1cos x$ behaves exactly as we'd expect, for $+infty$ down to a minimum of $1$ (as $cos x$ goes from $0$ to $1$ and peaks) and then back to $infty$. Then as $cos x$ goes from tiny positive through $0$, to tiny negative. $frac 1cos x$ goess to $+infty$ and jumps to $-infty$ and starts surfaces up to $-1$ and then (as $cos x$ reaches a nadir of $-1$ and heads back to $0$) $frac 1cos x$ reaches max at $-1$ and starts plumeting back to $-infty.



As for $tan x$ and $frac 1tan x$. $tan x$ will go from $infty$ where $cos x = 1; sin x= 0$ to $1$ where $cos x = sin x = frac 1sqrt 2$. In this stage $sin x$ is increasing faster than $cos x$ is decreasing. So there will be a bulge to the right in the graph. Then as $cos xto 0$ and $sin x to 1$ we have $frac sin xcos x to infty$. and as $cos x$ is not decreasing faster than $sin x$ is increasing, the graph stretches to be long and skinny. Then as $cos x$ goes through $0$ to negative, we jump to negative infinity.



In the same interval $cot x = frac cos xsin x$ starts and $frac 10 = infty$ and decreases down to $1$ and then to $0$. The exact same but in reverse. Then as $cos x$ goes threough $0$ to negative $frac cos xsin x$ goes ther $0$ to negative.



Useful to realize $cot x =frac cos xsin x = frac sin(frac pi 2 - x)cos frac pi 2 - x) = tan (frac pi 2 - x)$ so that explains more rigororously why their graphs are symmetriic.






share|cite|improve this answer




























    up vote
    0
    down vote













    Pictures often help.



    Here's a graphical depiction of $cos theta$ and $sec theta = frac1cos theta$ for $theta = fracpi3 = 60$ degrees.



    enter image description here



    The situation for $cos theta$ is represented by the right triangle $triangle ABC$. The radius is $CA = 1$, and the cosine of $theta$ is represented by the length of $CB = frac12$.



    Now, extend $CA$ rightward to $A'$, which lies on the vertical line tangent to the unit circle. I submit that the secant of $theta$ is represented by the length $CA'$, on this basis:



    • $triangle ABC$ and $triangle A'B'C$ are similar.

    • Therefore $CA'$ is to $CB'$ as $CA$ is to $CB$.

    • Since $CB' = CA = 1$, we have that $CA'$ is to $1$ as $1$ is to $CB$.

    • Symbolically, $CA' = fracCA'1 = frac1CB$.

    • And since $CB$ is $cos theta$, $CA' = frac1cos theta = sec theta$.

    Finally, imagine increasing $theta$ toward $fracpi2 = 90$ degrees. It is evident that $A'$ must move vertically upward—without bound, in fact, and that is indeed what the plot of $sec theta$ does.



    If you increase $theta$ beyond $fracpi2$, but continue to extend $AC$ rightward toward the same vertical tangent, you find that $sec theta$ is negative and initially large, but decreasing toward $0$ as you approach $theta = pi = 180$ degrees.






    share|cite|improve this answer





















      Your Answer




      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: false,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );








       

      draft saved


      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2863450%2fon-the-shape-of-trig-graphs-to-a-precalc-student%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest






























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      0
      down vote













      consider how behavior in a graph of $f(x)$ will affect behavior in a graph $frac 1 f(x)$. For values where $0 < f(x) < 1$ then we will have $infty > frac 1f(x)$, with little changes from $teensy$ to $frac 12 teensy$ resulting in huge stretches from $huge$ to $2 times huge$. And if $f(x)$ goes through from $teensy$ to $0$ to $-teensy$ then $frac 1f(x)$ will get asymptotic to infinity, be infinite(undefined) at a point, and jump to "negative infinity" and then imediate start reducing to more moderate negative values as $f(x)$ because more siginificant negative values.



      If $1 < f(x)$ we will have $1 > frac 1f(x) > 0$ and if $f(x)$ grows blithely huge toward $huge$, $double-huge$ and $huge^2$ then $frac 1f(x)$ will tend to flatline toward $0$.



      So bearing that in mind:



      $cos x$ is periodic from $0$ to $1$ back down $0$ and and to $-1$ to $0$ to $1$ etc. and $frac 1cos x$ behaves exactly as we'd expect, for $+infty$ down to a minimum of $1$ (as $cos x$ goes from $0$ to $1$ and peaks) and then back to $infty$. Then as $cos x$ goes from tiny positive through $0$, to tiny negative. $frac 1cos x$ goess to $+infty$ and jumps to $-infty$ and starts surfaces up to $-1$ and then (as $cos x$ reaches a nadir of $-1$ and heads back to $0$) $frac 1cos x$ reaches max at $-1$ and starts plumeting back to $-infty.



      As for $tan x$ and $frac 1tan x$. $tan x$ will go from $infty$ where $cos x = 1; sin x= 0$ to $1$ where $cos x = sin x = frac 1sqrt 2$. In this stage $sin x$ is increasing faster than $cos x$ is decreasing. So there will be a bulge to the right in the graph. Then as $cos xto 0$ and $sin x to 1$ we have $frac sin xcos x to infty$. and as $cos x$ is not decreasing faster than $sin x$ is increasing, the graph stretches to be long and skinny. Then as $cos x$ goes through $0$ to negative, we jump to negative infinity.



      In the same interval $cot x = frac cos xsin x$ starts and $frac 10 = infty$ and decreases down to $1$ and then to $0$. The exact same but in reverse. Then as $cos x$ goes threough $0$ to negative $frac cos xsin x$ goes ther $0$ to negative.



      Useful to realize $cot x =frac cos xsin x = frac sin(frac pi 2 - x)cos frac pi 2 - x) = tan (frac pi 2 - x)$ so that explains more rigororously why their graphs are symmetriic.






      share|cite|improve this answer

























        up vote
        0
        down vote













        consider how behavior in a graph of $f(x)$ will affect behavior in a graph $frac 1 f(x)$. For values where $0 < f(x) < 1$ then we will have $infty > frac 1f(x)$, with little changes from $teensy$ to $frac 12 teensy$ resulting in huge stretches from $huge$ to $2 times huge$. And if $f(x)$ goes through from $teensy$ to $0$ to $-teensy$ then $frac 1f(x)$ will get asymptotic to infinity, be infinite(undefined) at a point, and jump to "negative infinity" and then imediate start reducing to more moderate negative values as $f(x)$ because more siginificant negative values.



        If $1 < f(x)$ we will have $1 > frac 1f(x) > 0$ and if $f(x)$ grows blithely huge toward $huge$, $double-huge$ and $huge^2$ then $frac 1f(x)$ will tend to flatline toward $0$.



        So bearing that in mind:



        $cos x$ is periodic from $0$ to $1$ back down $0$ and and to $-1$ to $0$ to $1$ etc. and $frac 1cos x$ behaves exactly as we'd expect, for $+infty$ down to a minimum of $1$ (as $cos x$ goes from $0$ to $1$ and peaks) and then back to $infty$. Then as $cos x$ goes from tiny positive through $0$, to tiny negative. $frac 1cos x$ goess to $+infty$ and jumps to $-infty$ and starts surfaces up to $-1$ and then (as $cos x$ reaches a nadir of $-1$ and heads back to $0$) $frac 1cos x$ reaches max at $-1$ and starts plumeting back to $-infty.



        As for $tan x$ and $frac 1tan x$. $tan x$ will go from $infty$ where $cos x = 1; sin x= 0$ to $1$ where $cos x = sin x = frac 1sqrt 2$. In this stage $sin x$ is increasing faster than $cos x$ is decreasing. So there will be a bulge to the right in the graph. Then as $cos xto 0$ and $sin x to 1$ we have $frac sin xcos x to infty$. and as $cos x$ is not decreasing faster than $sin x$ is increasing, the graph stretches to be long and skinny. Then as $cos x$ goes through $0$ to negative, we jump to negative infinity.



        In the same interval $cot x = frac cos xsin x$ starts and $frac 10 = infty$ and decreases down to $1$ and then to $0$. The exact same but in reverse. Then as $cos x$ goes threough $0$ to negative $frac cos xsin x$ goes ther $0$ to negative.



        Useful to realize $cot x =frac cos xsin x = frac sin(frac pi 2 - x)cos frac pi 2 - x) = tan (frac pi 2 - x)$ so that explains more rigororously why their graphs are symmetriic.






        share|cite|improve this answer























          up vote
          0
          down vote










          up vote
          0
          down vote









          consider how behavior in a graph of $f(x)$ will affect behavior in a graph $frac 1 f(x)$. For values where $0 < f(x) < 1$ then we will have $infty > frac 1f(x)$, with little changes from $teensy$ to $frac 12 teensy$ resulting in huge stretches from $huge$ to $2 times huge$. And if $f(x)$ goes through from $teensy$ to $0$ to $-teensy$ then $frac 1f(x)$ will get asymptotic to infinity, be infinite(undefined) at a point, and jump to "negative infinity" and then imediate start reducing to more moderate negative values as $f(x)$ because more siginificant negative values.



          If $1 < f(x)$ we will have $1 > frac 1f(x) > 0$ and if $f(x)$ grows blithely huge toward $huge$, $double-huge$ and $huge^2$ then $frac 1f(x)$ will tend to flatline toward $0$.



          So bearing that in mind:



          $cos x$ is periodic from $0$ to $1$ back down $0$ and and to $-1$ to $0$ to $1$ etc. and $frac 1cos x$ behaves exactly as we'd expect, for $+infty$ down to a minimum of $1$ (as $cos x$ goes from $0$ to $1$ and peaks) and then back to $infty$. Then as $cos x$ goes from tiny positive through $0$, to tiny negative. $frac 1cos x$ goess to $+infty$ and jumps to $-infty$ and starts surfaces up to $-1$ and then (as $cos x$ reaches a nadir of $-1$ and heads back to $0$) $frac 1cos x$ reaches max at $-1$ and starts plumeting back to $-infty.



          As for $tan x$ and $frac 1tan x$. $tan x$ will go from $infty$ where $cos x = 1; sin x= 0$ to $1$ where $cos x = sin x = frac 1sqrt 2$. In this stage $sin x$ is increasing faster than $cos x$ is decreasing. So there will be a bulge to the right in the graph. Then as $cos xto 0$ and $sin x to 1$ we have $frac sin xcos x to infty$. and as $cos x$ is not decreasing faster than $sin x$ is increasing, the graph stretches to be long and skinny. Then as $cos x$ goes through $0$ to negative, we jump to negative infinity.



          In the same interval $cot x = frac cos xsin x$ starts and $frac 10 = infty$ and decreases down to $1$ and then to $0$. The exact same but in reverse. Then as $cos x$ goes threough $0$ to negative $frac cos xsin x$ goes ther $0$ to negative.



          Useful to realize $cot x =frac cos xsin x = frac sin(frac pi 2 - x)cos frac pi 2 - x) = tan (frac pi 2 - x)$ so that explains more rigororously why their graphs are symmetriic.






          share|cite|improve this answer













          consider how behavior in a graph of $f(x)$ will affect behavior in a graph $frac 1 f(x)$. For values where $0 < f(x) < 1$ then we will have $infty > frac 1f(x)$, with little changes from $teensy$ to $frac 12 teensy$ resulting in huge stretches from $huge$ to $2 times huge$. And if $f(x)$ goes through from $teensy$ to $0$ to $-teensy$ then $frac 1f(x)$ will get asymptotic to infinity, be infinite(undefined) at a point, and jump to "negative infinity" and then imediate start reducing to more moderate negative values as $f(x)$ because more siginificant negative values.



          If $1 < f(x)$ we will have $1 > frac 1f(x) > 0$ and if $f(x)$ grows blithely huge toward $huge$, $double-huge$ and $huge^2$ then $frac 1f(x)$ will tend to flatline toward $0$.



          So bearing that in mind:



          $cos x$ is periodic from $0$ to $1$ back down $0$ and and to $-1$ to $0$ to $1$ etc. and $frac 1cos x$ behaves exactly as we'd expect, for $+infty$ down to a minimum of $1$ (as $cos x$ goes from $0$ to $1$ and peaks) and then back to $infty$. Then as $cos x$ goes from tiny positive through $0$, to tiny negative. $frac 1cos x$ goess to $+infty$ and jumps to $-infty$ and starts surfaces up to $-1$ and then (as $cos x$ reaches a nadir of $-1$ and heads back to $0$) $frac 1cos x$ reaches max at $-1$ and starts plumeting back to $-infty.



          As for $tan x$ and $frac 1tan x$. $tan x$ will go from $infty$ where $cos x = 1; sin x= 0$ to $1$ where $cos x = sin x = frac 1sqrt 2$. In this stage $sin x$ is increasing faster than $cos x$ is decreasing. So there will be a bulge to the right in the graph. Then as $cos xto 0$ and $sin x to 1$ we have $frac sin xcos x to infty$. and as $cos x$ is not decreasing faster than $sin x$ is increasing, the graph stretches to be long and skinny. Then as $cos x$ goes through $0$ to negative, we jump to negative infinity.



          In the same interval $cot x = frac cos xsin x$ starts and $frac 10 = infty$ and decreases down to $1$ and then to $0$. The exact same but in reverse. Then as $cos x$ goes threough $0$ to negative $frac cos xsin x$ goes ther $0$ to negative.



          Useful to realize $cot x =frac cos xsin x = frac sin(frac pi 2 - x)cos frac pi 2 - x) = tan (frac pi 2 - x)$ so that explains more rigororously why their graphs are symmetriic.







          share|cite|improve this answer













          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer











          answered Jul 26 at 16:42









          fleablood

          60.3k22575




          60.3k22575




















              up vote
              0
              down vote













              Pictures often help.



              Here's a graphical depiction of $cos theta$ and $sec theta = frac1cos theta$ for $theta = fracpi3 = 60$ degrees.



              enter image description here



              The situation for $cos theta$ is represented by the right triangle $triangle ABC$. The radius is $CA = 1$, and the cosine of $theta$ is represented by the length of $CB = frac12$.



              Now, extend $CA$ rightward to $A'$, which lies on the vertical line tangent to the unit circle. I submit that the secant of $theta$ is represented by the length $CA'$, on this basis:



              • $triangle ABC$ and $triangle A'B'C$ are similar.

              • Therefore $CA'$ is to $CB'$ as $CA$ is to $CB$.

              • Since $CB' = CA = 1$, we have that $CA'$ is to $1$ as $1$ is to $CB$.

              • Symbolically, $CA' = fracCA'1 = frac1CB$.

              • And since $CB$ is $cos theta$, $CA' = frac1cos theta = sec theta$.

              Finally, imagine increasing $theta$ toward $fracpi2 = 90$ degrees. It is evident that $A'$ must move vertically upward—without bound, in fact, and that is indeed what the plot of $sec theta$ does.



              If you increase $theta$ beyond $fracpi2$, but continue to extend $AC$ rightward toward the same vertical tangent, you find that $sec theta$ is negative and initially large, but decreasing toward $0$ as you approach $theta = pi = 180$ degrees.






              share|cite|improve this answer

























                up vote
                0
                down vote













                Pictures often help.



                Here's a graphical depiction of $cos theta$ and $sec theta = frac1cos theta$ for $theta = fracpi3 = 60$ degrees.



                enter image description here



                The situation for $cos theta$ is represented by the right triangle $triangle ABC$. The radius is $CA = 1$, and the cosine of $theta$ is represented by the length of $CB = frac12$.



                Now, extend $CA$ rightward to $A'$, which lies on the vertical line tangent to the unit circle. I submit that the secant of $theta$ is represented by the length $CA'$, on this basis:



                • $triangle ABC$ and $triangle A'B'C$ are similar.

                • Therefore $CA'$ is to $CB'$ as $CA$ is to $CB$.

                • Since $CB' = CA = 1$, we have that $CA'$ is to $1$ as $1$ is to $CB$.

                • Symbolically, $CA' = fracCA'1 = frac1CB$.

                • And since $CB$ is $cos theta$, $CA' = frac1cos theta = sec theta$.

                Finally, imagine increasing $theta$ toward $fracpi2 = 90$ degrees. It is evident that $A'$ must move vertically upward—without bound, in fact, and that is indeed what the plot of $sec theta$ does.



                If you increase $theta$ beyond $fracpi2$, but continue to extend $AC$ rightward toward the same vertical tangent, you find that $sec theta$ is negative and initially large, but decreasing toward $0$ as you approach $theta = pi = 180$ degrees.






                share|cite|improve this answer























                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote









                  Pictures often help.



                  Here's a graphical depiction of $cos theta$ and $sec theta = frac1cos theta$ for $theta = fracpi3 = 60$ degrees.



                  enter image description here



                  The situation for $cos theta$ is represented by the right triangle $triangle ABC$. The radius is $CA = 1$, and the cosine of $theta$ is represented by the length of $CB = frac12$.



                  Now, extend $CA$ rightward to $A'$, which lies on the vertical line tangent to the unit circle. I submit that the secant of $theta$ is represented by the length $CA'$, on this basis:



                  • $triangle ABC$ and $triangle A'B'C$ are similar.

                  • Therefore $CA'$ is to $CB'$ as $CA$ is to $CB$.

                  • Since $CB' = CA = 1$, we have that $CA'$ is to $1$ as $1$ is to $CB$.

                  • Symbolically, $CA' = fracCA'1 = frac1CB$.

                  • And since $CB$ is $cos theta$, $CA' = frac1cos theta = sec theta$.

                  Finally, imagine increasing $theta$ toward $fracpi2 = 90$ degrees. It is evident that $A'$ must move vertically upward—without bound, in fact, and that is indeed what the plot of $sec theta$ does.



                  If you increase $theta$ beyond $fracpi2$, but continue to extend $AC$ rightward toward the same vertical tangent, you find that $sec theta$ is negative and initially large, but decreasing toward $0$ as you approach $theta = pi = 180$ degrees.






                  share|cite|improve this answer













                  Pictures often help.



                  Here's a graphical depiction of $cos theta$ and $sec theta = frac1cos theta$ for $theta = fracpi3 = 60$ degrees.



                  enter image description here



                  The situation for $cos theta$ is represented by the right triangle $triangle ABC$. The radius is $CA = 1$, and the cosine of $theta$ is represented by the length of $CB = frac12$.



                  Now, extend $CA$ rightward to $A'$, which lies on the vertical line tangent to the unit circle. I submit that the secant of $theta$ is represented by the length $CA'$, on this basis:



                  • $triangle ABC$ and $triangle A'B'C$ are similar.

                  • Therefore $CA'$ is to $CB'$ as $CA$ is to $CB$.

                  • Since $CB' = CA = 1$, we have that $CA'$ is to $1$ as $1$ is to $CB$.

                  • Symbolically, $CA' = fracCA'1 = frac1CB$.

                  • And since $CB$ is $cos theta$, $CA' = frac1cos theta = sec theta$.

                  Finally, imagine increasing $theta$ toward $fracpi2 = 90$ degrees. It is evident that $A'$ must move vertically upward—without bound, in fact, and that is indeed what the plot of $sec theta$ does.



                  If you increase $theta$ beyond $fracpi2$, but continue to extend $AC$ rightward toward the same vertical tangent, you find that $sec theta$ is negative and initially large, but decreasing toward $0$ as you approach $theta = pi = 180$ degrees.







                  share|cite|improve this answer













                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  answered Jul 26 at 17:09









                  Brian Tung

                  25.2k32353




                  25.2k32353






















                       

                      draft saved


                      draft discarded


























                       


                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2863450%2fon-the-shape-of-trig-graphs-to-a-precalc-student%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest













































































                      Comments

                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

                      Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?

                      What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?