Mixing
Exponential Fraction Simplification
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
It has been a while since I played with simplification of functions and my memory is a little spotty. I am currently doing some function fitting to data, so I am trying out many permutations of functions to see their results.
For one of my functions I managed to get the below to simplify rather easily:
$$
F(X) = frace^KXe^K = e^K(X-1)
$$
Now I have found that I can potently improve my fit with the following alteration:
$$
F(X) = frace^KX-Deltae^K-Delta
$$
Where K and $Delta$ are constant with respect to X.
I am wondering if there is a simplification of the above formula that I could use. I feel like I have seen something like this done before but I am just struggling to remember how to start.
I am not looking for someone to do all the work for me but if someone could get me started with a useful identify or a pointer of what method to use (eg partial fractions ect.) to get me going in the right direction.
Many thanks.
functions exponential-function
asked Jul 27 at 12:31
user10052900
31
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
It has been a while since I played with simplification of functions and my memory is a little spotty. I am currently doing some function fitting to data, so I am trying out many permutations of functions to see their results.
For one of my functions I managed to get the below to simplify rather easily:
$$
F(X) = frace^KXe^K = e^K(X-1)
$$
Now I have found that I can potently improve my fit with the following alteration:
$$
F(X) = frace^KX-Deltae^K-Delta
$$
Where K and $Delta$ are constant with respect to X.
I am wondering if there is a simplification of the above formula that I could use. I feel like I have seen something like this done before but I am just struggling to remember how to start.
I am not looking for someone to do all the work for me but if someone could get me started with a useful identify or a pointer of what method to use (eg partial fractions ect.) to get me going in the right direction.
Many thanks.
functions exponential-function
asked Jul 27 at 12:31
user10052900
31
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
It has been a while since I played with simplification of functions and my memory is a little spotty. I am currently doing some function fitting to data, so I am trying out many permutations of functions to see their results.
For one of my functions I managed to get the below to simplify rather easily:
$$
F(X) = frace^KXe^K = e^K(X-1)
$$
Now I have found that I can potently improve my fit with the following alteration:
$$
F(X) = frace^KX-Deltae^K-Delta
$$
Where K and $Delta$ are constant with respect to X.
I am wondering if there is a simplification of the above formula that I could use. I feel like I have seen something like this done before but I am just struggling to remember how to start.
I am not looking for someone to do all the work for me but if someone could get me started with a useful identify or a pointer of what method to use (eg partial fractions ect.) to get me going in the right direction.
Many thanks.
functions exponential-function
asked Jul 27 at 12:31
user10052900
31
It has been a while since I played with simplification of functions and my memory is a little spotty. I am currently doing some function fitting to data, so I am trying out many permutations of functions to see their results.
For one of my functions I managed to get the below to simplify rather easily:
$$
F(X) = frace^KXe^K = e^K(X-1)
$$
Now I have found that I can potently improve my fit with the following alteration:
$$
F(X) = frace^KX-Deltae^K-Delta
$$
Where K and $Delta$ are constant with respect to X.
I am wondering if there is a simplification of the above formula that I could use. I feel like I have seen something like this done before but I am just struggling to remember how to start.
I am not looking for someone to do all the work for me but if someone could get me started with a useful identify or a pointer of what method to use (eg partial fractions ect.) to get me going in the right direction.
Many thanks.
functions exponential-function
asked Jul 27 at 12:31
user10052900
31
asked Jul 27 at 12:31
user10052900
31
asked Jul 27 at 12:31
user10052900
31
asked Jul 27 at 12:31
user10052900
31
31
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
There is nothing helpful you can do on that fraction, that it the simpler form. The only thing you could do is to add and subtract the factor $e^K$ on the numerator, use associativity, and then take some factors out. Indeed nothing very useful!
answered Jul 27 at 12:46
Davide Morgante
1,751220
Thanks for answering, I guess that explains why I was not able to make any headway with this one.
– user10052900
Jul 27 at 12:52
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
I think it's as simple as it's going to get already. If we write $y = e^K,$ then we have $$y^X-Deltaover y - Delta$$ and even in the simple case where $X$ is a positive integer and $Delta=1,$ we have the sum of a geometric progression. The general case must be messier.
answered Jul 27 at 12:47
saulspatz
10.4k21323
Thank you for your reply, I marked the other answer as correct just on that basis that on my end this other answer was posted first, although they were equally as valuable.
– user10052900
Jul 27 at 12:53
Just to explain how it works, you can upvote as many answers as you please, by clicking on the up arrow. This just means that you consider it valuable. You can only accept one, by checking it. This means it answered your question. You can upvote and accept the same answer. Accepting an answer is encouraged, when appropriate, since people browsing the questions will see that it has been addressed to the OP's satisfaction.
– saulspatz
Jul 27 at 12:59
I did up-vote both however due to the new joiner limitations unfortunately, it will not show until I get over 15 reputation. Once I gain a bit more reputation this should tick through.
– user10052900
Jul 27 at 13:09
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
There is nothing helpful you can do on that fraction, that it the simpler form. The only thing you could do is to add and subtract the factor $e^K$ on the numerator, use associativity, and then take some factors out. Indeed nothing very useful!
answered Jul 27 at 12:46
Davide Morgante
1,751220
Thanks for answering, I guess that explains why I was not able to make any headway with this one.
– user10052900
Jul 27 at 12:52
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
There is nothing helpful you can do on that fraction, that it the simpler form. The only thing you could do is to add and subtract the factor $e^K$ on the numerator, use associativity, and then take some factors out. Indeed nothing very useful!
answered Jul 27 at 12:46
Davide Morgante
1,751220
Thanks for answering, I guess that explains why I was not able to make any headway with this one.
– user10052900
Jul 27 at 12:52
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
There is nothing helpful you can do on that fraction, that it the simpler form. The only thing you could do is to add and subtract the factor $e^K$ on the numerator, use associativity, and then take some factors out. Indeed nothing very useful!
answered Jul 27 at 12:46
Davide Morgante
1,751220
There is nothing helpful you can do on that fraction, that it the simpler form. The only thing you could do is to add and subtract the factor $e^K$ on the numerator, use associativity, and then take some factors out. Indeed nothing very useful!
answered Jul 27 at 12:46
Davide Morgante
1,751220
answered Jul 27 at 12:46
Davide Morgante
1,751220
answered Jul 27 at 12:46
Davide Morgante
1,751220
answered Jul 27 at 12:46
Davide Morgante
1,751220
1,751220
Thanks for answering, I guess that explains why I was not able to make any headway with this one.
– user10052900
Jul 27 at 12:52
add a comment |Â
Thanks for answering, I guess that explains why I was not able to make any headway with this one.
– user10052900
Jul 27 at 12:52
Thanks for answering, I guess that explains why I was not able to make any headway with this one.
– user10052900
Jul 27 at 12:52
Thanks for answering, I guess that explains why I was not able to make any headway with this one.
– user10052900
Jul 27 at 12:52
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
I think it's as simple as it's going to get already. If we write $y = e^K,$ then we have $$y^X-Deltaover y - Delta$$ and even in the simple case where $X$ is a positive integer and $Delta=1,$ we have the sum of a geometric progression. The general case must be messier.
answered Jul 27 at 12:47
saulspatz
10.4k21323
Thank you for your reply, I marked the other answer as correct just on that basis that on my end this other answer was posted first, although they were equally as valuable.
– user10052900
Jul 27 at 12:53
Just to explain how it works, you can upvote as many answers as you please, by clicking on the up arrow. This just means that you consider it valuable. You can only accept one, by checking it. This means it answered your question. You can upvote and accept the same answer. Accepting an answer is encouraged, when appropriate, since people browsing the questions will see that it has been addressed to the OP's satisfaction.
– saulspatz
Jul 27 at 12:59
I did up-vote both however due to the new joiner limitations unfortunately, it will not show until I get over 15 reputation. Once I gain a bit more reputation this should tick through.
– user10052900
Jul 27 at 13:09
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
I think it's as simple as it's going to get already. If we write $y = e^K,$ then we have $$y^X-Deltaover y - Delta$$ and even in the simple case where $X$ is a positive integer and $Delta=1,$ we have the sum of a geometric progression. The general case must be messier.
answered Jul 27 at 12:47
saulspatz
10.4k21323
Thank you for your reply, I marked the other answer as correct just on that basis that on my end this other answer was posted first, although they were equally as valuable.
– user10052900
Jul 27 at 12:53
Just to explain how it works, you can upvote as many answers as you please, by clicking on the up arrow. This just means that you consider it valuable. You can only accept one, by checking it. This means it answered your question. You can upvote and accept the same answer. Accepting an answer is encouraged, when appropriate, since people browsing the questions will see that it has been addressed to the OP's satisfaction.
– saulspatz
Jul 27 at 12:59
I did up-vote both however due to the new joiner limitations unfortunately, it will not show until I get over 15 reputation. Once I gain a bit more reputation this should tick through.
– user10052900
Jul 27 at 13:09
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
I think it's as simple as it's going to get already. If we write $y = e^K,$ then we have $$y^X-Deltaover y - Delta$$ and even in the simple case where $X$ is a positive integer and $Delta=1,$ we have the sum of a geometric progression. The general case must be messier.
answered Jul 27 at 12:47
saulspatz
10.4k21323
I think it's as simple as it's going to get already. If we write $y = e^K,$ then we have $$y^X-Deltaover y - Delta$$ and even in the simple case where $X$ is a positive integer and $Delta=1,$ we have the sum of a geometric progression. The general case must be messier.
answered Jul 27 at 12:47
saulspatz
10.4k21323
answered Jul 27 at 12:47
saulspatz
10.4k21323
answered Jul 27 at 12:47
saulspatz
10.4k21323
answered Jul 27 at 12:47
saulspatz
10.4k21323
10.4k21323
Thank you for your reply, I marked the other answer as correct just on that basis that on my end this other answer was posted first, although they were equally as valuable.
– user10052900
Jul 27 at 12:53
Just to explain how it works, you can upvote as many answers as you please, by clicking on the up arrow. This just means that you consider it valuable. You can only accept one, by checking it. This means it answered your question. You can upvote and accept the same answer. Accepting an answer is encouraged, when appropriate, since people browsing the questions will see that it has been addressed to the OP's satisfaction.
– saulspatz
Jul 27 at 12:59
I did up-vote both however due to the new joiner limitations unfortunately, it will not show until I get over 15 reputation. Once I gain a bit more reputation this should tick through.
– user10052900
Jul 27 at 13:09
add a comment |Â
Thank you for your reply, I marked the other answer as correct just on that basis that on my end this other answer was posted first, although they were equally as valuable.
– user10052900
Jul 27 at 12:53
Just to explain how it works, you can upvote as many answers as you please, by clicking on the up arrow. This just means that you consider it valuable. You can only accept one, by checking it. This means it answered your question. You can upvote and accept the same answer. Accepting an answer is encouraged, when appropriate, since people browsing the questions will see that it has been addressed to the OP's satisfaction.
– saulspatz
Jul 27 at 12:59
I did up-vote both however due to the new joiner limitations unfortunately, it will not show until I get over 15 reputation. Once I gain a bit more reputation this should tick through.
– user10052900
Jul 27 at 13:09
Thank you for your reply, I marked the other answer as correct just on that basis that on my end this other answer was posted first, although they were equally as valuable.
– user10052900
Jul 27 at 12:53
Thank you for your reply, I marked the other answer as correct just on that basis that on my end this other answer was posted first, although they were equally as valuable.
– user10052900
Jul 27 at 12:53
Just to explain how it works, you can upvote as many answers as you please, by clicking on the up arrow. This just means that you consider it valuable. You can only accept one, by checking it. This means it answered your question. You can upvote and accept the same answer. Accepting an answer is encouraged, when appropriate, since people browsing the questions will see that it has been addressed to the OP's satisfaction.
– saulspatz
Jul 27 at 12:59
Just to explain how it works, you can upvote as many answers as you please, by clicking on the up arrow. This just means that you consider it valuable. You can only accept one, by checking it. This means it answered your question. You can upvote and accept the same answer. Accepting an answer is encouraged, when appropriate, since people browsing the questions will see that it has been addressed to the OP's satisfaction.
– saulspatz
Jul 27 at 12:59
I did up-vote both however due to the new joiner limitations unfortunately, it will not show until I get over 15 reputation. Once I gain a bit more reputation this should tick through.
– user10052900
Jul 27 at 13:09
I did up-vote both however due to the new joiner limitations unfortunately, it will not show until I get over 15 reputation. Once I gain a bit more reputation this should tick through.
– user10052900
Jul 27 at 13:09
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2864364%2fexponential-fraction-simplification%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password