Generalized Pythagorean integer solutions

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
3
down vote

favorite
2












We know that $a^2 + b^2 = c^2$ has infinitely integer solutions which can be written as 3-tuples for example (3,4,5).



Can we conjecture that $$x_1^n +x_2^n + cdots +x_n^n = y^n$$ has infinitely many integer solutions for each $n in mathbb N$? If so how would one prove this to be correct?



I apologize if this is a simple question. I havent taken number theory but this is something that has caught my curiosity. Thanks in advance.







share|cite|improve this question

















  • 1




    related: mathoverflow.net/questions/62820/pythagorean-5-tuples
    – Michael McGovern
    Jul 26 at 22:52






  • 1




    An answer to this would follow from solutions to Waring's problem.
    – Somos
    Jul 27 at 0:00











  • Waring's problem is about the worst case, e.g., the number of 6th powers necessary to express each number as a sum. That number will be greater than 6, so solving Waring won't tell you anything about writing a 6th power as a sum of 6 6th powers.
    – Gerry Myerson
    Jul 27 at 7:03






  • 1




    But, Red, you might want to insist on positive integer solutions, else you can have $x_1=y$, $x_2=cdots=x_n=0$.
    – Gerry Myerson
    Jul 27 at 7:04










  • According to en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sixth_power#Sums "no examples are yet known of a sixth power expressible as the sum of just six sixth powers."
    – Gerry Myerson
    Jul 27 at 7:07














up vote
3
down vote

favorite
2












We know that $a^2 + b^2 = c^2$ has infinitely integer solutions which can be written as 3-tuples for example (3,4,5).



Can we conjecture that $$x_1^n +x_2^n + cdots +x_n^n = y^n$$ has infinitely many integer solutions for each $n in mathbb N$? If so how would one prove this to be correct?



I apologize if this is a simple question. I havent taken number theory but this is something that has caught my curiosity. Thanks in advance.







share|cite|improve this question

















  • 1




    related: mathoverflow.net/questions/62820/pythagorean-5-tuples
    – Michael McGovern
    Jul 26 at 22:52






  • 1




    An answer to this would follow from solutions to Waring's problem.
    – Somos
    Jul 27 at 0:00











  • Waring's problem is about the worst case, e.g., the number of 6th powers necessary to express each number as a sum. That number will be greater than 6, so solving Waring won't tell you anything about writing a 6th power as a sum of 6 6th powers.
    – Gerry Myerson
    Jul 27 at 7:03






  • 1




    But, Red, you might want to insist on positive integer solutions, else you can have $x_1=y$, $x_2=cdots=x_n=0$.
    – Gerry Myerson
    Jul 27 at 7:04










  • According to en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sixth_power#Sums "no examples are yet known of a sixth power expressible as the sum of just six sixth powers."
    – Gerry Myerson
    Jul 27 at 7:07












up vote
3
down vote

favorite
2









up vote
3
down vote

favorite
2






2





We know that $a^2 + b^2 = c^2$ has infinitely integer solutions which can be written as 3-tuples for example (3,4,5).



Can we conjecture that $$x_1^n +x_2^n + cdots +x_n^n = y^n$$ has infinitely many integer solutions for each $n in mathbb N$? If so how would one prove this to be correct?



I apologize if this is a simple question. I havent taken number theory but this is something that has caught my curiosity. Thanks in advance.







share|cite|improve this question













We know that $a^2 + b^2 = c^2$ has infinitely integer solutions which can be written as 3-tuples for example (3,4,5).



Can we conjecture that $$x_1^n +x_2^n + cdots +x_n^n = y^n$$ has infinitely many integer solutions for each $n in mathbb N$? If so how would one prove this to be correct?



I apologize if this is a simple question. I havent taken number theory but this is something that has caught my curiosity. Thanks in advance.









share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 27 at 6:48
























asked Jul 26 at 22:45









Red

1,747733




1,747733







  • 1




    related: mathoverflow.net/questions/62820/pythagorean-5-tuples
    – Michael McGovern
    Jul 26 at 22:52






  • 1




    An answer to this would follow from solutions to Waring's problem.
    – Somos
    Jul 27 at 0:00











  • Waring's problem is about the worst case, e.g., the number of 6th powers necessary to express each number as a sum. That number will be greater than 6, so solving Waring won't tell you anything about writing a 6th power as a sum of 6 6th powers.
    – Gerry Myerson
    Jul 27 at 7:03






  • 1




    But, Red, you might want to insist on positive integer solutions, else you can have $x_1=y$, $x_2=cdots=x_n=0$.
    – Gerry Myerson
    Jul 27 at 7:04










  • According to en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sixth_power#Sums "no examples are yet known of a sixth power expressible as the sum of just six sixth powers."
    – Gerry Myerson
    Jul 27 at 7:07












  • 1




    related: mathoverflow.net/questions/62820/pythagorean-5-tuples
    – Michael McGovern
    Jul 26 at 22:52






  • 1




    An answer to this would follow from solutions to Waring's problem.
    – Somos
    Jul 27 at 0:00











  • Waring's problem is about the worst case, e.g., the number of 6th powers necessary to express each number as a sum. That number will be greater than 6, so solving Waring won't tell you anything about writing a 6th power as a sum of 6 6th powers.
    – Gerry Myerson
    Jul 27 at 7:03






  • 1




    But, Red, you might want to insist on positive integer solutions, else you can have $x_1=y$, $x_2=cdots=x_n=0$.
    – Gerry Myerson
    Jul 27 at 7:04










  • According to en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sixth_power#Sums "no examples are yet known of a sixth power expressible as the sum of just six sixth powers."
    – Gerry Myerson
    Jul 27 at 7:07







1




1




related: mathoverflow.net/questions/62820/pythagorean-5-tuples
– Michael McGovern
Jul 26 at 22:52




related: mathoverflow.net/questions/62820/pythagorean-5-tuples
– Michael McGovern
Jul 26 at 22:52




1




1




An answer to this would follow from solutions to Waring's problem.
– Somos
Jul 27 at 0:00





An answer to this would follow from solutions to Waring's problem.
– Somos
Jul 27 at 0:00













Waring's problem is about the worst case, e.g., the number of 6th powers necessary to express each number as a sum. That number will be greater than 6, so solving Waring won't tell you anything about writing a 6th power as a sum of 6 6th powers.
– Gerry Myerson
Jul 27 at 7:03




Waring's problem is about the worst case, e.g., the number of 6th powers necessary to express each number as a sum. That number will be greater than 6, so solving Waring won't tell you anything about writing a 6th power as a sum of 6 6th powers.
– Gerry Myerson
Jul 27 at 7:03




1




1




But, Red, you might want to insist on positive integer solutions, else you can have $x_1=y$, $x_2=cdots=x_n=0$.
– Gerry Myerson
Jul 27 at 7:04




But, Red, you might want to insist on positive integer solutions, else you can have $x_1=y$, $x_2=cdots=x_n=0$.
– Gerry Myerson
Jul 27 at 7:04












According to en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sixth_power#Sums "no examples are yet known of a sixth power expressible as the sum of just six sixth powers."
– Gerry Myerson
Jul 27 at 7:07




According to en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sixth_power#Sums "no examples are yet known of a sixth power expressible as the sum of just six sixth powers."
– Gerry Myerson
Jul 27 at 7:07















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2863891%2fgeneralized-pythagorean-integer-solutions%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest



































active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes










 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2863891%2fgeneralized-pythagorean-integer-solutions%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?