If $f$ is proper, lsc, and $fracf(x) + f(y)2 = f^**left(fracx + y2right) implies x = y$, is $f$ necessarily convex?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1













Suppose $X$ is a real Hilbert Space and $f : X to (-infty, infty]$ is a lower semicontinuous, proper function. Further, suppose $f$ satisfies the following, for all $x, y in operatornamedom f$:
$$fracf(x) + f(y)2 = f^**left(fracx + y2right) implies x = y.$$
Is $f$ necessarily a convex function?




Here $^*$ refers to the Fenchel conjugate, and $operatornamedom f$ is the set of points $x in X$ such that $f(x) neq infty$.



I know that:



  • $f^**(x) le f(x)$ for all $x$ and $f^**(x) = f(x)$ for all $x$ if and only if $f$ is convex (and lsc).

  • In fact, $f^**$ is the greatest convex minorant of $f$.

  • This means that
    $$fracf(x) + f(y)2 ge fracf^**(x) + f^**(y)2 ge f^**left(fracx + y2right)$$
    for all $x, y in operatornamedom f$.

  • Therefore,
    $$fracf(x) + f(y)2 = f^**left(fracx + y2right)$$
    implies that $f(x) = f^**(x)$ and $f(y) = f^**(y)$.

  • Another consequence is that $f^**(lambda x + (1 - lambda y)) = lambda f^**(x) + (1 - lambda)f^**(y)$ for all $lambda in [0, 1]$.

My thoughts:



  • Really, I just need to establish that $f^**(x) = f(x)$ for all $x$.

  • Despite biduals showing up both in the premises and the above desired conclusion, there doesn't seem to be a direct path to manipulate one to the other, especially since not every point in $overlineoperatornameconv operatornamedom f$ can be expressed as $fracx+y2$ where $x, y in operatornamedom f$.

  • The function $g(x, y) = fracf(x)+f(y)2 - f^**left(fracx + y2right)$ is not a metric in general, even if $g(x, y) = 0 implies x = y$.

  • I get a feeling that Stegall's variational principle might help, for a variety of reasons, but one handy reason is that we may add any linear functional to $f$, without changing $g$.

Any thoughts are welcome!







share|cite|improve this question













This question has an open bounty worth +400
reputation from Theo Bendit ending ending at 2018-08-14 04:59:49Z">in 5 days.


This question has not received enough attention.















  • What does "proper" mean?
    – mathworker21
    yesterday










  • Proper means $operatornamedom f neq emptyset$.
    – Theo Bendit
    13 hours ago














up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1













Suppose $X$ is a real Hilbert Space and $f : X to (-infty, infty]$ is a lower semicontinuous, proper function. Further, suppose $f$ satisfies the following, for all $x, y in operatornamedom f$:
$$fracf(x) + f(y)2 = f^**left(fracx + y2right) implies x = y.$$
Is $f$ necessarily a convex function?




Here $^*$ refers to the Fenchel conjugate, and $operatornamedom f$ is the set of points $x in X$ such that $f(x) neq infty$.



I know that:



  • $f^**(x) le f(x)$ for all $x$ and $f^**(x) = f(x)$ for all $x$ if and only if $f$ is convex (and lsc).

  • In fact, $f^**$ is the greatest convex minorant of $f$.

  • This means that
    $$fracf(x) + f(y)2 ge fracf^**(x) + f^**(y)2 ge f^**left(fracx + y2right)$$
    for all $x, y in operatornamedom f$.

  • Therefore,
    $$fracf(x) + f(y)2 = f^**left(fracx + y2right)$$
    implies that $f(x) = f^**(x)$ and $f(y) = f^**(y)$.

  • Another consequence is that $f^**(lambda x + (1 - lambda y)) = lambda f^**(x) + (1 - lambda)f^**(y)$ for all $lambda in [0, 1]$.

My thoughts:



  • Really, I just need to establish that $f^**(x) = f(x)$ for all $x$.

  • Despite biduals showing up both in the premises and the above desired conclusion, there doesn't seem to be a direct path to manipulate one to the other, especially since not every point in $overlineoperatornameconv operatornamedom f$ can be expressed as $fracx+y2$ where $x, y in operatornamedom f$.

  • The function $g(x, y) = fracf(x)+f(y)2 - f^**left(fracx + y2right)$ is not a metric in general, even if $g(x, y) = 0 implies x = y$.

  • I get a feeling that Stegall's variational principle might help, for a variety of reasons, but one handy reason is that we may add any linear functional to $f$, without changing $g$.

Any thoughts are welcome!







share|cite|improve this question













This question has an open bounty worth +400
reputation from Theo Bendit ending ending at 2018-08-14 04:59:49Z">in 5 days.


This question has not received enough attention.















  • What does "proper" mean?
    – mathworker21
    yesterday










  • Proper means $operatornamedom f neq emptyset$.
    – Theo Bendit
    13 hours ago












up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1






1






Suppose $X$ is a real Hilbert Space and $f : X to (-infty, infty]$ is a lower semicontinuous, proper function. Further, suppose $f$ satisfies the following, for all $x, y in operatornamedom f$:
$$fracf(x) + f(y)2 = f^**left(fracx + y2right) implies x = y.$$
Is $f$ necessarily a convex function?




Here $^*$ refers to the Fenchel conjugate, and $operatornamedom f$ is the set of points $x in X$ such that $f(x) neq infty$.



I know that:



  • $f^**(x) le f(x)$ for all $x$ and $f^**(x) = f(x)$ for all $x$ if and only if $f$ is convex (and lsc).

  • In fact, $f^**$ is the greatest convex minorant of $f$.

  • This means that
    $$fracf(x) + f(y)2 ge fracf^**(x) + f^**(y)2 ge f^**left(fracx + y2right)$$
    for all $x, y in operatornamedom f$.

  • Therefore,
    $$fracf(x) + f(y)2 = f^**left(fracx + y2right)$$
    implies that $f(x) = f^**(x)$ and $f(y) = f^**(y)$.

  • Another consequence is that $f^**(lambda x + (1 - lambda y)) = lambda f^**(x) + (1 - lambda)f^**(y)$ for all $lambda in [0, 1]$.

My thoughts:



  • Really, I just need to establish that $f^**(x) = f(x)$ for all $x$.

  • Despite biduals showing up both in the premises and the above desired conclusion, there doesn't seem to be a direct path to manipulate one to the other, especially since not every point in $overlineoperatornameconv operatornamedom f$ can be expressed as $fracx+y2$ where $x, y in operatornamedom f$.

  • The function $g(x, y) = fracf(x)+f(y)2 - f^**left(fracx + y2right)$ is not a metric in general, even if $g(x, y) = 0 implies x = y$.

  • I get a feeling that Stegall's variational principle might help, for a variety of reasons, but one handy reason is that we may add any linear functional to $f$, without changing $g$.

Any thoughts are welcome!







share|cite|improve this question












Suppose $X$ is a real Hilbert Space and $f : X to (-infty, infty]$ is a lower semicontinuous, proper function. Further, suppose $f$ satisfies the following, for all $x, y in operatornamedom f$:
$$fracf(x) + f(y)2 = f^**left(fracx + y2right) implies x = y.$$
Is $f$ necessarily a convex function?




Here $^*$ refers to the Fenchel conjugate, and $operatornamedom f$ is the set of points $x in X$ such that $f(x) neq infty$.



I know that:



  • $f^**(x) le f(x)$ for all $x$ and $f^**(x) = f(x)$ for all $x$ if and only if $f$ is convex (and lsc).

  • In fact, $f^**$ is the greatest convex minorant of $f$.

  • This means that
    $$fracf(x) + f(y)2 ge fracf^**(x) + f^**(y)2 ge f^**left(fracx + y2right)$$
    for all $x, y in operatornamedom f$.

  • Therefore,
    $$fracf(x) + f(y)2 = f^**left(fracx + y2right)$$
    implies that $f(x) = f^**(x)$ and $f(y) = f^**(y)$.

  • Another consequence is that $f^**(lambda x + (1 - lambda y)) = lambda f^**(x) + (1 - lambda)f^**(y)$ for all $lambda in [0, 1]$.

My thoughts:



  • Really, I just need to establish that $f^**(x) = f(x)$ for all $x$.

  • Despite biduals showing up both in the premises and the above desired conclusion, there doesn't seem to be a direct path to manipulate one to the other, especially since not every point in $overlineoperatornameconv operatornamedom f$ can be expressed as $fracx+y2$ where $x, y in operatornamedom f$.

  • The function $g(x, y) = fracf(x)+f(y)2 - f^**left(fracx + y2right)$ is not a metric in general, even if $g(x, y) = 0 implies x = y$.

  • I get a feeling that Stegall's variational principle might help, for a variety of reasons, but one handy reason is that we may add any linear functional to $f$, without changing $g$.

Any thoughts are welcome!









share|cite|improve this question










share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question









asked Aug 1 at 5:21









Theo Bendit

11.7k1841




11.7k1841






This question has an open bounty worth +400
reputation from Theo Bendit ending ending at 2018-08-14 04:59:49Z">in 5 days.


This question has not received enough attention.








This question has an open bounty worth +400
reputation from Theo Bendit ending ending at 2018-08-14 04:59:49Z">in 5 days.


This question has not received enough attention.













  • What does "proper" mean?
    – mathworker21
    yesterday










  • Proper means $operatornamedom f neq emptyset$.
    – Theo Bendit
    13 hours ago
















  • What does "proper" mean?
    – mathworker21
    yesterday










  • Proper means $operatornamedom f neq emptyset$.
    – Theo Bendit
    13 hours ago















What does "proper" mean?
– mathworker21
yesterday




What does "proper" mean?
– mathworker21
yesterday












Proper means $operatornamedom f neq emptyset$.
– Theo Bendit
13 hours ago




Proper means $operatornamedom f neq emptyset$.
– Theo Bendit
13 hours ago















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2868745%2fif-f-is-proper-lsc-and-fracfx-fy2-f-left-fracx-y2%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest



































active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes










 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2868745%2fif-f-is-proper-lsc-and-fracfx-fy2-f-left-fracx-y2%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?