Solving Matrix RODEs with 1/f noise

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I've been trying to solve differential equations of the form



$$dotrho=omega Lrho$$



where $omega=omega(t)$ is scalar 1/f (or pink) noise and $L$ and $rho$ are matrices.



I wanted to know if there were any recommended numerical schemes to solve it. I have looked into the Taylor-RODE scheme (described here: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f357/b5b871bc704659bf18507135eea9f57a5fa4.pdf) but it doesn't seem very efficient (involves various integrals and such). I was hoping to find a nice efficient SDE-resembling scheme to solve it. I saw some papers on forming nonlinear and/or coupled SDEs for just 1/f noise.



https://arxiv.org/pdf/1603.03013.pdf



http://web.vu.lt/tfai/j.ruseckas/files/presentations/Turkey-2012.pdf



https://arxiv.org/pdf/1003.1155.pdf



I wanted to know if anyone had implemented solutions to SDEs like these and if anyone has a good idea on how to extend it properly and efficently to these matrix equations.



If there are any other nice schemes or ideas you have, please let me know as well!



Thanks!







share|cite|improve this question























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    I've been trying to solve differential equations of the form



    $$dotrho=omega Lrho$$



    where $omega=omega(t)$ is scalar 1/f (or pink) noise and $L$ and $rho$ are matrices.



    I wanted to know if there were any recommended numerical schemes to solve it. I have looked into the Taylor-RODE scheme (described here: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f357/b5b871bc704659bf18507135eea9f57a5fa4.pdf) but it doesn't seem very efficient (involves various integrals and such). I was hoping to find a nice efficient SDE-resembling scheme to solve it. I saw some papers on forming nonlinear and/or coupled SDEs for just 1/f noise.



    https://arxiv.org/pdf/1603.03013.pdf



    http://web.vu.lt/tfai/j.ruseckas/files/presentations/Turkey-2012.pdf



    https://arxiv.org/pdf/1003.1155.pdf



    I wanted to know if anyone had implemented solutions to SDEs like these and if anyone has a good idea on how to extend it properly and efficently to these matrix equations.



    If there are any other nice schemes or ideas you have, please let me know as well!



    Thanks!







    share|cite|improve this question





















      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      I've been trying to solve differential equations of the form



      $$dotrho=omega Lrho$$



      where $omega=omega(t)$ is scalar 1/f (or pink) noise and $L$ and $rho$ are matrices.



      I wanted to know if there were any recommended numerical schemes to solve it. I have looked into the Taylor-RODE scheme (described here: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f357/b5b871bc704659bf18507135eea9f57a5fa4.pdf) but it doesn't seem very efficient (involves various integrals and such). I was hoping to find a nice efficient SDE-resembling scheme to solve it. I saw some papers on forming nonlinear and/or coupled SDEs for just 1/f noise.



      https://arxiv.org/pdf/1603.03013.pdf



      http://web.vu.lt/tfai/j.ruseckas/files/presentations/Turkey-2012.pdf



      https://arxiv.org/pdf/1003.1155.pdf



      I wanted to know if anyone had implemented solutions to SDEs like these and if anyone has a good idea on how to extend it properly and efficently to these matrix equations.



      If there are any other nice schemes or ideas you have, please let me know as well!



      Thanks!







      share|cite|improve this question











      I've been trying to solve differential equations of the form



      $$dotrho=omega Lrho$$



      where $omega=omega(t)$ is scalar 1/f (or pink) noise and $L$ and $rho$ are matrices.



      I wanted to know if there were any recommended numerical schemes to solve it. I have looked into the Taylor-RODE scheme (described here: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f357/b5b871bc704659bf18507135eea9f57a5fa4.pdf) but it doesn't seem very efficient (involves various integrals and such). I was hoping to find a nice efficient SDE-resembling scheme to solve it. I saw some papers on forming nonlinear and/or coupled SDEs for just 1/f noise.



      https://arxiv.org/pdf/1603.03013.pdf



      http://web.vu.lt/tfai/j.ruseckas/files/presentations/Turkey-2012.pdf



      https://arxiv.org/pdf/1003.1155.pdf



      I wanted to know if anyone had implemented solutions to SDEs like these and if anyone has a good idea on how to extend it properly and efficently to these matrix equations.



      If there are any other nice schemes or ideas you have, please let me know as well!



      Thanks!









      share|cite|improve this question










      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question









      asked Jul 25 at 16:46









      Aakash Lakshmanan

      687




      687

























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );








           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2862602%2fsolving-matrix-rodes-with-1-f-noise%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest



































          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes










           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


























           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2862602%2fsolving-matrix-rodes-with-1-f-noise%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          Comments

          Popular posts from this blog

          What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

          Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

          Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?