On the diffeomorphism $mu$ in the definition of a weakly symmetric space

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Selberg in some paper introduced the notion of weakly symmetric space:




Definition. A weakly symmetric (Riemannian) space is a triple $(S, G, mu)$ with $S$ is a Riemannian manifold, $G$ a locally compact transitive group of isometries of $S$ and $mu$ an isometry (not necessarily in $G$) such that:



  1. $mu^2 in G$

  2. $mu G mu^-1 = G$

  3. for all $x, y in S$ there exists $sigma in G$ with
    $$ sigma x = mu y quad, quad sigma y = mu x $$



The point is that when $(S, G, mu)$ is such a triplet, then the algebra of $G$-invariant differential operators is commutative.



The same proof works when $G$ is not necessarily transitive and $mu$ is only a diffeomorphism satisfying 1. and 3.



(Examples: $mathbb R^n$ with $H$ the translation group and $mu$ the reflection, a unimodular Lie group with $H$ generated by left and right translations, and $mu$ the inversion, a symmetric space with its full isometry group and $mu=1$.)




Question. In the definition of a weakly symmetric space (and more generally, a triplet $(S, H, mu)$ as above) is $mu$ automatically an isometry? Is $mu G mu^-1 = G$ automatic?








share|cite|improve this question

























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    Selberg in some paper introduced the notion of weakly symmetric space:




    Definition. A weakly symmetric (Riemannian) space is a triple $(S, G, mu)$ with $S$ is a Riemannian manifold, $G$ a locally compact transitive group of isometries of $S$ and $mu$ an isometry (not necessarily in $G$) such that:



    1. $mu^2 in G$

    2. $mu G mu^-1 = G$

    3. for all $x, y in S$ there exists $sigma in G$ with
      $$ sigma x = mu y quad, quad sigma y = mu x $$



    The point is that when $(S, G, mu)$ is such a triplet, then the algebra of $G$-invariant differential operators is commutative.



    The same proof works when $G$ is not necessarily transitive and $mu$ is only a diffeomorphism satisfying 1. and 3.



    (Examples: $mathbb R^n$ with $H$ the translation group and $mu$ the reflection, a unimodular Lie group with $H$ generated by left and right translations, and $mu$ the inversion, a symmetric space with its full isometry group and $mu=1$.)




    Question. In the definition of a weakly symmetric space (and more generally, a triplet $(S, H, mu)$ as above) is $mu$ automatically an isometry? Is $mu G mu^-1 = G$ automatic?








    share|cite|improve this question























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      Selberg in some paper introduced the notion of weakly symmetric space:




      Definition. A weakly symmetric (Riemannian) space is a triple $(S, G, mu)$ with $S$ is a Riemannian manifold, $G$ a locally compact transitive group of isometries of $S$ and $mu$ an isometry (not necessarily in $G$) such that:



      1. $mu^2 in G$

      2. $mu G mu^-1 = G$

      3. for all $x, y in S$ there exists $sigma in G$ with
        $$ sigma x = mu y quad, quad sigma y = mu x $$



      The point is that when $(S, G, mu)$ is such a triplet, then the algebra of $G$-invariant differential operators is commutative.



      The same proof works when $G$ is not necessarily transitive and $mu$ is only a diffeomorphism satisfying 1. and 3.



      (Examples: $mathbb R^n$ with $H$ the translation group and $mu$ the reflection, a unimodular Lie group with $H$ generated by left and right translations, and $mu$ the inversion, a symmetric space with its full isometry group and $mu=1$.)




      Question. In the definition of a weakly symmetric space (and more generally, a triplet $(S, H, mu)$ as above) is $mu$ automatically an isometry? Is $mu G mu^-1 = G$ automatic?








      share|cite|improve this question













      Selberg in some paper introduced the notion of weakly symmetric space:




      Definition. A weakly symmetric (Riemannian) space is a triple $(S, G, mu)$ with $S$ is a Riemannian manifold, $G$ a locally compact transitive group of isometries of $S$ and $mu$ an isometry (not necessarily in $G$) such that:



      1. $mu^2 in G$

      2. $mu G mu^-1 = G$

      3. for all $x, y in S$ there exists $sigma in G$ with
        $$ sigma x = mu y quad, quad sigma y = mu x $$



      The point is that when $(S, G, mu)$ is such a triplet, then the algebra of $G$-invariant differential operators is commutative.



      The same proof works when $G$ is not necessarily transitive and $mu$ is only a diffeomorphism satisfying 1. and 3.



      (Examples: $mathbb R^n$ with $H$ the translation group and $mu$ the reflection, a unimodular Lie group with $H$ generated by left and right translations, and $mu$ the inversion, a symmetric space with its full isometry group and $mu=1$.)




      Question. In the definition of a weakly symmetric space (and more generally, a triplet $(S, H, mu)$ as above) is $mu$ automatically an isometry? Is $mu G mu^-1 = G$ automatic?










      share|cite|improve this question












      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jul 25 at 13:43
























      asked Jul 25 at 13:28









      barto

      12.9k32478




      12.9k32478

























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );








           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2862409%2fon-the-diffeomorphism-mu-in-the-definition-of-a-weakly-symmetric-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest



































          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes










           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


























           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2862409%2fon-the-diffeomorphism-mu-in-the-definition-of-a-weakly-symmetric-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          Comments

          Popular posts from this blog

          What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

          Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?

          Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon