The Image of Unitary Representation in the Space of Bimodules

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite













TL;DR: Bimodules over a von Neumann algebra are commonly understood as
a generalization of group representation. Indeed, when the von Neumann algebra $N$ is $mathcalL G$, the unitary representations embed into the
bimodules.



Question: Can we describe the image of this embedding? Which are the
bimodules over $mathcalL G$ that come from a representation?




Let $G$ be a discrete group. The four objects in the diagram bellow are:



  • $mathrmRep_cyc(G)$: its cyclic unitary representations, i.e. unitary representations $pi: G to U(H_pi)$ for which there is a vector $xi_pi in H_pi$ such that $pi(g) xi : g in G$ spans a dense subset of $H_pi$.

  • $mathcalP(G)$: The cone of positive definite functions on $G$.

  • $ _N H _N$: The space of all $N$-$N$-bimodules, i.e: Hilbert spaces with normal commuting left and right actions of $N$. In this case $N = mathcalL G$, the left regular von Neumann algebra of $G$. We ask the bimodules to be cyclic, i.e.: there has to be a $xi in H$ such that $x cdot xi cdot y$ is dense and that $xi$ is left $N$-bounded.

  • $mathcalCP(N to N)$: The cone of completely positive and normal maps.

All those objects are closely related. For instance, there are bijective correspondences between the objects in each of the columns of the diagram bellow. The objects in the right column are interpreted as "generalizations" of those on the right column from the context of groups to that of von Neumann algebras. The arrows from the left column to the right one are injections.





In particular the maps above are given by:




  • (i) Given a cyclic representation $pi$ there is a positive definite function $varphi$ given by $$varphi(g) = langle xi, pi(g) xi rangle.$$


  • (ii) Given a positive definite function $varphi$ we can obtain a rep. by a GNS-type construction. Define a positive form in $ell^1(G)$ given by $langle varphi, zeta^ast ast zeta rangle$. Quotienting out the nullspace and taking completions gives a Hilbert space with a cyclic representation of $G$.


  • (iii) Every unitary representation $pi$ gives rise to a $mathcalL G$-bimodule $ell^2(G) otimes H_pi$ with left and right actions given by:
    $$
    lambda_g cdot ( delta_k otimes xi ) cdot lambda_h = delta_g k h otimes pi(g) xi.
    $$


  • (iv) If $varphi$ is positive definite, the Fourier multiplier given by extension of $lambda_g mapsto varphi(g) lambda_g$ is normal and cp.


  • (v) Given a bimodule $H$ with a left $N$-bounded cyclic vector $xi$ we can construct a normal cp map by $x mapsto L_xi^ast x L_xi$


  • (vi) Given a normal cp map $phi: N to N$ we can construct a bimodule $L^2(N otimes_varphi N)$ by a GNS-type construction. Take $N otimes_alg N$ and complete it with respect to
    $$
    biglangle x_1 otimes y_1, x_2 otimes y_2 bigrangle = tau_N big( x_1^ast , phi(y_1^* y_2) , x_2 big).
    $$
    The actions are given by $x cdot (a otimes b) cdot y = x a otimes b y$. The construction above requires that $N$ is finite since it uses the trace (no problem since $N = mathcal L G$).

More on (iii), (v) and (vi) can be found in [AP: Chapter 13].




Question 1: The image of (iv) can be described as the $Delta$-equivariant cp maps, i.e. maps $T$ such that:
$$ (T otimes id) cdot Delta = Delta cdot T, $$
where $Delta: N to N otimes N$ is the natural comultiplication $Delta(lambda_g) = lambda_g otimes lambda_g$. Can something similar be said of the image of
(iii)? Is there a notion of "equivariant" bimodule?



Question 2: Given a normal cp map $phi: mathcal L G to mathcal L G$ we can associate to it a positive definite function $varphi(g) = tau(phi(lambda_g) lambda_g^ast)$. Is there an analogous
construction that gives an equivariant bimodule from a general one?




  • [AP]: http://www.math.ucla.edu/~popa/Books/IIun-v13.pdf






share|cite|improve this question























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite













    TL;DR: Bimodules over a von Neumann algebra are commonly understood as
    a generalization of group representation. Indeed, when the von Neumann algebra $N$ is $mathcalL G$, the unitary representations embed into the
    bimodules.



    Question: Can we describe the image of this embedding? Which are the
    bimodules over $mathcalL G$ that come from a representation?




    Let $G$ be a discrete group. The four objects in the diagram bellow are:



    • $mathrmRep_cyc(G)$: its cyclic unitary representations, i.e. unitary representations $pi: G to U(H_pi)$ for which there is a vector $xi_pi in H_pi$ such that $pi(g) xi : g in G$ spans a dense subset of $H_pi$.

    • $mathcalP(G)$: The cone of positive definite functions on $G$.

    • $ _N H _N$: The space of all $N$-$N$-bimodules, i.e: Hilbert spaces with normal commuting left and right actions of $N$. In this case $N = mathcalL G$, the left regular von Neumann algebra of $G$. We ask the bimodules to be cyclic, i.e.: there has to be a $xi in H$ such that $x cdot xi cdot y$ is dense and that $xi$ is left $N$-bounded.

    • $mathcalCP(N to N)$: The cone of completely positive and normal maps.

    All those objects are closely related. For instance, there are bijective correspondences between the objects in each of the columns of the diagram bellow. The objects in the right column are interpreted as "generalizations" of those on the right column from the context of groups to that of von Neumann algebras. The arrows from the left column to the right one are injections.





    In particular the maps above are given by:




    • (i) Given a cyclic representation $pi$ there is a positive definite function $varphi$ given by $$varphi(g) = langle xi, pi(g) xi rangle.$$


    • (ii) Given a positive definite function $varphi$ we can obtain a rep. by a GNS-type construction. Define a positive form in $ell^1(G)$ given by $langle varphi, zeta^ast ast zeta rangle$. Quotienting out the nullspace and taking completions gives a Hilbert space with a cyclic representation of $G$.


    • (iii) Every unitary representation $pi$ gives rise to a $mathcalL G$-bimodule $ell^2(G) otimes H_pi$ with left and right actions given by:
      $$
      lambda_g cdot ( delta_k otimes xi ) cdot lambda_h = delta_g k h otimes pi(g) xi.
      $$


    • (iv) If $varphi$ is positive definite, the Fourier multiplier given by extension of $lambda_g mapsto varphi(g) lambda_g$ is normal and cp.


    • (v) Given a bimodule $H$ with a left $N$-bounded cyclic vector $xi$ we can construct a normal cp map by $x mapsto L_xi^ast x L_xi$


    • (vi) Given a normal cp map $phi: N to N$ we can construct a bimodule $L^2(N otimes_varphi N)$ by a GNS-type construction. Take $N otimes_alg N$ and complete it with respect to
      $$
      biglangle x_1 otimes y_1, x_2 otimes y_2 bigrangle = tau_N big( x_1^ast , phi(y_1^* y_2) , x_2 big).
      $$
      The actions are given by $x cdot (a otimes b) cdot y = x a otimes b y$. The construction above requires that $N$ is finite since it uses the trace (no problem since $N = mathcal L G$).

    More on (iii), (v) and (vi) can be found in [AP: Chapter 13].




    Question 1: The image of (iv) can be described as the $Delta$-equivariant cp maps, i.e. maps $T$ such that:
    $$ (T otimes id) cdot Delta = Delta cdot T, $$
    where $Delta: N to N otimes N$ is the natural comultiplication $Delta(lambda_g) = lambda_g otimes lambda_g$. Can something similar be said of the image of
    (iii)? Is there a notion of "equivariant" bimodule?



    Question 2: Given a normal cp map $phi: mathcal L G to mathcal L G$ we can associate to it a positive definite function $varphi(g) = tau(phi(lambda_g) lambda_g^ast)$. Is there an analogous
    construction that gives an equivariant bimodule from a general one?




    • [AP]: http://www.math.ucla.edu/~popa/Books/IIun-v13.pdf






    share|cite|improve this question





















      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite












      TL;DR: Bimodules over a von Neumann algebra are commonly understood as
      a generalization of group representation. Indeed, when the von Neumann algebra $N$ is $mathcalL G$, the unitary representations embed into the
      bimodules.



      Question: Can we describe the image of this embedding? Which are the
      bimodules over $mathcalL G$ that come from a representation?




      Let $G$ be a discrete group. The four objects in the diagram bellow are:



      • $mathrmRep_cyc(G)$: its cyclic unitary representations, i.e. unitary representations $pi: G to U(H_pi)$ for which there is a vector $xi_pi in H_pi$ such that $pi(g) xi : g in G$ spans a dense subset of $H_pi$.

      • $mathcalP(G)$: The cone of positive definite functions on $G$.

      • $ _N H _N$: The space of all $N$-$N$-bimodules, i.e: Hilbert spaces with normal commuting left and right actions of $N$. In this case $N = mathcalL G$, the left regular von Neumann algebra of $G$. We ask the bimodules to be cyclic, i.e.: there has to be a $xi in H$ such that $x cdot xi cdot y$ is dense and that $xi$ is left $N$-bounded.

      • $mathcalCP(N to N)$: The cone of completely positive and normal maps.

      All those objects are closely related. For instance, there are bijective correspondences between the objects in each of the columns of the diagram bellow. The objects in the right column are interpreted as "generalizations" of those on the right column from the context of groups to that of von Neumann algebras. The arrows from the left column to the right one are injections.





      In particular the maps above are given by:




      • (i) Given a cyclic representation $pi$ there is a positive definite function $varphi$ given by $$varphi(g) = langle xi, pi(g) xi rangle.$$


      • (ii) Given a positive definite function $varphi$ we can obtain a rep. by a GNS-type construction. Define a positive form in $ell^1(G)$ given by $langle varphi, zeta^ast ast zeta rangle$. Quotienting out the nullspace and taking completions gives a Hilbert space with a cyclic representation of $G$.


      • (iii) Every unitary representation $pi$ gives rise to a $mathcalL G$-bimodule $ell^2(G) otimes H_pi$ with left and right actions given by:
        $$
        lambda_g cdot ( delta_k otimes xi ) cdot lambda_h = delta_g k h otimes pi(g) xi.
        $$


      • (iv) If $varphi$ is positive definite, the Fourier multiplier given by extension of $lambda_g mapsto varphi(g) lambda_g$ is normal and cp.


      • (v) Given a bimodule $H$ with a left $N$-bounded cyclic vector $xi$ we can construct a normal cp map by $x mapsto L_xi^ast x L_xi$


      • (vi) Given a normal cp map $phi: N to N$ we can construct a bimodule $L^2(N otimes_varphi N)$ by a GNS-type construction. Take $N otimes_alg N$ and complete it with respect to
        $$
        biglangle x_1 otimes y_1, x_2 otimes y_2 bigrangle = tau_N big( x_1^ast , phi(y_1^* y_2) , x_2 big).
        $$
        The actions are given by $x cdot (a otimes b) cdot y = x a otimes b y$. The construction above requires that $N$ is finite since it uses the trace (no problem since $N = mathcal L G$).

      More on (iii), (v) and (vi) can be found in [AP: Chapter 13].




      Question 1: The image of (iv) can be described as the $Delta$-equivariant cp maps, i.e. maps $T$ such that:
      $$ (T otimes id) cdot Delta = Delta cdot T, $$
      where $Delta: N to N otimes N$ is the natural comultiplication $Delta(lambda_g) = lambda_g otimes lambda_g$. Can something similar be said of the image of
      (iii)? Is there a notion of "equivariant" bimodule?



      Question 2: Given a normal cp map $phi: mathcal L G to mathcal L G$ we can associate to it a positive definite function $varphi(g) = tau(phi(lambda_g) lambda_g^ast)$. Is there an analogous
      construction that gives an equivariant bimodule from a general one?




      • [AP]: http://www.math.ucla.edu/~popa/Books/IIun-v13.pdf






      share|cite|improve this question












      TL;DR: Bimodules over a von Neumann algebra are commonly understood as
      a generalization of group representation. Indeed, when the von Neumann algebra $N$ is $mathcalL G$, the unitary representations embed into the
      bimodules.



      Question: Can we describe the image of this embedding? Which are the
      bimodules over $mathcalL G$ that come from a representation?




      Let $G$ be a discrete group. The four objects in the diagram bellow are:



      • $mathrmRep_cyc(G)$: its cyclic unitary representations, i.e. unitary representations $pi: G to U(H_pi)$ for which there is a vector $xi_pi in H_pi$ such that $pi(g) xi : g in G$ spans a dense subset of $H_pi$.

      • $mathcalP(G)$: The cone of positive definite functions on $G$.

      • $ _N H _N$: The space of all $N$-$N$-bimodules, i.e: Hilbert spaces with normal commuting left and right actions of $N$. In this case $N = mathcalL G$, the left regular von Neumann algebra of $G$. We ask the bimodules to be cyclic, i.e.: there has to be a $xi in H$ such that $x cdot xi cdot y$ is dense and that $xi$ is left $N$-bounded.

      • $mathcalCP(N to N)$: The cone of completely positive and normal maps.

      All those objects are closely related. For instance, there are bijective correspondences between the objects in each of the columns of the diagram bellow. The objects in the right column are interpreted as "generalizations" of those on the right column from the context of groups to that of von Neumann algebras. The arrows from the left column to the right one are injections.





      In particular the maps above are given by:




      • (i) Given a cyclic representation $pi$ there is a positive definite function $varphi$ given by $$varphi(g) = langle xi, pi(g) xi rangle.$$


      • (ii) Given a positive definite function $varphi$ we can obtain a rep. by a GNS-type construction. Define a positive form in $ell^1(G)$ given by $langle varphi, zeta^ast ast zeta rangle$. Quotienting out the nullspace and taking completions gives a Hilbert space with a cyclic representation of $G$.


      • (iii) Every unitary representation $pi$ gives rise to a $mathcalL G$-bimodule $ell^2(G) otimes H_pi$ with left and right actions given by:
        $$
        lambda_g cdot ( delta_k otimes xi ) cdot lambda_h = delta_g k h otimes pi(g) xi.
        $$


      • (iv) If $varphi$ is positive definite, the Fourier multiplier given by extension of $lambda_g mapsto varphi(g) lambda_g$ is normal and cp.


      • (v) Given a bimodule $H$ with a left $N$-bounded cyclic vector $xi$ we can construct a normal cp map by $x mapsto L_xi^ast x L_xi$


      • (vi) Given a normal cp map $phi: N to N$ we can construct a bimodule $L^2(N otimes_varphi N)$ by a GNS-type construction. Take $N otimes_alg N$ and complete it with respect to
        $$
        biglangle x_1 otimes y_1, x_2 otimes y_2 bigrangle = tau_N big( x_1^ast , phi(y_1^* y_2) , x_2 big).
        $$
        The actions are given by $x cdot (a otimes b) cdot y = x a otimes b y$. The construction above requires that $N$ is finite since it uses the trace (no problem since $N = mathcal L G$).

      More on (iii), (v) and (vi) can be found in [AP: Chapter 13].




      Question 1: The image of (iv) can be described as the $Delta$-equivariant cp maps, i.e. maps $T$ such that:
      $$ (T otimes id) cdot Delta = Delta cdot T, $$
      where $Delta: N to N otimes N$ is the natural comultiplication $Delta(lambda_g) = lambda_g otimes lambda_g$. Can something similar be said of the image of
      (iii)? Is there a notion of "equivariant" bimodule?



      Question 2: Given a normal cp map $phi: mathcal L G to mathcal L G$ we can associate to it a positive definite function $varphi(g) = tau(phi(lambda_g) lambda_g^ast)$. Is there an analogous
      construction that gives an equivariant bimodule from a general one?




      • [AP]: http://www.math.ucla.edu/~popa/Books/IIun-v13.pdf








      share|cite|improve this question










      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question









      asked Jul 25 at 13:48









      Adrián González-Pérez

      54138




      54138

























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );








           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2862427%2fthe-image-of-unitary-representation-in-the-space-of-bimodules%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest



































          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes










           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


























           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2862427%2fthe-image-of-unitary-representation-in-the-space-of-bimodules%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          Comments

          Popular posts from this blog

          What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

          Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

          Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?