Conditional probability by joint distribution

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
-1
down vote

favorite












I have read the following equation:

$$P(E_1|H)*P(E_2|H)*P(H) = P(E_1,E_2,H) $$

I don't understand why this equation is true. I know that

$$P(E_1|H)*P(H) = P(E_1,H)$$

thus:
$$P(E_1|H)*P(E_2|H)*P(H)=P(E_1,H)*P(E_2|H)$$
but why:
$$P(E_1|H)*P(E_2|H)*P(H) = P(E_1,E_2,H) $$
As a extra information it is also given that:

$$P(E_1|H,E_2) = P(E_1|H)$$







share|cite|improve this question





















  • How/When did you use the "extra information"?
    – Did
    Jul 25 at 17:57










  • ((This is not a question of stochastic-calculus at all.))
    – Did
    Jul 25 at 17:58















up vote
-1
down vote

favorite












I have read the following equation:

$$P(E_1|H)*P(E_2|H)*P(H) = P(E_1,E_2,H) $$

I don't understand why this equation is true. I know that

$$P(E_1|H)*P(H) = P(E_1,H)$$

thus:
$$P(E_1|H)*P(E_2|H)*P(H)=P(E_1,H)*P(E_2|H)$$
but why:
$$P(E_1|H)*P(E_2|H)*P(H) = P(E_1,E_2,H) $$
As a extra information it is also given that:

$$P(E_1|H,E_2) = P(E_1|H)$$







share|cite|improve this question





















  • How/When did you use the "extra information"?
    – Did
    Jul 25 at 17:57










  • ((This is not a question of stochastic-calculus at all.))
    – Did
    Jul 25 at 17:58













up vote
-1
down vote

favorite









up vote
-1
down vote

favorite











I have read the following equation:

$$P(E_1|H)*P(E_2|H)*P(H) = P(E_1,E_2,H) $$

I don't understand why this equation is true. I know that

$$P(E_1|H)*P(H) = P(E_1,H)$$

thus:
$$P(E_1|H)*P(E_2|H)*P(H)=P(E_1,H)*P(E_2|H)$$
but why:
$$P(E_1|H)*P(E_2|H)*P(H) = P(E_1,E_2,H) $$
As a extra information it is also given that:

$$P(E_1|H,E_2) = P(E_1|H)$$







share|cite|improve this question













I have read the following equation:

$$P(E_1|H)*P(E_2|H)*P(H) = P(E_1,E_2,H) $$

I don't understand why this equation is true. I know that

$$P(E_1|H)*P(H) = P(E_1,H)$$

thus:
$$P(E_1|H)*P(E_2|H)*P(H)=P(E_1,H)*P(E_2|H)$$
but why:
$$P(E_1|H)*P(E_2|H)*P(H) = P(E_1,E_2,H) $$
As a extra information it is also given that:

$$P(E_1|H,E_2) = P(E_1|H)$$









share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 25 at 17:36
























asked Jul 25 at 15:11









Mo Prog

1307




1307











  • How/When did you use the "extra information"?
    – Did
    Jul 25 at 17:57










  • ((This is not a question of stochastic-calculus at all.))
    – Did
    Jul 25 at 17:58

















  • How/When did you use the "extra information"?
    – Did
    Jul 25 at 17:57










  • ((This is not a question of stochastic-calculus at all.))
    – Did
    Jul 25 at 17:58
















How/When did you use the "extra information"?
– Did
Jul 25 at 17:57




How/When did you use the "extra information"?
– Did
Jul 25 at 17:57












((This is not a question of stochastic-calculus at all.))
– Did
Jul 25 at 17:58





((This is not a question of stochastic-calculus at all.))
– Did
Jul 25 at 17:58











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote



accepted










We are given that $$P(E_1|H,E_2)=P(E_1|H)$$



hence,



$$fracP(E_1,H,E_2)P(H,E_2)=P(E_1|H)$$



$$P(E_1,H,E_2)=P(E_1|H)P(H,E_2)$$



but we have $P(H,E_2)=P(H)P(E_2|H)$, hence the result.






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );








     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2862508%2fconditional-probability-by-joint-distribution%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    2
    down vote



    accepted










    We are given that $$P(E_1|H,E_2)=P(E_1|H)$$



    hence,



    $$fracP(E_1,H,E_2)P(H,E_2)=P(E_1|H)$$



    $$P(E_1,H,E_2)=P(E_1|H)P(H,E_2)$$



    but we have $P(H,E_2)=P(H)P(E_2|H)$, hence the result.






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      2
      down vote



      accepted










      We are given that $$P(E_1|H,E_2)=P(E_1|H)$$



      hence,



      $$fracP(E_1,H,E_2)P(H,E_2)=P(E_1|H)$$



      $$P(E_1,H,E_2)=P(E_1|H)P(H,E_2)$$



      but we have $P(H,E_2)=P(H)P(E_2|H)$, hence the result.






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        2
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        2
        down vote



        accepted






        We are given that $$P(E_1|H,E_2)=P(E_1|H)$$



        hence,



        $$fracP(E_1,H,E_2)P(H,E_2)=P(E_1|H)$$



        $$P(E_1,H,E_2)=P(E_1|H)P(H,E_2)$$



        but we have $P(H,E_2)=P(H)P(E_2|H)$, hence the result.






        share|cite|improve this answer













        We are given that $$P(E_1|H,E_2)=P(E_1|H)$$



        hence,



        $$fracP(E_1,H,E_2)P(H,E_2)=P(E_1|H)$$



        $$P(E_1,H,E_2)=P(E_1|H)P(H,E_2)$$



        but we have $P(H,E_2)=P(H)P(E_2|H)$, hence the result.







        share|cite|improve this answer













        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer











        answered Jul 25 at 15:15









        Siong Thye Goh

        77.3k134794




        77.3k134794






















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


























             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2862508%2fconditional-probability-by-joint-distribution%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            Comments

            Popular posts from this blog

            What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

            Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

            Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?