Integrability of Lipschitz constant of multivariate function

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Suppose $f in C(U, mathbbR^n)$, where $U$ is an open subset of $mathbbR times mathbbR^n$, and $f$ is locally Lipschitz continuous in the second argument, meaning that, for each $t$,
$$
sup_x neq y in V fracf(t, x) - f(t, y)x - y
$$
is finite for every compact subset $V$ of $mathbbR^n$ (such that $t times V subset U$, of course). Now, suppose $(t_0, x_0) subset U$ and choose $delta, T > 0$ such that $[t_0, t_0 + T] times overlineB_delta(x_0) subset U$. Set
$$
L(t) = sup_x neq y in B_delta(x_0) fracf(t, x) - f(t, y)x - y.
$$
and
$$
L_1(t) = int_t_0^t L(s) ds
$$
Now, I'm reading a book where one condition of a theorem is that $L_1(T_0) < infty$, where $0 < T_0 le T$, and along the proof the author assumes that $L_1'(t) = L(t)$.



I was thinking that $L$ must be continuous (so one can use the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus to have $L_1'(t) = L(t)$), but then integrability comes for free and it wouldn't make sense for the author to put $L_1(T_0) < infty$ as a condition in the theorem (it would already be true). So if $L$ is not continuous, why is it integrable (at least on a small interval arounnd $t_0$) and why is $L_1'(t) = L(t)$?







share|cite|improve this question























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    Suppose $f in C(U, mathbbR^n)$, where $U$ is an open subset of $mathbbR times mathbbR^n$, and $f$ is locally Lipschitz continuous in the second argument, meaning that, for each $t$,
    $$
    sup_x neq y in V fracf(t, x) - f(t, y)x - y
    $$
    is finite for every compact subset $V$ of $mathbbR^n$ (such that $t times V subset U$, of course). Now, suppose $(t_0, x_0) subset U$ and choose $delta, T > 0$ such that $[t_0, t_0 + T] times overlineB_delta(x_0) subset U$. Set
    $$
    L(t) = sup_x neq y in B_delta(x_0) fracf(t, x) - f(t, y)x - y.
    $$
    and
    $$
    L_1(t) = int_t_0^t L(s) ds
    $$
    Now, I'm reading a book where one condition of a theorem is that $L_1(T_0) < infty$, where $0 < T_0 le T$, and along the proof the author assumes that $L_1'(t) = L(t)$.



    I was thinking that $L$ must be continuous (so one can use the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus to have $L_1'(t) = L(t)$), but then integrability comes for free and it wouldn't make sense for the author to put $L_1(T_0) < infty$ as a condition in the theorem (it would already be true). So if $L$ is not continuous, why is it integrable (at least on a small interval arounnd $t_0$) and why is $L_1'(t) = L(t)$?







    share|cite|improve this question





















      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      Suppose $f in C(U, mathbbR^n)$, where $U$ is an open subset of $mathbbR times mathbbR^n$, and $f$ is locally Lipschitz continuous in the second argument, meaning that, for each $t$,
      $$
      sup_x neq y in V fracf(t, x) - f(t, y)x - y
      $$
      is finite for every compact subset $V$ of $mathbbR^n$ (such that $t times V subset U$, of course). Now, suppose $(t_0, x_0) subset U$ and choose $delta, T > 0$ such that $[t_0, t_0 + T] times overlineB_delta(x_0) subset U$. Set
      $$
      L(t) = sup_x neq y in B_delta(x_0) fracf(t, x) - f(t, y)x - y.
      $$
      and
      $$
      L_1(t) = int_t_0^t L(s) ds
      $$
      Now, I'm reading a book where one condition of a theorem is that $L_1(T_0) < infty$, where $0 < T_0 le T$, and along the proof the author assumes that $L_1'(t) = L(t)$.



      I was thinking that $L$ must be continuous (so one can use the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus to have $L_1'(t) = L(t)$), but then integrability comes for free and it wouldn't make sense for the author to put $L_1(T_0) < infty$ as a condition in the theorem (it would already be true). So if $L$ is not continuous, why is it integrable (at least on a small interval arounnd $t_0$) and why is $L_1'(t) = L(t)$?







      share|cite|improve this question











      Suppose $f in C(U, mathbbR^n)$, where $U$ is an open subset of $mathbbR times mathbbR^n$, and $f$ is locally Lipschitz continuous in the second argument, meaning that, for each $t$,
      $$
      sup_x neq y in V fracf(t, x) - f(t, y)x - y
      $$
      is finite for every compact subset $V$ of $mathbbR^n$ (such that $t times V subset U$, of course). Now, suppose $(t_0, x_0) subset U$ and choose $delta, T > 0$ such that $[t_0, t_0 + T] times overlineB_delta(x_0) subset U$. Set
      $$
      L(t) = sup_x neq y in B_delta(x_0) fracf(t, x) - f(t, y)x - y.
      $$
      and
      $$
      L_1(t) = int_t_0^t L(s) ds
      $$
      Now, I'm reading a book where one condition of a theorem is that $L_1(T_0) < infty$, where $0 < T_0 le T$, and along the proof the author assumes that $L_1'(t) = L(t)$.



      I was thinking that $L$ must be continuous (so one can use the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus to have $L_1'(t) = L(t)$), but then integrability comes for free and it wouldn't make sense for the author to put $L_1(T_0) < infty$ as a condition in the theorem (it would already be true). So if $L$ is not continuous, why is it integrable (at least on a small interval arounnd $t_0$) and why is $L_1'(t) = L(t)$?









      share|cite|improve this question










      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question









      asked Jul 25 at 14:32









      Doughnut Pump

      439312




      439312

























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );








           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2862479%2fintegrability-of-lipschitz-constant-of-multivariate-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest



































          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes










           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


























           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2862479%2fintegrability-of-lipschitz-constant-of-multivariate-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          Comments

          Popular posts from this blog

          What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

          Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?

          Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon