Is there a word for the condition of being infested with ticks? [on hold]
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
up vote
12
down vote
favorite
Is there a word or term for the state of a human or animal infested with ticks?
Mainly just curious.
Examples:
He's suffering from ______.
Don't get near him: he has _____.
single-word-requests terminology medical
put on hold as off-topic by JJJ, JonMark Perry, jimm101, John Lawler, J. Taylor 2 days ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – JJJ, jimm101, John Lawler, J. Taylor
 |Â
show 1 more comment
up vote
12
down vote
favorite
Is there a word or term for the state of a human or animal infested with ticks?
Mainly just curious.
Examples:
He's suffering from ______.
Don't get near him: he has _____.
single-word-requests terminology medical
put on hold as off-topic by JJJ, JonMark Perry, jimm101, John Lawler, J. Taylor 2 days ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – JJJ, jimm101, John Lawler, J. Taylor
1
Since the answer you said "is exactly what [you] were looking for" does not answer the original question at all, I took the liberty of rephrasing it to fit lbf's answer. If you really did mean something else and wanted a word for the person instead of the condition, feel free to rephrase and explain.
– lly
Aug 6 at 5:09
1
Schrodinger's Ticked: You're both Ticked on AND Ticked off.
– aslum
Aug 6 at 12:46
2
If I were looking to be somewhat humorous and non-technical, I'd personally say lousy with ticks just because I like using the more literal meaning of lousy.
– stevesliva
Aug 6 at 17:10
/me expects the etymology of "ticked" to appear here.
– Joshua
Aug 6 at 20:53
See also nhs.uk/conditions/scabies
– StuperUser
Aug 7 at 15:39
 |Â
show 1 more comment
up vote
12
down vote
favorite
up vote
12
down vote
favorite
Is there a word or term for the state of a human or animal infested with ticks?
Mainly just curious.
Examples:
He's suffering from ______.
Don't get near him: he has _____.
single-word-requests terminology medical
Is there a word or term for the state of a human or animal infested with ticks?
Mainly just curious.
Examples:
He's suffering from ______.
Don't get near him: he has _____.
single-word-requests terminology medical
edited Aug 6 at 5:08


lly
7,241833
7,241833
asked Aug 6 at 2:18


Nicholas Kopiwoda
6317
6317
put on hold as off-topic by JJJ, JonMark Perry, jimm101, John Lawler, J. Taylor 2 days ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – JJJ, jimm101, John Lawler, J. Taylor
put on hold as off-topic by JJJ, JonMark Perry, jimm101, John Lawler, J. Taylor 2 days ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – JJJ, jimm101, John Lawler, J. Taylor
1
Since the answer you said "is exactly what [you] were looking for" does not answer the original question at all, I took the liberty of rephrasing it to fit lbf's answer. If you really did mean something else and wanted a word for the person instead of the condition, feel free to rephrase and explain.
– lly
Aug 6 at 5:09
1
Schrodinger's Ticked: You're both Ticked on AND Ticked off.
– aslum
Aug 6 at 12:46
2
If I were looking to be somewhat humorous and non-technical, I'd personally say lousy with ticks just because I like using the more literal meaning of lousy.
– stevesliva
Aug 6 at 17:10
/me expects the etymology of "ticked" to appear here.
– Joshua
Aug 6 at 20:53
See also nhs.uk/conditions/scabies
– StuperUser
Aug 7 at 15:39
 |Â
show 1 more comment
1
Since the answer you said "is exactly what [you] were looking for" does not answer the original question at all, I took the liberty of rephrasing it to fit lbf's answer. If you really did mean something else and wanted a word for the person instead of the condition, feel free to rephrase and explain.
– lly
Aug 6 at 5:09
1
Schrodinger's Ticked: You're both Ticked on AND Ticked off.
– aslum
Aug 6 at 12:46
2
If I were looking to be somewhat humorous and non-technical, I'd personally say lousy with ticks just because I like using the more literal meaning of lousy.
– stevesliva
Aug 6 at 17:10
/me expects the etymology of "ticked" to appear here.
– Joshua
Aug 6 at 20:53
See also nhs.uk/conditions/scabies
– StuperUser
Aug 7 at 15:39
1
1
Since the answer you said "is exactly what [you] were looking for" does not answer the original question at all, I took the liberty of rephrasing it to fit lbf's answer. If you really did mean something else and wanted a word for the person instead of the condition, feel free to rephrase and explain.
– lly
Aug 6 at 5:09
Since the answer you said "is exactly what [you] were looking for" does not answer the original question at all, I took the liberty of rephrasing it to fit lbf's answer. If you really did mean something else and wanted a word for the person instead of the condition, feel free to rephrase and explain.
– lly
Aug 6 at 5:09
1
1
Schrodinger's Ticked: You're both Ticked on AND Ticked off.
– aslum
Aug 6 at 12:46
Schrodinger's Ticked: You're both Ticked on AND Ticked off.
– aslum
Aug 6 at 12:46
2
2
If I were looking to be somewhat humorous and non-technical, I'd personally say lousy with ticks just because I like using the more literal meaning of lousy.
– stevesliva
Aug 6 at 17:10
If I were looking to be somewhat humorous and non-technical, I'd personally say lousy with ticks just because I like using the more literal meaning of lousy.
– stevesliva
Aug 6 at 17:10
/me expects the etymology of "ticked" to appear here.
– Joshua
Aug 6 at 20:53
/me expects the etymology of "ticked" to appear here.
– Joshua
Aug 6 at 20:53
See also nhs.uk/conditions/scabies
– StuperUser
Aug 7 at 15:39
See also nhs.uk/conditions/scabies
– StuperUser
Aug 7 at 15:39
 |Â
show 1 more comment
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
up vote
21
down vote
accepted
Ectoparasitism TFD is the medical term:
the state in which the ectoparasite [ticks, lice] are living on the
surface of the host's body.
He went to the doctor with ticks, and was diagnosed with ectoparasitosis.
add a comment |Â
up vote
34
down vote
I don't think there is a word that refers to possessing ticks as a condition, but you could use "tick-ridden" or "tick-infested" as an adjective:
The dog is tick-ridden.
+1 We may need noun forms tick-infestation / tick-riddenness (?) rather. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tick_infestation
– Kris
Aug 6 at 6:19
1
It looks like the question's been edited since you answered; you may need to edit to fit the new example sentences in the question. (But usually you'd just say "he/it has ticks".)
– V2Blast
Aug 6 at 8:19
add a comment |Â
up vote
8
down vote
For the second sentence example you can simply use "ticks" - "don't go near him he has ticks", just as you would with lice or fleas.
If sticking to a single word is not essential you might want to be more specific and say "an infestation of ticks" - to make it clear that the subject has a large number of the parasites, not just one or two.
"an infestation of ticks" could also work in the first sentence example. "He's suffering from an infestation of ticks"
"He's suffering from ticks" works fine also.
– Timbo
Aug 6 at 23:10
@Timbo I'm not so sure , that sounds slightly wrong to me, I've never heard it used like that (though on googling it I can see quite a few examples of that phrase, which do sound fine, so maybe you are right)
– Ben
Aug 6 at 23:18
I wouldn't choose that construction (I'd pick the more informal "Watch out! He's got ticks!") but I would understand it if I heard it.
– Timbo
Aug 7 at 0:19
Ironically, you can't use the proper term for an infestation of lice as "lousy" is now used only in the figurative sense (as far as I'm aware).
– Hugh Meyers
Aug 7 at 12:42
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Merriam-Webster:
ticky -er/-est
: affected or infested with or full of ticks
add a comment |Â
up vote
-2
down vote
If you are looking for an informal way of saying it, you pretty much have the most natural way already:
"he is tick-infested" or "he is infested with ticks".
Saying "He has ..." is asking for a formal medical condition, like diabetes. The most informal of this would be
"He has a problem with ticks" or "He has a lot of ticks".
add a comment |Â
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
21
down vote
accepted
Ectoparasitism TFD is the medical term:
the state in which the ectoparasite [ticks, lice] are living on the
surface of the host's body.
He went to the doctor with ticks, and was diagnosed with ectoparasitosis.
add a comment |Â
up vote
21
down vote
accepted
Ectoparasitism TFD is the medical term:
the state in which the ectoparasite [ticks, lice] are living on the
surface of the host's body.
He went to the doctor with ticks, and was diagnosed with ectoparasitosis.
add a comment |Â
up vote
21
down vote
accepted
up vote
21
down vote
accepted
Ectoparasitism TFD is the medical term:
the state in which the ectoparasite [ticks, lice] are living on the
surface of the host's body.
He went to the doctor with ticks, and was diagnosed with ectoparasitosis.
Ectoparasitism TFD is the medical term:
the state in which the ectoparasite [ticks, lice] are living on the
surface of the host's body.
He went to the doctor with ticks, and was diagnosed with ectoparasitosis.
edited Aug 6 at 14:43
JJJ
6,20882543
6,20882543
answered Aug 6 at 3:15


lbf
11.5k21253
11.5k21253
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
34
down vote
I don't think there is a word that refers to possessing ticks as a condition, but you could use "tick-ridden" or "tick-infested" as an adjective:
The dog is tick-ridden.
+1 We may need noun forms tick-infestation / tick-riddenness (?) rather. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tick_infestation
– Kris
Aug 6 at 6:19
1
It looks like the question's been edited since you answered; you may need to edit to fit the new example sentences in the question. (But usually you'd just say "he/it has ticks".)
– V2Blast
Aug 6 at 8:19
add a comment |Â
up vote
34
down vote
I don't think there is a word that refers to possessing ticks as a condition, but you could use "tick-ridden" or "tick-infested" as an adjective:
The dog is tick-ridden.
+1 We may need noun forms tick-infestation / tick-riddenness (?) rather. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tick_infestation
– Kris
Aug 6 at 6:19
1
It looks like the question's been edited since you answered; you may need to edit to fit the new example sentences in the question. (But usually you'd just say "he/it has ticks".)
– V2Blast
Aug 6 at 8:19
add a comment |Â
up vote
34
down vote
up vote
34
down vote
I don't think there is a word that refers to possessing ticks as a condition, but you could use "tick-ridden" or "tick-infested" as an adjective:
The dog is tick-ridden.
I don't think there is a word that refers to possessing ticks as a condition, but you could use "tick-ridden" or "tick-infested" as an adjective:
The dog is tick-ridden.
answered Aug 6 at 2:57
Jeh
43433
43433
+1 We may need noun forms tick-infestation / tick-riddenness (?) rather. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tick_infestation
– Kris
Aug 6 at 6:19
1
It looks like the question's been edited since you answered; you may need to edit to fit the new example sentences in the question. (But usually you'd just say "he/it has ticks".)
– V2Blast
Aug 6 at 8:19
add a comment |Â
+1 We may need noun forms tick-infestation / tick-riddenness (?) rather. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tick_infestation
– Kris
Aug 6 at 6:19
1
It looks like the question's been edited since you answered; you may need to edit to fit the new example sentences in the question. (But usually you'd just say "he/it has ticks".)
– V2Blast
Aug 6 at 8:19
+1 We may need noun forms tick-infestation / tick-riddenness (?) rather. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tick_infestation
– Kris
Aug 6 at 6:19
+1 We may need noun forms tick-infestation / tick-riddenness (?) rather. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tick_infestation
– Kris
Aug 6 at 6:19
1
1
It looks like the question's been edited since you answered; you may need to edit to fit the new example sentences in the question. (But usually you'd just say "he/it has ticks".)
– V2Blast
Aug 6 at 8:19
It looks like the question's been edited since you answered; you may need to edit to fit the new example sentences in the question. (But usually you'd just say "he/it has ticks".)
– V2Blast
Aug 6 at 8:19
add a comment |Â
up vote
8
down vote
For the second sentence example you can simply use "ticks" - "don't go near him he has ticks", just as you would with lice or fleas.
If sticking to a single word is not essential you might want to be more specific and say "an infestation of ticks" - to make it clear that the subject has a large number of the parasites, not just one or two.
"an infestation of ticks" could also work in the first sentence example. "He's suffering from an infestation of ticks"
"He's suffering from ticks" works fine also.
– Timbo
Aug 6 at 23:10
@Timbo I'm not so sure , that sounds slightly wrong to me, I've never heard it used like that (though on googling it I can see quite a few examples of that phrase, which do sound fine, so maybe you are right)
– Ben
Aug 6 at 23:18
I wouldn't choose that construction (I'd pick the more informal "Watch out! He's got ticks!") but I would understand it if I heard it.
– Timbo
Aug 7 at 0:19
Ironically, you can't use the proper term for an infestation of lice as "lousy" is now used only in the figurative sense (as far as I'm aware).
– Hugh Meyers
Aug 7 at 12:42
add a comment |Â
up vote
8
down vote
For the second sentence example you can simply use "ticks" - "don't go near him he has ticks", just as you would with lice or fleas.
If sticking to a single word is not essential you might want to be more specific and say "an infestation of ticks" - to make it clear that the subject has a large number of the parasites, not just one or two.
"an infestation of ticks" could also work in the first sentence example. "He's suffering from an infestation of ticks"
"He's suffering from ticks" works fine also.
– Timbo
Aug 6 at 23:10
@Timbo I'm not so sure , that sounds slightly wrong to me, I've never heard it used like that (though on googling it I can see quite a few examples of that phrase, which do sound fine, so maybe you are right)
– Ben
Aug 6 at 23:18
I wouldn't choose that construction (I'd pick the more informal "Watch out! He's got ticks!") but I would understand it if I heard it.
– Timbo
Aug 7 at 0:19
Ironically, you can't use the proper term for an infestation of lice as "lousy" is now used only in the figurative sense (as far as I'm aware).
– Hugh Meyers
Aug 7 at 12:42
add a comment |Â
up vote
8
down vote
up vote
8
down vote
For the second sentence example you can simply use "ticks" - "don't go near him he has ticks", just as you would with lice or fleas.
If sticking to a single word is not essential you might want to be more specific and say "an infestation of ticks" - to make it clear that the subject has a large number of the parasites, not just one or two.
"an infestation of ticks" could also work in the first sentence example. "He's suffering from an infestation of ticks"
For the second sentence example you can simply use "ticks" - "don't go near him he has ticks", just as you would with lice or fleas.
If sticking to a single word is not essential you might want to be more specific and say "an infestation of ticks" - to make it clear that the subject has a large number of the parasites, not just one or two.
"an infestation of ticks" could also work in the first sentence example. "He's suffering from an infestation of ticks"
answered Aug 6 at 9:39
Ben
20917
20917
"He's suffering from ticks" works fine also.
– Timbo
Aug 6 at 23:10
@Timbo I'm not so sure , that sounds slightly wrong to me, I've never heard it used like that (though on googling it I can see quite a few examples of that phrase, which do sound fine, so maybe you are right)
– Ben
Aug 6 at 23:18
I wouldn't choose that construction (I'd pick the more informal "Watch out! He's got ticks!") but I would understand it if I heard it.
– Timbo
Aug 7 at 0:19
Ironically, you can't use the proper term for an infestation of lice as "lousy" is now used only in the figurative sense (as far as I'm aware).
– Hugh Meyers
Aug 7 at 12:42
add a comment |Â
"He's suffering from ticks" works fine also.
– Timbo
Aug 6 at 23:10
@Timbo I'm not so sure , that sounds slightly wrong to me, I've never heard it used like that (though on googling it I can see quite a few examples of that phrase, which do sound fine, so maybe you are right)
– Ben
Aug 6 at 23:18
I wouldn't choose that construction (I'd pick the more informal "Watch out! He's got ticks!") but I would understand it if I heard it.
– Timbo
Aug 7 at 0:19
Ironically, you can't use the proper term for an infestation of lice as "lousy" is now used only in the figurative sense (as far as I'm aware).
– Hugh Meyers
Aug 7 at 12:42
"He's suffering from ticks" works fine also.
– Timbo
Aug 6 at 23:10
"He's suffering from ticks" works fine also.
– Timbo
Aug 6 at 23:10
@Timbo I'm not so sure , that sounds slightly wrong to me, I've never heard it used like that (though on googling it I can see quite a few examples of that phrase, which do sound fine, so maybe you are right)
– Ben
Aug 6 at 23:18
@Timbo I'm not so sure , that sounds slightly wrong to me, I've never heard it used like that (though on googling it I can see quite a few examples of that phrase, which do sound fine, so maybe you are right)
– Ben
Aug 6 at 23:18
I wouldn't choose that construction (I'd pick the more informal "Watch out! He's got ticks!") but I would understand it if I heard it.
– Timbo
Aug 7 at 0:19
I wouldn't choose that construction (I'd pick the more informal "Watch out! He's got ticks!") but I would understand it if I heard it.
– Timbo
Aug 7 at 0:19
Ironically, you can't use the proper term for an infestation of lice as "lousy" is now used only in the figurative sense (as far as I'm aware).
– Hugh Meyers
Aug 7 at 12:42
Ironically, you can't use the proper term for an infestation of lice as "lousy" is now used only in the figurative sense (as far as I'm aware).
– Hugh Meyers
Aug 7 at 12:42
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Merriam-Webster:
ticky -er/-est
: affected or infested with or full of ticks
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Merriam-Webster:
ticky -er/-est
: affected or infested with or full of ticks
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Merriam-Webster:
ticky -er/-est
: affected or infested with or full of ticks
Merriam-Webster:
ticky -er/-est
: affected or infested with or full of ticks
answered Aug 8 at 5:09


Keith McClary
1457
1457
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
-2
down vote
If you are looking for an informal way of saying it, you pretty much have the most natural way already:
"he is tick-infested" or "he is infested with ticks".
Saying "He has ..." is asking for a formal medical condition, like diabetes. The most informal of this would be
"He has a problem with ticks" or "He has a lot of ticks".
add a comment |Â
up vote
-2
down vote
If you are looking for an informal way of saying it, you pretty much have the most natural way already:
"he is tick-infested" or "he is infested with ticks".
Saying "He has ..." is asking for a formal medical condition, like diabetes. The most informal of this would be
"He has a problem with ticks" or "He has a lot of ticks".
add a comment |Â
up vote
-2
down vote
up vote
-2
down vote
If you are looking for an informal way of saying it, you pretty much have the most natural way already:
"he is tick-infested" or "he is infested with ticks".
Saying "He has ..." is asking for a formal medical condition, like diabetes. The most informal of this would be
"He has a problem with ticks" or "He has a lot of ticks".
If you are looking for an informal way of saying it, you pretty much have the most natural way already:
"he is tick-infested" or "he is infested with ticks".
Saying "He has ..." is asking for a formal medical condition, like diabetes. The most informal of this would be
"He has a problem with ticks" or "He has a lot of ticks".
edited Aug 8 at 12:44
answered Aug 6 at 13:24
Mitch
47.9k1594204
47.9k1594204
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
1
Since the answer you said "is exactly what [you] were looking for" does not answer the original question at all, I took the liberty of rephrasing it to fit lbf's answer. If you really did mean something else and wanted a word for the person instead of the condition, feel free to rephrase and explain.
– lly
Aug 6 at 5:09
1
Schrodinger's Ticked: You're both Ticked on AND Ticked off.
– aslum
Aug 6 at 12:46
2
If I were looking to be somewhat humorous and non-technical, I'd personally say lousy with ticks just because I like using the more literal meaning of lousy.
– stevesliva
Aug 6 at 17:10
/me expects the etymology of "ticked" to appear here.
– Joshua
Aug 6 at 20:53
See also nhs.uk/conditions/scabies
– StuperUser
Aug 7 at 15:39