Is this “classic probability view” on Fermat Last Theorem studied somewhere?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
3
down vote

favorite












I was wondering where (or maybe even if) is this simple reformulation of Fermat's Last Theorem studied:




There are no two events $A,B$ with classical probabilities $P(A), P(B) in mathbbQ cap (0,1)$ satisfying following criterion: In $n>2$ tries, the probability of $A$ happening exactly $n$ times is the same as probability of $B$ not happening at least once.




If there were such events, and $P(A)=a/b$, $P(B)=c/d$, then we would have $(a/b)^n=1-(c/d)^n$, which means $(ad)^n+(cb)^n=(bd)^n$ and we would have solution to FLT (which we know is not possible of course).



Any literature that is viewing the problem this way would be interesting, similarly to situation where certain algebraic problems can be solved by looking at them from geometric point of view. In this case there could be some interesting line of thought when looking at the problem from probability point of view - what would such two events imply? Could we perhaps construct some another interesting events from these? Could we try to use some basic theorems from probability like Bayes's theorem? ...)



Searched through Fermat's Last Theorem for Amateurs by Ribenboim P., but nothing related seems to be there. Searching on MSE, the $p^n+q^n=1$ equation is here couple times, but usually to be studied from algebraic point of view. Maybe this approach is just so fruitless that no one bothers to mention it? ...







share|cite|improve this question

























    up vote
    3
    down vote

    favorite












    I was wondering where (or maybe even if) is this simple reformulation of Fermat's Last Theorem studied:




    There are no two events $A,B$ with classical probabilities $P(A), P(B) in mathbbQ cap (0,1)$ satisfying following criterion: In $n>2$ tries, the probability of $A$ happening exactly $n$ times is the same as probability of $B$ not happening at least once.




    If there were such events, and $P(A)=a/b$, $P(B)=c/d$, then we would have $(a/b)^n=1-(c/d)^n$, which means $(ad)^n+(cb)^n=(bd)^n$ and we would have solution to FLT (which we know is not possible of course).



    Any literature that is viewing the problem this way would be interesting, similarly to situation where certain algebraic problems can be solved by looking at them from geometric point of view. In this case there could be some interesting line of thought when looking at the problem from probability point of view - what would such two events imply? Could we perhaps construct some another interesting events from these? Could we try to use some basic theorems from probability like Bayes's theorem? ...)



    Searched through Fermat's Last Theorem for Amateurs by Ribenboim P., but nothing related seems to be there. Searching on MSE, the $p^n+q^n=1$ equation is here couple times, but usually to be studied from algebraic point of view. Maybe this approach is just so fruitless that no one bothers to mention it? ...







    share|cite|improve this question























      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite











      I was wondering where (or maybe even if) is this simple reformulation of Fermat's Last Theorem studied:




      There are no two events $A,B$ with classical probabilities $P(A), P(B) in mathbbQ cap (0,1)$ satisfying following criterion: In $n>2$ tries, the probability of $A$ happening exactly $n$ times is the same as probability of $B$ not happening at least once.




      If there were such events, and $P(A)=a/b$, $P(B)=c/d$, then we would have $(a/b)^n=1-(c/d)^n$, which means $(ad)^n+(cb)^n=(bd)^n$ and we would have solution to FLT (which we know is not possible of course).



      Any literature that is viewing the problem this way would be interesting, similarly to situation where certain algebraic problems can be solved by looking at them from geometric point of view. In this case there could be some interesting line of thought when looking at the problem from probability point of view - what would such two events imply? Could we perhaps construct some another interesting events from these? Could we try to use some basic theorems from probability like Bayes's theorem? ...)



      Searched through Fermat's Last Theorem for Amateurs by Ribenboim P., but nothing related seems to be there. Searching on MSE, the $p^n+q^n=1$ equation is here couple times, but usually to be studied from algebraic point of view. Maybe this approach is just so fruitless that no one bothers to mention it? ...







      share|cite|improve this question













      I was wondering where (or maybe even if) is this simple reformulation of Fermat's Last Theorem studied:




      There are no two events $A,B$ with classical probabilities $P(A), P(B) in mathbbQ cap (0,1)$ satisfying following criterion: In $n>2$ tries, the probability of $A$ happening exactly $n$ times is the same as probability of $B$ not happening at least once.




      If there were such events, and $P(A)=a/b$, $P(B)=c/d$, then we would have $(a/b)^n=1-(c/d)^n$, which means $(ad)^n+(cb)^n=(bd)^n$ and we would have solution to FLT (which we know is not possible of course).



      Any literature that is viewing the problem this way would be interesting, similarly to situation where certain algebraic problems can be solved by looking at them from geometric point of view. In this case there could be some interesting line of thought when looking at the problem from probability point of view - what would such two events imply? Could we perhaps construct some another interesting events from these? Could we try to use some basic theorems from probability like Bayes's theorem? ...)



      Searched through Fermat's Last Theorem for Amateurs by Ribenboim P., but nothing related seems to be there. Searching on MSE, the $p^n+q^n=1$ equation is here couple times, but usually to be studied from algebraic point of view. Maybe this approach is just so fruitless that no one bothers to mention it? ...









      share|cite|improve this question












      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jul 26 at 20:34
























      asked Jul 26 at 20:24









      Sil

      5,11821342




      5,11821342

























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );








           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2863781%2fis-this-classic-probability-view-on-fermat-last-theorem-studied-somewhere%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest



































          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes










           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


























           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2863781%2fis-this-classic-probability-view-on-fermat-last-theorem-studied-somewhere%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          Comments

          Popular posts from this blog

          What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

          Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

          Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?