Let $sum_n=1^infty a_n$ for $a_ngt 0$. Show that $lim_tto inftyfrac1tsum_n=1^inftylfloor ta_nrfloor =sum_n=1^infty a_n$

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












Let $sum_n=1^infty a_n$ be a series of positive terms. Show that $$lim_tto inftyfrac1tsum_n=1^inftylfloor ta_nrfloor =sum_n=1^infty a_n$$



So this is what I could come up with. I hope it's right



$$ ta_1-1 lt lfloor ta_1rfloor le ta_1$$
$$ ta_2-1 lt lfloor ta_2rfloor le ta_2$$
$$vdots$$
$$ ta_n-1 lt lfloor ta_nrfloor le ta_n$$
$$vdots$$
Dividing with $t$ we get
$$a_1-frac 1t lt fraclfloor ta_1rfloort le a_1 $$
$$a_2-frac 1t lt fraclfloor ta_2rfloort le a_2 $$
$$vdots$$
$$a_n-frac 1t lt fraclfloor ta_nrfloort le a_n $$
$$vdots$$



If we use the limit when $t to infty$ in every inequality and then by summing all of them we get
$$sum_n=1^infty a_n le lim_tto inftyfrac1tsum_n=1^inftylfloor ta_nrfloor le sum_n=1^infty a_n $$
So the limit is
$$lim_tto inftyfrac1tsum_n=1^inftylfloor ta_nrfloor =sum_n=1^infty a_n $$



I'm not very sure if this is right. Can somebody tell me what to do or does someone has another method?







share|cite|improve this question





















  • There are inequalities that you need to use such as $lfloor a_n rfloor lfloor t rfloor leq lfloor ta_n rfloor $
    – Paul
    Jul 27 at 12:28










  • Is this right now?
    – J.Dane
    Jul 27 at 12:49










  • What level class is this? If this is an elementary calculus class, your answer is probably sufficient. If this is an analysis class (or if you want to be 100% correct), you will need to justify moving limits in and out of the summation. If interchanging limits is not a topic you've discussed in your class thus far, then your solution should be sufficient.
    – JavaMan
    Jul 27 at 13:04










  • We've discussed it but only on finite terms. Can I move the limits when I am working with infinite terms?
    – J.Dane
    Jul 27 at 13:11










  • Something is missing. When you sum $a_n-frac1t$ you end up with $sum_n=1^inftya_n-fracinftyt$. How did you get rid of $fracinftyt$, since the limit is $fracinftyinfty$?
    – herb steinberg
    Jul 27 at 15:16














up vote
2
down vote

favorite












Let $sum_n=1^infty a_n$ be a series of positive terms. Show that $$lim_tto inftyfrac1tsum_n=1^inftylfloor ta_nrfloor =sum_n=1^infty a_n$$



So this is what I could come up with. I hope it's right



$$ ta_1-1 lt lfloor ta_1rfloor le ta_1$$
$$ ta_2-1 lt lfloor ta_2rfloor le ta_2$$
$$vdots$$
$$ ta_n-1 lt lfloor ta_nrfloor le ta_n$$
$$vdots$$
Dividing with $t$ we get
$$a_1-frac 1t lt fraclfloor ta_1rfloort le a_1 $$
$$a_2-frac 1t lt fraclfloor ta_2rfloort le a_2 $$
$$vdots$$
$$a_n-frac 1t lt fraclfloor ta_nrfloort le a_n $$
$$vdots$$



If we use the limit when $t to infty$ in every inequality and then by summing all of them we get
$$sum_n=1^infty a_n le lim_tto inftyfrac1tsum_n=1^inftylfloor ta_nrfloor le sum_n=1^infty a_n $$
So the limit is
$$lim_tto inftyfrac1tsum_n=1^inftylfloor ta_nrfloor =sum_n=1^infty a_n $$



I'm not very sure if this is right. Can somebody tell me what to do or does someone has another method?







share|cite|improve this question





















  • There are inequalities that you need to use such as $lfloor a_n rfloor lfloor t rfloor leq lfloor ta_n rfloor $
    – Paul
    Jul 27 at 12:28










  • Is this right now?
    – J.Dane
    Jul 27 at 12:49










  • What level class is this? If this is an elementary calculus class, your answer is probably sufficient. If this is an analysis class (or if you want to be 100% correct), you will need to justify moving limits in and out of the summation. If interchanging limits is not a topic you've discussed in your class thus far, then your solution should be sufficient.
    – JavaMan
    Jul 27 at 13:04










  • We've discussed it but only on finite terms. Can I move the limits when I am working with infinite terms?
    – J.Dane
    Jul 27 at 13:11










  • Something is missing. When you sum $a_n-frac1t$ you end up with $sum_n=1^inftya_n-fracinftyt$. How did you get rid of $fracinftyt$, since the limit is $fracinftyinfty$?
    – herb steinberg
    Jul 27 at 15:16












up vote
2
down vote

favorite









up vote
2
down vote

favorite











Let $sum_n=1^infty a_n$ be a series of positive terms. Show that $$lim_tto inftyfrac1tsum_n=1^inftylfloor ta_nrfloor =sum_n=1^infty a_n$$



So this is what I could come up with. I hope it's right



$$ ta_1-1 lt lfloor ta_1rfloor le ta_1$$
$$ ta_2-1 lt lfloor ta_2rfloor le ta_2$$
$$vdots$$
$$ ta_n-1 lt lfloor ta_nrfloor le ta_n$$
$$vdots$$
Dividing with $t$ we get
$$a_1-frac 1t lt fraclfloor ta_1rfloort le a_1 $$
$$a_2-frac 1t lt fraclfloor ta_2rfloort le a_2 $$
$$vdots$$
$$a_n-frac 1t lt fraclfloor ta_nrfloort le a_n $$
$$vdots$$



If we use the limit when $t to infty$ in every inequality and then by summing all of them we get
$$sum_n=1^infty a_n le lim_tto inftyfrac1tsum_n=1^inftylfloor ta_nrfloor le sum_n=1^infty a_n $$
So the limit is
$$lim_tto inftyfrac1tsum_n=1^inftylfloor ta_nrfloor =sum_n=1^infty a_n $$



I'm not very sure if this is right. Can somebody tell me what to do or does someone has another method?







share|cite|improve this question













Let $sum_n=1^infty a_n$ be a series of positive terms. Show that $$lim_tto inftyfrac1tsum_n=1^inftylfloor ta_nrfloor =sum_n=1^infty a_n$$



So this is what I could come up with. I hope it's right



$$ ta_1-1 lt lfloor ta_1rfloor le ta_1$$
$$ ta_2-1 lt lfloor ta_2rfloor le ta_2$$
$$vdots$$
$$ ta_n-1 lt lfloor ta_nrfloor le ta_n$$
$$vdots$$
Dividing with $t$ we get
$$a_1-frac 1t lt fraclfloor ta_1rfloort le a_1 $$
$$a_2-frac 1t lt fraclfloor ta_2rfloort le a_2 $$
$$vdots$$
$$a_n-frac 1t lt fraclfloor ta_nrfloort le a_n $$
$$vdots$$



If we use the limit when $t to infty$ in every inequality and then by summing all of them we get
$$sum_n=1^infty a_n le lim_tto inftyfrac1tsum_n=1^inftylfloor ta_nrfloor le sum_n=1^infty a_n $$
So the limit is
$$lim_tto inftyfrac1tsum_n=1^inftylfloor ta_nrfloor =sum_n=1^infty a_n $$



I'm not very sure if this is right. Can somebody tell me what to do or does someone has another method?









share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 27 at 15:28
























asked Jul 27 at 12:15









J.Dane

159112




159112











  • There are inequalities that you need to use such as $lfloor a_n rfloor lfloor t rfloor leq lfloor ta_n rfloor $
    – Paul
    Jul 27 at 12:28










  • Is this right now?
    – J.Dane
    Jul 27 at 12:49










  • What level class is this? If this is an elementary calculus class, your answer is probably sufficient. If this is an analysis class (or if you want to be 100% correct), you will need to justify moving limits in and out of the summation. If interchanging limits is not a topic you've discussed in your class thus far, then your solution should be sufficient.
    – JavaMan
    Jul 27 at 13:04










  • We've discussed it but only on finite terms. Can I move the limits when I am working with infinite terms?
    – J.Dane
    Jul 27 at 13:11










  • Something is missing. When you sum $a_n-frac1t$ you end up with $sum_n=1^inftya_n-fracinftyt$. How did you get rid of $fracinftyt$, since the limit is $fracinftyinfty$?
    – herb steinberg
    Jul 27 at 15:16
















  • There are inequalities that you need to use such as $lfloor a_n rfloor lfloor t rfloor leq lfloor ta_n rfloor $
    – Paul
    Jul 27 at 12:28










  • Is this right now?
    – J.Dane
    Jul 27 at 12:49










  • What level class is this? If this is an elementary calculus class, your answer is probably sufficient. If this is an analysis class (or if you want to be 100% correct), you will need to justify moving limits in and out of the summation. If interchanging limits is not a topic you've discussed in your class thus far, then your solution should be sufficient.
    – JavaMan
    Jul 27 at 13:04










  • We've discussed it but only on finite terms. Can I move the limits when I am working with infinite terms?
    – J.Dane
    Jul 27 at 13:11










  • Something is missing. When you sum $a_n-frac1t$ you end up with $sum_n=1^inftya_n-fracinftyt$. How did you get rid of $fracinftyt$, since the limit is $fracinftyinfty$?
    – herb steinberg
    Jul 27 at 15:16















There are inequalities that you need to use such as $lfloor a_n rfloor lfloor t rfloor leq lfloor ta_n rfloor $
– Paul
Jul 27 at 12:28




There are inequalities that you need to use such as $lfloor a_n rfloor lfloor t rfloor leq lfloor ta_n rfloor $
– Paul
Jul 27 at 12:28












Is this right now?
– J.Dane
Jul 27 at 12:49




Is this right now?
– J.Dane
Jul 27 at 12:49












What level class is this? If this is an elementary calculus class, your answer is probably sufficient. If this is an analysis class (or if you want to be 100% correct), you will need to justify moving limits in and out of the summation. If interchanging limits is not a topic you've discussed in your class thus far, then your solution should be sufficient.
– JavaMan
Jul 27 at 13:04




What level class is this? If this is an elementary calculus class, your answer is probably sufficient. If this is an analysis class (or if you want to be 100% correct), you will need to justify moving limits in and out of the summation. If interchanging limits is not a topic you've discussed in your class thus far, then your solution should be sufficient.
– JavaMan
Jul 27 at 13:04












We've discussed it but only on finite terms. Can I move the limits when I am working with infinite terms?
– J.Dane
Jul 27 at 13:11




We've discussed it but only on finite terms. Can I move the limits when I am working with infinite terms?
– J.Dane
Jul 27 at 13:11












Something is missing. When you sum $a_n-frac1t$ you end up with $sum_n=1^inftya_n-fracinftyt$. How did you get rid of $fracinftyt$, since the limit is $fracinftyinfty$?
– herb steinberg
Jul 27 at 15:16




Something is missing. When you sum $a_n-frac1t$ you end up with $sum_n=1^inftya_n-fracinftyt$. How did you get rid of $fracinftyt$, since the limit is $fracinftyinfty$?
– herb steinberg
Jul 27 at 15:16










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










This should help: Let $S=sum_n=1^inftya_n$ and assume $S<infty.$ Let $epsilon>0.$ Then there exists $N$ such that $sum_n=1^Na_n > S-epsilon/2.$ Choose $t_0$ such that $N/t<epsilon/2$ for $tge t_0.$ Then $tge t_0$ implies



$$frac1tsum_n=1^inftylfloor ta_nrfloor ge frac1tsum_n=1^Nlfloor ta_n rfloor ge frac1tsum_n=1^N (ta_n-1) = sum_n=1^N a_n -N/t > S-epsilon/2 - epsilon/2 = S-epsilon.$$






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Thank you very useful. So should I prove the other side of the inequality ie $frac1tsum_n=1^inftylfloor ta_nrfloor lefrac1tsum_n=1^infty ta_n= sum_n=1^infty a_n=S$ or is this enough?
    – J.Dane
    Jul 27 at 16:24











  • Yes, that's the easy side. And you still have the $S=infty$ case to do.
    – zhw.
    Jul 27 at 16:25











  • Ok thank you again
    – J.Dane
    Jul 27 at 16:26










Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2864352%2flet-sum-n-1-infty-a-n-for-a-n-gt-0-show-that-lim-t-to-infty-fr%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
1
down vote



accepted










This should help: Let $S=sum_n=1^inftya_n$ and assume $S<infty.$ Let $epsilon>0.$ Then there exists $N$ such that $sum_n=1^Na_n > S-epsilon/2.$ Choose $t_0$ such that $N/t<epsilon/2$ for $tge t_0.$ Then $tge t_0$ implies



$$frac1tsum_n=1^inftylfloor ta_nrfloor ge frac1tsum_n=1^Nlfloor ta_n rfloor ge frac1tsum_n=1^N (ta_n-1) = sum_n=1^N a_n -N/t > S-epsilon/2 - epsilon/2 = S-epsilon.$$






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Thank you very useful. So should I prove the other side of the inequality ie $frac1tsum_n=1^inftylfloor ta_nrfloor lefrac1tsum_n=1^infty ta_n= sum_n=1^infty a_n=S$ or is this enough?
    – J.Dane
    Jul 27 at 16:24











  • Yes, that's the easy side. And you still have the $S=infty$ case to do.
    – zhw.
    Jul 27 at 16:25











  • Ok thank you again
    – J.Dane
    Jul 27 at 16:26














up vote
1
down vote



accepted










This should help: Let $S=sum_n=1^inftya_n$ and assume $S<infty.$ Let $epsilon>0.$ Then there exists $N$ such that $sum_n=1^Na_n > S-epsilon/2.$ Choose $t_0$ such that $N/t<epsilon/2$ for $tge t_0.$ Then $tge t_0$ implies



$$frac1tsum_n=1^inftylfloor ta_nrfloor ge frac1tsum_n=1^Nlfloor ta_n rfloor ge frac1tsum_n=1^N (ta_n-1) = sum_n=1^N a_n -N/t > S-epsilon/2 - epsilon/2 = S-epsilon.$$






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Thank you very useful. So should I prove the other side of the inequality ie $frac1tsum_n=1^inftylfloor ta_nrfloor lefrac1tsum_n=1^infty ta_n= sum_n=1^infty a_n=S$ or is this enough?
    – J.Dane
    Jul 27 at 16:24











  • Yes, that's the easy side. And you still have the $S=infty$ case to do.
    – zhw.
    Jul 27 at 16:25











  • Ok thank you again
    – J.Dane
    Jul 27 at 16:26












up vote
1
down vote



accepted







up vote
1
down vote



accepted






This should help: Let $S=sum_n=1^inftya_n$ and assume $S<infty.$ Let $epsilon>0.$ Then there exists $N$ such that $sum_n=1^Na_n > S-epsilon/2.$ Choose $t_0$ such that $N/t<epsilon/2$ for $tge t_0.$ Then $tge t_0$ implies



$$frac1tsum_n=1^inftylfloor ta_nrfloor ge frac1tsum_n=1^Nlfloor ta_n rfloor ge frac1tsum_n=1^N (ta_n-1) = sum_n=1^N a_n -N/t > S-epsilon/2 - epsilon/2 = S-epsilon.$$






share|cite|improve this answer













This should help: Let $S=sum_n=1^inftya_n$ and assume $S<infty.$ Let $epsilon>0.$ Then there exists $N$ such that $sum_n=1^Na_n > S-epsilon/2.$ Choose $t_0$ such that $N/t<epsilon/2$ for $tge t_0.$ Then $tge t_0$ implies



$$frac1tsum_n=1^inftylfloor ta_nrfloor ge frac1tsum_n=1^Nlfloor ta_n rfloor ge frac1tsum_n=1^N (ta_n-1) = sum_n=1^N a_n -N/t > S-epsilon/2 - epsilon/2 = S-epsilon.$$







share|cite|improve this answer













share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer











answered Jul 27 at 16:02









zhw.

65.3k42870




65.3k42870











  • Thank you very useful. So should I prove the other side of the inequality ie $frac1tsum_n=1^inftylfloor ta_nrfloor lefrac1tsum_n=1^infty ta_n= sum_n=1^infty a_n=S$ or is this enough?
    – J.Dane
    Jul 27 at 16:24











  • Yes, that's the easy side. And you still have the $S=infty$ case to do.
    – zhw.
    Jul 27 at 16:25











  • Ok thank you again
    – J.Dane
    Jul 27 at 16:26
















  • Thank you very useful. So should I prove the other side of the inequality ie $frac1tsum_n=1^inftylfloor ta_nrfloor lefrac1tsum_n=1^infty ta_n= sum_n=1^infty a_n=S$ or is this enough?
    – J.Dane
    Jul 27 at 16:24











  • Yes, that's the easy side. And you still have the $S=infty$ case to do.
    – zhw.
    Jul 27 at 16:25











  • Ok thank you again
    – J.Dane
    Jul 27 at 16:26















Thank you very useful. So should I prove the other side of the inequality ie $frac1tsum_n=1^inftylfloor ta_nrfloor lefrac1tsum_n=1^infty ta_n= sum_n=1^infty a_n=S$ or is this enough?
– J.Dane
Jul 27 at 16:24





Thank you very useful. So should I prove the other side of the inequality ie $frac1tsum_n=1^inftylfloor ta_nrfloor lefrac1tsum_n=1^infty ta_n= sum_n=1^infty a_n=S$ or is this enough?
– J.Dane
Jul 27 at 16:24













Yes, that's the easy side. And you still have the $S=infty$ case to do.
– zhw.
Jul 27 at 16:25





Yes, that's the easy side. And you still have the $S=infty$ case to do.
– zhw.
Jul 27 at 16:25













Ok thank you again
– J.Dane
Jul 27 at 16:26




Ok thank you again
– J.Dane
Jul 27 at 16:26












 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2864352%2flet-sum-n-1-infty-a-n-for-a-n-gt-0-show-that-lim-t-to-infty-fr%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?