Show that $mathbbR^2/∼$ is homeomorphic to $mathbbR$

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Question: Let $∼$ be the equivalence relation on $mathbbR^2$ given by ($x_1,x_2)∼ (y_1,y_2)$ if and only if $x_2 = y_2$. Show that the identification space $mathbbR^2/∼$ is homeomorphic to $mathbbR$.



I have tried to define a function $f:mathbbR^2/∼ to mathbbR$ by $f(x,y)=y$ for all $(x,y)inmathbbR^2$. Then $f$ is clearly a bijection.



My trouble is to show $f$ and $f^-1$ are continuous. I think $f$ is a projection map, so it is continuous, am I right?



Any help is appreciated.







share|cite|improve this question















  • 1




    Do you know the topology on $mathbbR^2 / sim$?
    – mathworker21
    Jul 27 at 3:18






  • 1




    @mathworker21 Not really, the question has not mentioned the topology, I guess just the quotient topology
    – user138017
    Jul 27 at 3:23






  • 1




    That $f$ is continuous (with quotient topology on $mathbbR^2 / sim$) comes from the continuity of $mathbbR^2 to mathbbR$ given by $(x,y) mapsto y$, which induces a continuous map on the quotient. That $f$ is a bijection is clear. That $f^-1$ is continuous can be shown by explicitly describing it as a composition of maps $mathbbR to mathbbR^2 to mathbbR^2 / sim$, where the first is $t mapsto (0 , t)$ and the second is the quotient map, both of which maps are continuous.
    – Point
    Jul 27 at 3:28







  • 1




    @Point nice! you're missing a parenthesis somewhere though
    – mathworker21
    Jul 27 at 3:30










  • @mathworker21 Thanks! I have tried to fix the paranthesis problem
    – Point
    Jul 27 at 3:31














up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Question: Let $∼$ be the equivalence relation on $mathbbR^2$ given by ($x_1,x_2)∼ (y_1,y_2)$ if and only if $x_2 = y_2$. Show that the identification space $mathbbR^2/∼$ is homeomorphic to $mathbbR$.



I have tried to define a function $f:mathbbR^2/∼ to mathbbR$ by $f(x,y)=y$ for all $(x,y)inmathbbR^2$. Then $f$ is clearly a bijection.



My trouble is to show $f$ and $f^-1$ are continuous. I think $f$ is a projection map, so it is continuous, am I right?



Any help is appreciated.







share|cite|improve this question















  • 1




    Do you know the topology on $mathbbR^2 / sim$?
    – mathworker21
    Jul 27 at 3:18






  • 1




    @mathworker21 Not really, the question has not mentioned the topology, I guess just the quotient topology
    – user138017
    Jul 27 at 3:23






  • 1




    That $f$ is continuous (with quotient topology on $mathbbR^2 / sim$) comes from the continuity of $mathbbR^2 to mathbbR$ given by $(x,y) mapsto y$, which induces a continuous map on the quotient. That $f$ is a bijection is clear. That $f^-1$ is continuous can be shown by explicitly describing it as a composition of maps $mathbbR to mathbbR^2 to mathbbR^2 / sim$, where the first is $t mapsto (0 , t)$ and the second is the quotient map, both of which maps are continuous.
    – Point
    Jul 27 at 3:28







  • 1




    @Point nice! you're missing a parenthesis somewhere though
    – mathworker21
    Jul 27 at 3:30










  • @mathworker21 Thanks! I have tried to fix the paranthesis problem
    – Point
    Jul 27 at 3:31












up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











Question: Let $∼$ be the equivalence relation on $mathbbR^2$ given by ($x_1,x_2)∼ (y_1,y_2)$ if and only if $x_2 = y_2$. Show that the identification space $mathbbR^2/∼$ is homeomorphic to $mathbbR$.



I have tried to define a function $f:mathbbR^2/∼ to mathbbR$ by $f(x,y)=y$ for all $(x,y)inmathbbR^2$. Then $f$ is clearly a bijection.



My trouble is to show $f$ and $f^-1$ are continuous. I think $f$ is a projection map, so it is continuous, am I right?



Any help is appreciated.







share|cite|improve this question











Question: Let $∼$ be the equivalence relation on $mathbbR^2$ given by ($x_1,x_2)∼ (y_1,y_2)$ if and only if $x_2 = y_2$. Show that the identification space $mathbbR^2/∼$ is homeomorphic to $mathbbR$.



I have tried to define a function $f:mathbbR^2/∼ to mathbbR$ by $f(x,y)=y$ for all $(x,y)inmathbbR^2$. Then $f$ is clearly a bijection.



My trouble is to show $f$ and $f^-1$ are continuous. I think $f$ is a projection map, so it is continuous, am I right?



Any help is appreciated.









share|cite|improve this question










share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question









asked Jul 27 at 3:01









user138017

446212




446212







  • 1




    Do you know the topology on $mathbbR^2 / sim$?
    – mathworker21
    Jul 27 at 3:18






  • 1




    @mathworker21 Not really, the question has not mentioned the topology, I guess just the quotient topology
    – user138017
    Jul 27 at 3:23






  • 1




    That $f$ is continuous (with quotient topology on $mathbbR^2 / sim$) comes from the continuity of $mathbbR^2 to mathbbR$ given by $(x,y) mapsto y$, which induces a continuous map on the quotient. That $f$ is a bijection is clear. That $f^-1$ is continuous can be shown by explicitly describing it as a composition of maps $mathbbR to mathbbR^2 to mathbbR^2 / sim$, where the first is $t mapsto (0 , t)$ and the second is the quotient map, both of which maps are continuous.
    – Point
    Jul 27 at 3:28







  • 1




    @Point nice! you're missing a parenthesis somewhere though
    – mathworker21
    Jul 27 at 3:30










  • @mathworker21 Thanks! I have tried to fix the paranthesis problem
    – Point
    Jul 27 at 3:31












  • 1




    Do you know the topology on $mathbbR^2 / sim$?
    – mathworker21
    Jul 27 at 3:18






  • 1




    @mathworker21 Not really, the question has not mentioned the topology, I guess just the quotient topology
    – user138017
    Jul 27 at 3:23






  • 1




    That $f$ is continuous (with quotient topology on $mathbbR^2 / sim$) comes from the continuity of $mathbbR^2 to mathbbR$ given by $(x,y) mapsto y$, which induces a continuous map on the quotient. That $f$ is a bijection is clear. That $f^-1$ is continuous can be shown by explicitly describing it as a composition of maps $mathbbR to mathbbR^2 to mathbbR^2 / sim$, where the first is $t mapsto (0 , t)$ and the second is the quotient map, both of which maps are continuous.
    – Point
    Jul 27 at 3:28







  • 1




    @Point nice! you're missing a parenthesis somewhere though
    – mathworker21
    Jul 27 at 3:30










  • @mathworker21 Thanks! I have tried to fix the paranthesis problem
    – Point
    Jul 27 at 3:31







1




1




Do you know the topology on $mathbbR^2 / sim$?
– mathworker21
Jul 27 at 3:18




Do you know the topology on $mathbbR^2 / sim$?
– mathworker21
Jul 27 at 3:18




1




1




@mathworker21 Not really, the question has not mentioned the topology, I guess just the quotient topology
– user138017
Jul 27 at 3:23




@mathworker21 Not really, the question has not mentioned the topology, I guess just the quotient topology
– user138017
Jul 27 at 3:23




1




1




That $f$ is continuous (with quotient topology on $mathbbR^2 / sim$) comes from the continuity of $mathbbR^2 to mathbbR$ given by $(x,y) mapsto y$, which induces a continuous map on the quotient. That $f$ is a bijection is clear. That $f^-1$ is continuous can be shown by explicitly describing it as a composition of maps $mathbbR to mathbbR^2 to mathbbR^2 / sim$, where the first is $t mapsto (0 , t)$ and the second is the quotient map, both of which maps are continuous.
– Point
Jul 27 at 3:28





That $f$ is continuous (with quotient topology on $mathbbR^2 / sim$) comes from the continuity of $mathbbR^2 to mathbbR$ given by $(x,y) mapsto y$, which induces a continuous map on the quotient. That $f$ is a bijection is clear. That $f^-1$ is continuous can be shown by explicitly describing it as a composition of maps $mathbbR to mathbbR^2 to mathbbR^2 / sim$, where the first is $t mapsto (0 , t)$ and the second is the quotient map, both of which maps are continuous.
– Point
Jul 27 at 3:28





1




1




@Point nice! you're missing a parenthesis somewhere though
– mathworker21
Jul 27 at 3:30




@Point nice! you're missing a parenthesis somewhere though
– mathworker21
Jul 27 at 3:30












@mathworker21 Thanks! I have tried to fix the paranthesis problem
– Point
Jul 27 at 3:31




@mathworker21 Thanks! I have tried to fix the paranthesis problem
– Point
Jul 27 at 3:31










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote













Let $[y]$ denote the equivalence class of any point $(x,y) in mathbbR^2$, according to $sim$. That is, $[y] = (x,y) : x in mathbbR$. Now let $U$ be an open subset of $mathbbR$. Then $f^-1(U) = [y] : y in U$ and this set is open in $mathbbR^2/ sim$ by the definition of quotient toplogy, since if $pi : mathbbR^2 to mathbbR^2 / sim$ given by $pi(x,y) = [y]$ is the quotient map, then $pi^-1(f^-1(U)) = mathbbRtimes U$, which is open in $mathbbR^2$.



That $f^-1$ is continuous means that if $W$ is open in $mathbbR^2/ sim$, then $f(W)$ is open in $mathbbR$. So fix such $W$ and note that $pi^-1(W) = mathbbRtimes W$ must be open in $mathbbR^2$, so $W$ is open in $mathbbR$. But $W = f(W)$, so we're done.






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );








     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2864005%2fshow-that-mathbbr2-%25e2%2588%25bc-is-homeomorphic-to-mathbbr%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    2
    down vote













    Let $[y]$ denote the equivalence class of any point $(x,y) in mathbbR^2$, according to $sim$. That is, $[y] = (x,y) : x in mathbbR$. Now let $U$ be an open subset of $mathbbR$. Then $f^-1(U) = [y] : y in U$ and this set is open in $mathbbR^2/ sim$ by the definition of quotient toplogy, since if $pi : mathbbR^2 to mathbbR^2 / sim$ given by $pi(x,y) = [y]$ is the quotient map, then $pi^-1(f^-1(U)) = mathbbRtimes U$, which is open in $mathbbR^2$.



    That $f^-1$ is continuous means that if $W$ is open in $mathbbR^2/ sim$, then $f(W)$ is open in $mathbbR$. So fix such $W$ and note that $pi^-1(W) = mathbbRtimes W$ must be open in $mathbbR^2$, so $W$ is open in $mathbbR$. But $W = f(W)$, so we're done.






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      2
      down vote













      Let $[y]$ denote the equivalence class of any point $(x,y) in mathbbR^2$, according to $sim$. That is, $[y] = (x,y) : x in mathbbR$. Now let $U$ be an open subset of $mathbbR$. Then $f^-1(U) = [y] : y in U$ and this set is open in $mathbbR^2/ sim$ by the definition of quotient toplogy, since if $pi : mathbbR^2 to mathbbR^2 / sim$ given by $pi(x,y) = [y]$ is the quotient map, then $pi^-1(f^-1(U)) = mathbbRtimes U$, which is open in $mathbbR^2$.



      That $f^-1$ is continuous means that if $W$ is open in $mathbbR^2/ sim$, then $f(W)$ is open in $mathbbR$. So fix such $W$ and note that $pi^-1(W) = mathbbRtimes W$ must be open in $mathbbR^2$, so $W$ is open in $mathbbR$. But $W = f(W)$, so we're done.






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        2
        down vote










        up vote
        2
        down vote









        Let $[y]$ denote the equivalence class of any point $(x,y) in mathbbR^2$, according to $sim$. That is, $[y] = (x,y) : x in mathbbR$. Now let $U$ be an open subset of $mathbbR$. Then $f^-1(U) = [y] : y in U$ and this set is open in $mathbbR^2/ sim$ by the definition of quotient toplogy, since if $pi : mathbbR^2 to mathbbR^2 / sim$ given by $pi(x,y) = [y]$ is the quotient map, then $pi^-1(f^-1(U)) = mathbbRtimes U$, which is open in $mathbbR^2$.



        That $f^-1$ is continuous means that if $W$ is open in $mathbbR^2/ sim$, then $f(W)$ is open in $mathbbR$. So fix such $W$ and note that $pi^-1(W) = mathbbRtimes W$ must be open in $mathbbR^2$, so $W$ is open in $mathbbR$. But $W = f(W)$, so we're done.






        share|cite|improve this answer













        Let $[y]$ denote the equivalence class of any point $(x,y) in mathbbR^2$, according to $sim$. That is, $[y] = (x,y) : x in mathbbR$. Now let $U$ be an open subset of $mathbbR$. Then $f^-1(U) = [y] : y in U$ and this set is open in $mathbbR^2/ sim$ by the definition of quotient toplogy, since if $pi : mathbbR^2 to mathbbR^2 / sim$ given by $pi(x,y) = [y]$ is the quotient map, then $pi^-1(f^-1(U)) = mathbbRtimes U$, which is open in $mathbbR^2$.



        That $f^-1$ is continuous means that if $W$ is open in $mathbbR^2/ sim$, then $f(W)$ is open in $mathbbR$. So fix such $W$ and note that $pi^-1(W) = mathbbRtimes W$ must be open in $mathbbR^2$, so $W$ is open in $mathbbR$. But $W = f(W)$, so we're done.







        share|cite|improve this answer













        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer











        answered Jul 27 at 3:26









        mathworker21

        6,4301727




        6,4301727






















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


























             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2864005%2fshow-that-mathbbr2-%25e2%2588%25bc-is-homeomorphic-to-mathbbr%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            Comments

            Popular posts from this blog

            What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

            Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

            Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?