2 Exercises on Weierstrass M-test for power series

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












A First Course in Complex Analysis by Matthias Beck, Gerald Marchesi, Dennis Pixton, and Lucas Sabalka 7.29(c),7.30



Please point out errors.




enter image description hereenter image description here




Exer 7.29



(c) $M_k = r^k$ because $$frac^kr^k le 1 le |z^k + 1| $$



Elaboration: I believe that $|fracz^kz^k+1| le r^k$.



Pf: For $|z| le r,$ we have $$|z|^k le r^k implies frac^kr^k le 1. tag1$$



But for $|z| in [0,infty),$ $$|z^k+1| ge ||z^k|-|1|| = ||z|^k-1| ge |0-1| = 1 implies 1 le |z^k+1| tag2$$



Thus,



$$(1) wedge (2) implies frac^kr^k le 1 le |z^k+1| implies frac^k le r^k$$



$$therefore, |fracz^kz^k+1| = frac = frac^k le r^k textQED$$





enter image description here




Exer 7.30



Weierstrass M-Test: $|fraczw|^k le frac^kr^k = |fraczr|^k =: M_k$







share|cite|improve this question

























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    A First Course in Complex Analysis by Matthias Beck, Gerald Marchesi, Dennis Pixton, and Lucas Sabalka 7.29(c),7.30



    Please point out errors.




    enter image description hereenter image description here




    Exer 7.29



    (c) $M_k = r^k$ because $$frac^kr^k le 1 le |z^k + 1| $$



    Elaboration: I believe that $|fracz^kz^k+1| le r^k$.



    Pf: For $|z| le r,$ we have $$|z|^k le r^k implies frac^kr^k le 1. tag1$$



    But for $|z| in [0,infty),$ $$|z^k+1| ge ||z^k|-|1|| = ||z|^k-1| ge |0-1| = 1 implies 1 le |z^k+1| tag2$$



    Thus,



    $$(1) wedge (2) implies frac^kr^k le 1 le |z^k+1| implies frac^k le r^k$$



    $$therefore, |fracz^kz^k+1| = frac = frac^k le r^k textQED$$





    enter image description here




    Exer 7.30



    Weierstrass M-Test: $|fraczw|^k le frac^kr^k = |fraczr|^k =: M_k$







    share|cite|improve this question























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      A First Course in Complex Analysis by Matthias Beck, Gerald Marchesi, Dennis Pixton, and Lucas Sabalka 7.29(c),7.30



      Please point out errors.




      enter image description hereenter image description here




      Exer 7.29



      (c) $M_k = r^k$ because $$frac^kr^k le 1 le |z^k + 1| $$



      Elaboration: I believe that $|fracz^kz^k+1| le r^k$.



      Pf: For $|z| le r,$ we have $$|z|^k le r^k implies frac^kr^k le 1. tag1$$



      But for $|z| in [0,infty),$ $$|z^k+1| ge ||z^k|-|1|| = ||z|^k-1| ge |0-1| = 1 implies 1 le |z^k+1| tag2$$



      Thus,



      $$(1) wedge (2) implies frac^kr^k le 1 le |z^k+1| implies frac^k le r^k$$



      $$therefore, |fracz^kz^k+1| = frac = frac^k le r^k textQED$$





      enter image description here




      Exer 7.30



      Weierstrass M-Test: $|fraczw|^k le frac^kr^k = |fraczr|^k =: M_k$







      share|cite|improve this question













      A First Course in Complex Analysis by Matthias Beck, Gerald Marchesi, Dennis Pixton, and Lucas Sabalka 7.29(c),7.30



      Please point out errors.




      enter image description hereenter image description here




      Exer 7.29



      (c) $M_k = r^k$ because $$frac^kr^k le 1 le |z^k + 1| $$



      Elaboration: I believe that $|fracz^kz^k+1| le r^k$.



      Pf: For $|z| le r,$ we have $$|z|^k le r^k implies frac^kr^k le 1. tag1$$



      But for $|z| in [0,infty),$ $$|z^k+1| ge ||z^k|-|1|| = ||z|^k-1| ge |0-1| = 1 implies 1 le |z^k+1| tag2$$



      Thus,



      $$(1) wedge (2) implies frac^kr^k le 1 le |z^k+1| implies frac^k le r^k$$



      $$therefore, |fracz^kz^k+1| = frac = frac^k le r^k textQED$$





      enter image description here




      Exer 7.30



      Weierstrass M-Test: $|fraczw|^k le frac^kr^k = |fraczr|^k =: M_k$









      share|cite|improve this question












      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 2 days ago
























      asked Aug 2 at 12:38









      BCLC

      6,98221973




      6,98221973




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          In exercise 7.29 (c)
          $$leftlvert fracz^kz^k+1 rightrvert leq r^k$$
          doesn't hold for all of the $z in overlineD[0,r]$. According to the maximum modulus principle, the maximum occurs on the boundary where $z=r expi theta$. The functions to be maximized then become
          $$fracr^k,$$
          and the maxima occur when $expi k theta=-1$. Hence $M_k$ really should be $$M_k:=fracr^k1-r^k .$$



          Exericse 7.30 looks ok to me.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Thanks user1337, but what exactly is wrong with my argument please?
            – BCLC
            Aug 4 at 2:26










          • @BCLC Your choice of $M_k$.
            – user1337
            Aug 4 at 17:22










          • lol I mean why? I believe it's an upper bound whose series is convergent
            – BCLC
            Aug 4 at 20:11






          • 1




            @BCLC It is not an upper bound. Consider $z=-r$ when $k$ is odd, for instance.
            – user1337
            Aug 4 at 21:02






          • 1




            @BCLC $||z|^k-1|ge|0-1|$ is not necessarily true, consider $z=0.1$
            – Erlang Wiratama Surya
            2 days ago










          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );








           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2870028%2f2-exercises-on-weierstrass-m-test-for-power-series%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          In exercise 7.29 (c)
          $$leftlvert fracz^kz^k+1 rightrvert leq r^k$$
          doesn't hold for all of the $z in overlineD[0,r]$. According to the maximum modulus principle, the maximum occurs on the boundary where $z=r expi theta$. The functions to be maximized then become
          $$fracr^k,$$
          and the maxima occur when $expi k theta=-1$. Hence $M_k$ really should be $$M_k:=fracr^k1-r^k .$$



          Exericse 7.30 looks ok to me.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Thanks user1337, but what exactly is wrong with my argument please?
            – BCLC
            Aug 4 at 2:26










          • @BCLC Your choice of $M_k$.
            – user1337
            Aug 4 at 17:22










          • lol I mean why? I believe it's an upper bound whose series is convergent
            – BCLC
            Aug 4 at 20:11






          • 1




            @BCLC It is not an upper bound. Consider $z=-r$ when $k$ is odd, for instance.
            – user1337
            Aug 4 at 21:02






          • 1




            @BCLC $||z|^k-1|ge|0-1|$ is not necessarily true, consider $z=0.1$
            – Erlang Wiratama Surya
            2 days ago














          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          In exercise 7.29 (c)
          $$leftlvert fracz^kz^k+1 rightrvert leq r^k$$
          doesn't hold for all of the $z in overlineD[0,r]$. According to the maximum modulus principle, the maximum occurs on the boundary where $z=r expi theta$. The functions to be maximized then become
          $$fracr^k,$$
          and the maxima occur when $expi k theta=-1$. Hence $M_k$ really should be $$M_k:=fracr^k1-r^k .$$



          Exericse 7.30 looks ok to me.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Thanks user1337, but what exactly is wrong with my argument please?
            – BCLC
            Aug 4 at 2:26










          • @BCLC Your choice of $M_k$.
            – user1337
            Aug 4 at 17:22










          • lol I mean why? I believe it's an upper bound whose series is convergent
            – BCLC
            Aug 4 at 20:11






          • 1




            @BCLC It is not an upper bound. Consider $z=-r$ when $k$ is odd, for instance.
            – user1337
            Aug 4 at 21:02






          • 1




            @BCLC $||z|^k-1|ge|0-1|$ is not necessarily true, consider $z=0.1$
            – Erlang Wiratama Surya
            2 days ago












          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted






          In exercise 7.29 (c)
          $$leftlvert fracz^kz^k+1 rightrvert leq r^k$$
          doesn't hold for all of the $z in overlineD[0,r]$. According to the maximum modulus principle, the maximum occurs on the boundary where $z=r expi theta$. The functions to be maximized then become
          $$fracr^k,$$
          and the maxima occur when $expi k theta=-1$. Hence $M_k$ really should be $$M_k:=fracr^k1-r^k .$$



          Exericse 7.30 looks ok to me.






          share|cite|improve this answer













          In exercise 7.29 (c)
          $$leftlvert fracz^kz^k+1 rightrvert leq r^k$$
          doesn't hold for all of the $z in overlineD[0,r]$. According to the maximum modulus principle, the maximum occurs on the boundary where $z=r expi theta$. The functions to be maximized then become
          $$fracr^k,$$
          and the maxima occur when $expi k theta=-1$. Hence $M_k$ really should be $$M_k:=fracr^k1-r^k .$$



          Exericse 7.30 looks ok to me.







          share|cite|improve this answer













          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer











          answered Aug 2 at 13:42









          user1337

          16.4k42989




          16.4k42989











          • Thanks user1337, but what exactly is wrong with my argument please?
            – BCLC
            Aug 4 at 2:26










          • @BCLC Your choice of $M_k$.
            – user1337
            Aug 4 at 17:22










          • lol I mean why? I believe it's an upper bound whose series is convergent
            – BCLC
            Aug 4 at 20:11






          • 1




            @BCLC It is not an upper bound. Consider $z=-r$ when $k$ is odd, for instance.
            – user1337
            Aug 4 at 21:02






          • 1




            @BCLC $||z|^k-1|ge|0-1|$ is not necessarily true, consider $z=0.1$
            – Erlang Wiratama Surya
            2 days ago
















          • Thanks user1337, but what exactly is wrong with my argument please?
            – BCLC
            Aug 4 at 2:26










          • @BCLC Your choice of $M_k$.
            – user1337
            Aug 4 at 17:22










          • lol I mean why? I believe it's an upper bound whose series is convergent
            – BCLC
            Aug 4 at 20:11






          • 1




            @BCLC It is not an upper bound. Consider $z=-r$ when $k$ is odd, for instance.
            – user1337
            Aug 4 at 21:02






          • 1




            @BCLC $||z|^k-1|ge|0-1|$ is not necessarily true, consider $z=0.1$
            – Erlang Wiratama Surya
            2 days ago















          Thanks user1337, but what exactly is wrong with my argument please?
          – BCLC
          Aug 4 at 2:26




          Thanks user1337, but what exactly is wrong with my argument please?
          – BCLC
          Aug 4 at 2:26












          @BCLC Your choice of $M_k$.
          – user1337
          Aug 4 at 17:22




          @BCLC Your choice of $M_k$.
          – user1337
          Aug 4 at 17:22












          lol I mean why? I believe it's an upper bound whose series is convergent
          – BCLC
          Aug 4 at 20:11




          lol I mean why? I believe it's an upper bound whose series is convergent
          – BCLC
          Aug 4 at 20:11




          1




          1




          @BCLC It is not an upper bound. Consider $z=-r$ when $k$ is odd, for instance.
          – user1337
          Aug 4 at 21:02




          @BCLC It is not an upper bound. Consider $z=-r$ when $k$ is odd, for instance.
          – user1337
          Aug 4 at 21:02




          1




          1




          @BCLC $||z|^k-1|ge|0-1|$ is not necessarily true, consider $z=0.1$
          – Erlang Wiratama Surya
          2 days ago




          @BCLC $||z|^k-1|ge|0-1|$ is not necessarily true, consider $z=0.1$
          – Erlang Wiratama Surya
          2 days ago












           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


























           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2870028%2f2-exercises-on-weierstrass-m-test-for-power-series%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          Comments

          Popular posts from this blog

          What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

          Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?

          Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon