Stochastic Process Simulation
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I am trying to understand some basic stochastic process simulation for population growth. Let us say, a population grows exponentially at a constant rate $R$, given by the equation,
$$
P(t+1) = R P(t)
$$
In the book "A Biologist's Guide to Mathematical Modeling in Ecology and Evolution" the authors generate various realizations of this model by taking a value of the rate parameter (like $R = 1.2$) and sampling from a Poisson distribution with mean $RP(t)$ to get $P(t+1)$. In reality, in some cases, we may not know the rate parameter $R$. Is there a way to estimate $R$ if we know the mean value of $P(t)$ and $P(t+1)$ at some point $t$, by such simulations? Thanks.
stochastic-processes
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I am trying to understand some basic stochastic process simulation for population growth. Let us say, a population grows exponentially at a constant rate $R$, given by the equation,
$$
P(t+1) = R P(t)
$$
In the book "A Biologist's Guide to Mathematical Modeling in Ecology and Evolution" the authors generate various realizations of this model by taking a value of the rate parameter (like $R = 1.2$) and sampling from a Poisson distribution with mean $RP(t)$ to get $P(t+1)$. In reality, in some cases, we may not know the rate parameter $R$. Is there a way to estimate $R$ if we know the mean value of $P(t)$ and $P(t+1)$ at some point $t$, by such simulations? Thanks.
stochastic-processes
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I am trying to understand some basic stochastic process simulation for population growth. Let us say, a population grows exponentially at a constant rate $R$, given by the equation,
$$
P(t+1) = R P(t)
$$
In the book "A Biologist's Guide to Mathematical Modeling in Ecology and Evolution" the authors generate various realizations of this model by taking a value of the rate parameter (like $R = 1.2$) and sampling from a Poisson distribution with mean $RP(t)$ to get $P(t+1)$. In reality, in some cases, we may not know the rate parameter $R$. Is there a way to estimate $R$ if we know the mean value of $P(t)$ and $P(t+1)$ at some point $t$, by such simulations? Thanks.
stochastic-processes
I am trying to understand some basic stochastic process simulation for population growth. Let us say, a population grows exponentially at a constant rate $R$, given by the equation,
$$
P(t+1) = R P(t)
$$
In the book "A Biologist's Guide to Mathematical Modeling in Ecology and Evolution" the authors generate various realizations of this model by taking a value of the rate parameter (like $R = 1.2$) and sampling from a Poisson distribution with mean $RP(t)$ to get $P(t+1)$. In reality, in some cases, we may not know the rate parameter $R$. Is there a way to estimate $R$ if we know the mean value of $P(t)$ and $P(t+1)$ at some point $t$, by such simulations? Thanks.
stochastic-processes
asked Aug 2 at 3:48
user2167741
1019
1019
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Let $p(t) = logP(t), r = log R$. Then the equation becomes $p(t+1)=r+p(t)$, and you can turn that into something like $p(t+t_0)-p(t_0)=rt$. You can run a standard linear regression on the latter.
Brilliant! So you mean to say we can simulate from a Poisson for $p(t+t_0)$ and $p(t_0)$ and do a regression. But the $log$ of a Poisson will not be a Poisson right? I suppose we can still sample from Poisson and take a log.
â user2167741
Aug 2 at 11:35
Also, the above equation should be $p(t+t_0)-p(t) = rt_0$.
â user2167741
Aug 2 at 14:26
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Let $p(t) = logP(t), r = log R$. Then the equation becomes $p(t+1)=r+p(t)$, and you can turn that into something like $p(t+t_0)-p(t_0)=rt$. You can run a standard linear regression on the latter.
Brilliant! So you mean to say we can simulate from a Poisson for $p(t+t_0)$ and $p(t_0)$ and do a regression. But the $log$ of a Poisson will not be a Poisson right? I suppose we can still sample from Poisson and take a log.
â user2167741
Aug 2 at 11:35
Also, the above equation should be $p(t+t_0)-p(t) = rt_0$.
â user2167741
Aug 2 at 14:26
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Let $p(t) = logP(t), r = log R$. Then the equation becomes $p(t+1)=r+p(t)$, and you can turn that into something like $p(t+t_0)-p(t_0)=rt$. You can run a standard linear regression on the latter.
Brilliant! So you mean to say we can simulate from a Poisson for $p(t+t_0)$ and $p(t_0)$ and do a regression. But the $log$ of a Poisson will not be a Poisson right? I suppose we can still sample from Poisson and take a log.
â user2167741
Aug 2 at 11:35
Also, the above equation should be $p(t+t_0)-p(t) = rt_0$.
â user2167741
Aug 2 at 14:26
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Let $p(t) = logP(t), r = log R$. Then the equation becomes $p(t+1)=r+p(t)$, and you can turn that into something like $p(t+t_0)-p(t_0)=rt$. You can run a standard linear regression on the latter.
Let $p(t) = logP(t), r = log R$. Then the equation becomes $p(t+1)=r+p(t)$, and you can turn that into something like $p(t+t_0)-p(t_0)=rt$. You can run a standard linear regression on the latter.
answered Aug 2 at 6:56
ertl
427110
427110
Brilliant! So you mean to say we can simulate from a Poisson for $p(t+t_0)$ and $p(t_0)$ and do a regression. But the $log$ of a Poisson will not be a Poisson right? I suppose we can still sample from Poisson and take a log.
â user2167741
Aug 2 at 11:35
Also, the above equation should be $p(t+t_0)-p(t) = rt_0$.
â user2167741
Aug 2 at 14:26
add a comment |Â
Brilliant! So you mean to say we can simulate from a Poisson for $p(t+t_0)$ and $p(t_0)$ and do a regression. But the $log$ of a Poisson will not be a Poisson right? I suppose we can still sample from Poisson and take a log.
â user2167741
Aug 2 at 11:35
Also, the above equation should be $p(t+t_0)-p(t) = rt_0$.
â user2167741
Aug 2 at 14:26
Brilliant! So you mean to say we can simulate from a Poisson for $p(t+t_0)$ and $p(t_0)$ and do a regression. But the $log$ of a Poisson will not be a Poisson right? I suppose we can still sample from Poisson and take a log.
â user2167741
Aug 2 at 11:35
Brilliant! So you mean to say we can simulate from a Poisson for $p(t+t_0)$ and $p(t_0)$ and do a regression. But the $log$ of a Poisson will not be a Poisson right? I suppose we can still sample from Poisson and take a log.
â user2167741
Aug 2 at 11:35
Also, the above equation should be $p(t+t_0)-p(t) = rt_0$.
â user2167741
Aug 2 at 14:26
Also, the above equation should be $p(t+t_0)-p(t) = rt_0$.
â user2167741
Aug 2 at 14:26
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2869699%2fstochastic-process-simulation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password