Asymptotics of a function defined by an integral

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












This arises in trying to understand the Uncertainty Principle. Suppose $psi(x)$ is a Schwartz function on $mathbbR^n$ such that $|psi|_2=1$. Let $R_1$ denote the rectangle $[-1,1]^n$ in $mathbbR ^n$. How can one show that $f(h),$ for $h$ a small parameter and $epsilon > 0$ defined as



$$f(h):= h^-n epsilonint_mathbbR^n setminus R_1 left(psileft(fracxh^epsilonright)right)^2 dx$$



belongs to $O(h^infty)$ as $h to 0?$







share|cite|improve this question





















  • What's $O(h^infty)$??
    – mathworker21
    2 days ago










  • Letting $y = fracxh^epsilon$ gives that $f(h) = int_mathbbR^n setminus I_h psi(y)^2 dy$, where $I_h = [-frac1h^epsilon,frac1h^epsilon]$. As $h to 0$, $f(h) to 0$.
    – mathworker21
    2 days ago










  • $f(h) in O(h^infty)$ means that $f(h) in O(h^n)$ for every $n in mathbbZ_+$ as $h to 0$. I know $f(h) to 0$ but I don't know how to show the order.
    – Memeboy Inc.
    2 days ago














up vote
1
down vote

favorite












This arises in trying to understand the Uncertainty Principle. Suppose $psi(x)$ is a Schwartz function on $mathbbR^n$ such that $|psi|_2=1$. Let $R_1$ denote the rectangle $[-1,1]^n$ in $mathbbR ^n$. How can one show that $f(h),$ for $h$ a small parameter and $epsilon > 0$ defined as



$$f(h):= h^-n epsilonint_mathbbR^n setminus R_1 left(psileft(fracxh^epsilonright)right)^2 dx$$



belongs to $O(h^infty)$ as $h to 0?$







share|cite|improve this question





















  • What's $O(h^infty)$??
    – mathworker21
    2 days ago










  • Letting $y = fracxh^epsilon$ gives that $f(h) = int_mathbbR^n setminus I_h psi(y)^2 dy$, where $I_h = [-frac1h^epsilon,frac1h^epsilon]$. As $h to 0$, $f(h) to 0$.
    – mathworker21
    2 days ago










  • $f(h) in O(h^infty)$ means that $f(h) in O(h^n)$ for every $n in mathbbZ_+$ as $h to 0$. I know $f(h) to 0$ but I don't know how to show the order.
    – Memeboy Inc.
    2 days ago












up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











This arises in trying to understand the Uncertainty Principle. Suppose $psi(x)$ is a Schwartz function on $mathbbR^n$ such that $|psi|_2=1$. Let $R_1$ denote the rectangle $[-1,1]^n$ in $mathbbR ^n$. How can one show that $f(h),$ for $h$ a small parameter and $epsilon > 0$ defined as



$$f(h):= h^-n epsilonint_mathbbR^n setminus R_1 left(psileft(fracxh^epsilonright)right)^2 dx$$



belongs to $O(h^infty)$ as $h to 0?$







share|cite|improve this question













This arises in trying to understand the Uncertainty Principle. Suppose $psi(x)$ is a Schwartz function on $mathbbR^n$ such that $|psi|_2=1$. Let $R_1$ denote the rectangle $[-1,1]^n$ in $mathbbR ^n$. How can one show that $f(h),$ for $h$ a small parameter and $epsilon > 0$ defined as



$$f(h):= h^-n epsilonint_mathbbR^n setminus R_1 left(psileft(fracxh^epsilonright)right)^2 dx$$



belongs to $O(h^infty)$ as $h to 0?$









share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Aug 2 at 15:37









Adrian Keister

3,49321533




3,49321533









asked Aug 2 at 15:30









Memeboy Inc.

499




499











  • What's $O(h^infty)$??
    – mathworker21
    2 days ago










  • Letting $y = fracxh^epsilon$ gives that $f(h) = int_mathbbR^n setminus I_h psi(y)^2 dy$, where $I_h = [-frac1h^epsilon,frac1h^epsilon]$. As $h to 0$, $f(h) to 0$.
    – mathworker21
    2 days ago










  • $f(h) in O(h^infty)$ means that $f(h) in O(h^n)$ for every $n in mathbbZ_+$ as $h to 0$. I know $f(h) to 0$ but I don't know how to show the order.
    – Memeboy Inc.
    2 days ago
















  • What's $O(h^infty)$??
    – mathworker21
    2 days ago










  • Letting $y = fracxh^epsilon$ gives that $f(h) = int_mathbbR^n setminus I_h psi(y)^2 dy$, where $I_h = [-frac1h^epsilon,frac1h^epsilon]$. As $h to 0$, $f(h) to 0$.
    – mathworker21
    2 days ago










  • $f(h) in O(h^infty)$ means that $f(h) in O(h^n)$ for every $n in mathbbZ_+$ as $h to 0$. I know $f(h) to 0$ but I don't know how to show the order.
    – Memeboy Inc.
    2 days ago















What's $O(h^infty)$??
– mathworker21
2 days ago




What's $O(h^infty)$??
– mathworker21
2 days ago












Letting $y = fracxh^epsilon$ gives that $f(h) = int_mathbbR^n setminus I_h psi(y)^2 dy$, where $I_h = [-frac1h^epsilon,frac1h^epsilon]$. As $h to 0$, $f(h) to 0$.
– mathworker21
2 days ago




Letting $y = fracxh^epsilon$ gives that $f(h) = int_mathbbR^n setminus I_h psi(y)^2 dy$, where $I_h = [-frac1h^epsilon,frac1h^epsilon]$. As $h to 0$, $f(h) to 0$.
– mathworker21
2 days ago












$f(h) in O(h^infty)$ means that $f(h) in O(h^n)$ for every $n in mathbbZ_+$ as $h to 0$. I know $f(h) to 0$ but I don't know how to show the order.
– Memeboy Inc.
2 days ago




$f(h) in O(h^infty)$ means that $f(h) in O(h^n)$ for every $n in mathbbZ_+$ as $h to 0$. I know $f(h) to 0$ but I don't know how to show the order.
– Memeboy Inc.
2 days ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote



+50










I think this just follows from the definition of a Schwartz function. Fix $epsilon > 0$ and let $I_h = [-frac1h^epsilon,frac1h^epsilon]$. For $M ge 2$, $|psi(y)| lesssim_M y$ on the range $|y| ge 1$ (say). Then, $int_mathbbR^nsetminus I_h psi(y)^2 lesssim_M int_mathbbR^nsetminus I_h frac1ydy lesssim_M h^epsilon(2M-1)$. As $M$ can be arbitrarily large, this shows $f(h) in O(h^infty)$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Ah, of course! For clarification your notation means $leq C_M |y|^M$ where $C_M$ is a constant depending on $M$?
    – Memeboy Inc.
    2 days ago










  • @MemeboyInc. Yes
    – mathworker21
    2 days ago










Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2870186%2fasymptotics-of-a-function-defined-by-an-integral%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
2
down vote



+50










I think this just follows from the definition of a Schwartz function. Fix $epsilon > 0$ and let $I_h = [-frac1h^epsilon,frac1h^epsilon]$. For $M ge 2$, $|psi(y)| lesssim_M y$ on the range $|y| ge 1$ (say). Then, $int_mathbbR^nsetminus I_h psi(y)^2 lesssim_M int_mathbbR^nsetminus I_h frac1ydy lesssim_M h^epsilon(2M-1)$. As $M$ can be arbitrarily large, this shows $f(h) in O(h^infty)$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Ah, of course! For clarification your notation means $leq C_M |y|^M$ where $C_M$ is a constant depending on $M$?
    – Memeboy Inc.
    2 days ago










  • @MemeboyInc. Yes
    – mathworker21
    2 days ago














up vote
2
down vote



+50










I think this just follows from the definition of a Schwartz function. Fix $epsilon > 0$ and let $I_h = [-frac1h^epsilon,frac1h^epsilon]$. For $M ge 2$, $|psi(y)| lesssim_M y$ on the range $|y| ge 1$ (say). Then, $int_mathbbR^nsetminus I_h psi(y)^2 lesssim_M int_mathbbR^nsetminus I_h frac1ydy lesssim_M h^epsilon(2M-1)$. As $M$ can be arbitrarily large, this shows $f(h) in O(h^infty)$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Ah, of course! For clarification your notation means $leq C_M |y|^M$ where $C_M$ is a constant depending on $M$?
    – Memeboy Inc.
    2 days ago










  • @MemeboyInc. Yes
    – mathworker21
    2 days ago












up vote
2
down vote



+50







up vote
2
down vote



+50




+50




I think this just follows from the definition of a Schwartz function. Fix $epsilon > 0$ and let $I_h = [-frac1h^epsilon,frac1h^epsilon]$. For $M ge 2$, $|psi(y)| lesssim_M y$ on the range $|y| ge 1$ (say). Then, $int_mathbbR^nsetminus I_h psi(y)^2 lesssim_M int_mathbbR^nsetminus I_h frac1ydy lesssim_M h^epsilon(2M-1)$. As $M$ can be arbitrarily large, this shows $f(h) in O(h^infty)$.






share|cite|improve this answer













I think this just follows from the definition of a Schwartz function. Fix $epsilon > 0$ and let $I_h = [-frac1h^epsilon,frac1h^epsilon]$. For $M ge 2$, $|psi(y)| lesssim_M y$ on the range $|y| ge 1$ (say). Then, $int_mathbbR^nsetminus I_h psi(y)^2 lesssim_M int_mathbbR^nsetminus I_h frac1ydy lesssim_M h^epsilon(2M-1)$. As $M$ can be arbitrarily large, this shows $f(h) in O(h^infty)$.







share|cite|improve this answer













share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer











answered 2 days ago









mathworker21

6,4231727




6,4231727











  • Ah, of course! For clarification your notation means $leq C_M |y|^M$ where $C_M$ is a constant depending on $M$?
    – Memeboy Inc.
    2 days ago










  • @MemeboyInc. Yes
    – mathworker21
    2 days ago
















  • Ah, of course! For clarification your notation means $leq C_M |y|^M$ where $C_M$ is a constant depending on $M$?
    – Memeboy Inc.
    2 days ago










  • @MemeboyInc. Yes
    – mathworker21
    2 days ago















Ah, of course! For clarification your notation means $leq C_M |y|^M$ where $C_M$ is a constant depending on $M$?
– Memeboy Inc.
2 days ago




Ah, of course! For clarification your notation means $leq C_M |y|^M$ where $C_M$ is a constant depending on $M$?
– Memeboy Inc.
2 days ago












@MemeboyInc. Yes
– mathworker21
2 days ago




@MemeboyInc. Yes
– mathworker21
2 days ago












 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2870186%2fasymptotics-of-a-function-defined-by-an-integral%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?