Automatic readjustment of the order of the display of items

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












I use the following code to display items sequentially



documentclassbeamer
setbeamertemplatenavigation symbols
begindocument
beginframe[fragile,t]
 frametitle
textcolor blueLarge Items on a List
beginenumerate
item<2>
item 1
item<3>
item 2
item<4>
item 3
item<5>
item 4
item<6>
item 5
item<7>
item 6
endenumerate
endframe 
enddocument


When making a list using enumerate environment, their numbering is adjusted automatically; and when adding new items in the middle, their numbering is re-adjusted automatically.



When displaying these items sequentially, I use item<2>..., item<3>... and so on. But, when I need to insert new items in the middle of the list (for example, when adding an item between 4 and 5), I have to re-adjust the order of the display of each subsequent item.



Is there a way to make the order of their display re-adjusted automatically as their numbering is re-adjusted automatically.




beamer itemize




share|improve this question

















  • 1




    samcarter or another beamer expert can give you a more authoritative answer, but there is item<+> which looks suspiciously like it could help you.
    – moewe
    Aug 6 at 7:54






  • 2




    You can also use beginenumerate[<+->] and then just regular item commands.
    – Max Snippe
    Aug 6 at 7:55






  • 1




    Or even better: beginenumerate[<+>] item item 1 item item 2 item item 3 item item 4 item item 5 item item 6 endenumerate possibly with stepcounterbeamerpauses see tex.stackexchange.com/q/86678/35864
    – moewe
    Aug 6 at 7:58















up vote
2
down vote

favorite












I use the following code to display items sequentially



documentclassbeamer
setbeamertemplatenavigation symbols
begindocument
beginframe[fragile,t]
 frametitle
textcolor blueLarge Items on a List
beginenumerate
item<2>
item 1
item<3>
item 2
item<4>
item 3
item<5>
item 4
item<6>
item 5
item<7>
item 6
endenumerate
endframe 
enddocument


When making a list using enumerate environment, their numbering is adjusted automatically; and when adding new items in the middle, their numbering is re-adjusted automatically.



When displaying these items sequentially, I use item<2>..., item<3>... and so on. But, when I need to insert new items in the middle of the list (for example, when adding an item between 4 and 5), I have to re-adjust the order of the display of each subsequent item.



Is there a way to make the order of their display re-adjusted automatically as their numbering is re-adjusted automatically.




beamer itemize




share|improve this question

















  • 1




    samcarter or another beamer expert can give you a more authoritative answer, but there is item<+> which looks suspiciously like it could help you.
    – moewe
    Aug 6 at 7:54






  • 2




    You can also use beginenumerate[<+->] and then just regular item commands.
    – Max Snippe
    Aug 6 at 7:55






  • 1




    Or even better: beginenumerate[<+>] item item 1 item item 2 item item 3 item item 4 item item 5 item item 6 endenumerate possibly with stepcounterbeamerpauses see tex.stackexchange.com/q/86678/35864
    – moewe
    Aug 6 at 7:58













up vote
2
down vote

favorite









up vote
2
down vote

favorite











I use the following code to display items sequentially



documentclassbeamer
setbeamertemplatenavigation symbols
begindocument
beginframe[fragile,t]
 frametitle
textcolor blueLarge Items on a List
beginenumerate
item<2>
item 1
item<3>
item 2
item<4>
item 3
item<5>
item 4
item<6>
item 5
item<7>
item 6
endenumerate
endframe 
enddocument


When making a list using enumerate environment, their numbering is adjusted automatically; and when adding new items in the middle, their numbering is re-adjusted automatically.



When displaying these items sequentially, I use item<2>..., item<3>... and so on. But, when I need to insert new items in the middle of the list (for example, when adding an item between 4 and 5), I have to re-adjust the order of the display of each subsequent item.



Is there a way to make the order of their display re-adjusted automatically as their numbering is re-adjusted automatically.




beamer itemize




share|improve this question













I use the following code to display items sequentially



documentclassbeamer
setbeamertemplatenavigation symbols
begindocument
beginframe[fragile,t]
 frametitle
textcolor blueLarge Items on a List
beginenumerate
item<2>
item 1
item<3>
item 2
item<4>
item 3
item<5>
item 4
item<6>
item 5
item<7>
item 6
endenumerate
endframe 
enddocument


When making a list using enumerate environment, their numbering is adjusted automatically; and when adding new items in the middle, their numbering is re-adjusted automatically.



When displaying these items sequentially, I use item<2>..., item<3>... and so on. But, when I need to insert new items in the middle of the list (for example, when adding an item between 4 and 5), I have to re-adjust the order of the display of each subsequent item.



Is there a way to make the order of their display re-adjusted automatically as their numbering is re-adjusted automatically.





beamer itemize





share|improve this question












share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Aug 6 at 8:01









Max Snippe

3,85311221




3,85311221









asked Aug 6 at 7:27









Hany

636214




636214







  • 1




    samcarter or another beamer expert can give you a more authoritative answer, but there is item<+> which looks suspiciously like it could help you.
    – moewe
    Aug 6 at 7:54






  • 2




    You can also use beginenumerate[<+->] and then just regular item commands.
    – Max Snippe
    Aug 6 at 7:55






  • 1




    Or even better: beginenumerate[<+>] item item 1 item item 2 item item 3 item item 4 item item 5 item item 6 endenumerate possibly with stepcounterbeamerpauses see tex.stackexchange.com/q/86678/35864
    – moewe
    Aug 6 at 7:58













  • 1




    samcarter or another beamer expert can give you a more authoritative answer, but there is item<+> which looks suspiciously like it could help you.
    – moewe
    Aug 6 at 7:54






  • 2




    You can also use beginenumerate[<+->] and then just regular item commands.
    – Max Snippe
    Aug 6 at 7:55






  • 1




    Or even better: beginenumerate[<+>] item item 1 item item 2 item item 3 item item 4 item item 5 item item 6 endenumerate possibly with stepcounterbeamerpauses see tex.stackexchange.com/q/86678/35864
    – moewe
    Aug 6 at 7:58








1




1




samcarter or another beamer expert can give you a more authoritative answer, but there is item<+> which looks suspiciously like it could help you.
– moewe
Aug 6 at 7:54




samcarter or another beamer expert can give you a more authoritative answer, but there is item<+> which looks suspiciously like it could help you.
– moewe
Aug 6 at 7:54




2




2




You can also use beginenumerate[<+->] and then just regular item commands.
– Max Snippe
Aug 6 at 7:55




You can also use beginenumerate[<+->] and then just regular item commands.
– Max Snippe
Aug 6 at 7:55




1




1




Or even better: beginenumerate[<+>] item item 1 item item 2 item item 3 item item 4 item item 5 item item 6 endenumerate possibly with stepcounterbeamerpauses see tex.stackexchange.com/q/86678/35864
– moewe
Aug 6 at 7:58





Or even better: beginenumerate[<+>] item item 1 item item 2 item item 3 item item 4 item item 5 item item 6 endenumerate possibly with stepcounterbeamerpauses see tex.stackexchange.com/q/86678/35864
– moewe
Aug 6 at 7:58











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
6
down vote



accepted










You can give the enumerate environment an <+-> overlay specification like this:



documentclassbeamer
setbeamertemplatenavigation symbols
begindocument
beginframe[t]
 frametitle
textcolor blueLarge Items on a List
beginenumerate[<+->]
item item 1
item item 2
item item 3
item item 4
item item 5
item item 6
endenumerate
endframe 
enddocument


enter image description here



Alternatively if you want only the current item to show, you can use <+> as specification as mentioned by @moewe:



enter image description here



In the latter I used pause before the beginenumerate to make the first sheet empty:



documentclassbeamer
setbeamertemplatenavigation symbols
begindocument
beginframe[t]
 frametitle
textcolor blueLarge Items on a List
pause
beginenumerate[<+>]
item item 1
item item 2
item item 3
item item 4
item item 5
item item 6
endenumerate
endframe 
enddocument





share|improve this answer



















  • 1




    I think the OP only wants <+> and not <+->, at least that is what the MWE shows. And in their example the first slide is empty, but I don't know if that is a requirement.
    – moewe
    Aug 6 at 8:02







  • 1




    @moewe You are right, I must've overlooked that! I adjusted the answer accordingly.
    – Max Snippe
    Aug 6 at 8:06






  • 1




    +1 But I think it would be a nice touch to add the code for the second output as well. That makes it easier for people looking for a copy-and-paste solution.
    – moewe
    Aug 6 at 8:09






  • 1




    @moewe Again, you are right :)
    – Max Snippe
    Aug 6 at 8:10










  • Thank you very much; this is what I wanted. Just one comment, instead of using pause before the beginenumerate, I used beginenumerate[<+(1)>]
    – Hany
    Aug 6 at 8:34











Your Answer







StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f444794%2fautomatic-readjustment-of-the-order-of-the-display-of-items%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

















1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
6
down vote



accepted










You can give the enumerate environment an <+-> overlay specification like this:



documentclassbeamer
setbeamertemplatenavigation symbols
begindocument
beginframe[t]
 frametitle
textcolor blueLarge Items on a List
beginenumerate[<+->]
item item 1
item item 2
item item 3
item item 4
item item 5
item item 6
endenumerate
endframe 
enddocument


enter image description here



Alternatively if you want only the current item to show, you can use <+> as specification as mentioned by @moewe:



enter image description here



In the latter I used pause before the beginenumerate to make the first sheet empty:



documentclassbeamer
setbeamertemplatenavigation symbols
begindocument
beginframe[t]
 frametitle
textcolor blueLarge Items on a List
pause
beginenumerate[<+>]
item item 1
item item 2
item item 3
item item 4
item item 5
item item 6
endenumerate
endframe 
enddocument





share|improve this answer



















  • 1




    I think the OP only wants <+> and not <+->, at least that is what the MWE shows. And in their example the first slide is empty, but I don't know if that is a requirement.
    – moewe
    Aug 6 at 8:02







  • 1




    @moewe You are right, I must've overlooked that! I adjusted the answer accordingly.
    – Max Snippe
    Aug 6 at 8:06






  • 1




    +1 But I think it would be a nice touch to add the code for the second output as well. That makes it easier for people looking for a copy-and-paste solution.
    – moewe
    Aug 6 at 8:09






  • 1




    @moewe Again, you are right :)
    – Max Snippe
    Aug 6 at 8:10










  • Thank you very much; this is what I wanted. Just one comment, instead of using pause before the beginenumerate, I used beginenumerate[<+(1)>]
    – Hany
    Aug 6 at 8:34















up vote
6
down vote



accepted










You can give the enumerate environment an <+-> overlay specification like this:



documentclassbeamer
setbeamertemplatenavigation symbols
begindocument
beginframe[t]
 frametitle
textcolor blueLarge Items on a List
beginenumerate[<+->]
item item 1
item item 2
item item 3
item item 4
item item 5
item item 6
endenumerate
endframe 
enddocument


enter image description here



Alternatively if you want only the current item to show, you can use <+> as specification as mentioned by @moewe:



enter image description here



In the latter I used pause before the beginenumerate to make the first sheet empty:



documentclassbeamer
setbeamertemplatenavigation symbols
begindocument
beginframe[t]
 frametitle
textcolor blueLarge Items on a List
pause
beginenumerate[<+>]
item item 1
item item 2
item item 3
item item 4
item item 5
item item 6
endenumerate
endframe 
enddocument





share|improve this answer



















  • 1




    I think the OP only wants <+> and not <+->, at least that is what the MWE shows. And in their example the first slide is empty, but I don't know if that is a requirement.
    – moewe
    Aug 6 at 8:02







  • 1




    @moewe You are right, I must've overlooked that! I adjusted the answer accordingly.
    – Max Snippe
    Aug 6 at 8:06






  • 1




    +1 But I think it would be a nice touch to add the code for the second output as well. That makes it easier for people looking for a copy-and-paste solution.
    – moewe
    Aug 6 at 8:09






  • 1




    @moewe Again, you are right :)
    – Max Snippe
    Aug 6 at 8:10










  • Thank you very much; this is what I wanted. Just one comment, instead of using pause before the beginenumerate, I used beginenumerate[<+(1)>]
    – Hany
    Aug 6 at 8:34













up vote
6
down vote



accepted







up vote
6
down vote



accepted






You can give the enumerate environment an <+-> overlay specification like this:



documentclassbeamer
setbeamertemplatenavigation symbols
begindocument
beginframe[t]
 frametitle
textcolor blueLarge Items on a List
beginenumerate[<+->]
item item 1
item item 2
item item 3
item item 4
item item 5
item item 6
endenumerate
endframe 
enddocument


enter image description here



Alternatively if you want only the current item to show, you can use <+> as specification as mentioned by @moewe:



enter image description here



In the latter I used pause before the beginenumerate to make the first sheet empty:



documentclassbeamer
setbeamertemplatenavigation symbols
begindocument
beginframe[t]
 frametitle
textcolor blueLarge Items on a List
pause
beginenumerate[<+>]
item item 1
item item 2
item item 3
item item 4
item item 5
item item 6
endenumerate
endframe 
enddocument





share|improve this answer















You can give the enumerate environment an <+-> overlay specification like this:



documentclassbeamer
setbeamertemplatenavigation symbols
begindocument
beginframe[t]
 frametitle
textcolor blueLarge Items on a List
beginenumerate[<+->]
item item 1
item item 2
item item 3
item item 4
item item 5
item item 6
endenumerate
endframe 
enddocument


enter image description here



Alternatively if you want only the current item to show, you can use <+> as specification as mentioned by @moewe:



enter image description here



In the latter I used pause before the beginenumerate to make the first sheet empty:



documentclassbeamer
setbeamertemplatenavigation symbols
begindocument
beginframe[t]
 frametitle
textcolor blueLarge Items on a List
pause
beginenumerate[<+>]
item item 1
item item 2
item item 3
item item 4
item item 5
item item 6
endenumerate
endframe 
enddocument






share|improve this answer















share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Aug 6 at 8:10


























answered Aug 6 at 8:01









Max Snippe

3,85311221




3,85311221







  • 1




    I think the OP only wants <+> and not <+->, at least that is what the MWE shows. And in their example the first slide is empty, but I don't know if that is a requirement.
    – moewe
    Aug 6 at 8:02







  • 1




    @moewe You are right, I must've overlooked that! I adjusted the answer accordingly.
    – Max Snippe
    Aug 6 at 8:06






  • 1




    +1 But I think it would be a nice touch to add the code for the second output as well. That makes it easier for people looking for a copy-and-paste solution.
    – moewe
    Aug 6 at 8:09






  • 1




    @moewe Again, you are right :)
    – Max Snippe
    Aug 6 at 8:10










  • Thank you very much; this is what I wanted. Just one comment, instead of using pause before the beginenumerate, I used beginenumerate[<+(1)>]
    – Hany
    Aug 6 at 8:34













  • 1




    I think the OP only wants <+> and not <+->, at least that is what the MWE shows. And in their example the first slide is empty, but I don't know if that is a requirement.
    – moewe
    Aug 6 at 8:02







  • 1




    @moewe You are right, I must've overlooked that! I adjusted the answer accordingly.
    – Max Snippe
    Aug 6 at 8:06






  • 1




    +1 But I think it would be a nice touch to add the code for the second output as well. That makes it easier for people looking for a copy-and-paste solution.
    – moewe
    Aug 6 at 8:09






  • 1




    @moewe Again, you are right :)
    – Max Snippe
    Aug 6 at 8:10










  • Thank you very much; this is what I wanted. Just one comment, instead of using pause before the beginenumerate, I used beginenumerate[<+(1)>]
    – Hany
    Aug 6 at 8:34








1




1




I think the OP only wants <+> and not <+->, at least that is what the MWE shows. And in their example the first slide is empty, but I don't know if that is a requirement.
– moewe
Aug 6 at 8:02





I think the OP only wants <+> and not <+->, at least that is what the MWE shows. And in their example the first slide is empty, but I don't know if that is a requirement.
– moewe
Aug 6 at 8:02





1




1




@moewe You are right, I must've overlooked that! I adjusted the answer accordingly.
– Max Snippe
Aug 6 at 8:06




@moewe You are right, I must've overlooked that! I adjusted the answer accordingly.
– Max Snippe
Aug 6 at 8:06




1




1




+1 But I think it would be a nice touch to add the code for the second output as well. That makes it easier for people looking for a copy-and-paste solution.
– moewe
Aug 6 at 8:09




+1 But I think it would be a nice touch to add the code for the second output as well. That makes it easier for people looking for a copy-and-paste solution.
– moewe
Aug 6 at 8:09




1




1




@moewe Again, you are right :)
– Max Snippe
Aug 6 at 8:10




@moewe Again, you are right :)
– Max Snippe
Aug 6 at 8:10












Thank you very much; this is what I wanted. Just one comment, instead of using pause before the beginenumerate, I used beginenumerate[<+(1)>]
– Hany
Aug 6 at 8:34





Thank you very much; this is what I wanted. Just one comment, instead of using pause before the beginenumerate, I used beginenumerate[<+(1)>]
– Hany
Aug 6 at 8:34













 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f444794%2fautomatic-readjustment-of-the-order-of-the-display-of-items%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest
































































Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

Image
Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 2 down vote favorite What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalized tilt? I've noticed that in most equations given to represent a cone, there is no parameter which defines the tilt of the cone in 3D space and that most of them have their point at the origin $(0,0,0)$ - I was wondering if anyone could give me a more generalized cone equation for a cone in any position in 3D space 3d share | cite | improve this question edited Jul 25 '16 at 0:05 ervx 9,425 3 13 36 asked Jul 24 '16 at 15:38 Charlene 11 2 2 Welcome to Math.SE! Could you please explain a few things to help people give an answer useful to you: 1. What do you mean by "generalized tilt"? 2. Are you asking about a right circular cone? Does the angle at the vertex matter? 3. What form of answer (implicit, parametric...?) are you looking for? 4. If this is homework, what tools do you have available, an...
Read more

Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

Image
Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 5 down vote favorite 1 Here is the problem: For what $n$ is it possible to color the edges and diagonals of an $n$-side regular polygon with $dfracbinomn23$ colors, such that you use every color exactly three times and for every color the three segments (edges or diagonals) with that color form a triangle? Trivially $nequiv 0 text or 1 pmod3$. I can also prove that if the statement is true for $k$ than it is true for $3k$ as well. How to finish? Please help! Thanks combinatorial-geometry share | cite | improve this question edited Aug 6 at 21:57 alcana 118 4 asked Aug 6 at 21:15 Leo Gardner 356 11 Even assuming "polyhpn" in the title is a typo for polygon , it is unclear what you mean by "the edges and sides". Aren't the side of a regular polygon the same as the edges? A regular $n$-sided polygon has $n$ edges. – hardmath Aug 6 at 21:20 3 $n$ ne...
Read more

Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?

Image
Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 2 down vote favorite We are studying adjoints in class, and I was curious if there is a relationship between the determinant of matrix A, and the determinant of the adjoint of matrix A? I assume there would be a relationship because finding the adjoint requires creating a cofactor matrix and then transposing it. linear-algebra determinant adjoint-operators share | cite | improve this question asked Nov 17 '17 at 17:32 CluelessCoder 32 5 For a square matrix $A$ of order $n$, we have $A(operatornameadj A)=(operatornameadj A)A=|A|I_n$ where $I_n$ is the identity matrix of order $n$. This should tell you about the determinant of the adjoint in terms of that of $A$ (use multiplicative property and other elementary properties of determinants). – Prasun Biswas Nov 17 '17 at 17:35 1 @CluelessCoder: see here: math.stackexchange.com/questions/516127/…...
Read more