Counting tuples of subsets for which every subtuple of a given size has union equal to the entire set

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1












I have a question which is a refined version of the question asked here. Let $A = 1,ldots,n$, $S_r = = r$ for $0 < r leq n$, $S_r^m = (a_1,ldots,a_m) : a_i in S_r $ for $m>0$, and consider, for $0 < d leq m$, the set $$ U^n_r,m,d = T in S_r^m : text the union of any $d$ components of $T$ equals $A$ subset S_r^m $$



Note that $U^n_r,m,1 subset U^n_r,m,2 subset cdots subset U^n_r,m,m subset S_r^m$.



I'm interested in computing $tau(n,r,m,d) triangleq |U^n_r,m,d|$.



My first guess is to use an inclusion-exclusion argument. I'll run through it to illustrate where it gets stuck (as far as I can tell). We try to calculate the cardinality of the complement of $U^n_r,m,d$, say $S_r^m = U^n_r,m,d sqcup V^n_r,m,d$. For $ell in A$ let $ K_ell = (a_1,ldots,a_m) in S_r^m : exists i_1,ldots,i_d text with
ell notin cup_j a_i_j $, wherefore $$ V^n_r,m,d = bigcup_ell in A K_ell $$ To proceed we are required to be able to express the cardinality of $bigcap_j in J K_j$, for $J subset A$. I don't know how to do this. It seems tricky to count: if $(a_1,ldots,a_m) in K_1 cap K_2$, we know that for some $i_1,ldots,i_d$, $1 notin cup_j a_i_j$, and for some $k_1,ldots,k_d$, $2 notin cup_j a_k_j$, but these tuples may not have any relation to one another in general.



When $m = d$, it simplifies because they must be the same $m$-tuple of indices. Namely we know that $$ bigcap_j in J K_j = (a_1,ldots,a_m) in S_r^m : exists ell in J , ell notin cup_i a_i $$ The cardinality of this is simply $binomn-jr^m$, the result of independently choosing a subset of size $r$ from $A - J$ a total of $m$ times. One concludes that



beginalign
tau(n,r,m,m) = | S_r^m| - |V^n_r,m,d| &= binomnr^m -sum_j = 1^n (-1)^j-1 binomnj binomn-jr^m \
&=sum_j = 0^n (-1)^j binomnj binomn-jr^m endalign Note that the upper bound for the sum in the answer to the other problem is (with respect to the variables here) $n - r$ and not $n$ as it is here. If mine is the one which is mistaken please leave a comment.







share|cite|improve this question

























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    I have a question which is a refined version of the question asked here. Let $A = 1,ldots,n$, $S_r = = r$ for $0 < r leq n$, $S_r^m = (a_1,ldots,a_m) : a_i in S_r $ for $m>0$, and consider, for $0 < d leq m$, the set $$ U^n_r,m,d = T in S_r^m : text the union of any $d$ components of $T$ equals $A$ subset S_r^m $$



    Note that $U^n_r,m,1 subset U^n_r,m,2 subset cdots subset U^n_r,m,m subset S_r^m$.



    I'm interested in computing $tau(n,r,m,d) triangleq |U^n_r,m,d|$.



    My first guess is to use an inclusion-exclusion argument. I'll run through it to illustrate where it gets stuck (as far as I can tell). We try to calculate the cardinality of the complement of $U^n_r,m,d$, say $S_r^m = U^n_r,m,d sqcup V^n_r,m,d$. For $ell in A$ let $ K_ell = (a_1,ldots,a_m) in S_r^m : exists i_1,ldots,i_d text with
    ell notin cup_j a_i_j $, wherefore $$ V^n_r,m,d = bigcup_ell in A K_ell $$ To proceed we are required to be able to express the cardinality of $bigcap_j in J K_j$, for $J subset A$. I don't know how to do this. It seems tricky to count: if $(a_1,ldots,a_m) in K_1 cap K_2$, we know that for some $i_1,ldots,i_d$, $1 notin cup_j a_i_j$, and for some $k_1,ldots,k_d$, $2 notin cup_j a_k_j$, but these tuples may not have any relation to one another in general.



    When $m = d$, it simplifies because they must be the same $m$-tuple of indices. Namely we know that $$ bigcap_j in J K_j = (a_1,ldots,a_m) in S_r^m : exists ell in J , ell notin cup_i a_i $$ The cardinality of this is simply $binomn-jr^m$, the result of independently choosing a subset of size $r$ from $A - J$ a total of $m$ times. One concludes that



    beginalign
    tau(n,r,m,m) = | S_r^m| - |V^n_r,m,d| &= binomnr^m -sum_j = 1^n (-1)^j-1 binomnj binomn-jr^m \
    &=sum_j = 0^n (-1)^j binomnj binomn-jr^m endalign Note that the upper bound for the sum in the answer to the other problem is (with respect to the variables here) $n - r$ and not $n$ as it is here. If mine is the one which is mistaken please leave a comment.







    share|cite|improve this question























      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      I have a question which is a refined version of the question asked here. Let $A = 1,ldots,n$, $S_r = = r$ for $0 < r leq n$, $S_r^m = (a_1,ldots,a_m) : a_i in S_r $ for $m>0$, and consider, for $0 < d leq m$, the set $$ U^n_r,m,d = T in S_r^m : text the union of any $d$ components of $T$ equals $A$ subset S_r^m $$



      Note that $U^n_r,m,1 subset U^n_r,m,2 subset cdots subset U^n_r,m,m subset S_r^m$.



      I'm interested in computing $tau(n,r,m,d) triangleq |U^n_r,m,d|$.



      My first guess is to use an inclusion-exclusion argument. I'll run through it to illustrate where it gets stuck (as far as I can tell). We try to calculate the cardinality of the complement of $U^n_r,m,d$, say $S_r^m = U^n_r,m,d sqcup V^n_r,m,d$. For $ell in A$ let $ K_ell = (a_1,ldots,a_m) in S_r^m : exists i_1,ldots,i_d text with
      ell notin cup_j a_i_j $, wherefore $$ V^n_r,m,d = bigcup_ell in A K_ell $$ To proceed we are required to be able to express the cardinality of $bigcap_j in J K_j$, for $J subset A$. I don't know how to do this. It seems tricky to count: if $(a_1,ldots,a_m) in K_1 cap K_2$, we know that for some $i_1,ldots,i_d$, $1 notin cup_j a_i_j$, and for some $k_1,ldots,k_d$, $2 notin cup_j a_k_j$, but these tuples may not have any relation to one another in general.



      When $m = d$, it simplifies because they must be the same $m$-tuple of indices. Namely we know that $$ bigcap_j in J K_j = (a_1,ldots,a_m) in S_r^m : exists ell in J , ell notin cup_i a_i $$ The cardinality of this is simply $binomn-jr^m$, the result of independently choosing a subset of size $r$ from $A - J$ a total of $m$ times. One concludes that



      beginalign
      tau(n,r,m,m) = | S_r^m| - |V^n_r,m,d| &= binomnr^m -sum_j = 1^n (-1)^j-1 binomnj binomn-jr^m \
      &=sum_j = 0^n (-1)^j binomnj binomn-jr^m endalign Note that the upper bound for the sum in the answer to the other problem is (with respect to the variables here) $n - r$ and not $n$ as it is here. If mine is the one which is mistaken please leave a comment.







      share|cite|improve this question













      I have a question which is a refined version of the question asked here. Let $A = 1,ldots,n$, $S_r = = r$ for $0 < r leq n$, $S_r^m = (a_1,ldots,a_m) : a_i in S_r $ for $m>0$, and consider, for $0 < d leq m$, the set $$ U^n_r,m,d = T in S_r^m : text the union of any $d$ components of $T$ equals $A$ subset S_r^m $$



      Note that $U^n_r,m,1 subset U^n_r,m,2 subset cdots subset U^n_r,m,m subset S_r^m$.



      I'm interested in computing $tau(n,r,m,d) triangleq |U^n_r,m,d|$.



      My first guess is to use an inclusion-exclusion argument. I'll run through it to illustrate where it gets stuck (as far as I can tell). We try to calculate the cardinality of the complement of $U^n_r,m,d$, say $S_r^m = U^n_r,m,d sqcup V^n_r,m,d$. For $ell in A$ let $ K_ell = (a_1,ldots,a_m) in S_r^m : exists i_1,ldots,i_d text with
      ell notin cup_j a_i_j $, wherefore $$ V^n_r,m,d = bigcup_ell in A K_ell $$ To proceed we are required to be able to express the cardinality of $bigcap_j in J K_j$, for $J subset A$. I don't know how to do this. It seems tricky to count: if $(a_1,ldots,a_m) in K_1 cap K_2$, we know that for some $i_1,ldots,i_d$, $1 notin cup_j a_i_j$, and for some $k_1,ldots,k_d$, $2 notin cup_j a_k_j$, but these tuples may not have any relation to one another in general.



      When $m = d$, it simplifies because they must be the same $m$-tuple of indices. Namely we know that $$ bigcap_j in J K_j = (a_1,ldots,a_m) in S_r^m : exists ell in J , ell notin cup_i a_i $$ The cardinality of this is simply $binomn-jr^m$, the result of independently choosing a subset of size $r$ from $A - J$ a total of $m$ times. One concludes that



      beginalign
      tau(n,r,m,m) = | S_r^m| - |V^n_r,m,d| &= binomnr^m -sum_j = 1^n (-1)^j-1 binomnj binomn-jr^m \
      &=sum_j = 0^n (-1)^j binomnj binomn-jr^m endalign Note that the upper bound for the sum in the answer to the other problem is (with respect to the variables here) $n - r$ and not $n$ as it is here. If mine is the one which is mistaken please leave a comment.









      share|cite|improve this question












      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Aug 2 at 15:41
























      asked Aug 2 at 15:35









      Andrew

      11113




      11113

























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );








           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2870188%2fcounting-tuples-of-subsets-for-which-every-subtuple-of-a-given-size-has-union-eq%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest



































          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes










           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


























           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2870188%2fcounting-tuples-of-subsets-for-which-every-subtuple-of-a-given-size-has-union-eq%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          Comments

          Popular posts from this blog

          What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

          Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

          Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?