Does c#k + i actually generate all primes above c# (plus some composites)?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












The Wikipedia page for "Primality test", linked below [1], states that "all primes are of the form c#k + i for i < c# where c and k are integers, c# represents c primorial, and i represents the numbers that are coprime to c#."



I understand this to mean the following:



  • Pick a particular value for c, for example set c=11.

  • Compute the primorial of c, c#=2*3*5*7*11=2310.

  • The values that i can take on for this choice of c are: 1, 13, 17, ..., 2309. (The values 2, 3, 5, 7, and 11 are omitted due to being primes less than 11, and the list of possible i values ends at the largest prime smaller than c#=2310 or in this case 2309.)

  • For this c# every possible prime number above c#=2310, can be produced for some value k (any integer) and a particular value of i.

  • Note, I understand that the series will ALSO generate composite numbers, but my understanding is that it will be guaranteed to generate every prime above c#.

I tried to test this. Specifically, I checked to see if [(2^13)-1]=8191 (which is a prime number, specifically a Mersenne prime) can be generated by the sequence of numbers for c=11, c#=2310.



  • To find the appropriate value for k I computed [(2^13)-1]/(2310)=3.54... Thus I selected k=3 since the values of i are less than c#, and if k were any other value there would be no chance of reaching the number in question (8191).

  • Then I did [(2^13)-1]-3*2310=1261. And looked to see if 1261 is a possible value that i can take on. However, 1261 is not prime, so i can not equal 1261.

  • Thus I concluded that the series of numbers generated by c#k + i can not possibly equal [(2^13)-1] for the series generated by c=11.

So it would seem to me that the claim made in the Wikipedia page for Primality Tests that all prime numbers above c# can be generated by the series c#k+i is false. Am I misunderstanding the original claim? Or have a applied it incorrectly and make a mistake in the calculations? Any clarification regarding series of this form that generate all primes (plus some composites) would be greatly appreciated. (Is there a name for series of this type that I could use to search for more information?)



[1] Wikipedia page for "Primality test"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primality_test







share|cite|improve this question

















  • 1




    It says coprime to $c#$. Since $1261 = 13cdot 97$, it is coprime to $11#$.
    – Daniel Fischer♦
    Jul 25 at 21:54










  • @DanielFischer Thank you. I see now I have somehow misunderstood the original claim. The value 1261 is "coprime" with c# as it shares no common prime factors (2,3,5,7,11). This is many more possible values than I listed for i, or understood that i could take on.
    – user669487
    Jul 25 at 22:07














up vote
0
down vote

favorite












The Wikipedia page for "Primality test", linked below [1], states that "all primes are of the form c#k + i for i < c# where c and k are integers, c# represents c primorial, and i represents the numbers that are coprime to c#."



I understand this to mean the following:



  • Pick a particular value for c, for example set c=11.

  • Compute the primorial of c, c#=2*3*5*7*11=2310.

  • The values that i can take on for this choice of c are: 1, 13, 17, ..., 2309. (The values 2, 3, 5, 7, and 11 are omitted due to being primes less than 11, and the list of possible i values ends at the largest prime smaller than c#=2310 or in this case 2309.)

  • For this c# every possible prime number above c#=2310, can be produced for some value k (any integer) and a particular value of i.

  • Note, I understand that the series will ALSO generate composite numbers, but my understanding is that it will be guaranteed to generate every prime above c#.

I tried to test this. Specifically, I checked to see if [(2^13)-1]=8191 (which is a prime number, specifically a Mersenne prime) can be generated by the sequence of numbers for c=11, c#=2310.



  • To find the appropriate value for k I computed [(2^13)-1]/(2310)=3.54... Thus I selected k=3 since the values of i are less than c#, and if k were any other value there would be no chance of reaching the number in question (8191).

  • Then I did [(2^13)-1]-3*2310=1261. And looked to see if 1261 is a possible value that i can take on. However, 1261 is not prime, so i can not equal 1261.

  • Thus I concluded that the series of numbers generated by c#k + i can not possibly equal [(2^13)-1] for the series generated by c=11.

So it would seem to me that the claim made in the Wikipedia page for Primality Tests that all prime numbers above c# can be generated by the series c#k+i is false. Am I misunderstanding the original claim? Or have a applied it incorrectly and make a mistake in the calculations? Any clarification regarding series of this form that generate all primes (plus some composites) would be greatly appreciated. (Is there a name for series of this type that I could use to search for more information?)



[1] Wikipedia page for "Primality test"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primality_test







share|cite|improve this question

















  • 1




    It says coprime to $c#$. Since $1261 = 13cdot 97$, it is coprime to $11#$.
    – Daniel Fischer♦
    Jul 25 at 21:54










  • @DanielFischer Thank you. I see now I have somehow misunderstood the original claim. The value 1261 is "coprime" with c# as it shares no common prime factors (2,3,5,7,11). This is many more possible values than I listed for i, or understood that i could take on.
    – user669487
    Jul 25 at 22:07












up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











The Wikipedia page for "Primality test", linked below [1], states that "all primes are of the form c#k + i for i < c# where c and k are integers, c# represents c primorial, and i represents the numbers that are coprime to c#."



I understand this to mean the following:



  • Pick a particular value for c, for example set c=11.

  • Compute the primorial of c, c#=2*3*5*7*11=2310.

  • The values that i can take on for this choice of c are: 1, 13, 17, ..., 2309. (The values 2, 3, 5, 7, and 11 are omitted due to being primes less than 11, and the list of possible i values ends at the largest prime smaller than c#=2310 or in this case 2309.)

  • For this c# every possible prime number above c#=2310, can be produced for some value k (any integer) and a particular value of i.

  • Note, I understand that the series will ALSO generate composite numbers, but my understanding is that it will be guaranteed to generate every prime above c#.

I tried to test this. Specifically, I checked to see if [(2^13)-1]=8191 (which is a prime number, specifically a Mersenne prime) can be generated by the sequence of numbers for c=11, c#=2310.



  • To find the appropriate value for k I computed [(2^13)-1]/(2310)=3.54... Thus I selected k=3 since the values of i are less than c#, and if k were any other value there would be no chance of reaching the number in question (8191).

  • Then I did [(2^13)-1]-3*2310=1261. And looked to see if 1261 is a possible value that i can take on. However, 1261 is not prime, so i can not equal 1261.

  • Thus I concluded that the series of numbers generated by c#k + i can not possibly equal [(2^13)-1] for the series generated by c=11.

So it would seem to me that the claim made in the Wikipedia page for Primality Tests that all prime numbers above c# can be generated by the series c#k+i is false. Am I misunderstanding the original claim? Or have a applied it incorrectly and make a mistake in the calculations? Any clarification regarding series of this form that generate all primes (plus some composites) would be greatly appreciated. (Is there a name for series of this type that I could use to search for more information?)



[1] Wikipedia page for "Primality test"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primality_test







share|cite|improve this question













The Wikipedia page for "Primality test", linked below [1], states that "all primes are of the form c#k + i for i < c# where c and k are integers, c# represents c primorial, and i represents the numbers that are coprime to c#."



I understand this to mean the following:



  • Pick a particular value for c, for example set c=11.

  • Compute the primorial of c, c#=2*3*5*7*11=2310.

  • The values that i can take on for this choice of c are: 1, 13, 17, ..., 2309. (The values 2, 3, 5, 7, and 11 are omitted due to being primes less than 11, and the list of possible i values ends at the largest prime smaller than c#=2310 or in this case 2309.)

  • For this c# every possible prime number above c#=2310, can be produced for some value k (any integer) and a particular value of i.

  • Note, I understand that the series will ALSO generate composite numbers, but my understanding is that it will be guaranteed to generate every prime above c#.

I tried to test this. Specifically, I checked to see if [(2^13)-1]=8191 (which is a prime number, specifically a Mersenne prime) can be generated by the sequence of numbers for c=11, c#=2310.



  • To find the appropriate value for k I computed [(2^13)-1]/(2310)=3.54... Thus I selected k=3 since the values of i are less than c#, and if k were any other value there would be no chance of reaching the number in question (8191).

  • Then I did [(2^13)-1]-3*2310=1261. And looked to see if 1261 is a possible value that i can take on. However, 1261 is not prime, so i can not equal 1261.

  • Thus I concluded that the series of numbers generated by c#k + i can not possibly equal [(2^13)-1] for the series generated by c=11.

So it would seem to me that the claim made in the Wikipedia page for Primality Tests that all prime numbers above c# can be generated by the series c#k+i is false. Am I misunderstanding the original claim? Or have a applied it incorrectly and make a mistake in the calculations? Any clarification regarding series of this form that generate all primes (plus some composites) would be greatly appreciated. (Is there a name for series of this type that I could use to search for more information?)



[1] Wikipedia page for "Primality test"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primality_test









share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 25 at 21:58
























asked Jul 25 at 21:51









user669487

662




662







  • 1




    It says coprime to $c#$. Since $1261 = 13cdot 97$, it is coprime to $11#$.
    – Daniel Fischer♦
    Jul 25 at 21:54










  • @DanielFischer Thank you. I see now I have somehow misunderstood the original claim. The value 1261 is "coprime" with c# as it shares no common prime factors (2,3,5,7,11). This is many more possible values than I listed for i, or understood that i could take on.
    – user669487
    Jul 25 at 22:07












  • 1




    It says coprime to $c#$. Since $1261 = 13cdot 97$, it is coprime to $11#$.
    – Daniel Fischer♦
    Jul 25 at 21:54










  • @DanielFischer Thank you. I see now I have somehow misunderstood the original claim. The value 1261 is "coprime" with c# as it shares no common prime factors (2,3,5,7,11). This is many more possible values than I listed for i, or understood that i could take on.
    – user669487
    Jul 25 at 22:07







1




1




It says coprime to $c#$. Since $1261 = 13cdot 97$, it is coprime to $11#$.
– Daniel Fischer♦
Jul 25 at 21:54




It says coprime to $c#$. Since $1261 = 13cdot 97$, it is coprime to $11#$.
– Daniel Fischer♦
Jul 25 at 21:54












@DanielFischer Thank you. I see now I have somehow misunderstood the original claim. The value 1261 is "coprime" with c# as it shares no common prime factors (2,3,5,7,11). This is many more possible values than I listed for i, or understood that i could take on.
– user669487
Jul 25 at 22:07




@DanielFischer Thank you. I see now I have somehow misunderstood the original claim. The value 1261 is "coprime" with c# as it shares no common prime factors (2,3,5,7,11). This is many more possible values than I listed for i, or understood that i could take on.
– user669487
Jul 25 at 22:07















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2862857%2fdoes-ck-i-actually-generate-all-primes-above-c-plus-some-composites%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest



































active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes










 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2862857%2fdoes-ck-i-actually-generate-all-primes-above-c-plus-some-composites%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?