How to derive boundary conditions for variational problems?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I have a variational problem of the form
$$
E(u) = int_Omega F(x,y,u,u_x,u_y)dxdy
$$
which leads me
$$
fracdEdu = int_Omega left( fracpartial Fpartial u - fracddxfracpartial Fpartial u_x - fracddyfracpartial Fpartial u_y right)h dxdy + int_Gamma left(F_u_xdy - F_u_ydx right)h
$$
Assuming the increment function $h$ is not fixed,it can be arbitrary, how do I get from this term
$$
int_Gamma left(F_u_xdy - F_u_ydx right)h = 0
$$
the boundary conditions of my problem when I try to apply gradient descent? Namely how do I fill the system
$$
left{
beginarrayl
fracpartial upartial t = - fracpartial Fpartial u + fracddxfracpartial Fpartial u_x + fracddyfracpartial Fpartial u_y \
textboundary conditions?
endarray
right.
$$
I should end up having the Von Neumann boundary conditions, but I'm slightly confused how to pass from the line integral to the boundary conditions.
My guess is that we should pose $F_u_x = 0, F_u_y = 0$ on the boundary, I can't prove it though.
Thank you
pde calculus-of-variations boundary-value-problem
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I have a variational problem of the form
$$
E(u) = int_Omega F(x,y,u,u_x,u_y)dxdy
$$
which leads me
$$
fracdEdu = int_Omega left( fracpartial Fpartial u - fracddxfracpartial Fpartial u_x - fracddyfracpartial Fpartial u_y right)h dxdy + int_Gamma left(F_u_xdy - F_u_ydx right)h
$$
Assuming the increment function $h$ is not fixed,it can be arbitrary, how do I get from this term
$$
int_Gamma left(F_u_xdy - F_u_ydx right)h = 0
$$
the boundary conditions of my problem when I try to apply gradient descent? Namely how do I fill the system
$$
left{
beginarrayl
fracpartial upartial t = - fracpartial Fpartial u + fracddxfracpartial Fpartial u_x + fracddyfracpartial Fpartial u_y \
textboundary conditions?
endarray
right.
$$
I should end up having the Von Neumann boundary conditions, but I'm slightly confused how to pass from the line integral to the boundary conditions.
My guess is that we should pose $F_u_x = 0, F_u_y = 0$ on the boundary, I can't prove it though.
Thank you
pde calculus-of-variations boundary-value-problem
$h=h(x)$? if so, not clear in your question
– phdmba7of12
Aug 3 at 16:28
$h=0$ on the boudary.
– Rafa BudrÃa
Aug 3 at 16:36
1
@phdmba7of12, yes it's h=h(x)
– user8469759
Aug 3 at 17:04
1
@Rafa, it's not 0.
– user8469759
Aug 4 at 13:19
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I have a variational problem of the form
$$
E(u) = int_Omega F(x,y,u,u_x,u_y)dxdy
$$
which leads me
$$
fracdEdu = int_Omega left( fracpartial Fpartial u - fracddxfracpartial Fpartial u_x - fracddyfracpartial Fpartial u_y right)h dxdy + int_Gamma left(F_u_xdy - F_u_ydx right)h
$$
Assuming the increment function $h$ is not fixed,it can be arbitrary, how do I get from this term
$$
int_Gamma left(F_u_xdy - F_u_ydx right)h = 0
$$
the boundary conditions of my problem when I try to apply gradient descent? Namely how do I fill the system
$$
left{
beginarrayl
fracpartial upartial t = - fracpartial Fpartial u + fracddxfracpartial Fpartial u_x + fracddyfracpartial Fpartial u_y \
textboundary conditions?
endarray
right.
$$
I should end up having the Von Neumann boundary conditions, but I'm slightly confused how to pass from the line integral to the boundary conditions.
My guess is that we should pose $F_u_x = 0, F_u_y = 0$ on the boundary, I can't prove it though.
Thank you
pde calculus-of-variations boundary-value-problem
I have a variational problem of the form
$$
E(u) = int_Omega F(x,y,u,u_x,u_y)dxdy
$$
which leads me
$$
fracdEdu = int_Omega left( fracpartial Fpartial u - fracddxfracpartial Fpartial u_x - fracddyfracpartial Fpartial u_y right)h dxdy + int_Gamma left(F_u_xdy - F_u_ydx right)h
$$
Assuming the increment function $h$ is not fixed,it can be arbitrary, how do I get from this term
$$
int_Gamma left(F_u_xdy - F_u_ydx right)h = 0
$$
the boundary conditions of my problem when I try to apply gradient descent? Namely how do I fill the system
$$
left{
beginarrayl
fracpartial upartial t = - fracpartial Fpartial u + fracddxfracpartial Fpartial u_x + fracddyfracpartial Fpartial u_y \
textboundary conditions?
endarray
right.
$$
I should end up having the Von Neumann boundary conditions, but I'm slightly confused how to pass from the line integral to the boundary conditions.
My guess is that we should pose $F_u_x = 0, F_u_y = 0$ on the boundary, I can't prove it though.
Thank you
pde calculus-of-variations boundary-value-problem
edited Aug 2 at 16:46
asked Aug 2 at 14:40
user8469759
1,4271513
1,4271513
$h=h(x)$? if so, not clear in your question
– phdmba7of12
Aug 3 at 16:28
$h=0$ on the boudary.
– Rafa BudrÃa
Aug 3 at 16:36
1
@phdmba7of12, yes it's h=h(x)
– user8469759
Aug 3 at 17:04
1
@Rafa, it's not 0.
– user8469759
Aug 4 at 13:19
add a comment |Â
$h=h(x)$? if so, not clear in your question
– phdmba7of12
Aug 3 at 16:28
$h=0$ on the boudary.
– Rafa BudrÃa
Aug 3 at 16:36
1
@phdmba7of12, yes it's h=h(x)
– user8469759
Aug 3 at 17:04
1
@Rafa, it's not 0.
– user8469759
Aug 4 at 13:19
$h=h(x)$? if so, not clear in your question
– phdmba7of12
Aug 3 at 16:28
$h=h(x)$? if so, not clear in your question
– phdmba7of12
Aug 3 at 16:28
$h=0$ on the boudary.
– Rafa BudrÃa
Aug 3 at 16:36
$h=0$ on the boudary.
– Rafa BudrÃa
Aug 3 at 16:36
1
1
@phdmba7of12, yes it's h=h(x)
– user8469759
Aug 3 at 17:04
@phdmba7of12, yes it's h=h(x)
– user8469759
Aug 3 at 17:04
1
1
@Rafa, it's not 0.
– user8469759
Aug 4 at 13:19
@Rafa, it's not 0.
– user8469759
Aug 4 at 13:19
add a comment |Â
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2870137%2fhow-to-derive-boundary-conditions-for-variational-problems%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
$h=h(x)$? if so, not clear in your question
– phdmba7of12
Aug 3 at 16:28
$h=0$ on the boudary.
– Rafa BudrÃa
Aug 3 at 16:36
1
@phdmba7of12, yes it's h=h(x)
– user8469759
Aug 3 at 17:04
1
@Rafa, it's not 0.
– user8469759
Aug 4 at 13:19