How to show that the kernel of this ring homomorphism $phi: mathbbZ[i]tomathbbZ/5mathbbZ$ is the principal ideal $(2+i)$?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












In order to prove that $Z[i]/(2+i)cong mathbbZ/5mathbbZ$, I defined the homomorphism $phi(a+bi)=(a-2b)mod 5$. It is easy to show that $2+iinker(phi)$, but I'm unsure how to prove the reverse inclusion.



I have the following so far: Suppose $a+bimapsto 0$. Then $a-2bequiv 0mod 5$, so $5$ divides $a-2b$.



I'm wondering if I can use the fact that $2+i$ is irreducible in $mathbbZ[i]$.







share|cite|improve this question























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    In order to prove that $Z[i]/(2+i)cong mathbbZ/5mathbbZ$, I defined the homomorphism $phi(a+bi)=(a-2b)mod 5$. It is easy to show that $2+iinker(phi)$, but I'm unsure how to prove the reverse inclusion.



    I have the following so far: Suppose $a+bimapsto 0$. Then $a-2bequiv 0mod 5$, so $5$ divides $a-2b$.



    I'm wondering if I can use the fact that $2+i$ is irreducible in $mathbbZ[i]$.







    share|cite|improve this question





















      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      In order to prove that $Z[i]/(2+i)cong mathbbZ/5mathbbZ$, I defined the homomorphism $phi(a+bi)=(a-2b)mod 5$. It is easy to show that $2+iinker(phi)$, but I'm unsure how to prove the reverse inclusion.



      I have the following so far: Suppose $a+bimapsto 0$. Then $a-2bequiv 0mod 5$, so $5$ divides $a-2b$.



      I'm wondering if I can use the fact that $2+i$ is irreducible in $mathbbZ[i]$.







      share|cite|improve this question











      In order to prove that $Z[i]/(2+i)cong mathbbZ/5mathbbZ$, I defined the homomorphism $phi(a+bi)=(a-2b)mod 5$. It is easy to show that $2+iinker(phi)$, but I'm unsure how to prove the reverse inclusion.



      I have the following so far: Suppose $a+bimapsto 0$. Then $a-2bequiv 0mod 5$, so $5$ divides $a-2b$.



      I'm wondering if I can use the fact that $2+i$ is irreducible in $mathbbZ[i]$.









      share|cite|improve this question










      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question









      asked Jul 25 at 22:45









      FakeAnalyst56

      175




      175




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          Hint: Going from where you left off, suppose that $a-2b = 5n$; then $a+bi = 2b+5n+bi$. Now, why is this a multiple of $2+i$?






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • I got it now, thank you very much: I found that $(2+i)[b+n(2-i)]=2b+5n+bi$.
            – FakeAnalyst56
            Jul 25 at 23:04

















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          Now show that the quotient has five elements (for example, by considering $mathbb Z[i]$ as a free abelian group of rank two and the ideal $(2+i)$ as the subgroup generated by $(2,1)$ and $(-1,2)$, and doing row and column reduction i.e. Smith normal form). Any surjective or injective function between sets of the same cardinality is bijective.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • I'm somewhat confused, would you mind clarifying: is this answer intended to help me prove the isomorphism or is it related to showing that $ker(phi)subset (2+i)$? (My confusion is mostly with the latter) Thanks for your answer regardless.
            – FakeAnalyst56
            Jul 25 at 22:53











          • @FakeAnalyst56 You know that $mathbb Z[i]/kerphi$ has five elements: the induced map is onto $mathbb Z/5$ so this is an isomorphism. The inclusion you gave provides you with a map from $mathbb Z[i]/kerphi to mathbb Z[i]/(2+i)$ which is onto. Check that this last quotient also has five elements to conlude this is an isomorphism, so $(2+i)=kerphi$.
            – Pedro Tamaroff♦
            Jul 25 at 22:58











          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );








           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2862901%2fhow-to-show-that-the-kernel-of-this-ring-homomorphism-phi-mathbbzi-to-ma%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          Hint: Going from where you left off, suppose that $a-2b = 5n$; then $a+bi = 2b+5n+bi$. Now, why is this a multiple of $2+i$?






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • I got it now, thank you very much: I found that $(2+i)[b+n(2-i)]=2b+5n+bi$.
            – FakeAnalyst56
            Jul 25 at 23:04














          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          Hint: Going from where you left off, suppose that $a-2b = 5n$; then $a+bi = 2b+5n+bi$. Now, why is this a multiple of $2+i$?






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • I got it now, thank you very much: I found that $(2+i)[b+n(2-i)]=2b+5n+bi$.
            – FakeAnalyst56
            Jul 25 at 23:04












          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted






          Hint: Going from where you left off, suppose that $a-2b = 5n$; then $a+bi = 2b+5n+bi$. Now, why is this a multiple of $2+i$?






          share|cite|improve this answer













          Hint: Going from where you left off, suppose that $a-2b = 5n$; then $a+bi = 2b+5n+bi$. Now, why is this a multiple of $2+i$?







          share|cite|improve this answer













          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer











          answered Jul 25 at 22:58









          Daniel Schepler

          6,6681513




          6,6681513











          • I got it now, thank you very much: I found that $(2+i)[b+n(2-i)]=2b+5n+bi$.
            – FakeAnalyst56
            Jul 25 at 23:04
















          • I got it now, thank you very much: I found that $(2+i)[b+n(2-i)]=2b+5n+bi$.
            – FakeAnalyst56
            Jul 25 at 23:04















          I got it now, thank you very much: I found that $(2+i)[b+n(2-i)]=2b+5n+bi$.
          – FakeAnalyst56
          Jul 25 at 23:04




          I got it now, thank you very much: I found that $(2+i)[b+n(2-i)]=2b+5n+bi$.
          – FakeAnalyst56
          Jul 25 at 23:04










          up vote
          0
          down vote













          Now show that the quotient has five elements (for example, by considering $mathbb Z[i]$ as a free abelian group of rank two and the ideal $(2+i)$ as the subgroup generated by $(2,1)$ and $(-1,2)$, and doing row and column reduction i.e. Smith normal form). Any surjective or injective function between sets of the same cardinality is bijective.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • I'm somewhat confused, would you mind clarifying: is this answer intended to help me prove the isomorphism or is it related to showing that $ker(phi)subset (2+i)$? (My confusion is mostly with the latter) Thanks for your answer regardless.
            – FakeAnalyst56
            Jul 25 at 22:53











          • @FakeAnalyst56 You know that $mathbb Z[i]/kerphi$ has five elements: the induced map is onto $mathbb Z/5$ so this is an isomorphism. The inclusion you gave provides you with a map from $mathbb Z[i]/kerphi to mathbb Z[i]/(2+i)$ which is onto. Check that this last quotient also has five elements to conlude this is an isomorphism, so $(2+i)=kerphi$.
            – Pedro Tamaroff♦
            Jul 25 at 22:58















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          Now show that the quotient has five elements (for example, by considering $mathbb Z[i]$ as a free abelian group of rank two and the ideal $(2+i)$ as the subgroup generated by $(2,1)$ and $(-1,2)$, and doing row and column reduction i.e. Smith normal form). Any surjective or injective function between sets of the same cardinality is bijective.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • I'm somewhat confused, would you mind clarifying: is this answer intended to help me prove the isomorphism or is it related to showing that $ker(phi)subset (2+i)$? (My confusion is mostly with the latter) Thanks for your answer regardless.
            – FakeAnalyst56
            Jul 25 at 22:53











          • @FakeAnalyst56 You know that $mathbb Z[i]/kerphi$ has five elements: the induced map is onto $mathbb Z/5$ so this is an isomorphism. The inclusion you gave provides you with a map from $mathbb Z[i]/kerphi to mathbb Z[i]/(2+i)$ which is onto. Check that this last quotient also has five elements to conlude this is an isomorphism, so $(2+i)=kerphi$.
            – Pedro Tamaroff♦
            Jul 25 at 22:58













          up vote
          0
          down vote










          up vote
          0
          down vote









          Now show that the quotient has five elements (for example, by considering $mathbb Z[i]$ as a free abelian group of rank two and the ideal $(2+i)$ as the subgroup generated by $(2,1)$ and $(-1,2)$, and doing row and column reduction i.e. Smith normal form). Any surjective or injective function between sets of the same cardinality is bijective.






          share|cite|improve this answer













          Now show that the quotient has five elements (for example, by considering $mathbb Z[i]$ as a free abelian group of rank two and the ideal $(2+i)$ as the subgroup generated by $(2,1)$ and $(-1,2)$, and doing row and column reduction i.e. Smith normal form). Any surjective or injective function between sets of the same cardinality is bijective.







          share|cite|improve this answer













          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer











          answered Jul 25 at 22:47









          Pedro Tamaroff♦

          93.8k10143290




          93.8k10143290











          • I'm somewhat confused, would you mind clarifying: is this answer intended to help me prove the isomorphism or is it related to showing that $ker(phi)subset (2+i)$? (My confusion is mostly with the latter) Thanks for your answer regardless.
            – FakeAnalyst56
            Jul 25 at 22:53











          • @FakeAnalyst56 You know that $mathbb Z[i]/kerphi$ has five elements: the induced map is onto $mathbb Z/5$ so this is an isomorphism. The inclusion you gave provides you with a map from $mathbb Z[i]/kerphi to mathbb Z[i]/(2+i)$ which is onto. Check that this last quotient also has five elements to conlude this is an isomorphism, so $(2+i)=kerphi$.
            – Pedro Tamaroff♦
            Jul 25 at 22:58

















          • I'm somewhat confused, would you mind clarifying: is this answer intended to help me prove the isomorphism or is it related to showing that $ker(phi)subset (2+i)$? (My confusion is mostly with the latter) Thanks for your answer regardless.
            – FakeAnalyst56
            Jul 25 at 22:53











          • @FakeAnalyst56 You know that $mathbb Z[i]/kerphi$ has five elements: the induced map is onto $mathbb Z/5$ so this is an isomorphism. The inclusion you gave provides you with a map from $mathbb Z[i]/kerphi to mathbb Z[i]/(2+i)$ which is onto. Check that this last quotient also has five elements to conlude this is an isomorphism, so $(2+i)=kerphi$.
            – Pedro Tamaroff♦
            Jul 25 at 22:58
















          I'm somewhat confused, would you mind clarifying: is this answer intended to help me prove the isomorphism or is it related to showing that $ker(phi)subset (2+i)$? (My confusion is mostly with the latter) Thanks for your answer regardless.
          – FakeAnalyst56
          Jul 25 at 22:53





          I'm somewhat confused, would you mind clarifying: is this answer intended to help me prove the isomorphism or is it related to showing that $ker(phi)subset (2+i)$? (My confusion is mostly with the latter) Thanks for your answer regardless.
          – FakeAnalyst56
          Jul 25 at 22:53













          @FakeAnalyst56 You know that $mathbb Z[i]/kerphi$ has five elements: the induced map is onto $mathbb Z/5$ so this is an isomorphism. The inclusion you gave provides you with a map from $mathbb Z[i]/kerphi to mathbb Z[i]/(2+i)$ which is onto. Check that this last quotient also has five elements to conlude this is an isomorphism, so $(2+i)=kerphi$.
          – Pedro Tamaroff♦
          Jul 25 at 22:58





          @FakeAnalyst56 You know that $mathbb Z[i]/kerphi$ has five elements: the induced map is onto $mathbb Z/5$ so this is an isomorphism. The inclusion you gave provides you with a map from $mathbb Z[i]/kerphi to mathbb Z[i]/(2+i)$ which is onto. Check that this last quotient also has five elements to conlude this is an isomorphism, so $(2+i)=kerphi$.
          – Pedro Tamaroff♦
          Jul 25 at 22:58













           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


























           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2862901%2fhow-to-show-that-the-kernel-of-this-ring-homomorphism-phi-mathbbzi-to-ma%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          Comments

          Popular posts from this blog

          What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

          Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

          Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?