Meaning of âintensity measureâ for Poisson processes
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
A compound Poisson process with jump intensity measure (Lévy measure) $nu$ is a Lévy process $X_t$ on $mathbbR^d$ such that $X_t+s-X_s$ has law $pi_tnu$, where $pi_tnu$ is the measure with characteristic function $p mapstoexp(-tint (1-e^ipcdot y , nu(dy))$. (Definition taken from the lecture notes I'm currently looking at).
That definition suggests that the intensity measure $nu$ indicates the size of the jumps when they occur. However, in other contexts, it's seemingly also used to denote the measure governing how often jumps occur, which in the above example seems to be just the Lebesgue measure.
How can one separate the terminology here? "Intensity measure" seems to be quite an ambiguous concept.
stochastic-processes terminology stochastic-calculus stochastic-analysis poisson-process
 |Â
show 6 more comments
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
A compound Poisson process with jump intensity measure (Lévy measure) $nu$ is a Lévy process $X_t$ on $mathbbR^d$ such that $X_t+s-X_s$ has law $pi_tnu$, where $pi_tnu$ is the measure with characteristic function $p mapstoexp(-tint (1-e^ipcdot y , nu(dy))$. (Definition taken from the lecture notes I'm currently looking at).
That definition suggests that the intensity measure $nu$ indicates the size of the jumps when they occur. However, in other contexts, it's seemingly also used to denote the measure governing how often jumps occur, which in the above example seems to be just the Lebesgue measure.
How can one separate the terminology here? "Intensity measure" seems to be quite an ambiguous concept.
stochastic-processes terminology stochastic-calculus stochastic-analysis poisson-process
1
At first I thought you mean the characteristic function is $tmapsto exp(-tint (1-e^ipcdot y , nu(dy)),$ but on closer inspection it looks as if you must have meant $pmapsto exp(-tint (1-e^ipcdot y , nu(dy)).$ I'd be explicit about that in the question. $qquad$
â Michael Hardy
Jul 22 at 17:09
Your definition looks as if it may make sense on $mathbb R^1$ but not for $mathbb R^d$ for $d>1.$ For $t,sin mathbb R^1$ and t>0$,$ the intensity measure of the interval $(s,t+s)$ is the expected number of jumps in that interval. In higher dimensions, I'd expect to specify the measure of a set other than an interval, so the sum of the jump sizes would not be expressed as $X_t+s-X_s. qquad$
â Michael Hardy
Jul 22 at 17:15
So far it looks to me as if the intensity measure $nu$ gives you the expected number of jumps within the interval $(s,t+s)$ (where $t>0$) and the measure $pi_tnu$ gives you the distribution of the size of a jump. $qquad$
â Michael Hardy
Jul 22 at 17:17
$ldots,$and the fact that not all jumps have size $1$ is the reason why the word "compound" is used. $qquad$
â Michael Hardy
Jul 22 at 17:23
The characteristic function of $pi_tnu$ would be the same in higher dimensions as in one dimension, but that thing about $X_t+s - X_s$ would be expressed differently. $qquad$
â Michael Hardy
Jul 22 at 17:42
 |Â
show 6 more comments
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
A compound Poisson process with jump intensity measure (Lévy measure) $nu$ is a Lévy process $X_t$ on $mathbbR^d$ such that $X_t+s-X_s$ has law $pi_tnu$, where $pi_tnu$ is the measure with characteristic function $p mapstoexp(-tint (1-e^ipcdot y , nu(dy))$. (Definition taken from the lecture notes I'm currently looking at).
That definition suggests that the intensity measure $nu$ indicates the size of the jumps when they occur. However, in other contexts, it's seemingly also used to denote the measure governing how often jumps occur, which in the above example seems to be just the Lebesgue measure.
How can one separate the terminology here? "Intensity measure" seems to be quite an ambiguous concept.
stochastic-processes terminology stochastic-calculus stochastic-analysis poisson-process
A compound Poisson process with jump intensity measure (Lévy measure) $nu$ is a Lévy process $X_t$ on $mathbbR^d$ such that $X_t+s-X_s$ has law $pi_tnu$, where $pi_tnu$ is the measure with characteristic function $p mapstoexp(-tint (1-e^ipcdot y , nu(dy))$. (Definition taken from the lecture notes I'm currently looking at).
That definition suggests that the intensity measure $nu$ indicates the size of the jumps when they occur. However, in other contexts, it's seemingly also used to denote the measure governing how often jumps occur, which in the above example seems to be just the Lebesgue measure.
How can one separate the terminology here? "Intensity measure" seems to be quite an ambiguous concept.
stochastic-processes terminology stochastic-calculus stochastic-analysis poisson-process
edited Jul 22 at 22:11
asked Jul 22 at 15:17
Marc Vaisband
213
213
1
At first I thought you mean the characteristic function is $tmapsto exp(-tint (1-e^ipcdot y , nu(dy)),$ but on closer inspection it looks as if you must have meant $pmapsto exp(-tint (1-e^ipcdot y , nu(dy)).$ I'd be explicit about that in the question. $qquad$
â Michael Hardy
Jul 22 at 17:09
Your definition looks as if it may make sense on $mathbb R^1$ but not for $mathbb R^d$ for $d>1.$ For $t,sin mathbb R^1$ and t>0$,$ the intensity measure of the interval $(s,t+s)$ is the expected number of jumps in that interval. In higher dimensions, I'd expect to specify the measure of a set other than an interval, so the sum of the jump sizes would not be expressed as $X_t+s-X_s. qquad$
â Michael Hardy
Jul 22 at 17:15
So far it looks to me as if the intensity measure $nu$ gives you the expected number of jumps within the interval $(s,t+s)$ (where $t>0$) and the measure $pi_tnu$ gives you the distribution of the size of a jump. $qquad$
â Michael Hardy
Jul 22 at 17:17
$ldots,$and the fact that not all jumps have size $1$ is the reason why the word "compound" is used. $qquad$
â Michael Hardy
Jul 22 at 17:23
The characteristic function of $pi_tnu$ would be the same in higher dimensions as in one dimension, but that thing about $X_t+s - X_s$ would be expressed differently. $qquad$
â Michael Hardy
Jul 22 at 17:42
 |Â
show 6 more comments
1
At first I thought you mean the characteristic function is $tmapsto exp(-tint (1-e^ipcdot y , nu(dy)),$ but on closer inspection it looks as if you must have meant $pmapsto exp(-tint (1-e^ipcdot y , nu(dy)).$ I'd be explicit about that in the question. $qquad$
â Michael Hardy
Jul 22 at 17:09
Your definition looks as if it may make sense on $mathbb R^1$ but not for $mathbb R^d$ for $d>1.$ For $t,sin mathbb R^1$ and t>0$,$ the intensity measure of the interval $(s,t+s)$ is the expected number of jumps in that interval. In higher dimensions, I'd expect to specify the measure of a set other than an interval, so the sum of the jump sizes would not be expressed as $X_t+s-X_s. qquad$
â Michael Hardy
Jul 22 at 17:15
So far it looks to me as if the intensity measure $nu$ gives you the expected number of jumps within the interval $(s,t+s)$ (where $t>0$) and the measure $pi_tnu$ gives you the distribution of the size of a jump. $qquad$
â Michael Hardy
Jul 22 at 17:17
$ldots,$and the fact that not all jumps have size $1$ is the reason why the word "compound" is used. $qquad$
â Michael Hardy
Jul 22 at 17:23
The characteristic function of $pi_tnu$ would be the same in higher dimensions as in one dimension, but that thing about $X_t+s - X_s$ would be expressed differently. $qquad$
â Michael Hardy
Jul 22 at 17:42
1
1
At first I thought you mean the characteristic function is $tmapsto exp(-tint (1-e^ipcdot y , nu(dy)),$ but on closer inspection it looks as if you must have meant $pmapsto exp(-tint (1-e^ipcdot y , nu(dy)).$ I'd be explicit about that in the question. $qquad$
â Michael Hardy
Jul 22 at 17:09
At first I thought you mean the characteristic function is $tmapsto exp(-tint (1-e^ipcdot y , nu(dy)),$ but on closer inspection it looks as if you must have meant $pmapsto exp(-tint (1-e^ipcdot y , nu(dy)).$ I'd be explicit about that in the question. $qquad$
â Michael Hardy
Jul 22 at 17:09
Your definition looks as if it may make sense on $mathbb R^1$ but not for $mathbb R^d$ for $d>1.$ For $t,sin mathbb R^1$ and t>0$,$ the intensity measure of the interval $(s,t+s)$ is the expected number of jumps in that interval. In higher dimensions, I'd expect to specify the measure of a set other than an interval, so the sum of the jump sizes would not be expressed as $X_t+s-X_s. qquad$
â Michael Hardy
Jul 22 at 17:15
Your definition looks as if it may make sense on $mathbb R^1$ but not for $mathbb R^d$ for $d>1.$ For $t,sin mathbb R^1$ and t>0$,$ the intensity measure of the interval $(s,t+s)$ is the expected number of jumps in that interval. In higher dimensions, I'd expect to specify the measure of a set other than an interval, so the sum of the jump sizes would not be expressed as $X_t+s-X_s. qquad$
â Michael Hardy
Jul 22 at 17:15
So far it looks to me as if the intensity measure $nu$ gives you the expected number of jumps within the interval $(s,t+s)$ (where $t>0$) and the measure $pi_tnu$ gives you the distribution of the size of a jump. $qquad$
â Michael Hardy
Jul 22 at 17:17
So far it looks to me as if the intensity measure $nu$ gives you the expected number of jumps within the interval $(s,t+s)$ (where $t>0$) and the measure $pi_tnu$ gives you the distribution of the size of a jump. $qquad$
â Michael Hardy
Jul 22 at 17:17
$ldots,$and the fact that not all jumps have size $1$ is the reason why the word "compound" is used. $qquad$
â Michael Hardy
Jul 22 at 17:23
$ldots,$and the fact that not all jumps have size $1$ is the reason why the word "compound" is used. $qquad$
â Michael Hardy
Jul 22 at 17:23
The characteristic function of $pi_tnu$ would be the same in higher dimensions as in one dimension, but that thing about $X_t+s - X_s$ would be expressed differently. $qquad$
â Michael Hardy
Jul 22 at 17:42
The characteristic function of $pi_tnu$ would be the same in higher dimensions as in one dimension, but that thing about $X_t+s - X_s$ would be expressed differently. $qquad$
â Michael Hardy
Jul 22 at 17:42
 |Â
show 6 more comments
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2859492%2fmeaning-of-intensity-measure-for-poisson-processes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
1
At first I thought you mean the characteristic function is $tmapsto exp(-tint (1-e^ipcdot y , nu(dy)),$ but on closer inspection it looks as if you must have meant $pmapsto exp(-tint (1-e^ipcdot y , nu(dy)).$ I'd be explicit about that in the question. $qquad$
â Michael Hardy
Jul 22 at 17:09
Your definition looks as if it may make sense on $mathbb R^1$ but not for $mathbb R^d$ for $d>1.$ For $t,sin mathbb R^1$ and t>0$,$ the intensity measure of the interval $(s,t+s)$ is the expected number of jumps in that interval. In higher dimensions, I'd expect to specify the measure of a set other than an interval, so the sum of the jump sizes would not be expressed as $X_t+s-X_s. qquad$
â Michael Hardy
Jul 22 at 17:15
So far it looks to me as if the intensity measure $nu$ gives you the expected number of jumps within the interval $(s,t+s)$ (where $t>0$) and the measure $pi_tnu$ gives you the distribution of the size of a jump. $qquad$
â Michael Hardy
Jul 22 at 17:17
$ldots,$and the fact that not all jumps have size $1$ is the reason why the word "compound" is used. $qquad$
â Michael Hardy
Jul 22 at 17:23
The characteristic function of $pi_tnu$ would be the same in higher dimensions as in one dimension, but that thing about $X_t+s - X_s$ would be expressed differently. $qquad$
â Michael Hardy
Jul 22 at 17:42