Meaning of “intensity measure” for Poisson processes

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1












A compound Poisson process with jump intensity measure (Lévy measure) $nu$ is a Lévy process $X_t$ on $mathbbR^d$ such that $X_t+s-X_s$ has law $pi_tnu$, where $pi_tnu$ is the measure with characteristic function $p mapstoexp(-tint (1-e^ipcdot y , nu(dy))$. (Definition taken from the lecture notes I'm currently looking at).



That definition suggests that the intensity measure $nu$ indicates the size of the jumps when they occur. However, in other contexts, it's seemingly also used to denote the measure governing how often jumps occur, which in the above example seems to be just the Lebesgue measure.



How can one separate the terminology here? "Intensity measure" seems to be quite an ambiguous concept.







share|cite|improve this question

















  • 1




    At first I thought you mean the characteristic function is $tmapsto exp(-tint (1-e^ipcdot y , nu(dy)),$ but on closer inspection it looks as if you must have meant $pmapsto exp(-tint (1-e^ipcdot y , nu(dy)).$ I'd be explicit about that in the question. $qquad$
    – Michael Hardy
    Jul 22 at 17:09










  • Your definition looks as if it may make sense on $mathbb R^1$ but not for $mathbb R^d$ for $d>1.$ For $t,sin mathbb R^1$ and t>0$,$ the intensity measure of the interval $(s,t+s)$ is the expected number of jumps in that interval. In higher dimensions, I'd expect to specify the measure of a set other than an interval, so the sum of the jump sizes would not be expressed as $X_t+s-X_s. qquad$
    – Michael Hardy
    Jul 22 at 17:15










  • So far it looks to me as if the intensity measure $nu$ gives you the expected number of jumps within the interval $(s,t+s)$ (where $t>0$) and the measure $pi_tnu$ gives you the distribution of the size of a jump. $qquad$
    – Michael Hardy
    Jul 22 at 17:17










  • $ldots,$and the fact that not all jumps have size $1$ is the reason why the word "compound" is used. $qquad$
    – Michael Hardy
    Jul 22 at 17:23










  • The characteristic function of $pi_tnu$ would be the same in higher dimensions as in one dimension, but that thing about $X_t+s - X_s$ would be expressed differently. $qquad$
    – Michael Hardy
    Jul 22 at 17:42














up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1












A compound Poisson process with jump intensity measure (Lévy measure) $nu$ is a Lévy process $X_t$ on $mathbbR^d$ such that $X_t+s-X_s$ has law $pi_tnu$, where $pi_tnu$ is the measure with characteristic function $p mapstoexp(-tint (1-e^ipcdot y , nu(dy))$. (Definition taken from the lecture notes I'm currently looking at).



That definition suggests that the intensity measure $nu$ indicates the size of the jumps when they occur. However, in other contexts, it's seemingly also used to denote the measure governing how often jumps occur, which in the above example seems to be just the Lebesgue measure.



How can one separate the terminology here? "Intensity measure" seems to be quite an ambiguous concept.







share|cite|improve this question

















  • 1




    At first I thought you mean the characteristic function is $tmapsto exp(-tint (1-e^ipcdot y , nu(dy)),$ but on closer inspection it looks as if you must have meant $pmapsto exp(-tint (1-e^ipcdot y , nu(dy)).$ I'd be explicit about that in the question. $qquad$
    – Michael Hardy
    Jul 22 at 17:09










  • Your definition looks as if it may make sense on $mathbb R^1$ but not for $mathbb R^d$ for $d>1.$ For $t,sin mathbb R^1$ and t>0$,$ the intensity measure of the interval $(s,t+s)$ is the expected number of jumps in that interval. In higher dimensions, I'd expect to specify the measure of a set other than an interval, so the sum of the jump sizes would not be expressed as $X_t+s-X_s. qquad$
    – Michael Hardy
    Jul 22 at 17:15










  • So far it looks to me as if the intensity measure $nu$ gives you the expected number of jumps within the interval $(s,t+s)$ (where $t>0$) and the measure $pi_tnu$ gives you the distribution of the size of a jump. $qquad$
    – Michael Hardy
    Jul 22 at 17:17










  • $ldots,$and the fact that not all jumps have size $1$ is the reason why the word "compound" is used. $qquad$
    – Michael Hardy
    Jul 22 at 17:23










  • The characteristic function of $pi_tnu$ would be the same in higher dimensions as in one dimension, but that thing about $X_t+s - X_s$ would be expressed differently. $qquad$
    – Michael Hardy
    Jul 22 at 17:42












up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1






1





A compound Poisson process with jump intensity measure (Lévy measure) $nu$ is a Lévy process $X_t$ on $mathbbR^d$ such that $X_t+s-X_s$ has law $pi_tnu$, where $pi_tnu$ is the measure with characteristic function $p mapstoexp(-tint (1-e^ipcdot y , nu(dy))$. (Definition taken from the lecture notes I'm currently looking at).



That definition suggests that the intensity measure $nu$ indicates the size of the jumps when they occur. However, in other contexts, it's seemingly also used to denote the measure governing how often jumps occur, which in the above example seems to be just the Lebesgue measure.



How can one separate the terminology here? "Intensity measure" seems to be quite an ambiguous concept.







share|cite|improve this question













A compound Poisson process with jump intensity measure (Lévy measure) $nu$ is a Lévy process $X_t$ on $mathbbR^d$ such that $X_t+s-X_s$ has law $pi_tnu$, where $pi_tnu$ is the measure with characteristic function $p mapstoexp(-tint (1-e^ipcdot y , nu(dy))$. (Definition taken from the lecture notes I'm currently looking at).



That definition suggests that the intensity measure $nu$ indicates the size of the jumps when they occur. However, in other contexts, it's seemingly also used to denote the measure governing how often jumps occur, which in the above example seems to be just the Lebesgue measure.



How can one separate the terminology here? "Intensity measure" seems to be quite an ambiguous concept.









share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 22 at 22:11
























asked Jul 22 at 15:17









Marc Vaisband

213




213







  • 1




    At first I thought you mean the characteristic function is $tmapsto exp(-tint (1-e^ipcdot y , nu(dy)),$ but on closer inspection it looks as if you must have meant $pmapsto exp(-tint (1-e^ipcdot y , nu(dy)).$ I'd be explicit about that in the question. $qquad$
    – Michael Hardy
    Jul 22 at 17:09










  • Your definition looks as if it may make sense on $mathbb R^1$ but not for $mathbb R^d$ for $d>1.$ For $t,sin mathbb R^1$ and t>0$,$ the intensity measure of the interval $(s,t+s)$ is the expected number of jumps in that interval. In higher dimensions, I'd expect to specify the measure of a set other than an interval, so the sum of the jump sizes would not be expressed as $X_t+s-X_s. qquad$
    – Michael Hardy
    Jul 22 at 17:15










  • So far it looks to me as if the intensity measure $nu$ gives you the expected number of jumps within the interval $(s,t+s)$ (where $t>0$) and the measure $pi_tnu$ gives you the distribution of the size of a jump. $qquad$
    – Michael Hardy
    Jul 22 at 17:17










  • $ldots,$and the fact that not all jumps have size $1$ is the reason why the word "compound" is used. $qquad$
    – Michael Hardy
    Jul 22 at 17:23










  • The characteristic function of $pi_tnu$ would be the same in higher dimensions as in one dimension, but that thing about $X_t+s - X_s$ would be expressed differently. $qquad$
    – Michael Hardy
    Jul 22 at 17:42












  • 1




    At first I thought you mean the characteristic function is $tmapsto exp(-tint (1-e^ipcdot y , nu(dy)),$ but on closer inspection it looks as if you must have meant $pmapsto exp(-tint (1-e^ipcdot y , nu(dy)).$ I'd be explicit about that in the question. $qquad$
    – Michael Hardy
    Jul 22 at 17:09










  • Your definition looks as if it may make sense on $mathbb R^1$ but not for $mathbb R^d$ for $d>1.$ For $t,sin mathbb R^1$ and t>0$,$ the intensity measure of the interval $(s,t+s)$ is the expected number of jumps in that interval. In higher dimensions, I'd expect to specify the measure of a set other than an interval, so the sum of the jump sizes would not be expressed as $X_t+s-X_s. qquad$
    – Michael Hardy
    Jul 22 at 17:15










  • So far it looks to me as if the intensity measure $nu$ gives you the expected number of jumps within the interval $(s,t+s)$ (where $t>0$) and the measure $pi_tnu$ gives you the distribution of the size of a jump. $qquad$
    – Michael Hardy
    Jul 22 at 17:17










  • $ldots,$and the fact that not all jumps have size $1$ is the reason why the word "compound" is used. $qquad$
    – Michael Hardy
    Jul 22 at 17:23










  • The characteristic function of $pi_tnu$ would be the same in higher dimensions as in one dimension, but that thing about $X_t+s - X_s$ would be expressed differently. $qquad$
    – Michael Hardy
    Jul 22 at 17:42







1




1




At first I thought you mean the characteristic function is $tmapsto exp(-tint (1-e^ipcdot y , nu(dy)),$ but on closer inspection it looks as if you must have meant $pmapsto exp(-tint (1-e^ipcdot y , nu(dy)).$ I'd be explicit about that in the question. $qquad$
– Michael Hardy
Jul 22 at 17:09




At first I thought you mean the characteristic function is $tmapsto exp(-tint (1-e^ipcdot y , nu(dy)),$ but on closer inspection it looks as if you must have meant $pmapsto exp(-tint (1-e^ipcdot y , nu(dy)).$ I'd be explicit about that in the question. $qquad$
– Michael Hardy
Jul 22 at 17:09












Your definition looks as if it may make sense on $mathbb R^1$ but not for $mathbb R^d$ for $d>1.$ For $t,sin mathbb R^1$ and t>0$,$ the intensity measure of the interval $(s,t+s)$ is the expected number of jumps in that interval. In higher dimensions, I'd expect to specify the measure of a set other than an interval, so the sum of the jump sizes would not be expressed as $X_t+s-X_s. qquad$
– Michael Hardy
Jul 22 at 17:15




Your definition looks as if it may make sense on $mathbb R^1$ but not for $mathbb R^d$ for $d>1.$ For $t,sin mathbb R^1$ and t>0$,$ the intensity measure of the interval $(s,t+s)$ is the expected number of jumps in that interval. In higher dimensions, I'd expect to specify the measure of a set other than an interval, so the sum of the jump sizes would not be expressed as $X_t+s-X_s. qquad$
– Michael Hardy
Jul 22 at 17:15












So far it looks to me as if the intensity measure $nu$ gives you the expected number of jumps within the interval $(s,t+s)$ (where $t>0$) and the measure $pi_tnu$ gives you the distribution of the size of a jump. $qquad$
– Michael Hardy
Jul 22 at 17:17




So far it looks to me as if the intensity measure $nu$ gives you the expected number of jumps within the interval $(s,t+s)$ (where $t>0$) and the measure $pi_tnu$ gives you the distribution of the size of a jump. $qquad$
– Michael Hardy
Jul 22 at 17:17












$ldots,$and the fact that not all jumps have size $1$ is the reason why the word "compound" is used. $qquad$
– Michael Hardy
Jul 22 at 17:23




$ldots,$and the fact that not all jumps have size $1$ is the reason why the word "compound" is used. $qquad$
– Michael Hardy
Jul 22 at 17:23












The characteristic function of $pi_tnu$ would be the same in higher dimensions as in one dimension, but that thing about $X_t+s - X_s$ would be expressed differently. $qquad$
– Michael Hardy
Jul 22 at 17:42




The characteristic function of $pi_tnu$ would be the same in higher dimensions as in one dimension, but that thing about $X_t+s - X_s$ would be expressed differently. $qquad$
– Michael Hardy
Jul 22 at 17:42















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2859492%2fmeaning-of-intensity-measure-for-poisson-processes%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest



































active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes










 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2859492%2fmeaning-of-intensity-measure-for-poisson-processes%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?

Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon