Understanding fractional exponents

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












How do I understand fractional exponents like 1/2, 3/2, 1/5, etc?



Like $y$ raised to a power 2 is $y.y$ and when the power is increased or decreased by one, it means we multiply the number by another $y$ or divide it by $y$ respectively.



But how do I think about fractional exponential powers by this same logic?



Thank you.







share|cite|improve this question























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    How do I understand fractional exponents like 1/2, 3/2, 1/5, etc?



    Like $y$ raised to a power 2 is $y.y$ and when the power is increased or decreased by one, it means we multiply the number by another $y$ or divide it by $y$ respectively.



    But how do I think about fractional exponential powers by this same logic?



    Thank you.







    share|cite|improve this question





















      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      How do I understand fractional exponents like 1/2, 3/2, 1/5, etc?



      Like $y$ raised to a power 2 is $y.y$ and when the power is increased or decreased by one, it means we multiply the number by another $y$ or divide it by $y$ respectively.



      But how do I think about fractional exponential powers by this same logic?



      Thank you.







      share|cite|improve this question











      How do I understand fractional exponents like 1/2, 3/2, 1/5, etc?



      Like $y$ raised to a power 2 is $y.y$ and when the power is increased or decreased by one, it means we multiply the number by another $y$ or divide it by $y$ respectively.



      But how do I think about fractional exponential powers by this same logic?



      Thank you.









      share|cite|improve this question










      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question









      asked Jul 22 at 16:23









      Ram Keswani

      32112




      32112




















          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          Notice that, for example, if $x^frac12=a$, then by squaring both sides we get $x=(x^frac12)^2=a^2$.

          In other words $sqrtx=a$.



          Following the same logic you can get that for every $n in mathbbN$, $x^frac1n = sqrt[n]x$



          After you accepted that, by exponentiation rules, you know that for every $p,q in mathbbN$:
          $$
          x^fracpq = x^p cdot frac1q = (x^p)^frac1q = sqrt[q]x^p
          $$



          So in general, raising to a rational number $fracpq$ means to take the $p$-th power and the $q$-th root.

          And, of course, it also generalize to negative rational numbers.






          share|cite|improve this answer




























            up vote
            0
            down vote













            "how do I think about fractional exponential powers by this same logic?"



            Carefully.



            You have to expand the definition.



            We notice that $b^n*b^m = underbraceb*...*b_nunderbraceb*...*b_m=underbraceb*...*b= b^n+m$ for positive integers $n$ and $m$ and we take $b^n+m = b^nb^m$ as a rule.



            Then we think. Well what that means $b^0*b^m = b^0+m = b^m$. That would mean $b^0 =1$, doesn't it? Well, in one sense it does not make sense that we can't mulitple $b$ times itself zero times. That's meaningless.



            But that is no longer what the definition of $b^n$ means. It means that for $nin mathbb Z$ and $n ge 2$ but... for $nin mathbb Z$ and $n le 1$ we are going to have it mean.... whatever it has to be in order for the rule $b^n+m = b^n*b^m$ to work.



            That means: $b^1 = b$ and $b^0 = 0$ and for a negative integer $-n < 0$ then $b^-n = frac 1b^n$ (becuase we must have $b^-n*b^n = b^-n+n = b^0 = 1$.



            Okay, but we also have the rule $(b^n)^m = underbraceb^n*...*b^n_m = b^underbracen+....+n_m = b^nm$.



            So what does that make $b^frac 1m$ have to be?



            Well, $(b^frac 1m)^m = b^frac 1m*m = b^1 = b$. So that means $b^frac 1m$ has to be $sqrt[m]b$, right?



            And that's that. $b^frac mn = (sqrt[n]b)^m$.



            That's it.



            ....



            Except we have to be careful. $x^2 = 4$ has two possible answer $-2,2$ so which will it be. ANd $x^2 = -4$ has none.



            So we add a caveat rule: we only feel safe talking about $b^frac mn$ if $b ge 0$ if $n$ is even and in that case the value is positive. We can talk about $(-4)^frac mn$ if $n$ is odd (in which case the value is negative) but for most of the time, we should avoid it. Many mathematicians will simply say $b^q;qin mathbb Q$ is only defined if $bge 0$.



            And for $x in mathbb R$, we say $b^x$ is only defined fro $bge 0$. Unless we are doing complex analysis where we accept the square roots of negative numbers. In that case, things get very different. But it's still a matter of defining things by what the must be in order for the rules to work.






            share|cite|improve this answer






























              up vote
              0
              down vote













              The exponents follow the rule



              $$(a^b)^c=a^bc$$



              meaning that the power of a power is the power to the product of the exponents.



              Then assume a rational power $p/q$. We write



              $$a^p/q=b$$ and raise both members to the $q^th$:



              $$a^(p/q)q=a^p=b^q.$$



              So $b$ is the number such that when raised to the $q^th$ power yields $a^p$. In other words, it is the $q^th$ root of $a^p$.




              If you didn't learn the roots yet, understand that this is the "inverse" operation of exponentiation. For instance,



              $$3^5=243iff243^1/5=sqrt[5]243=3.$$



              Very often, roots are irrational numbers,



              $$1.24573093cdots^5=3iff 3^1/5=sqrt[5]3=1.24573093cdots$$






              share|cite|improve this answer






























                up vote
                0
                down vote













                Let us start with $1/2$



                If I want to find $16^1/2$, I expect to find a number whose square is $16.$



                That is if $$x= 16^1/2$$ we like to have $x^2=16$



                Well we have two such real numbers, namely $4$ and $-4$



                We denote them by $ sqrt 16 =4$ and $- sqrt 16 =-4$



                Sometimes you do not get a real solution at all, for example $(-16)^1/2$ is not a real number, because when you square a real number the answer is always non-negative.



                Sometimes you get only one solution for example $27^1/3=3$ because 3^3=27 and no other real number satisfies $x^3=27.$



                Once you find $a^1/n$ then $a^m/n$ is found by $(a^1/n)^m$



                For example $$27^2/3 = (27^1/3)^2 = 3^2 =9 $$



                You may practice with some fractional powers and check your answers with a calculator to build confidence.






                share|cite|improve this answer





















                  Your Answer




                  StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
                  return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
                  StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
                  StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
                  );
                  );
                  , "mathjax-editing");

                  StackExchange.ready(function()
                  var channelOptions =
                  tags: "".split(" "),
                  id: "69"
                  ;
                  initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                  StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
                  // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                  if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
                  StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
                  createEditor();
                  );

                  else
                  createEditor();

                  );

                  function createEditor()
                  StackExchange.prepareEditor(
                  heartbeatType: 'answer',
                  convertImagesToLinks: true,
                  noModals: false,
                  showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                  reputationToPostImages: 10,
                  bindNavPrevention: true,
                  postfix: "",
                  noCode: true, onDemand: true,
                  discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                  ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                  );



                  );








                   

                  draft saved


                  draft discarded


















                  StackExchange.ready(
                  function ()
                  StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2859543%2funderstanding-fractional-exponents%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                  );

                  Post as a guest






























                  4 Answers
                  4






                  active

                  oldest

                  votes








                  4 Answers
                  4






                  active

                  oldest

                  votes









                  active

                  oldest

                  votes






                  active

                  oldest

                  votes








                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote













                  Notice that, for example, if $x^frac12=a$, then by squaring both sides we get $x=(x^frac12)^2=a^2$.

                  In other words $sqrtx=a$.



                  Following the same logic you can get that for every $n in mathbbN$, $x^frac1n = sqrt[n]x$



                  After you accepted that, by exponentiation rules, you know that for every $p,q in mathbbN$:
                  $$
                  x^fracpq = x^p cdot frac1q = (x^p)^frac1q = sqrt[q]x^p
                  $$



                  So in general, raising to a rational number $fracpq$ means to take the $p$-th power and the $q$-th root.

                  And, of course, it also generalize to negative rational numbers.






                  share|cite|improve this answer

























                    up vote
                    0
                    down vote













                    Notice that, for example, if $x^frac12=a$, then by squaring both sides we get $x=(x^frac12)^2=a^2$.

                    In other words $sqrtx=a$.



                    Following the same logic you can get that for every $n in mathbbN$, $x^frac1n = sqrt[n]x$



                    After you accepted that, by exponentiation rules, you know that for every $p,q in mathbbN$:
                    $$
                    x^fracpq = x^p cdot frac1q = (x^p)^frac1q = sqrt[q]x^p
                    $$



                    So in general, raising to a rational number $fracpq$ means to take the $p$-th power and the $q$-th root.

                    And, of course, it also generalize to negative rational numbers.






                    share|cite|improve this answer























                      up vote
                      0
                      down vote










                      up vote
                      0
                      down vote









                      Notice that, for example, if $x^frac12=a$, then by squaring both sides we get $x=(x^frac12)^2=a^2$.

                      In other words $sqrtx=a$.



                      Following the same logic you can get that for every $n in mathbbN$, $x^frac1n = sqrt[n]x$



                      After you accepted that, by exponentiation rules, you know that for every $p,q in mathbbN$:
                      $$
                      x^fracpq = x^p cdot frac1q = (x^p)^frac1q = sqrt[q]x^p
                      $$



                      So in general, raising to a rational number $fracpq$ means to take the $p$-th power and the $q$-th root.

                      And, of course, it also generalize to negative rational numbers.






                      share|cite|improve this answer













                      Notice that, for example, if $x^frac12=a$, then by squaring both sides we get $x=(x^frac12)^2=a^2$.

                      In other words $sqrtx=a$.



                      Following the same logic you can get that for every $n in mathbbN$, $x^frac1n = sqrt[n]x$



                      After you accepted that, by exponentiation rules, you know that for every $p,q in mathbbN$:
                      $$
                      x^fracpq = x^p cdot frac1q = (x^p)^frac1q = sqrt[q]x^p
                      $$



                      So in general, raising to a rational number $fracpq$ means to take the $p$-th power and the $q$-th root.

                      And, of course, it also generalize to negative rational numbers.







                      share|cite|improve this answer













                      share|cite|improve this answer



                      share|cite|improve this answer











                      answered Jul 22 at 16:33









                      GuySa

                      402313




                      402313




















                          up vote
                          0
                          down vote













                          "how do I think about fractional exponential powers by this same logic?"



                          Carefully.



                          You have to expand the definition.



                          We notice that $b^n*b^m = underbraceb*...*b_nunderbraceb*...*b_m=underbraceb*...*b= b^n+m$ for positive integers $n$ and $m$ and we take $b^n+m = b^nb^m$ as a rule.



                          Then we think. Well what that means $b^0*b^m = b^0+m = b^m$. That would mean $b^0 =1$, doesn't it? Well, in one sense it does not make sense that we can't mulitple $b$ times itself zero times. That's meaningless.



                          But that is no longer what the definition of $b^n$ means. It means that for $nin mathbb Z$ and $n ge 2$ but... for $nin mathbb Z$ and $n le 1$ we are going to have it mean.... whatever it has to be in order for the rule $b^n+m = b^n*b^m$ to work.



                          That means: $b^1 = b$ and $b^0 = 0$ and for a negative integer $-n < 0$ then $b^-n = frac 1b^n$ (becuase we must have $b^-n*b^n = b^-n+n = b^0 = 1$.



                          Okay, but we also have the rule $(b^n)^m = underbraceb^n*...*b^n_m = b^underbracen+....+n_m = b^nm$.



                          So what does that make $b^frac 1m$ have to be?



                          Well, $(b^frac 1m)^m = b^frac 1m*m = b^1 = b$. So that means $b^frac 1m$ has to be $sqrt[m]b$, right?



                          And that's that. $b^frac mn = (sqrt[n]b)^m$.



                          That's it.



                          ....



                          Except we have to be careful. $x^2 = 4$ has two possible answer $-2,2$ so which will it be. ANd $x^2 = -4$ has none.



                          So we add a caveat rule: we only feel safe talking about $b^frac mn$ if $b ge 0$ if $n$ is even and in that case the value is positive. We can talk about $(-4)^frac mn$ if $n$ is odd (in which case the value is negative) but for most of the time, we should avoid it. Many mathematicians will simply say $b^q;qin mathbb Q$ is only defined if $bge 0$.



                          And for $x in mathbb R$, we say $b^x$ is only defined fro $bge 0$. Unless we are doing complex analysis where we accept the square roots of negative numbers. In that case, things get very different. But it's still a matter of defining things by what the must be in order for the rules to work.






                          share|cite|improve this answer



























                            up vote
                            0
                            down vote













                            "how do I think about fractional exponential powers by this same logic?"



                            Carefully.



                            You have to expand the definition.



                            We notice that $b^n*b^m = underbraceb*...*b_nunderbraceb*...*b_m=underbraceb*...*b= b^n+m$ for positive integers $n$ and $m$ and we take $b^n+m = b^nb^m$ as a rule.



                            Then we think. Well what that means $b^0*b^m = b^0+m = b^m$. That would mean $b^0 =1$, doesn't it? Well, in one sense it does not make sense that we can't mulitple $b$ times itself zero times. That's meaningless.



                            But that is no longer what the definition of $b^n$ means. It means that for $nin mathbb Z$ and $n ge 2$ but... for $nin mathbb Z$ and $n le 1$ we are going to have it mean.... whatever it has to be in order for the rule $b^n+m = b^n*b^m$ to work.



                            That means: $b^1 = b$ and $b^0 = 0$ and for a negative integer $-n < 0$ then $b^-n = frac 1b^n$ (becuase we must have $b^-n*b^n = b^-n+n = b^0 = 1$.



                            Okay, but we also have the rule $(b^n)^m = underbraceb^n*...*b^n_m = b^underbracen+....+n_m = b^nm$.



                            So what does that make $b^frac 1m$ have to be?



                            Well, $(b^frac 1m)^m = b^frac 1m*m = b^1 = b$. So that means $b^frac 1m$ has to be $sqrt[m]b$, right?



                            And that's that. $b^frac mn = (sqrt[n]b)^m$.



                            That's it.



                            ....



                            Except we have to be careful. $x^2 = 4$ has two possible answer $-2,2$ so which will it be. ANd $x^2 = -4$ has none.



                            So we add a caveat rule: we only feel safe talking about $b^frac mn$ if $b ge 0$ if $n$ is even and in that case the value is positive. We can talk about $(-4)^frac mn$ if $n$ is odd (in which case the value is negative) but for most of the time, we should avoid it. Many mathematicians will simply say $b^q;qin mathbb Q$ is only defined if $bge 0$.



                            And for $x in mathbb R$, we say $b^x$ is only defined fro $bge 0$. Unless we are doing complex analysis where we accept the square roots of negative numbers. In that case, things get very different. But it's still a matter of defining things by what the must be in order for the rules to work.






                            share|cite|improve this answer

























                              up vote
                              0
                              down vote










                              up vote
                              0
                              down vote









                              "how do I think about fractional exponential powers by this same logic?"



                              Carefully.



                              You have to expand the definition.



                              We notice that $b^n*b^m = underbraceb*...*b_nunderbraceb*...*b_m=underbraceb*...*b= b^n+m$ for positive integers $n$ and $m$ and we take $b^n+m = b^nb^m$ as a rule.



                              Then we think. Well what that means $b^0*b^m = b^0+m = b^m$. That would mean $b^0 =1$, doesn't it? Well, in one sense it does not make sense that we can't mulitple $b$ times itself zero times. That's meaningless.



                              But that is no longer what the definition of $b^n$ means. It means that for $nin mathbb Z$ and $n ge 2$ but... for $nin mathbb Z$ and $n le 1$ we are going to have it mean.... whatever it has to be in order for the rule $b^n+m = b^n*b^m$ to work.



                              That means: $b^1 = b$ and $b^0 = 0$ and for a negative integer $-n < 0$ then $b^-n = frac 1b^n$ (becuase we must have $b^-n*b^n = b^-n+n = b^0 = 1$.



                              Okay, but we also have the rule $(b^n)^m = underbraceb^n*...*b^n_m = b^underbracen+....+n_m = b^nm$.



                              So what does that make $b^frac 1m$ have to be?



                              Well, $(b^frac 1m)^m = b^frac 1m*m = b^1 = b$. So that means $b^frac 1m$ has to be $sqrt[m]b$, right?



                              And that's that. $b^frac mn = (sqrt[n]b)^m$.



                              That's it.



                              ....



                              Except we have to be careful. $x^2 = 4$ has two possible answer $-2,2$ so which will it be. ANd $x^2 = -4$ has none.



                              So we add a caveat rule: we only feel safe talking about $b^frac mn$ if $b ge 0$ if $n$ is even and in that case the value is positive. We can talk about $(-4)^frac mn$ if $n$ is odd (in which case the value is negative) but for most of the time, we should avoid it. Many mathematicians will simply say $b^q;qin mathbb Q$ is only defined if $bge 0$.



                              And for $x in mathbb R$, we say $b^x$ is only defined fro $bge 0$. Unless we are doing complex analysis where we accept the square roots of negative numbers. In that case, things get very different. But it's still a matter of defining things by what the must be in order for the rules to work.






                              share|cite|improve this answer















                              "how do I think about fractional exponential powers by this same logic?"



                              Carefully.



                              You have to expand the definition.



                              We notice that $b^n*b^m = underbraceb*...*b_nunderbraceb*...*b_m=underbraceb*...*b= b^n+m$ for positive integers $n$ and $m$ and we take $b^n+m = b^nb^m$ as a rule.



                              Then we think. Well what that means $b^0*b^m = b^0+m = b^m$. That would mean $b^0 =1$, doesn't it? Well, in one sense it does not make sense that we can't mulitple $b$ times itself zero times. That's meaningless.



                              But that is no longer what the definition of $b^n$ means. It means that for $nin mathbb Z$ and $n ge 2$ but... for $nin mathbb Z$ and $n le 1$ we are going to have it mean.... whatever it has to be in order for the rule $b^n+m = b^n*b^m$ to work.



                              That means: $b^1 = b$ and $b^0 = 0$ and for a negative integer $-n < 0$ then $b^-n = frac 1b^n$ (becuase we must have $b^-n*b^n = b^-n+n = b^0 = 1$.



                              Okay, but we also have the rule $(b^n)^m = underbraceb^n*...*b^n_m = b^underbracen+....+n_m = b^nm$.



                              So what does that make $b^frac 1m$ have to be?



                              Well, $(b^frac 1m)^m = b^frac 1m*m = b^1 = b$. So that means $b^frac 1m$ has to be $sqrt[m]b$, right?



                              And that's that. $b^frac mn = (sqrt[n]b)^m$.



                              That's it.



                              ....



                              Except we have to be careful. $x^2 = 4$ has two possible answer $-2,2$ so which will it be. ANd $x^2 = -4$ has none.



                              So we add a caveat rule: we only feel safe talking about $b^frac mn$ if $b ge 0$ if $n$ is even and in that case the value is positive. We can talk about $(-4)^frac mn$ if $n$ is odd (in which case the value is negative) but for most of the time, we should avoid it. Many mathematicians will simply say $b^q;qin mathbb Q$ is only defined if $bge 0$.



                              And for $x in mathbb R$, we say $b^x$ is only defined fro $bge 0$. Unless we are doing complex analysis where we accept the square roots of negative numbers. In that case, things get very different. But it's still a matter of defining things by what the must be in order for the rules to work.







                              share|cite|improve this answer















                              share|cite|improve this answer



                              share|cite|improve this answer








                              edited Jul 22 at 16:50


























                              answered Jul 22 at 16:43









                              fleablood

                              60.4k22575




                              60.4k22575




















                                  up vote
                                  0
                                  down vote













                                  The exponents follow the rule



                                  $$(a^b)^c=a^bc$$



                                  meaning that the power of a power is the power to the product of the exponents.



                                  Then assume a rational power $p/q$. We write



                                  $$a^p/q=b$$ and raise both members to the $q^th$:



                                  $$a^(p/q)q=a^p=b^q.$$



                                  So $b$ is the number such that when raised to the $q^th$ power yields $a^p$. In other words, it is the $q^th$ root of $a^p$.




                                  If you didn't learn the roots yet, understand that this is the "inverse" operation of exponentiation. For instance,



                                  $$3^5=243iff243^1/5=sqrt[5]243=3.$$



                                  Very often, roots are irrational numbers,



                                  $$1.24573093cdots^5=3iff 3^1/5=sqrt[5]3=1.24573093cdots$$






                                  share|cite|improve this answer



























                                    up vote
                                    0
                                    down vote













                                    The exponents follow the rule



                                    $$(a^b)^c=a^bc$$



                                    meaning that the power of a power is the power to the product of the exponents.



                                    Then assume a rational power $p/q$. We write



                                    $$a^p/q=b$$ and raise both members to the $q^th$:



                                    $$a^(p/q)q=a^p=b^q.$$



                                    So $b$ is the number such that when raised to the $q^th$ power yields $a^p$. In other words, it is the $q^th$ root of $a^p$.




                                    If you didn't learn the roots yet, understand that this is the "inverse" operation of exponentiation. For instance,



                                    $$3^5=243iff243^1/5=sqrt[5]243=3.$$



                                    Very often, roots are irrational numbers,



                                    $$1.24573093cdots^5=3iff 3^1/5=sqrt[5]3=1.24573093cdots$$






                                    share|cite|improve this answer

























                                      up vote
                                      0
                                      down vote










                                      up vote
                                      0
                                      down vote









                                      The exponents follow the rule



                                      $$(a^b)^c=a^bc$$



                                      meaning that the power of a power is the power to the product of the exponents.



                                      Then assume a rational power $p/q$. We write



                                      $$a^p/q=b$$ and raise both members to the $q^th$:



                                      $$a^(p/q)q=a^p=b^q.$$



                                      So $b$ is the number such that when raised to the $q^th$ power yields $a^p$. In other words, it is the $q^th$ root of $a^p$.




                                      If you didn't learn the roots yet, understand that this is the "inverse" operation of exponentiation. For instance,



                                      $$3^5=243iff243^1/5=sqrt[5]243=3.$$



                                      Very often, roots are irrational numbers,



                                      $$1.24573093cdots^5=3iff 3^1/5=sqrt[5]3=1.24573093cdots$$






                                      share|cite|improve this answer















                                      The exponents follow the rule



                                      $$(a^b)^c=a^bc$$



                                      meaning that the power of a power is the power to the product of the exponents.



                                      Then assume a rational power $p/q$. We write



                                      $$a^p/q=b$$ and raise both members to the $q^th$:



                                      $$a^(p/q)q=a^p=b^q.$$



                                      So $b$ is the number such that when raised to the $q^th$ power yields $a^p$. In other words, it is the $q^th$ root of $a^p$.




                                      If you didn't learn the roots yet, understand that this is the "inverse" operation of exponentiation. For instance,



                                      $$3^5=243iff243^1/5=sqrt[5]243=3.$$



                                      Very often, roots are irrational numbers,



                                      $$1.24573093cdots^5=3iff 3^1/5=sqrt[5]3=1.24573093cdots$$







                                      share|cite|improve this answer















                                      share|cite|improve this answer



                                      share|cite|improve this answer








                                      edited Jul 22 at 17:08


























                                      answered Jul 22 at 16:34









                                      Yves Daoust

                                      111k665203




                                      111k665203




















                                          up vote
                                          0
                                          down vote













                                          Let us start with $1/2$



                                          If I want to find $16^1/2$, I expect to find a number whose square is $16.$



                                          That is if $$x= 16^1/2$$ we like to have $x^2=16$



                                          Well we have two such real numbers, namely $4$ and $-4$



                                          We denote them by $ sqrt 16 =4$ and $- sqrt 16 =-4$



                                          Sometimes you do not get a real solution at all, for example $(-16)^1/2$ is not a real number, because when you square a real number the answer is always non-negative.



                                          Sometimes you get only one solution for example $27^1/3=3$ because 3^3=27 and no other real number satisfies $x^3=27.$



                                          Once you find $a^1/n$ then $a^m/n$ is found by $(a^1/n)^m$



                                          For example $$27^2/3 = (27^1/3)^2 = 3^2 =9 $$



                                          You may practice with some fractional powers and check your answers with a calculator to build confidence.






                                          share|cite|improve this answer

























                                            up vote
                                            0
                                            down vote













                                            Let us start with $1/2$



                                            If I want to find $16^1/2$, I expect to find a number whose square is $16.$



                                            That is if $$x= 16^1/2$$ we like to have $x^2=16$



                                            Well we have two such real numbers, namely $4$ and $-4$



                                            We denote them by $ sqrt 16 =4$ and $- sqrt 16 =-4$



                                            Sometimes you do not get a real solution at all, for example $(-16)^1/2$ is not a real number, because when you square a real number the answer is always non-negative.



                                            Sometimes you get only one solution for example $27^1/3=3$ because 3^3=27 and no other real number satisfies $x^3=27.$



                                            Once you find $a^1/n$ then $a^m/n$ is found by $(a^1/n)^m$



                                            For example $$27^2/3 = (27^1/3)^2 = 3^2 =9 $$



                                            You may practice with some fractional powers and check your answers with a calculator to build confidence.






                                            share|cite|improve this answer























                                              up vote
                                              0
                                              down vote










                                              up vote
                                              0
                                              down vote









                                              Let us start with $1/2$



                                              If I want to find $16^1/2$, I expect to find a number whose square is $16.$



                                              That is if $$x= 16^1/2$$ we like to have $x^2=16$



                                              Well we have two such real numbers, namely $4$ and $-4$



                                              We denote them by $ sqrt 16 =4$ and $- sqrt 16 =-4$



                                              Sometimes you do not get a real solution at all, for example $(-16)^1/2$ is not a real number, because when you square a real number the answer is always non-negative.



                                              Sometimes you get only one solution for example $27^1/3=3$ because 3^3=27 and no other real number satisfies $x^3=27.$



                                              Once you find $a^1/n$ then $a^m/n$ is found by $(a^1/n)^m$



                                              For example $$27^2/3 = (27^1/3)^2 = 3^2 =9 $$



                                              You may practice with some fractional powers and check your answers with a calculator to build confidence.






                                              share|cite|improve this answer













                                              Let us start with $1/2$



                                              If I want to find $16^1/2$, I expect to find a number whose square is $16.$



                                              That is if $$x= 16^1/2$$ we like to have $x^2=16$



                                              Well we have two such real numbers, namely $4$ and $-4$



                                              We denote them by $ sqrt 16 =4$ and $- sqrt 16 =-4$



                                              Sometimes you do not get a real solution at all, for example $(-16)^1/2$ is not a real number, because when you square a real number the answer is always non-negative.



                                              Sometimes you get only one solution for example $27^1/3=3$ because 3^3=27 and no other real number satisfies $x^3=27.$



                                              Once you find $a^1/n$ then $a^m/n$ is found by $(a^1/n)^m$



                                              For example $$27^2/3 = (27^1/3)^2 = 3^2 =9 $$



                                              You may practice with some fractional powers and check your answers with a calculator to build confidence.







                                              share|cite|improve this answer













                                              share|cite|improve this answer



                                              share|cite|improve this answer











                                              answered Jul 22 at 17:09









                                              Mohammad Riazi-Kermani

                                              27.5k41852




                                              27.5k41852






















                                                   

                                                  draft saved


                                                  draft discarded


























                                                   


                                                  draft saved


                                                  draft discarded














                                                  StackExchange.ready(
                                                  function ()
                                                  StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2859543%2funderstanding-fractional-exponents%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                                  );

                                                  Post as a guest













































































                                                  Comments

                                                  Popular posts from this blog

                                                  What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

                                                  Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

                                                  Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?