On Changing The Direction Of The Inequality Sign By Dividing By A Negative Number?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












When solving inequality equations, we have to change the sign of the inequality when we divide/multiply by a negative number. And I get why. Because your making one side positive and one side negative.



But let's say you were multiplying by say $(x^3+1)/x>1$ or something. When you multiply both sides by x, why don't you need to flip the sign? Because there's the possibility x is negative! Why don't you need to construct to equations, one where the sign is the same, and one where the sign is flipped.



As an extension, let's say you were multiplying both sides of $(x^3+1)/-x>1$ by -x. Do you need to change the sign too?



Thank you in advance.







share|cite|improve this question















  • 1




    When multiplying by an expression whose sign may vary (according to some variable, $x$ for instance), then one must separate the inequality into two different inequalities, one for each case, and solve each of them separately.
    – Suzet
    Aug 2 at 13:50










  • @Suzet So does one need to flip the sign in the 2 situations ($(x^3+1)/x>1$ etc) above? If so, why?
    – Ethan Chan
    Aug 2 at 13:52










  • See Inequalities.
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Aug 2 at 13:53










  • "And I get why. Because your making one side positive and one side negative." - not sure I understand what you are saying here, but it does not sound correct to me.
    – NickD
    Aug 2 at 15:40














up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












When solving inequality equations, we have to change the sign of the inequality when we divide/multiply by a negative number. And I get why. Because your making one side positive and one side negative.



But let's say you were multiplying by say $(x^3+1)/x>1$ or something. When you multiply both sides by x, why don't you need to flip the sign? Because there's the possibility x is negative! Why don't you need to construct to equations, one where the sign is the same, and one where the sign is flipped.



As an extension, let's say you were multiplying both sides of $(x^3+1)/-x>1$ by -x. Do you need to change the sign too?



Thank you in advance.







share|cite|improve this question















  • 1




    When multiplying by an expression whose sign may vary (according to some variable, $x$ for instance), then one must separate the inequality into two different inequalities, one for each case, and solve each of them separately.
    – Suzet
    Aug 2 at 13:50










  • @Suzet So does one need to flip the sign in the 2 situations ($(x^3+1)/x>1$ etc) above? If so, why?
    – Ethan Chan
    Aug 2 at 13:52










  • See Inequalities.
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Aug 2 at 13:53










  • "And I get why. Because your making one side positive and one side negative." - not sure I understand what you are saying here, but it does not sound correct to me.
    – NickD
    Aug 2 at 15:40












up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1






1





When solving inequality equations, we have to change the sign of the inequality when we divide/multiply by a negative number. And I get why. Because your making one side positive and one side negative.



But let's say you were multiplying by say $(x^3+1)/x>1$ or something. When you multiply both sides by x, why don't you need to flip the sign? Because there's the possibility x is negative! Why don't you need to construct to equations, one where the sign is the same, and one where the sign is flipped.



As an extension, let's say you were multiplying both sides of $(x^3+1)/-x>1$ by -x. Do you need to change the sign too?



Thank you in advance.







share|cite|improve this question











When solving inequality equations, we have to change the sign of the inequality when we divide/multiply by a negative number. And I get why. Because your making one side positive and one side negative.



But let's say you were multiplying by say $(x^3+1)/x>1$ or something. When you multiply both sides by x, why don't you need to flip the sign? Because there's the possibility x is negative! Why don't you need to construct to equations, one where the sign is the same, and one where the sign is flipped.



As an extension, let's say you were multiplying both sides of $(x^3+1)/-x>1$ by -x. Do you need to change the sign too?



Thank you in advance.









share|cite|improve this question










share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question









asked Aug 2 at 13:48









Ethan Chan

591322




591322







  • 1




    When multiplying by an expression whose sign may vary (according to some variable, $x$ for instance), then one must separate the inequality into two different inequalities, one for each case, and solve each of them separately.
    – Suzet
    Aug 2 at 13:50










  • @Suzet So does one need to flip the sign in the 2 situations ($(x^3+1)/x>1$ etc) above? If so, why?
    – Ethan Chan
    Aug 2 at 13:52










  • See Inequalities.
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Aug 2 at 13:53










  • "And I get why. Because your making one side positive and one side negative." - not sure I understand what you are saying here, but it does not sound correct to me.
    – NickD
    Aug 2 at 15:40












  • 1




    When multiplying by an expression whose sign may vary (according to some variable, $x$ for instance), then one must separate the inequality into two different inequalities, one for each case, and solve each of them separately.
    – Suzet
    Aug 2 at 13:50










  • @Suzet So does one need to flip the sign in the 2 situations ($(x^3+1)/x>1$ etc) above? If so, why?
    – Ethan Chan
    Aug 2 at 13:52










  • See Inequalities.
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Aug 2 at 13:53










  • "And I get why. Because your making one side positive and one side negative." - not sure I understand what you are saying here, but it does not sound correct to me.
    – NickD
    Aug 2 at 15:40







1




1




When multiplying by an expression whose sign may vary (according to some variable, $x$ for instance), then one must separate the inequality into two different inequalities, one for each case, and solve each of them separately.
– Suzet
Aug 2 at 13:50




When multiplying by an expression whose sign may vary (according to some variable, $x$ for instance), then one must separate the inequality into two different inequalities, one for each case, and solve each of them separately.
– Suzet
Aug 2 at 13:50












@Suzet So does one need to flip the sign in the 2 situations ($(x^3+1)/x>1$ etc) above? If so, why?
– Ethan Chan
Aug 2 at 13:52




@Suzet So does one need to flip the sign in the 2 situations ($(x^3+1)/x>1$ etc) above? If so, why?
– Ethan Chan
Aug 2 at 13:52












See Inequalities.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Aug 2 at 13:53




See Inequalities.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Aug 2 at 13:53












"And I get why. Because your making one side positive and one side negative." - not sure I understand what you are saying here, but it does not sound correct to me.
– NickD
Aug 2 at 15:40




"And I get why. Because your making one side positive and one side negative." - not sure I understand what you are saying here, but it does not sound correct to me.
– NickD
Aug 2 at 15:40










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










Note that there is not exception and the following



$$fracx^3+1x>1 iff x^3+1>x$$



holds for $x>0$ while for $x<0$ we have



$$fracx^3+1x>1 iff x^3+1<x$$



To avoid this kind of manipulation and distinction in two cases, we can proceed, as an alternative, as follow



$$fracx^3+1x>1 iff fracx^3+1x-1>0 iff fracx^3+1-xx>0$$



and consider separetely the sign of numerator and denominator.






share|cite|improve this answer




























    up vote
    0
    down vote













    When you multiply the sides by $x$, you don't need to flip the sign if you assume that $x>0$. If you assume that $x<0$, then you do have to flip the sign.



    In general, when solving the inequality $$fracx^3+1x > 1$$ you must separate two cases:



    1. If $x>0$, then the inequality is equivalent to $x^3+1 > x$

    2. If $x<0$, then the inequality is equivalent to $x^3+1<x$





    share|cite|improve this answer





















      Your Answer




      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: false,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );








       

      draft saved


      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2870077%2fon-changing-the-direction-of-the-inequality-sign-by-dividing-by-a-negative-numbe%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest






























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      1
      down vote



      accepted










      Note that there is not exception and the following



      $$fracx^3+1x>1 iff x^3+1>x$$



      holds for $x>0$ while for $x<0$ we have



      $$fracx^3+1x>1 iff x^3+1<x$$



      To avoid this kind of manipulation and distinction in two cases, we can proceed, as an alternative, as follow



      $$fracx^3+1x>1 iff fracx^3+1x-1>0 iff fracx^3+1-xx>0$$



      and consider separetely the sign of numerator and denominator.






      share|cite|improve this answer

























        up vote
        1
        down vote



        accepted










        Note that there is not exception and the following



        $$fracx^3+1x>1 iff x^3+1>x$$



        holds for $x>0$ while for $x<0$ we have



        $$fracx^3+1x>1 iff x^3+1<x$$



        To avoid this kind of manipulation and distinction in two cases, we can proceed, as an alternative, as follow



        $$fracx^3+1x>1 iff fracx^3+1x-1>0 iff fracx^3+1-xx>0$$



        and consider separetely the sign of numerator and denominator.






        share|cite|improve this answer























          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted






          Note that there is not exception and the following



          $$fracx^3+1x>1 iff x^3+1>x$$



          holds for $x>0$ while for $x<0$ we have



          $$fracx^3+1x>1 iff x^3+1<x$$



          To avoid this kind of manipulation and distinction in two cases, we can proceed, as an alternative, as follow



          $$fracx^3+1x>1 iff fracx^3+1x-1>0 iff fracx^3+1-xx>0$$



          and consider separetely the sign of numerator and denominator.






          share|cite|improve this answer













          Note that there is not exception and the following



          $$fracx^3+1x>1 iff x^3+1>x$$



          holds for $x>0$ while for $x<0$ we have



          $$fracx^3+1x>1 iff x^3+1<x$$



          To avoid this kind of manipulation and distinction in two cases, we can proceed, as an alternative, as follow



          $$fracx^3+1x>1 iff fracx^3+1x-1>0 iff fracx^3+1-xx>0$$



          and consider separetely the sign of numerator and denominator.







          share|cite|improve this answer













          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer











          answered Aug 2 at 13:52









          gimusi

          63.8k73480




          63.8k73480




















              up vote
              0
              down vote













              When you multiply the sides by $x$, you don't need to flip the sign if you assume that $x>0$. If you assume that $x<0$, then you do have to flip the sign.



              In general, when solving the inequality $$fracx^3+1x > 1$$ you must separate two cases:



              1. If $x>0$, then the inequality is equivalent to $x^3+1 > x$

              2. If $x<0$, then the inequality is equivalent to $x^3+1<x$





              share|cite|improve this answer

























                up vote
                0
                down vote













                When you multiply the sides by $x$, you don't need to flip the sign if you assume that $x>0$. If you assume that $x<0$, then you do have to flip the sign.



                In general, when solving the inequality $$fracx^3+1x > 1$$ you must separate two cases:



                1. If $x>0$, then the inequality is equivalent to $x^3+1 > x$

                2. If $x<0$, then the inequality is equivalent to $x^3+1<x$





                share|cite|improve this answer























                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote









                  When you multiply the sides by $x$, you don't need to flip the sign if you assume that $x>0$. If you assume that $x<0$, then you do have to flip the sign.



                  In general, when solving the inequality $$fracx^3+1x > 1$$ you must separate two cases:



                  1. If $x>0$, then the inequality is equivalent to $x^3+1 > x$

                  2. If $x<0$, then the inequality is equivalent to $x^3+1<x$





                  share|cite|improve this answer













                  When you multiply the sides by $x$, you don't need to flip the sign if you assume that $x>0$. If you assume that $x<0$, then you do have to flip the sign.



                  In general, when solving the inequality $$fracx^3+1x > 1$$ you must separate two cases:



                  1. If $x>0$, then the inequality is equivalent to $x^3+1 > x$

                  2. If $x<0$, then the inequality is equivalent to $x^3+1<x$






                  share|cite|improve this answer













                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  answered Aug 2 at 13:52









                  5xum

                  81.8k382146




                  81.8k382146






















                       

                      draft saved


                      draft discarded


























                       


                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2870077%2fon-changing-the-direction-of-the-inequality-sign-by-dividing-by-a-negative-numbe%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest













































































                      Comments

                      Popular posts from this blog

                      What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

                      Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

                      Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?