Pointwise and Uniformly Convergent Series [closed]

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1












Does there exist a pointwise convergent series on $mathbbR$, but not uniformly convergent at any interval?







share|cite|improve this question













closed as off-topic by Leucippus, Shailesh, Xander Henderson, Taroccoesbrocco, Parcly Taxel Jul 23 at 7:54


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Leucippus, Shailesh, Xander Henderson, Taroccoesbrocco, Parcly Taxel
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.








  • 3




    What does it mean for a series to be uniformly convergent 'at a point'?
    – Fimpellizieri
    Jul 22 at 20:55










  • Sorry , it just a mistake , I have modified it
    – ArMaRm
    Jul 22 at 21:14














up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1












Does there exist a pointwise convergent series on $mathbbR$, but not uniformly convergent at any interval?







share|cite|improve this question













closed as off-topic by Leucippus, Shailesh, Xander Henderson, Taroccoesbrocco, Parcly Taxel Jul 23 at 7:54


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Leucippus, Shailesh, Xander Henderson, Taroccoesbrocco, Parcly Taxel
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.








  • 3




    What does it mean for a series to be uniformly convergent 'at a point'?
    – Fimpellizieri
    Jul 22 at 20:55










  • Sorry , it just a mistake , I have modified it
    – ArMaRm
    Jul 22 at 21:14












up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1






1





Does there exist a pointwise convergent series on $mathbbR$, but not uniformly convergent at any interval?







share|cite|improve this question













Does there exist a pointwise convergent series on $mathbbR$, but not uniformly convergent at any interval?









share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 22 at 22:52









mechanodroid

22.2k52041




22.2k52041









asked Jul 22 at 20:54









ArMaRm

959




959




closed as off-topic by Leucippus, Shailesh, Xander Henderson, Taroccoesbrocco, Parcly Taxel Jul 23 at 7:54


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Leucippus, Shailesh, Xander Henderson, Taroccoesbrocco, Parcly Taxel
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




closed as off-topic by Leucippus, Shailesh, Xander Henderson, Taroccoesbrocco, Parcly Taxel Jul 23 at 7:54


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Leucippus, Shailesh, Xander Henderson, Taroccoesbrocco, Parcly Taxel
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







  • 3




    What does it mean for a series to be uniformly convergent 'at a point'?
    – Fimpellizieri
    Jul 22 at 20:55










  • Sorry , it just a mistake , I have modified it
    – ArMaRm
    Jul 22 at 21:14












  • 3




    What does it mean for a series to be uniformly convergent 'at a point'?
    – Fimpellizieri
    Jul 22 at 20:55










  • Sorry , it just a mistake , I have modified it
    – ArMaRm
    Jul 22 at 21:14







3




3




What does it mean for a series to be uniformly convergent 'at a point'?
– Fimpellizieri
Jul 22 at 20:55




What does it mean for a series to be uniformly convergent 'at a point'?
– Fimpellizieri
Jul 22 at 20:55












Sorry , it just a mistake , I have modified it
– ArMaRm
Jul 22 at 21:14




Sorry , it just a mistake , I have modified it
– ArMaRm
Jul 22 at 21:14










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
4
down vote













Let $mathbbQ = r_1, r_2, ldots$ be an enumeration of the rational numbers and take



$$f_n(x) = begincases1, &x = r_n \ 0, & textotherwise endcases$$



We have pointwise convergence of the series



$$sum_n=1^infty f_n(x) = f(x) =begincases1, &x in mathbbQ \ 0, & textotherwise endcases$$



The rational numbers in any interval $[a,b]$ can be enumerated by a subsequence $(r_n_k)$. The series does not converge uniformly on the interval because for any $k in mathbbN$ we have $n_k geqslant k$ such that



$$left|sum_n=1^n_k f_n(r_n_k+1) - f(r_n_k+1)right| = 1, $$



and it is not possible to find for any $0 < epsilon < 1$ an integer $k$ such that for all $m >k$ and all $x in [a,b],$



$$left|sum_n=1^m f_n(x) - f(x)right| < epsilon$$






share|cite|improve this answer




























    up vote
    2
    down vote













    If you mean "Does there exist a sequence of functions $f_n:Bbb RtoBbb R$ which converges pointwise, but doesn't converge uniformly on any interval?", then yes, there are such sequences.



    For instance, let $f$ be the Conway base 13 function. It is a function which attains all real numbers as value on any (non-trivial) interval. Then set $f_n(x)=frac1n f(x)$. Each $f_n$ still has the property that on any interval it attains any real number as value, so the sequence cannot possibly converge uniformly on any interval. But the sequence clearly converges pointwise to the zero function.






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • Let $f_n$ be a sequence of functions , and $S_n$ = $f_1$ + $f_2$ + .... be the partial sum of the series $Z$ . If the limit of $S_n$ converges P.W then $Z$ converges P.W , similarly for U.C .
      – ArMaRm
      Jul 22 at 21:37










    • From any sequence, you can easily make a series with that sequence as partial sums. So the existence of one implies the existence of the other.
      – Arthur
      Jul 22 at 22:04


















    up vote
    2
    down vote













    This answer constructs a sequence $(f_n)_n$ of continuous functions $f_n : mathbbR to mathbbR$ which converges pointwise to Thomae's function $f: mathbbR to mathbbR$ given by



    $$f(x)= begincases
    frac1q &: text if $x = fracpq$ with $p inmathbbZ, q in mathbbN$ coprime\
    0 &: text if $x$ is irrational
    endcases$$



    The set of discontinuities of $f$ is precisely $mathbbQ$.



    If $f_n|_[a,b] to f|_[a,b]$ uniformly for some interval $[a,b]$ then it would follow that $f|_[a,b]$ is continuous, which is impossible because the set of discontinuities $mathbbQ$ is dense in $mathbbR$.



    Therefore the convergence $f_n to f$ is not uniform on any interval.






    share|cite|improve this answer






























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      4
      down vote













      Let $mathbbQ = r_1, r_2, ldots$ be an enumeration of the rational numbers and take



      $$f_n(x) = begincases1, &x = r_n \ 0, & textotherwise endcases$$



      We have pointwise convergence of the series



      $$sum_n=1^infty f_n(x) = f(x) =begincases1, &x in mathbbQ \ 0, & textotherwise endcases$$



      The rational numbers in any interval $[a,b]$ can be enumerated by a subsequence $(r_n_k)$. The series does not converge uniformly on the interval because for any $k in mathbbN$ we have $n_k geqslant k$ such that



      $$left|sum_n=1^n_k f_n(r_n_k+1) - f(r_n_k+1)right| = 1, $$



      and it is not possible to find for any $0 < epsilon < 1$ an integer $k$ such that for all $m >k$ and all $x in [a,b],$



      $$left|sum_n=1^m f_n(x) - f(x)right| < epsilon$$






      share|cite|improve this answer

























        up vote
        4
        down vote













        Let $mathbbQ = r_1, r_2, ldots$ be an enumeration of the rational numbers and take



        $$f_n(x) = begincases1, &x = r_n \ 0, & textotherwise endcases$$



        We have pointwise convergence of the series



        $$sum_n=1^infty f_n(x) = f(x) =begincases1, &x in mathbbQ \ 0, & textotherwise endcases$$



        The rational numbers in any interval $[a,b]$ can be enumerated by a subsequence $(r_n_k)$. The series does not converge uniformly on the interval because for any $k in mathbbN$ we have $n_k geqslant k$ such that



        $$left|sum_n=1^n_k f_n(r_n_k+1) - f(r_n_k+1)right| = 1, $$



        and it is not possible to find for any $0 < epsilon < 1$ an integer $k$ such that for all $m >k$ and all $x in [a,b],$



        $$left|sum_n=1^m f_n(x) - f(x)right| < epsilon$$






        share|cite|improve this answer























          up vote
          4
          down vote










          up vote
          4
          down vote









          Let $mathbbQ = r_1, r_2, ldots$ be an enumeration of the rational numbers and take



          $$f_n(x) = begincases1, &x = r_n \ 0, & textotherwise endcases$$



          We have pointwise convergence of the series



          $$sum_n=1^infty f_n(x) = f(x) =begincases1, &x in mathbbQ \ 0, & textotherwise endcases$$



          The rational numbers in any interval $[a,b]$ can be enumerated by a subsequence $(r_n_k)$. The series does not converge uniformly on the interval because for any $k in mathbbN$ we have $n_k geqslant k$ such that



          $$left|sum_n=1^n_k f_n(r_n_k+1) - f(r_n_k+1)right| = 1, $$



          and it is not possible to find for any $0 < epsilon < 1$ an integer $k$ such that for all $m >k$ and all $x in [a,b],$



          $$left|sum_n=1^m f_n(x) - f(x)right| < epsilon$$






          share|cite|improve this answer













          Let $mathbbQ = r_1, r_2, ldots$ be an enumeration of the rational numbers and take



          $$f_n(x) = begincases1, &x = r_n \ 0, & textotherwise endcases$$



          We have pointwise convergence of the series



          $$sum_n=1^infty f_n(x) = f(x) =begincases1, &x in mathbbQ \ 0, & textotherwise endcases$$



          The rational numbers in any interval $[a,b]$ can be enumerated by a subsequence $(r_n_k)$. The series does not converge uniformly on the interval because for any $k in mathbbN$ we have $n_k geqslant k$ such that



          $$left|sum_n=1^n_k f_n(r_n_k+1) - f(r_n_k+1)right| = 1, $$



          and it is not possible to find for any $0 < epsilon < 1$ an integer $k$ such that for all $m >k$ and all $x in [a,b],$



          $$left|sum_n=1^m f_n(x) - f(x)right| < epsilon$$







          share|cite|improve this answer













          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer











          answered Jul 22 at 21:56









          RRL

          43.6k42260




          43.6k42260




















              up vote
              2
              down vote













              If you mean "Does there exist a sequence of functions $f_n:Bbb RtoBbb R$ which converges pointwise, but doesn't converge uniformly on any interval?", then yes, there are such sequences.



              For instance, let $f$ be the Conway base 13 function. It is a function which attains all real numbers as value on any (non-trivial) interval. Then set $f_n(x)=frac1n f(x)$. Each $f_n$ still has the property that on any interval it attains any real number as value, so the sequence cannot possibly converge uniformly on any interval. But the sequence clearly converges pointwise to the zero function.






              share|cite|improve this answer





















              • Let $f_n$ be a sequence of functions , and $S_n$ = $f_1$ + $f_2$ + .... be the partial sum of the series $Z$ . If the limit of $S_n$ converges P.W then $Z$ converges P.W , similarly for U.C .
                – ArMaRm
                Jul 22 at 21:37










              • From any sequence, you can easily make a series with that sequence as partial sums. So the existence of one implies the existence of the other.
                – Arthur
                Jul 22 at 22:04















              up vote
              2
              down vote













              If you mean "Does there exist a sequence of functions $f_n:Bbb RtoBbb R$ which converges pointwise, but doesn't converge uniformly on any interval?", then yes, there are such sequences.



              For instance, let $f$ be the Conway base 13 function. It is a function which attains all real numbers as value on any (non-trivial) interval. Then set $f_n(x)=frac1n f(x)$. Each $f_n$ still has the property that on any interval it attains any real number as value, so the sequence cannot possibly converge uniformly on any interval. But the sequence clearly converges pointwise to the zero function.






              share|cite|improve this answer





















              • Let $f_n$ be a sequence of functions , and $S_n$ = $f_1$ + $f_2$ + .... be the partial sum of the series $Z$ . If the limit of $S_n$ converges P.W then $Z$ converges P.W , similarly for U.C .
                – ArMaRm
                Jul 22 at 21:37










              • From any sequence, you can easily make a series with that sequence as partial sums. So the existence of one implies the existence of the other.
                – Arthur
                Jul 22 at 22:04













              up vote
              2
              down vote










              up vote
              2
              down vote









              If you mean "Does there exist a sequence of functions $f_n:Bbb RtoBbb R$ which converges pointwise, but doesn't converge uniformly on any interval?", then yes, there are such sequences.



              For instance, let $f$ be the Conway base 13 function. It is a function which attains all real numbers as value on any (non-trivial) interval. Then set $f_n(x)=frac1n f(x)$. Each $f_n$ still has the property that on any interval it attains any real number as value, so the sequence cannot possibly converge uniformly on any interval. But the sequence clearly converges pointwise to the zero function.






              share|cite|improve this answer













              If you mean "Does there exist a sequence of functions $f_n:Bbb RtoBbb R$ which converges pointwise, but doesn't converge uniformly on any interval?", then yes, there are such sequences.



              For instance, let $f$ be the Conway base 13 function. It is a function which attains all real numbers as value on any (non-trivial) interval. Then set $f_n(x)=frac1n f(x)$. Each $f_n$ still has the property that on any interval it attains any real number as value, so the sequence cannot possibly converge uniformly on any interval. But the sequence clearly converges pointwise to the zero function.







              share|cite|improve this answer













              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer











              answered Jul 22 at 21:29









              Arthur

              98.5k793174




              98.5k793174











              • Let $f_n$ be a sequence of functions , and $S_n$ = $f_1$ + $f_2$ + .... be the partial sum of the series $Z$ . If the limit of $S_n$ converges P.W then $Z$ converges P.W , similarly for U.C .
                – ArMaRm
                Jul 22 at 21:37










              • From any sequence, you can easily make a series with that sequence as partial sums. So the existence of one implies the existence of the other.
                – Arthur
                Jul 22 at 22:04

















              • Let $f_n$ be a sequence of functions , and $S_n$ = $f_1$ + $f_2$ + .... be the partial sum of the series $Z$ . If the limit of $S_n$ converges P.W then $Z$ converges P.W , similarly for U.C .
                – ArMaRm
                Jul 22 at 21:37










              • From any sequence, you can easily make a series with that sequence as partial sums. So the existence of one implies the existence of the other.
                – Arthur
                Jul 22 at 22:04
















              Let $f_n$ be a sequence of functions , and $S_n$ = $f_1$ + $f_2$ + .... be the partial sum of the series $Z$ . If the limit of $S_n$ converges P.W then $Z$ converges P.W , similarly for U.C .
              – ArMaRm
              Jul 22 at 21:37




              Let $f_n$ be a sequence of functions , and $S_n$ = $f_1$ + $f_2$ + .... be the partial sum of the series $Z$ . If the limit of $S_n$ converges P.W then $Z$ converges P.W , similarly for U.C .
              – ArMaRm
              Jul 22 at 21:37












              From any sequence, you can easily make a series with that sequence as partial sums. So the existence of one implies the existence of the other.
              – Arthur
              Jul 22 at 22:04





              From any sequence, you can easily make a series with that sequence as partial sums. So the existence of one implies the existence of the other.
              – Arthur
              Jul 22 at 22:04











              up vote
              2
              down vote













              This answer constructs a sequence $(f_n)_n$ of continuous functions $f_n : mathbbR to mathbbR$ which converges pointwise to Thomae's function $f: mathbbR to mathbbR$ given by



              $$f(x)= begincases
              frac1q &: text if $x = fracpq$ with $p inmathbbZ, q in mathbbN$ coprime\
              0 &: text if $x$ is irrational
              endcases$$



              The set of discontinuities of $f$ is precisely $mathbbQ$.



              If $f_n|_[a,b] to f|_[a,b]$ uniformly for some interval $[a,b]$ then it would follow that $f|_[a,b]$ is continuous, which is impossible because the set of discontinuities $mathbbQ$ is dense in $mathbbR$.



              Therefore the convergence $f_n to f$ is not uniform on any interval.






              share|cite|improve this answer



























                up vote
                2
                down vote













                This answer constructs a sequence $(f_n)_n$ of continuous functions $f_n : mathbbR to mathbbR$ which converges pointwise to Thomae's function $f: mathbbR to mathbbR$ given by



                $$f(x)= begincases
                frac1q &: text if $x = fracpq$ with $p inmathbbZ, q in mathbbN$ coprime\
                0 &: text if $x$ is irrational
                endcases$$



                The set of discontinuities of $f$ is precisely $mathbbQ$.



                If $f_n|_[a,b] to f|_[a,b]$ uniformly for some interval $[a,b]$ then it would follow that $f|_[a,b]$ is continuous, which is impossible because the set of discontinuities $mathbbQ$ is dense in $mathbbR$.



                Therefore the convergence $f_n to f$ is not uniform on any interval.






                share|cite|improve this answer

























                  up vote
                  2
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  2
                  down vote









                  This answer constructs a sequence $(f_n)_n$ of continuous functions $f_n : mathbbR to mathbbR$ which converges pointwise to Thomae's function $f: mathbbR to mathbbR$ given by



                  $$f(x)= begincases
                  frac1q &: text if $x = fracpq$ with $p inmathbbZ, q in mathbbN$ coprime\
                  0 &: text if $x$ is irrational
                  endcases$$



                  The set of discontinuities of $f$ is precisely $mathbbQ$.



                  If $f_n|_[a,b] to f|_[a,b]$ uniformly for some interval $[a,b]$ then it would follow that $f|_[a,b]$ is continuous, which is impossible because the set of discontinuities $mathbbQ$ is dense in $mathbbR$.



                  Therefore the convergence $f_n to f$ is not uniform on any interval.






                  share|cite|improve this answer















                  This answer constructs a sequence $(f_n)_n$ of continuous functions $f_n : mathbbR to mathbbR$ which converges pointwise to Thomae's function $f: mathbbR to mathbbR$ given by



                  $$f(x)= begincases
                  frac1q &: text if $x = fracpq$ with $p inmathbbZ, q in mathbbN$ coprime\
                  0 &: text if $x$ is irrational
                  endcases$$



                  The set of discontinuities of $f$ is precisely $mathbbQ$.



                  If $f_n|_[a,b] to f|_[a,b]$ uniformly for some interval $[a,b]$ then it would follow that $f|_[a,b]$ is continuous, which is impossible because the set of discontinuities $mathbbQ$ is dense in $mathbbR$.



                  Therefore the convergence $f_n to f$ is not uniform on any interval.







                  share|cite|improve this answer















                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited Jul 23 at 9:30


























                  answered Jul 22 at 22:48









                  mechanodroid

                  22.2k52041




                  22.2k52041












                      Comments

                      Popular posts from this blog

                      What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

                      Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

                      Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?