Proof that if $n^2-1$ is divisible by $8$ then $n$ is odd
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
I am still very new to proofs. I am just getting some practice, as I am still struggling with the concepts. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. Thank you in advance.
Claim: If $n^2-1$ is divisible by $8$, then $n$ is odd.
Proof: Suppose $n$ is even; that is, $n=2k$, for some $k in mathbbZ$. Then, $n^2-1 = (2k)^2-1$, which is odd. Therefore, $n$ must be odd and thus, contradicts our assumption that $n$ is even.
This is my second practice proof I am working on so please be gentle! I am still learning the logic and working through the proofs slowly. Any feedback, tips, or hints/tricks would be greatly appreciated! Thanks.
elementary-number-theory proof-verification proof-writing
 |Â
show 2 more comments
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
I am still very new to proofs. I am just getting some practice, as I am still struggling with the concepts. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. Thank you in advance.
Claim: If $n^2-1$ is divisible by $8$, then $n$ is odd.
Proof: Suppose $n$ is even; that is, $n=2k$, for some $k in mathbbZ$. Then, $n^2-1 = (2k)^2-1$, which is odd. Therefore, $n$ must be odd and thus, contradicts our assumption that $n$ is even.
This is my second practice proof I am working on so please be gentle! I am still learning the logic and working through the proofs slowly. Any feedback, tips, or hints/tricks would be greatly appreciated! Thanks.
elementary-number-theory proof-verification proof-writing
2
Where did you use the assumption "$n^2-1$ is divisible by $8$"? Also, how can you justify the sentence "Therefore, $n$ must be odd" ?
– Suzet
Jul 27 at 4:01
@Suzet It was unnecessary since the OP approached via contradiction.
– JMoravitz
Jul 27 at 4:02
2
@ Ryan, you could have explained better why $(2k)^2-1$ being odd implies that $8$ is not a divisor of $n^2-1$. You seem to have glossed over this step which can be fleshed out. (Note that since $2mid 8$ and supposing that $8mid n^2-1$ this should have implied something about the parity of $n^2-1$)
– JMoravitz
Jul 27 at 4:05
This contradiction shows that $n$ must atleast be odd for it to be divisible by $8$. But it doesn't guarantee that if $n$ is odd $n^2-1$ is divisible by $8$. I think the proof is ok if you only want to prove the forward implication.
– Piyush Divyanakar
Jul 27 at 4:06
@JMoravitz Actually, either the OP is proving the proposition by contraposition (where we do not have $n^2-1$ divisible by $8$), either the OP is proving it by contradiction (where we have and need to use $n^2-1$ is divisible by $8$).
– Suzet
Jul 27 at 4:06
 |Â
show 2 more comments
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
I am still very new to proofs. I am just getting some practice, as I am still struggling with the concepts. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. Thank you in advance.
Claim: If $n^2-1$ is divisible by $8$, then $n$ is odd.
Proof: Suppose $n$ is even; that is, $n=2k$, for some $k in mathbbZ$. Then, $n^2-1 = (2k)^2-1$, which is odd. Therefore, $n$ must be odd and thus, contradicts our assumption that $n$ is even.
This is my second practice proof I am working on so please be gentle! I am still learning the logic and working through the proofs slowly. Any feedback, tips, or hints/tricks would be greatly appreciated! Thanks.
elementary-number-theory proof-verification proof-writing
I am still very new to proofs. I am just getting some practice, as I am still struggling with the concepts. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. Thank you in advance.
Claim: If $n^2-1$ is divisible by $8$, then $n$ is odd.
Proof: Suppose $n$ is even; that is, $n=2k$, for some $k in mathbbZ$. Then, $n^2-1 = (2k)^2-1$, which is odd. Therefore, $n$ must be odd and thus, contradicts our assumption that $n$ is even.
This is my second practice proof I am working on so please be gentle! I am still learning the logic and working through the proofs slowly. Any feedback, tips, or hints/tricks would be greatly appreciated! Thanks.
elementary-number-theory proof-verification proof-writing
edited Jul 27 at 9:31
user21820
35.8k440136
35.8k440136
asked Jul 27 at 3:58
Ryan
865
865
2
Where did you use the assumption "$n^2-1$ is divisible by $8$"? Also, how can you justify the sentence "Therefore, $n$ must be odd" ?
– Suzet
Jul 27 at 4:01
@Suzet It was unnecessary since the OP approached via contradiction.
– JMoravitz
Jul 27 at 4:02
2
@ Ryan, you could have explained better why $(2k)^2-1$ being odd implies that $8$ is not a divisor of $n^2-1$. You seem to have glossed over this step which can be fleshed out. (Note that since $2mid 8$ and supposing that $8mid n^2-1$ this should have implied something about the parity of $n^2-1$)
– JMoravitz
Jul 27 at 4:05
This contradiction shows that $n$ must atleast be odd for it to be divisible by $8$. But it doesn't guarantee that if $n$ is odd $n^2-1$ is divisible by $8$. I think the proof is ok if you only want to prove the forward implication.
– Piyush Divyanakar
Jul 27 at 4:06
@JMoravitz Actually, either the OP is proving the proposition by contraposition (where we do not have $n^2-1$ divisible by $8$), either the OP is proving it by contradiction (where we have and need to use $n^2-1$ is divisible by $8$).
– Suzet
Jul 27 at 4:06
 |Â
show 2 more comments
2
Where did you use the assumption "$n^2-1$ is divisible by $8$"? Also, how can you justify the sentence "Therefore, $n$ must be odd" ?
– Suzet
Jul 27 at 4:01
@Suzet It was unnecessary since the OP approached via contradiction.
– JMoravitz
Jul 27 at 4:02
2
@ Ryan, you could have explained better why $(2k)^2-1$ being odd implies that $8$ is not a divisor of $n^2-1$. You seem to have glossed over this step which can be fleshed out. (Note that since $2mid 8$ and supposing that $8mid n^2-1$ this should have implied something about the parity of $n^2-1$)
– JMoravitz
Jul 27 at 4:05
This contradiction shows that $n$ must atleast be odd for it to be divisible by $8$. But it doesn't guarantee that if $n$ is odd $n^2-1$ is divisible by $8$. I think the proof is ok if you only want to prove the forward implication.
– Piyush Divyanakar
Jul 27 at 4:06
@JMoravitz Actually, either the OP is proving the proposition by contraposition (where we do not have $n^2-1$ divisible by $8$), either the OP is proving it by contradiction (where we have and need to use $n^2-1$ is divisible by $8$).
– Suzet
Jul 27 at 4:06
2
2
Where did you use the assumption "$n^2-1$ is divisible by $8$"? Also, how can you justify the sentence "Therefore, $n$ must be odd" ?
– Suzet
Jul 27 at 4:01
Where did you use the assumption "$n^2-1$ is divisible by $8$"? Also, how can you justify the sentence "Therefore, $n$ must be odd" ?
– Suzet
Jul 27 at 4:01
@Suzet It was unnecessary since the OP approached via contradiction.
– JMoravitz
Jul 27 at 4:02
@Suzet It was unnecessary since the OP approached via contradiction.
– JMoravitz
Jul 27 at 4:02
2
2
@ Ryan, you could have explained better why $(2k)^2-1$ being odd implies that $8$ is not a divisor of $n^2-1$. You seem to have glossed over this step which can be fleshed out. (Note that since $2mid 8$ and supposing that $8mid n^2-1$ this should have implied something about the parity of $n^2-1$)
– JMoravitz
Jul 27 at 4:05
@ Ryan, you could have explained better why $(2k)^2-1$ being odd implies that $8$ is not a divisor of $n^2-1$. You seem to have glossed over this step which can be fleshed out. (Note that since $2mid 8$ and supposing that $8mid n^2-1$ this should have implied something about the parity of $n^2-1$)
– JMoravitz
Jul 27 at 4:05
This contradiction shows that $n$ must atleast be odd for it to be divisible by $8$. But it doesn't guarantee that if $n$ is odd $n^2-1$ is divisible by $8$. I think the proof is ok if you only want to prove the forward implication.
– Piyush Divyanakar
Jul 27 at 4:06
This contradiction shows that $n$ must atleast be odd for it to be divisible by $8$. But it doesn't guarantee that if $n$ is odd $n^2-1$ is divisible by $8$. I think the proof is ok if you only want to prove the forward implication.
– Piyush Divyanakar
Jul 27 at 4:06
@JMoravitz Actually, either the OP is proving the proposition by contraposition (where we do not have $n^2-1$ divisible by $8$), either the OP is proving it by contradiction (where we have and need to use $n^2-1$ is divisible by $8$).
– Suzet
Jul 27 at 4:06
@JMoravitz Actually, either the OP is proving the proposition by contraposition (where we do not have $n^2-1$ divisible by $8$), either the OP is proving it by contradiction (where we have and need to use $n^2-1$ is divisible by $8$).
– Suzet
Jul 27 at 4:06
 |Â
show 2 more comments
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
up vote
7
down vote
In your problem, proof-by-contradiction works as follows:
(Hypothesis) Suppose 8 divides $n^2-1$.
(Assumption) Let us assume that $n$ is even.
$n$ is even $implies$ $n=2k$ for some $k in mathbbZ$
Then, $n^2-1 = (2k)^2-1$
$n^2-1 = 2(2k^2)-1 implies n^2-1 $ is an odd number.
$n^2-1$ is odd $implies$ 8 does not divide $n^2-1$.
Contradiction! That is, assuming n is even contradicts our hypothesis (i.e., $n^2-1$ is divisible by 8).
So our assumption is wrong. This means $n$ has to be odd.
Alternatively, we can prove the contrapositive (i.e., Proving $Aimplies B $ is equivalent to proving $ neg B implies neg A $ ). This works as follows in your case:
Suppose $n$ is even.
Then, $n = 2k$ for some $k in mathbbZ$
$implies$ $n^2-1 = (2k)^2-1$
$implies$ $n^2-1 = 2(2k^2)-1$
$implies$ $n^2-1$ is odd.
$implies$ $n^2-1$ is not divisible by 8.
Thus, we have proved this: $n$ is not odd $implies$ $n^2-1$ is not divisible by 8, which is equivalent to proving this: $n^2-1$ is divisible 8 $implies n$ is odd.
Great! Thank you! I've read from some other people that proof by contraposition was an 'easier' approach, but I did not want to abandon my initial approach by contradiction. Thank you for your solution.
– Ryan
Jul 27 at 4:55
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
As you have used the tag number-theory, solution with modular arithmetic:
$n^2-1equiv 0pmod8$ or, $n^2equiv 1pmod8$, if $n$ is even then we need to check two cases, $n=2k$, with $(2,k)=1$ and $n=2^tcdot m$ for $tge 2$. If $n=2k$ then, $n^2equiv 4k^2equiv 1pmod8 $ implies $k^2equiv 4^-1pmod8$, as, $4$ has no inverse $pmod8$, the equation can't be satisfied with any $n=2k$ and for $tge 2$,$n=2^tcdot m,n^2equiv 0pmod8$. Now, if $n$ is odd, $$n^2equiv 4p^2+4p+1equiv 4p(p+1)+1equiv 1pmod8$$
as $p(p+1)equiv 0pmod2$ for any $pin mathbbN$. Hence done. $boxed$
1
Thank you for your response. We have not covered modular arithmetic, yet, so I am unable to comprehend your solution. I apologize for using the wrong tag and will be more careful going forward. Thanks for your solution!
– Ryan
Jul 27 at 4:31
1
@Ryan Write down all $aequiv bpmodp$ as $p$ divides $(a-b)$ and try to understand the solution. Modulo is nothing more than that.
– tarit goswami
Jul 27 at 8:42
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
Yes $8$, as an even number, cannot divide a number unless that number is even. (For the number would then be a multiple of $8$, which in turn is a multiple of $2$; so the number would be a multiple of $2$ also, that is, even)
But, as you have shown, $n$ even implies $n^2-1$ is odd.
Your proof, however, doesn't mention divisibility by $8$, and what it implies; as well as circling around unnecessarily at the end. What I mean is, once you get that $n$ is odd you should be done (no need for a contradiction heaped on top of that; it's what you wanted to prove.) But, it's beside the point, for, as I mentioned, your proof was incomplete... Hang in there and it will get easier...
Thank you for your feedback. The concepts of proof is still extremely difficult for me so thanks for the encouragement.
– Ryan
Jul 27 at 17:09
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
Assume to the contrary that n is even. That is, n = 2k for some integer k.
Then
$n^2 - 1
= (2k)^2 - 1
= 2(2k^2) - 1$
Note that this is an odd number which is clearly not divisible by 8 (an even number).
Thanks! That was my thought track, but I had a hard time translating it into a proof format. Still trying to get my head around writing a clear and concise proof.
– Ryan
Jul 27 at 17:02
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
You can also prove this by the direct approach. Notice that if $n^2-1$ is divisible by $8$, then $n^2-1=8k$ for some integer $k$. Then $n^2=8k+1=2(4k)+1$. Letting $4k=j$ gives us $n^2=2j+1$ which is an odd integer. Since $n^2$ is odd, it follows that $n$ must also be odd. (Q.E.D.)
Hope this really helps you! :)
Wow, that was such a quick and easy way! I did not even think of that. Thank you so much for your feedback.
– Ryan
Jul 27 at 5:06
1
You are welcome! :)
– user573497
Jul 27 at 5:19
add a comment |Â
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
7
down vote
In your problem, proof-by-contradiction works as follows:
(Hypothesis) Suppose 8 divides $n^2-1$.
(Assumption) Let us assume that $n$ is even.
$n$ is even $implies$ $n=2k$ for some $k in mathbbZ$
Then, $n^2-1 = (2k)^2-1$
$n^2-1 = 2(2k^2)-1 implies n^2-1 $ is an odd number.
$n^2-1$ is odd $implies$ 8 does not divide $n^2-1$.
Contradiction! That is, assuming n is even contradicts our hypothesis (i.e., $n^2-1$ is divisible by 8).
So our assumption is wrong. This means $n$ has to be odd.
Alternatively, we can prove the contrapositive (i.e., Proving $Aimplies B $ is equivalent to proving $ neg B implies neg A $ ). This works as follows in your case:
Suppose $n$ is even.
Then, $n = 2k$ for some $k in mathbbZ$
$implies$ $n^2-1 = (2k)^2-1$
$implies$ $n^2-1 = 2(2k^2)-1$
$implies$ $n^2-1$ is odd.
$implies$ $n^2-1$ is not divisible by 8.
Thus, we have proved this: $n$ is not odd $implies$ $n^2-1$ is not divisible by 8, which is equivalent to proving this: $n^2-1$ is divisible 8 $implies n$ is odd.
Great! Thank you! I've read from some other people that proof by contraposition was an 'easier' approach, but I did not want to abandon my initial approach by contradiction. Thank you for your solution.
– Ryan
Jul 27 at 4:55
add a comment |Â
up vote
7
down vote
In your problem, proof-by-contradiction works as follows:
(Hypothesis) Suppose 8 divides $n^2-1$.
(Assumption) Let us assume that $n$ is even.
$n$ is even $implies$ $n=2k$ for some $k in mathbbZ$
Then, $n^2-1 = (2k)^2-1$
$n^2-1 = 2(2k^2)-1 implies n^2-1 $ is an odd number.
$n^2-1$ is odd $implies$ 8 does not divide $n^2-1$.
Contradiction! That is, assuming n is even contradicts our hypothesis (i.e., $n^2-1$ is divisible by 8).
So our assumption is wrong. This means $n$ has to be odd.
Alternatively, we can prove the contrapositive (i.e., Proving $Aimplies B $ is equivalent to proving $ neg B implies neg A $ ). This works as follows in your case:
Suppose $n$ is even.
Then, $n = 2k$ for some $k in mathbbZ$
$implies$ $n^2-1 = (2k)^2-1$
$implies$ $n^2-1 = 2(2k^2)-1$
$implies$ $n^2-1$ is odd.
$implies$ $n^2-1$ is not divisible by 8.
Thus, we have proved this: $n$ is not odd $implies$ $n^2-1$ is not divisible by 8, which is equivalent to proving this: $n^2-1$ is divisible 8 $implies n$ is odd.
Great! Thank you! I've read from some other people that proof by contraposition was an 'easier' approach, but I did not want to abandon my initial approach by contradiction. Thank you for your solution.
– Ryan
Jul 27 at 4:55
add a comment |Â
up vote
7
down vote
up vote
7
down vote
In your problem, proof-by-contradiction works as follows:
(Hypothesis) Suppose 8 divides $n^2-1$.
(Assumption) Let us assume that $n$ is even.
$n$ is even $implies$ $n=2k$ for some $k in mathbbZ$
Then, $n^2-1 = (2k)^2-1$
$n^2-1 = 2(2k^2)-1 implies n^2-1 $ is an odd number.
$n^2-1$ is odd $implies$ 8 does not divide $n^2-1$.
Contradiction! That is, assuming n is even contradicts our hypothesis (i.e., $n^2-1$ is divisible by 8).
So our assumption is wrong. This means $n$ has to be odd.
Alternatively, we can prove the contrapositive (i.e., Proving $Aimplies B $ is equivalent to proving $ neg B implies neg A $ ). This works as follows in your case:
Suppose $n$ is even.
Then, $n = 2k$ for some $k in mathbbZ$
$implies$ $n^2-1 = (2k)^2-1$
$implies$ $n^2-1 = 2(2k^2)-1$
$implies$ $n^2-1$ is odd.
$implies$ $n^2-1$ is not divisible by 8.
Thus, we have proved this: $n$ is not odd $implies$ $n^2-1$ is not divisible by 8, which is equivalent to proving this: $n^2-1$ is divisible 8 $implies n$ is odd.
In your problem, proof-by-contradiction works as follows:
(Hypothesis) Suppose 8 divides $n^2-1$.
(Assumption) Let us assume that $n$ is even.
$n$ is even $implies$ $n=2k$ for some $k in mathbbZ$
Then, $n^2-1 = (2k)^2-1$
$n^2-1 = 2(2k^2)-1 implies n^2-1 $ is an odd number.
$n^2-1$ is odd $implies$ 8 does not divide $n^2-1$.
Contradiction! That is, assuming n is even contradicts our hypothesis (i.e., $n^2-1$ is divisible by 8).
So our assumption is wrong. This means $n$ has to be odd.
Alternatively, we can prove the contrapositive (i.e., Proving $Aimplies B $ is equivalent to proving $ neg B implies neg A $ ). This works as follows in your case:
Suppose $n$ is even.
Then, $n = 2k$ for some $k in mathbbZ$
$implies$ $n^2-1 = (2k)^2-1$
$implies$ $n^2-1 = 2(2k^2)-1$
$implies$ $n^2-1$ is odd.
$implies$ $n^2-1$ is not divisible by 8.
Thus, we have proved this: $n$ is not odd $implies$ $n^2-1$ is not divisible by 8, which is equivalent to proving this: $n^2-1$ is divisible 8 $implies n$ is odd.
answered Jul 27 at 4:51


Suhan Shetty
835
835
Great! Thank you! I've read from some other people that proof by contraposition was an 'easier' approach, but I did not want to abandon my initial approach by contradiction. Thank you for your solution.
– Ryan
Jul 27 at 4:55
add a comment |Â
Great! Thank you! I've read from some other people that proof by contraposition was an 'easier' approach, but I did not want to abandon my initial approach by contradiction. Thank you for your solution.
– Ryan
Jul 27 at 4:55
Great! Thank you! I've read from some other people that proof by contraposition was an 'easier' approach, but I did not want to abandon my initial approach by contradiction. Thank you for your solution.
– Ryan
Jul 27 at 4:55
Great! Thank you! I've read from some other people that proof by contraposition was an 'easier' approach, but I did not want to abandon my initial approach by contradiction. Thank you for your solution.
– Ryan
Jul 27 at 4:55
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
As you have used the tag number-theory, solution with modular arithmetic:
$n^2-1equiv 0pmod8$ or, $n^2equiv 1pmod8$, if $n$ is even then we need to check two cases, $n=2k$, with $(2,k)=1$ and $n=2^tcdot m$ for $tge 2$. If $n=2k$ then, $n^2equiv 4k^2equiv 1pmod8 $ implies $k^2equiv 4^-1pmod8$, as, $4$ has no inverse $pmod8$, the equation can't be satisfied with any $n=2k$ and for $tge 2$,$n=2^tcdot m,n^2equiv 0pmod8$. Now, if $n$ is odd, $$n^2equiv 4p^2+4p+1equiv 4p(p+1)+1equiv 1pmod8$$
as $p(p+1)equiv 0pmod2$ for any $pin mathbbN$. Hence done. $boxed$
1
Thank you for your response. We have not covered modular arithmetic, yet, so I am unable to comprehend your solution. I apologize for using the wrong tag and will be more careful going forward. Thanks for your solution!
– Ryan
Jul 27 at 4:31
1
@Ryan Write down all $aequiv bpmodp$ as $p$ divides $(a-b)$ and try to understand the solution. Modulo is nothing more than that.
– tarit goswami
Jul 27 at 8:42
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
As you have used the tag number-theory, solution with modular arithmetic:
$n^2-1equiv 0pmod8$ or, $n^2equiv 1pmod8$, if $n$ is even then we need to check two cases, $n=2k$, with $(2,k)=1$ and $n=2^tcdot m$ for $tge 2$. If $n=2k$ then, $n^2equiv 4k^2equiv 1pmod8 $ implies $k^2equiv 4^-1pmod8$, as, $4$ has no inverse $pmod8$, the equation can't be satisfied with any $n=2k$ and for $tge 2$,$n=2^tcdot m,n^2equiv 0pmod8$. Now, if $n$ is odd, $$n^2equiv 4p^2+4p+1equiv 4p(p+1)+1equiv 1pmod8$$
as $p(p+1)equiv 0pmod2$ for any $pin mathbbN$. Hence done. $boxed$
1
Thank you for your response. We have not covered modular arithmetic, yet, so I am unable to comprehend your solution. I apologize for using the wrong tag and will be more careful going forward. Thanks for your solution!
– Ryan
Jul 27 at 4:31
1
@Ryan Write down all $aequiv bpmodp$ as $p$ divides $(a-b)$ and try to understand the solution. Modulo is nothing more than that.
– tarit goswami
Jul 27 at 8:42
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
As you have used the tag number-theory, solution with modular arithmetic:
$n^2-1equiv 0pmod8$ or, $n^2equiv 1pmod8$, if $n$ is even then we need to check two cases, $n=2k$, with $(2,k)=1$ and $n=2^tcdot m$ for $tge 2$. If $n=2k$ then, $n^2equiv 4k^2equiv 1pmod8 $ implies $k^2equiv 4^-1pmod8$, as, $4$ has no inverse $pmod8$, the equation can't be satisfied with any $n=2k$ and for $tge 2$,$n=2^tcdot m,n^2equiv 0pmod8$. Now, if $n$ is odd, $$n^2equiv 4p^2+4p+1equiv 4p(p+1)+1equiv 1pmod8$$
as $p(p+1)equiv 0pmod2$ for any $pin mathbbN$. Hence done. $boxed$
As you have used the tag number-theory, solution with modular arithmetic:
$n^2-1equiv 0pmod8$ or, $n^2equiv 1pmod8$, if $n$ is even then we need to check two cases, $n=2k$, with $(2,k)=1$ and $n=2^tcdot m$ for $tge 2$. If $n=2k$ then, $n^2equiv 4k^2equiv 1pmod8 $ implies $k^2equiv 4^-1pmod8$, as, $4$ has no inverse $pmod8$, the equation can't be satisfied with any $n=2k$ and for $tge 2$,$n=2^tcdot m,n^2equiv 0pmod8$. Now, if $n$ is odd, $$n^2equiv 4p^2+4p+1equiv 4p(p+1)+1equiv 1pmod8$$
as $p(p+1)equiv 0pmod2$ for any $pin mathbbN$. Hence done. $boxed$
answered Jul 27 at 4:29


tarit goswami
1289
1289
1
Thank you for your response. We have not covered modular arithmetic, yet, so I am unable to comprehend your solution. I apologize for using the wrong tag and will be more careful going forward. Thanks for your solution!
– Ryan
Jul 27 at 4:31
1
@Ryan Write down all $aequiv bpmodp$ as $p$ divides $(a-b)$ and try to understand the solution. Modulo is nothing more than that.
– tarit goswami
Jul 27 at 8:42
add a comment |Â
1
Thank you for your response. We have not covered modular arithmetic, yet, so I am unable to comprehend your solution. I apologize for using the wrong tag and will be more careful going forward. Thanks for your solution!
– Ryan
Jul 27 at 4:31
1
@Ryan Write down all $aequiv bpmodp$ as $p$ divides $(a-b)$ and try to understand the solution. Modulo is nothing more than that.
– tarit goswami
Jul 27 at 8:42
1
1
Thank you for your response. We have not covered modular arithmetic, yet, so I am unable to comprehend your solution. I apologize for using the wrong tag and will be more careful going forward. Thanks for your solution!
– Ryan
Jul 27 at 4:31
Thank you for your response. We have not covered modular arithmetic, yet, so I am unable to comprehend your solution. I apologize for using the wrong tag and will be more careful going forward. Thanks for your solution!
– Ryan
Jul 27 at 4:31
1
1
@Ryan Write down all $aequiv bpmodp$ as $p$ divides $(a-b)$ and try to understand the solution. Modulo is nothing more than that.
– tarit goswami
Jul 27 at 8:42
@Ryan Write down all $aequiv bpmodp$ as $p$ divides $(a-b)$ and try to understand the solution. Modulo is nothing more than that.
– tarit goswami
Jul 27 at 8:42
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
Yes $8$, as an even number, cannot divide a number unless that number is even. (For the number would then be a multiple of $8$, which in turn is a multiple of $2$; so the number would be a multiple of $2$ also, that is, even)
But, as you have shown, $n$ even implies $n^2-1$ is odd.
Your proof, however, doesn't mention divisibility by $8$, and what it implies; as well as circling around unnecessarily at the end. What I mean is, once you get that $n$ is odd you should be done (no need for a contradiction heaped on top of that; it's what you wanted to prove.) But, it's beside the point, for, as I mentioned, your proof was incomplete... Hang in there and it will get easier...
Thank you for your feedback. The concepts of proof is still extremely difficult for me so thanks for the encouragement.
– Ryan
Jul 27 at 17:09
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
Yes $8$, as an even number, cannot divide a number unless that number is even. (For the number would then be a multiple of $8$, which in turn is a multiple of $2$; so the number would be a multiple of $2$ also, that is, even)
But, as you have shown, $n$ even implies $n^2-1$ is odd.
Your proof, however, doesn't mention divisibility by $8$, and what it implies; as well as circling around unnecessarily at the end. What I mean is, once you get that $n$ is odd you should be done (no need for a contradiction heaped on top of that; it's what you wanted to prove.) But, it's beside the point, for, as I mentioned, your proof was incomplete... Hang in there and it will get easier...
Thank you for your feedback. The concepts of proof is still extremely difficult for me so thanks for the encouragement.
– Ryan
Jul 27 at 17:09
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
Yes $8$, as an even number, cannot divide a number unless that number is even. (For the number would then be a multiple of $8$, which in turn is a multiple of $2$; so the number would be a multiple of $2$ also, that is, even)
But, as you have shown, $n$ even implies $n^2-1$ is odd.
Your proof, however, doesn't mention divisibility by $8$, and what it implies; as well as circling around unnecessarily at the end. What I mean is, once you get that $n$ is odd you should be done (no need for a contradiction heaped on top of that; it's what you wanted to prove.) But, it's beside the point, for, as I mentioned, your proof was incomplete... Hang in there and it will get easier...
Yes $8$, as an even number, cannot divide a number unless that number is even. (For the number would then be a multiple of $8$, which in turn is a multiple of $2$; so the number would be a multiple of $2$ also, that is, even)
But, as you have shown, $n$ even implies $n^2-1$ is odd.
Your proof, however, doesn't mention divisibility by $8$, and what it implies; as well as circling around unnecessarily at the end. What I mean is, once you get that $n$ is odd you should be done (no need for a contradiction heaped on top of that; it's what you wanted to prove.) But, it's beside the point, for, as I mentioned, your proof was incomplete... Hang in there and it will get easier...
edited Jul 27 at 6:20
answered Jul 27 at 5:59
Chris Custer
5,2782622
5,2782622
Thank you for your feedback. The concepts of proof is still extremely difficult for me so thanks for the encouragement.
– Ryan
Jul 27 at 17:09
add a comment |Â
Thank you for your feedback. The concepts of proof is still extremely difficult for me so thanks for the encouragement.
– Ryan
Jul 27 at 17:09
Thank you for your feedback. The concepts of proof is still extremely difficult for me so thanks for the encouragement.
– Ryan
Jul 27 at 17:09
Thank you for your feedback. The concepts of proof is still extremely difficult for me so thanks for the encouragement.
– Ryan
Jul 27 at 17:09
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
Assume to the contrary that n is even. That is, n = 2k for some integer k.
Then
$n^2 - 1
= (2k)^2 - 1
= 2(2k^2) - 1$
Note that this is an odd number which is clearly not divisible by 8 (an even number).
Thanks! That was my thought track, but I had a hard time translating it into a proof format. Still trying to get my head around writing a clear and concise proof.
– Ryan
Jul 27 at 17:02
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
Assume to the contrary that n is even. That is, n = 2k for some integer k.
Then
$n^2 - 1
= (2k)^2 - 1
= 2(2k^2) - 1$
Note that this is an odd number which is clearly not divisible by 8 (an even number).
Thanks! That was my thought track, but I had a hard time translating it into a proof format. Still trying to get my head around writing a clear and concise proof.
– Ryan
Jul 27 at 17:02
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
Assume to the contrary that n is even. That is, n = 2k for some integer k.
Then
$n^2 - 1
= (2k)^2 - 1
= 2(2k^2) - 1$
Note that this is an odd number which is clearly not divisible by 8 (an even number).
Assume to the contrary that n is even. That is, n = 2k for some integer k.
Then
$n^2 - 1
= (2k)^2 - 1
= 2(2k^2) - 1$
Note that this is an odd number which is clearly not divisible by 8 (an even number).
answered Jul 27 at 9:34
August
1,077617
1,077617
Thanks! That was my thought track, but I had a hard time translating it into a proof format. Still trying to get my head around writing a clear and concise proof.
– Ryan
Jul 27 at 17:02
add a comment |Â
Thanks! That was my thought track, but I had a hard time translating it into a proof format. Still trying to get my head around writing a clear and concise proof.
– Ryan
Jul 27 at 17:02
Thanks! That was my thought track, but I had a hard time translating it into a proof format. Still trying to get my head around writing a clear and concise proof.
– Ryan
Jul 27 at 17:02
Thanks! That was my thought track, but I had a hard time translating it into a proof format. Still trying to get my head around writing a clear and concise proof.
– Ryan
Jul 27 at 17:02
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
You can also prove this by the direct approach. Notice that if $n^2-1$ is divisible by $8$, then $n^2-1=8k$ for some integer $k$. Then $n^2=8k+1=2(4k)+1$. Letting $4k=j$ gives us $n^2=2j+1$ which is an odd integer. Since $n^2$ is odd, it follows that $n$ must also be odd. (Q.E.D.)
Hope this really helps you! :)
Wow, that was such a quick and easy way! I did not even think of that. Thank you so much for your feedback.
– Ryan
Jul 27 at 5:06
1
You are welcome! :)
– user573497
Jul 27 at 5:19
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
You can also prove this by the direct approach. Notice that if $n^2-1$ is divisible by $8$, then $n^2-1=8k$ for some integer $k$. Then $n^2=8k+1=2(4k)+1$. Letting $4k=j$ gives us $n^2=2j+1$ which is an odd integer. Since $n^2$ is odd, it follows that $n$ must also be odd. (Q.E.D.)
Hope this really helps you! :)
Wow, that was such a quick and easy way! I did not even think of that. Thank you so much for your feedback.
– Ryan
Jul 27 at 5:06
1
You are welcome! :)
– user573497
Jul 27 at 5:19
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
You can also prove this by the direct approach. Notice that if $n^2-1$ is divisible by $8$, then $n^2-1=8k$ for some integer $k$. Then $n^2=8k+1=2(4k)+1$. Letting $4k=j$ gives us $n^2=2j+1$ which is an odd integer. Since $n^2$ is odd, it follows that $n$ must also be odd. (Q.E.D.)
Hope this really helps you! :)
You can also prove this by the direct approach. Notice that if $n^2-1$ is divisible by $8$, then $n^2-1=8k$ for some integer $k$. Then $n^2=8k+1=2(4k)+1$. Letting $4k=j$ gives us $n^2=2j+1$ which is an odd integer. Since $n^2$ is odd, it follows that $n$ must also be odd. (Q.E.D.)
Hope this really helps you! :)
answered Jul 27 at 4:54
user573497
2009
2009
Wow, that was such a quick and easy way! I did not even think of that. Thank you so much for your feedback.
– Ryan
Jul 27 at 5:06
1
You are welcome! :)
– user573497
Jul 27 at 5:19
add a comment |Â
Wow, that was such a quick and easy way! I did not even think of that. Thank you so much for your feedback.
– Ryan
Jul 27 at 5:06
1
You are welcome! :)
– user573497
Jul 27 at 5:19
Wow, that was such a quick and easy way! I did not even think of that. Thank you so much for your feedback.
– Ryan
Jul 27 at 5:06
Wow, that was such a quick and easy way! I did not even think of that. Thank you so much for your feedback.
– Ryan
Jul 27 at 5:06
1
1
You are welcome! :)
– user573497
Jul 27 at 5:19
You are welcome! :)
– user573497
Jul 27 at 5:19
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2864035%2fproof-that-if-n2-1-is-divisible-by-8-then-n-is-odd%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
2
Where did you use the assumption "$n^2-1$ is divisible by $8$"? Also, how can you justify the sentence "Therefore, $n$ must be odd" ?
– Suzet
Jul 27 at 4:01
@Suzet It was unnecessary since the OP approached via contradiction.
– JMoravitz
Jul 27 at 4:02
2
@ Ryan, you could have explained better why $(2k)^2-1$ being odd implies that $8$ is not a divisor of $n^2-1$. You seem to have glossed over this step which can be fleshed out. (Note that since $2mid 8$ and supposing that $8mid n^2-1$ this should have implied something about the parity of $n^2-1$)
– JMoravitz
Jul 27 at 4:05
This contradiction shows that $n$ must atleast be odd for it to be divisible by $8$. But it doesn't guarantee that if $n$ is odd $n^2-1$ is divisible by $8$. I think the proof is ok if you only want to prove the forward implication.
– Piyush Divyanakar
Jul 27 at 4:06
@JMoravitz Actually, either the OP is proving the proposition by contraposition (where we do not have $n^2-1$ divisible by $8$), either the OP is proving it by contradiction (where we have and need to use $n^2-1$ is divisible by $8$).
– Suzet
Jul 27 at 4:06