Suppose A is a square matrix that satisfies the matrix equation $A^5 = A$. Find, with justification, all possible eigenvalues of A.

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












From what I understand, because any eigenvalue $lambda$ of A will solve the equation
$$
lambda^5=lambda\
0=(A^5−A)v=(lambda^5−λ)v
$$
Is this a sufficient answer? It seems lame to just say that any possible eigenvalue of A is the answer..







share|cite|improve this question

















  • 2




    You've left out important context. What kind of matrix is $A$? See this introduction to posting mathematical expressions.
    – hardmath
    Jul 27 at 0:10










  • All thats given in the question is that it is a square matrix. No other information is provided.
    – shroomyshroomy
    Jul 27 at 0:14














up vote
0
down vote

favorite












From what I understand, because any eigenvalue $lambda$ of A will solve the equation
$$
lambda^5=lambda\
0=(A^5−A)v=(lambda^5−λ)v
$$
Is this a sufficient answer? It seems lame to just say that any possible eigenvalue of A is the answer..







share|cite|improve this question

















  • 2




    You've left out important context. What kind of matrix is $A$? See this introduction to posting mathematical expressions.
    – hardmath
    Jul 27 at 0:10










  • All thats given in the question is that it is a square matrix. No other information is provided.
    – shroomyshroomy
    Jul 27 at 0:14












up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











From what I understand, because any eigenvalue $lambda$ of A will solve the equation
$$
lambda^5=lambda\
0=(A^5−A)v=(lambda^5−λ)v
$$
Is this a sufficient answer? It seems lame to just say that any possible eigenvalue of A is the answer..







share|cite|improve this question













From what I understand, because any eigenvalue $lambda$ of A will solve the equation
$$
lambda^5=lambda\
0=(A^5−A)v=(lambda^5−λ)v
$$
Is this a sufficient answer? It seems lame to just say that any possible eigenvalue of A is the answer..









share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 27 at 0:10









gt6989b

30.2k22148




30.2k22148









asked Jul 27 at 0:00









shroomyshroomy

91




91







  • 2




    You've left out important context. What kind of matrix is $A$? See this introduction to posting mathematical expressions.
    – hardmath
    Jul 27 at 0:10










  • All thats given in the question is that it is a square matrix. No other information is provided.
    – shroomyshroomy
    Jul 27 at 0:14












  • 2




    You've left out important context. What kind of matrix is $A$? See this introduction to posting mathematical expressions.
    – hardmath
    Jul 27 at 0:10










  • All thats given in the question is that it is a square matrix. No other information is provided.
    – shroomyshroomy
    Jul 27 at 0:14







2




2




You've left out important context. What kind of matrix is $A$? See this introduction to posting mathematical expressions.
– hardmath
Jul 27 at 0:10




You've left out important context. What kind of matrix is $A$? See this introduction to posting mathematical expressions.
– hardmath
Jul 27 at 0:10












All thats given in the question is that it is a square matrix. No other information is provided.
– shroomyshroomy
Jul 27 at 0:14




All thats given in the question is that it is a square matrix. No other information is provided.
– shroomyshroomy
Jul 27 at 0:14










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote













Certainly, assuming $v$ is an eigenvector, you have $v ne vec0$, thus you must have
$$
0 = lambda^5 - lambda = lambdaleft(lambda^4 - 1right)
= lambdaleft(lambda^2 - 1right)left(lambda^2 + 1right),
$$
which easily factorizes further... Can you finish this?






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • so setting λ(λ^2−1)(λ^2+1)=0 we could solve for lambda = 0, or +/- 1?
    – shroomyshroomy
    Jul 27 at 0:21











  • @shroomyshroomy: there are two more roots than that. They are complex, but that is no problem. I am sure you are expected to find them as well.
    – Ross Millikan
    Jul 27 at 0:24










  • thats where you lose me.. I can factor to ) but im unsure what other complex roots one could find λ(λ−1)(λ+1)(λ^2+1)=0
    – shroomyshroomy
    Jul 27 at 0:29







  • 1




    Is there a way to verify with just the information given? This practice problem is from an old exam that weights it as 4/100 exam total points for reference. Most questions worth ~10-15 marks each. Seems like it should be a quick little answer type q
    – shroomyshroomy
    Jul 27 at 0:32






  • 1




    For a $4-$point question, I'm sure you would just be expected to answer $0, pm 1, pm i$
    – saulspatz
    Jul 27 at 1:26










Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2863937%2fsuppose-a-is-a-square-matrix-that-satisfies-the-matrix-equation-a5-a-find%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
1
down vote













Certainly, assuming $v$ is an eigenvector, you have $v ne vec0$, thus you must have
$$
0 = lambda^5 - lambda = lambdaleft(lambda^4 - 1right)
= lambdaleft(lambda^2 - 1right)left(lambda^2 + 1right),
$$
which easily factorizes further... Can you finish this?






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • so setting λ(λ^2−1)(λ^2+1)=0 we could solve for lambda = 0, or +/- 1?
    – shroomyshroomy
    Jul 27 at 0:21











  • @shroomyshroomy: there are two more roots than that. They are complex, but that is no problem. I am sure you are expected to find them as well.
    – Ross Millikan
    Jul 27 at 0:24










  • thats where you lose me.. I can factor to ) but im unsure what other complex roots one could find λ(λ−1)(λ+1)(λ^2+1)=0
    – shroomyshroomy
    Jul 27 at 0:29







  • 1




    Is there a way to verify with just the information given? This practice problem is from an old exam that weights it as 4/100 exam total points for reference. Most questions worth ~10-15 marks each. Seems like it should be a quick little answer type q
    – shroomyshroomy
    Jul 27 at 0:32






  • 1




    For a $4-$point question, I'm sure you would just be expected to answer $0, pm 1, pm i$
    – saulspatz
    Jul 27 at 1:26














up vote
1
down vote













Certainly, assuming $v$ is an eigenvector, you have $v ne vec0$, thus you must have
$$
0 = lambda^5 - lambda = lambdaleft(lambda^4 - 1right)
= lambdaleft(lambda^2 - 1right)left(lambda^2 + 1right),
$$
which easily factorizes further... Can you finish this?






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • so setting λ(λ^2−1)(λ^2+1)=0 we could solve for lambda = 0, or +/- 1?
    – shroomyshroomy
    Jul 27 at 0:21











  • @shroomyshroomy: there are two more roots than that. They are complex, but that is no problem. I am sure you are expected to find them as well.
    – Ross Millikan
    Jul 27 at 0:24










  • thats where you lose me.. I can factor to ) but im unsure what other complex roots one could find λ(λ−1)(λ+1)(λ^2+1)=0
    – shroomyshroomy
    Jul 27 at 0:29







  • 1




    Is there a way to verify with just the information given? This practice problem is from an old exam that weights it as 4/100 exam total points for reference. Most questions worth ~10-15 marks each. Seems like it should be a quick little answer type q
    – shroomyshroomy
    Jul 27 at 0:32






  • 1




    For a $4-$point question, I'm sure you would just be expected to answer $0, pm 1, pm i$
    – saulspatz
    Jul 27 at 1:26












up vote
1
down vote










up vote
1
down vote









Certainly, assuming $v$ is an eigenvector, you have $v ne vec0$, thus you must have
$$
0 = lambda^5 - lambda = lambdaleft(lambda^4 - 1right)
= lambdaleft(lambda^2 - 1right)left(lambda^2 + 1right),
$$
which easily factorizes further... Can you finish this?






share|cite|improve this answer













Certainly, assuming $v$ is an eigenvector, you have $v ne vec0$, thus you must have
$$
0 = lambda^5 - lambda = lambdaleft(lambda^4 - 1right)
= lambdaleft(lambda^2 - 1right)left(lambda^2 + 1right),
$$
which easily factorizes further... Can you finish this?







share|cite|improve this answer













share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer











answered Jul 27 at 0:13









gt6989b

30.2k22148




30.2k22148











  • so setting λ(λ^2−1)(λ^2+1)=0 we could solve for lambda = 0, or +/- 1?
    – shroomyshroomy
    Jul 27 at 0:21











  • @shroomyshroomy: there are two more roots than that. They are complex, but that is no problem. I am sure you are expected to find them as well.
    – Ross Millikan
    Jul 27 at 0:24










  • thats where you lose me.. I can factor to ) but im unsure what other complex roots one could find λ(λ−1)(λ+1)(λ^2+1)=0
    – shroomyshroomy
    Jul 27 at 0:29







  • 1




    Is there a way to verify with just the information given? This practice problem is from an old exam that weights it as 4/100 exam total points for reference. Most questions worth ~10-15 marks each. Seems like it should be a quick little answer type q
    – shroomyshroomy
    Jul 27 at 0:32






  • 1




    For a $4-$point question, I'm sure you would just be expected to answer $0, pm 1, pm i$
    – saulspatz
    Jul 27 at 1:26
















  • so setting λ(λ^2−1)(λ^2+1)=0 we could solve for lambda = 0, or +/- 1?
    – shroomyshroomy
    Jul 27 at 0:21











  • @shroomyshroomy: there are two more roots than that. They are complex, but that is no problem. I am sure you are expected to find them as well.
    – Ross Millikan
    Jul 27 at 0:24










  • thats where you lose me.. I can factor to ) but im unsure what other complex roots one could find λ(λ−1)(λ+1)(λ^2+1)=0
    – shroomyshroomy
    Jul 27 at 0:29







  • 1




    Is there a way to verify with just the information given? This practice problem is from an old exam that weights it as 4/100 exam total points for reference. Most questions worth ~10-15 marks each. Seems like it should be a quick little answer type q
    – shroomyshroomy
    Jul 27 at 0:32






  • 1




    For a $4-$point question, I'm sure you would just be expected to answer $0, pm 1, pm i$
    – saulspatz
    Jul 27 at 1:26















so setting λ(λ^2−1)(λ^2+1)=0 we could solve for lambda = 0, or +/- 1?
– shroomyshroomy
Jul 27 at 0:21





so setting λ(λ^2−1)(λ^2+1)=0 we could solve for lambda = 0, or +/- 1?
– shroomyshroomy
Jul 27 at 0:21













@shroomyshroomy: there are two more roots than that. They are complex, but that is no problem. I am sure you are expected to find them as well.
– Ross Millikan
Jul 27 at 0:24




@shroomyshroomy: there are two more roots than that. They are complex, but that is no problem. I am sure you are expected to find them as well.
– Ross Millikan
Jul 27 at 0:24












thats where you lose me.. I can factor to ) but im unsure what other complex roots one could find λ(λ−1)(λ+1)(λ^2+1)=0
– shroomyshroomy
Jul 27 at 0:29





thats where you lose me.. I can factor to ) but im unsure what other complex roots one could find λ(λ−1)(λ+1)(λ^2+1)=0
– shroomyshroomy
Jul 27 at 0:29





1




1




Is there a way to verify with just the information given? This practice problem is from an old exam that weights it as 4/100 exam total points for reference. Most questions worth ~10-15 marks each. Seems like it should be a quick little answer type q
– shroomyshroomy
Jul 27 at 0:32




Is there a way to verify with just the information given? This practice problem is from an old exam that weights it as 4/100 exam total points for reference. Most questions worth ~10-15 marks each. Seems like it should be a quick little answer type q
– shroomyshroomy
Jul 27 at 0:32




1




1




For a $4-$point question, I'm sure you would just be expected to answer $0, pm 1, pm i$
– saulspatz
Jul 27 at 1:26




For a $4-$point question, I'm sure you would just be expected to answer $0, pm 1, pm i$
– saulspatz
Jul 27 at 1:26












 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2863937%2fsuppose-a-is-a-square-matrix-that-satisfies-the-matrix-equation-a5-a-find%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?