What is an $F$-rational section of a line bundle?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Let $X$ be an algebraic variety over a field $F$. What is the definition of an ``$F$-rational section" of a line bundle? I can't find any references for this notion.
algebraic-geometry
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Let $X$ be an algebraic variety over a field $F$. What is the definition of an ``$F$-rational section" of a line bundle? I can't find any references for this notion.
algebraic-geometry
1
It might help if you could give some context - but I suspect here it's saying you have a morphism of $F$-schemes $Xrightarrow L$ (i.e. a section in the usual sense). The reason for this distinction, at least in the context I've seen, is that sometimes people work after base changing to the algebraic closure.
– loch
Jul 26 at 0:02
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Let $X$ be an algebraic variety over a field $F$. What is the definition of an ``$F$-rational section" of a line bundle? I can't find any references for this notion.
algebraic-geometry
Let $X$ be an algebraic variety over a field $F$. What is the definition of an ``$F$-rational section" of a line bundle? I can't find any references for this notion.
algebraic-geometry
asked Jul 25 at 21:50
Mehta
34519
34519
1
It might help if you could give some context - but I suspect here it's saying you have a morphism of $F$-schemes $Xrightarrow L$ (i.e. a section in the usual sense). The reason for this distinction, at least in the context I've seen, is that sometimes people work after base changing to the algebraic closure.
– loch
Jul 26 at 0:02
add a comment |Â
1
It might help if you could give some context - but I suspect here it's saying you have a morphism of $F$-schemes $Xrightarrow L$ (i.e. a section in the usual sense). The reason for this distinction, at least in the context I've seen, is that sometimes people work after base changing to the algebraic closure.
– loch
Jul 26 at 0:02
1
1
It might help if you could give some context - but I suspect here it's saying you have a morphism of $F$-schemes $Xrightarrow L$ (i.e. a section in the usual sense). The reason for this distinction, at least in the context I've seen, is that sometimes people work after base changing to the algebraic closure.
– loch
Jul 26 at 0:02
It might help if you could give some context - but I suspect here it's saying you have a morphism of $F$-schemes $Xrightarrow L$ (i.e. a section in the usual sense). The reason for this distinction, at least in the context I've seen, is that sometimes people work after base changing to the algebraic closure.
– loch
Jul 26 at 0:02
add a comment |Â
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Â
draft saved
draft discarded
Â
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2862855%2fwhat-is-an-f-rational-section-of-a-line-bundle%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
1
It might help if you could give some context - but I suspect here it's saying you have a morphism of $F$-schemes $Xrightarrow L$ (i.e. a section in the usual sense). The reason for this distinction, at least in the context I've seen, is that sometimes people work after base changing to the algebraic closure.
– loch
Jul 26 at 0:02