Why variance is not squared before scaling for rolling dice problem?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I am trying to calculate mean $E[Y]$ and variance $Var[Y]$ of sums, when rolling a dice of 6 outcomes $(1,2,3,4,5,6)$, 10 times. I get the mean as below.



Mean of sums for 10 tosses



$
Y = 10X, \ \
E[Y] = E[10X] = 10E[X] \ \
E[X] = 1 frac16 + 2 frac16 + 3 frac16 + 4 frac16 + 5 frac16 + 6 frac16
= frac216 = 3.5 \ \
E[Y] = 10E[X] = 10(3.5) = 35 \ \
$



Variance for 10 tosses



Here I thought as follows.

$
Var[Y] = Var[10X] = 10^2Var[X] = 100Var[X] \
Var[X] = frac(1-3.5)^26 + frac(2-3.5)^26 + frac(3-3.5)^26 + frac(4-3.5)^26 + frac(5-3.5)^26 + frac(6-3.5)^26 \
= 2.91 \
Var[Y] = 100(2.91) = 291
$



However as per here, Variance is



$
Var[Y] = 10Var[X] = 10(2.91) = 29.1
$



because each throw is an independent event. I also verified statistically this being correct.



Questions:

1. If each throw is an independent event, then mean would have been $E[X_1 + X_2 + cdot + X_10]$, Isn't it? I could not imagine how $E[X_1] = frac 106$ and so on?

2. I am confused when to apply scaling $E[aX]$ or $E[X_1 + X_2 + cdot + X_10]$. Because, this affects variance as above, while both assumption for mean might result in same value. Kindly clarify.







share|cite|improve this question

























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    I am trying to calculate mean $E[Y]$ and variance $Var[Y]$ of sums, when rolling a dice of 6 outcomes $(1,2,3,4,5,6)$, 10 times. I get the mean as below.



    Mean of sums for 10 tosses



    $
    Y = 10X, \ \
    E[Y] = E[10X] = 10E[X] \ \
    E[X] = 1 frac16 + 2 frac16 + 3 frac16 + 4 frac16 + 5 frac16 + 6 frac16
    = frac216 = 3.5 \ \
    E[Y] = 10E[X] = 10(3.5) = 35 \ \
    $



    Variance for 10 tosses



    Here I thought as follows.

    $
    Var[Y] = Var[10X] = 10^2Var[X] = 100Var[X] \
    Var[X] = frac(1-3.5)^26 + frac(2-3.5)^26 + frac(3-3.5)^26 + frac(4-3.5)^26 + frac(5-3.5)^26 + frac(6-3.5)^26 \
    = 2.91 \
    Var[Y] = 100(2.91) = 291
    $



    However as per here, Variance is



    $
    Var[Y] = 10Var[X] = 10(2.91) = 29.1
    $



    because each throw is an independent event. I also verified statistically this being correct.



    Questions:

    1. If each throw is an independent event, then mean would have been $E[X_1 + X_2 + cdot + X_10]$, Isn't it? I could not imagine how $E[X_1] = frac 106$ and so on?

    2. I am confused when to apply scaling $E[aX]$ or $E[X_1 + X_2 + cdot + X_10]$. Because, this affects variance as above, while both assumption for mean might result in same value. Kindly clarify.







    share|cite|improve this question























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      I am trying to calculate mean $E[Y]$ and variance $Var[Y]$ of sums, when rolling a dice of 6 outcomes $(1,2,3,4,5,6)$, 10 times. I get the mean as below.



      Mean of sums for 10 tosses



      $
      Y = 10X, \ \
      E[Y] = E[10X] = 10E[X] \ \
      E[X] = 1 frac16 + 2 frac16 + 3 frac16 + 4 frac16 + 5 frac16 + 6 frac16
      = frac216 = 3.5 \ \
      E[Y] = 10E[X] = 10(3.5) = 35 \ \
      $



      Variance for 10 tosses



      Here I thought as follows.

      $
      Var[Y] = Var[10X] = 10^2Var[X] = 100Var[X] \
      Var[X] = frac(1-3.5)^26 + frac(2-3.5)^26 + frac(3-3.5)^26 + frac(4-3.5)^26 + frac(5-3.5)^26 + frac(6-3.5)^26 \
      = 2.91 \
      Var[Y] = 100(2.91) = 291
      $



      However as per here, Variance is



      $
      Var[Y] = 10Var[X] = 10(2.91) = 29.1
      $



      because each throw is an independent event. I also verified statistically this being correct.



      Questions:

      1. If each throw is an independent event, then mean would have been $E[X_1 + X_2 + cdot + X_10]$, Isn't it? I could not imagine how $E[X_1] = frac 106$ and so on?

      2. I am confused when to apply scaling $E[aX]$ or $E[X_1 + X_2 + cdot + X_10]$. Because, this affects variance as above, while both assumption for mean might result in same value. Kindly clarify.







      share|cite|improve this question













      I am trying to calculate mean $E[Y]$ and variance $Var[Y]$ of sums, when rolling a dice of 6 outcomes $(1,2,3,4,5,6)$, 10 times. I get the mean as below.



      Mean of sums for 10 tosses



      $
      Y = 10X, \ \
      E[Y] = E[10X] = 10E[X] \ \
      E[X] = 1 frac16 + 2 frac16 + 3 frac16 + 4 frac16 + 5 frac16 + 6 frac16
      = frac216 = 3.5 \ \
      E[Y] = 10E[X] = 10(3.5) = 35 \ \
      $



      Variance for 10 tosses



      Here I thought as follows.

      $
      Var[Y] = Var[10X] = 10^2Var[X] = 100Var[X] \
      Var[X] = frac(1-3.5)^26 + frac(2-3.5)^26 + frac(3-3.5)^26 + frac(4-3.5)^26 + frac(5-3.5)^26 + frac(6-3.5)^26 \
      = 2.91 \
      Var[Y] = 100(2.91) = 291
      $



      However as per here, Variance is



      $
      Var[Y] = 10Var[X] = 10(2.91) = 29.1
      $



      because each throw is an independent event. I also verified statistically this being correct.



      Questions:

      1. If each throw is an independent event, then mean would have been $E[X_1 + X_2 + cdot + X_10]$, Isn't it? I could not imagine how $E[X_1] = frac 106$ and so on?

      2. I am confused when to apply scaling $E[aX]$ or $E[X_1 + X_2 + cdot + X_10]$. Because, this affects variance as above, while both assumption for mean might result in same value. Kindly clarify.









      share|cite|improve this question












      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Aug 3 at 17:33
























      asked Aug 3 at 15:00









      Paari Vendhan

      355




      355




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          3
          down vote



          accepted










          The error here is right at the beginning: it's actually not true that $Y = 10X$. That would be equivalent to rolling one die and multiplying the result by $10$, which is quite a different process than rolling ten dice and taking their sum. (Proof: The probability that [the sum of ten dice is $10$] is $6^-10$, but the probability that [a single die rolled multiplied by $10$ is $10$] is $1/6$.)



          What you really want here is $Y = sum_i=1^10 X_i$, where the $X_i$ represent independent die rolls. From here, it follows that
          $$operatornameVar(Y) = operatornameVar left( sum_i=1^10 X_i right) = sum_i=1^10 operatornameVar(X_i) = sum_i=1^10 2.91 = 29.1.$$



          EDIT: Oops, I forgot to answer your questions at the end as well!



          1. Means are additive, yes.

          2. Apply scaling only when you are genuinely multiplying a random variable by something, which is distinct from taking a sum. An example of a genuine scaling problem is, for instance, if you were to take the result of a die roll and double it (as opposed to rolling two dice and adding their results).





          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Great but Mean would be same for both $Y=10X$ and $Y = sumlimits_i=1^10X_i$ ? So both scaling and independent rolls have same mean, still probability variations different?
            – Paari Vendhan
            Aug 3 at 17:37











          • Yes, it's true that means do scale and add in the obvious way -- but the scaling and adding have differing effects on variances. Put another way: $mathbb E[10 X] = 10 mathbb E[X]$, and $mathbb E[sum X_i] = sum mathbb E[X_i]$.
            – Aaron Montgomery
            Aug 3 at 17:39











          • I did not understand " The probability that [the sum of ten dice is 10] is $6^−10$, but the probability that [a single die rolled multiplied by 10 is 10] is $frac16$.)". Can you kindly elaborate on that.
            – Paari Vendhan
            Aug 3 at 17:44











          • First, roll ten dice and add their values. You'll get a sum of $10$ if and only if all ten dice came up $1$, and since each die is independent, the probability of this is $frac 1 6 cdot frac 1 6 cdots frac 1 6 = 6^-10$. On the other hand, roll one die and multiply its result by 10. That value will be 10 if and only if the die originally came up a 1, which will occur $frac 1 6$ of the time.
            – Aaron Montgomery
            Aug 3 at 17:46










          • And do we have any derived formula like we have $np$ and $npq$ as mean and variance for many coin flips?
            – Paari Vendhan
            Aug 3 at 17:50










          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );








           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2871176%2fwhy-variance-is-not-squared-before-scaling-for-rolling-dice-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          3
          down vote



          accepted










          The error here is right at the beginning: it's actually not true that $Y = 10X$. That would be equivalent to rolling one die and multiplying the result by $10$, which is quite a different process than rolling ten dice and taking their sum. (Proof: The probability that [the sum of ten dice is $10$] is $6^-10$, but the probability that [a single die rolled multiplied by $10$ is $10$] is $1/6$.)



          What you really want here is $Y = sum_i=1^10 X_i$, where the $X_i$ represent independent die rolls. From here, it follows that
          $$operatornameVar(Y) = operatornameVar left( sum_i=1^10 X_i right) = sum_i=1^10 operatornameVar(X_i) = sum_i=1^10 2.91 = 29.1.$$



          EDIT: Oops, I forgot to answer your questions at the end as well!



          1. Means are additive, yes.

          2. Apply scaling only when you are genuinely multiplying a random variable by something, which is distinct from taking a sum. An example of a genuine scaling problem is, for instance, if you were to take the result of a die roll and double it (as opposed to rolling two dice and adding their results).





          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Great but Mean would be same for both $Y=10X$ and $Y = sumlimits_i=1^10X_i$ ? So both scaling and independent rolls have same mean, still probability variations different?
            – Paari Vendhan
            Aug 3 at 17:37











          • Yes, it's true that means do scale and add in the obvious way -- but the scaling and adding have differing effects on variances. Put another way: $mathbb E[10 X] = 10 mathbb E[X]$, and $mathbb E[sum X_i] = sum mathbb E[X_i]$.
            – Aaron Montgomery
            Aug 3 at 17:39











          • I did not understand " The probability that [the sum of ten dice is 10] is $6^−10$, but the probability that [a single die rolled multiplied by 10 is 10] is $frac16$.)". Can you kindly elaborate on that.
            – Paari Vendhan
            Aug 3 at 17:44











          • First, roll ten dice and add their values. You'll get a sum of $10$ if and only if all ten dice came up $1$, and since each die is independent, the probability of this is $frac 1 6 cdot frac 1 6 cdots frac 1 6 = 6^-10$. On the other hand, roll one die and multiply its result by 10. That value will be 10 if and only if the die originally came up a 1, which will occur $frac 1 6$ of the time.
            – Aaron Montgomery
            Aug 3 at 17:46










          • And do we have any derived formula like we have $np$ and $npq$ as mean and variance for many coin flips?
            – Paari Vendhan
            Aug 3 at 17:50














          up vote
          3
          down vote



          accepted










          The error here is right at the beginning: it's actually not true that $Y = 10X$. That would be equivalent to rolling one die and multiplying the result by $10$, which is quite a different process than rolling ten dice and taking their sum. (Proof: The probability that [the sum of ten dice is $10$] is $6^-10$, but the probability that [a single die rolled multiplied by $10$ is $10$] is $1/6$.)



          What you really want here is $Y = sum_i=1^10 X_i$, where the $X_i$ represent independent die rolls. From here, it follows that
          $$operatornameVar(Y) = operatornameVar left( sum_i=1^10 X_i right) = sum_i=1^10 operatornameVar(X_i) = sum_i=1^10 2.91 = 29.1.$$



          EDIT: Oops, I forgot to answer your questions at the end as well!



          1. Means are additive, yes.

          2. Apply scaling only when you are genuinely multiplying a random variable by something, which is distinct from taking a sum. An example of a genuine scaling problem is, for instance, if you were to take the result of a die roll and double it (as opposed to rolling two dice and adding their results).





          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Great but Mean would be same for both $Y=10X$ and $Y = sumlimits_i=1^10X_i$ ? So both scaling and independent rolls have same mean, still probability variations different?
            – Paari Vendhan
            Aug 3 at 17:37











          • Yes, it's true that means do scale and add in the obvious way -- but the scaling and adding have differing effects on variances. Put another way: $mathbb E[10 X] = 10 mathbb E[X]$, and $mathbb E[sum X_i] = sum mathbb E[X_i]$.
            – Aaron Montgomery
            Aug 3 at 17:39











          • I did not understand " The probability that [the sum of ten dice is 10] is $6^−10$, but the probability that [a single die rolled multiplied by 10 is 10] is $frac16$.)". Can you kindly elaborate on that.
            – Paari Vendhan
            Aug 3 at 17:44











          • First, roll ten dice and add their values. You'll get a sum of $10$ if and only if all ten dice came up $1$, and since each die is independent, the probability of this is $frac 1 6 cdot frac 1 6 cdots frac 1 6 = 6^-10$. On the other hand, roll one die and multiply its result by 10. That value will be 10 if and only if the die originally came up a 1, which will occur $frac 1 6$ of the time.
            – Aaron Montgomery
            Aug 3 at 17:46










          • And do we have any derived formula like we have $np$ and $npq$ as mean and variance for many coin flips?
            – Paari Vendhan
            Aug 3 at 17:50












          up vote
          3
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          3
          down vote



          accepted






          The error here is right at the beginning: it's actually not true that $Y = 10X$. That would be equivalent to rolling one die and multiplying the result by $10$, which is quite a different process than rolling ten dice and taking their sum. (Proof: The probability that [the sum of ten dice is $10$] is $6^-10$, but the probability that [a single die rolled multiplied by $10$ is $10$] is $1/6$.)



          What you really want here is $Y = sum_i=1^10 X_i$, where the $X_i$ represent independent die rolls. From here, it follows that
          $$operatornameVar(Y) = operatornameVar left( sum_i=1^10 X_i right) = sum_i=1^10 operatornameVar(X_i) = sum_i=1^10 2.91 = 29.1.$$



          EDIT: Oops, I forgot to answer your questions at the end as well!



          1. Means are additive, yes.

          2. Apply scaling only when you are genuinely multiplying a random variable by something, which is distinct from taking a sum. An example of a genuine scaling problem is, for instance, if you were to take the result of a die roll and double it (as opposed to rolling two dice and adding their results).





          share|cite|improve this answer















          The error here is right at the beginning: it's actually not true that $Y = 10X$. That would be equivalent to rolling one die and multiplying the result by $10$, which is quite a different process than rolling ten dice and taking their sum. (Proof: The probability that [the sum of ten dice is $10$] is $6^-10$, but the probability that [a single die rolled multiplied by $10$ is $10$] is $1/6$.)



          What you really want here is $Y = sum_i=1^10 X_i$, where the $X_i$ represent independent die rolls. From here, it follows that
          $$operatornameVar(Y) = operatornameVar left( sum_i=1^10 X_i right) = sum_i=1^10 operatornameVar(X_i) = sum_i=1^10 2.91 = 29.1.$$



          EDIT: Oops, I forgot to answer your questions at the end as well!



          1. Means are additive, yes.

          2. Apply scaling only when you are genuinely multiplying a random variable by something, which is distinct from taking a sum. An example of a genuine scaling problem is, for instance, if you were to take the result of a die roll and double it (as opposed to rolling two dice and adding their results).






          share|cite|improve this answer















          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Aug 3 at 16:08


























          answered Aug 3 at 15:17









          Aaron Montgomery

          4,217423




          4,217423











          • Great but Mean would be same for both $Y=10X$ and $Y = sumlimits_i=1^10X_i$ ? So both scaling and independent rolls have same mean, still probability variations different?
            – Paari Vendhan
            Aug 3 at 17:37











          • Yes, it's true that means do scale and add in the obvious way -- but the scaling and adding have differing effects on variances. Put another way: $mathbb E[10 X] = 10 mathbb E[X]$, and $mathbb E[sum X_i] = sum mathbb E[X_i]$.
            – Aaron Montgomery
            Aug 3 at 17:39











          • I did not understand " The probability that [the sum of ten dice is 10] is $6^−10$, but the probability that [a single die rolled multiplied by 10 is 10] is $frac16$.)". Can you kindly elaborate on that.
            – Paari Vendhan
            Aug 3 at 17:44











          • First, roll ten dice and add their values. You'll get a sum of $10$ if and only if all ten dice came up $1$, and since each die is independent, the probability of this is $frac 1 6 cdot frac 1 6 cdots frac 1 6 = 6^-10$. On the other hand, roll one die and multiply its result by 10. That value will be 10 if and only if the die originally came up a 1, which will occur $frac 1 6$ of the time.
            – Aaron Montgomery
            Aug 3 at 17:46










          • And do we have any derived formula like we have $np$ and $npq$ as mean and variance for many coin flips?
            – Paari Vendhan
            Aug 3 at 17:50
















          • Great but Mean would be same for both $Y=10X$ and $Y = sumlimits_i=1^10X_i$ ? So both scaling and independent rolls have same mean, still probability variations different?
            – Paari Vendhan
            Aug 3 at 17:37











          • Yes, it's true that means do scale and add in the obvious way -- but the scaling and adding have differing effects on variances. Put another way: $mathbb E[10 X] = 10 mathbb E[X]$, and $mathbb E[sum X_i] = sum mathbb E[X_i]$.
            – Aaron Montgomery
            Aug 3 at 17:39











          • I did not understand " The probability that [the sum of ten dice is 10] is $6^−10$, but the probability that [a single die rolled multiplied by 10 is 10] is $frac16$.)". Can you kindly elaborate on that.
            – Paari Vendhan
            Aug 3 at 17:44











          • First, roll ten dice and add their values. You'll get a sum of $10$ if and only if all ten dice came up $1$, and since each die is independent, the probability of this is $frac 1 6 cdot frac 1 6 cdots frac 1 6 = 6^-10$. On the other hand, roll one die and multiply its result by 10. That value will be 10 if and only if the die originally came up a 1, which will occur $frac 1 6$ of the time.
            – Aaron Montgomery
            Aug 3 at 17:46










          • And do we have any derived formula like we have $np$ and $npq$ as mean and variance for many coin flips?
            – Paari Vendhan
            Aug 3 at 17:50















          Great but Mean would be same for both $Y=10X$ and $Y = sumlimits_i=1^10X_i$ ? So both scaling and independent rolls have same mean, still probability variations different?
          – Paari Vendhan
          Aug 3 at 17:37





          Great but Mean would be same for both $Y=10X$ and $Y = sumlimits_i=1^10X_i$ ? So both scaling and independent rolls have same mean, still probability variations different?
          – Paari Vendhan
          Aug 3 at 17:37













          Yes, it's true that means do scale and add in the obvious way -- but the scaling and adding have differing effects on variances. Put another way: $mathbb E[10 X] = 10 mathbb E[X]$, and $mathbb E[sum X_i] = sum mathbb E[X_i]$.
          – Aaron Montgomery
          Aug 3 at 17:39





          Yes, it's true that means do scale and add in the obvious way -- but the scaling and adding have differing effects on variances. Put another way: $mathbb E[10 X] = 10 mathbb E[X]$, and $mathbb E[sum X_i] = sum mathbb E[X_i]$.
          – Aaron Montgomery
          Aug 3 at 17:39













          I did not understand " The probability that [the sum of ten dice is 10] is $6^−10$, but the probability that [a single die rolled multiplied by 10 is 10] is $frac16$.)". Can you kindly elaborate on that.
          – Paari Vendhan
          Aug 3 at 17:44





          I did not understand " The probability that [the sum of ten dice is 10] is $6^−10$, but the probability that [a single die rolled multiplied by 10 is 10] is $frac16$.)". Can you kindly elaborate on that.
          – Paari Vendhan
          Aug 3 at 17:44













          First, roll ten dice and add their values. You'll get a sum of $10$ if and only if all ten dice came up $1$, and since each die is independent, the probability of this is $frac 1 6 cdot frac 1 6 cdots frac 1 6 = 6^-10$. On the other hand, roll one die and multiply its result by 10. That value will be 10 if and only if the die originally came up a 1, which will occur $frac 1 6$ of the time.
          – Aaron Montgomery
          Aug 3 at 17:46




          First, roll ten dice and add their values. You'll get a sum of $10$ if and only if all ten dice came up $1$, and since each die is independent, the probability of this is $frac 1 6 cdot frac 1 6 cdots frac 1 6 = 6^-10$. On the other hand, roll one die and multiply its result by 10. That value will be 10 if and only if the die originally came up a 1, which will occur $frac 1 6$ of the time.
          – Aaron Montgomery
          Aug 3 at 17:46












          And do we have any derived formula like we have $np$ and $npq$ as mean and variance for many coin flips?
          – Paari Vendhan
          Aug 3 at 17:50




          And do we have any derived formula like we have $np$ and $npq$ as mean and variance for many coin flips?
          – Paari Vendhan
          Aug 3 at 17:50












           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


























           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2871176%2fwhy-variance-is-not-squared-before-scaling-for-rolling-dice-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          Comments

          Popular posts from this blog

          What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

          Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

          Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?