A Formula of Orthogonal Curvilinear Coordinate Systems

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Let $(u_1,u_2,u_3)$ represent the three coordinates in a general curvilinear system in $mathbbR^3$, and let $mathbfe_i$ be the unit vector that points the direction of increasing $u_i$. Let $mathbfe_i cdot mathbfe_j=delta_ij$, and $mathbfe_itimesmathbfe_j=varepsilon_ijkmathbfe_k$ for $i,j,k=1,2,3$. For any $mathbfr$ in $mathbbR^3$, let $fracpartial mathbfrpartial u_i=h_imathbfe_i$, where $h_i$ is the scale vector. We then have $dr^2=(sum_i=1^3 h_idu_i)^2$. This is called orthogonal curvilinear coordinate system. Moreover, by making use of $nabla u_i=h_i^-1mathbfe_i$, we can write the operator $nabla$ as $nabla=sum_i=1^3 mathbfe_i h_i^-1fracpartialpartial u_i$. Then, the gradient formula for the orthogonal curvilinear system is obvious.



We have some tricks to obtain the divergence and curl formulas in the orthognal curvilinear system. For example, we may use the relation $nablacdotleft(fracmathbfe_1h_2h_3right)=nablacdot(nabla mathbfe_2timesnablamathbfe_3)=0$ to obtain the divergence formula. However, we may consider a direct approach: Compute the derivative of a unit vector against a coordinate, i.e., compute the value of $fracpartial mathbfe_jpartial u_i$. If $i=j$, by noticing $fracpartial mathbfe_ipartial u_i=varepsilon_ijkfracpartial(mathbfe_jtimesmathbfe_k)partial u_i$, it suffices to compute $fracpartial mathbfe_jpartial u_i$ for $jneq i$. Actually, there is a simple formula about it: For $jneq i$, $fracpartial mathbfe_jpartial u_i=h_j^-1fracpartial h_ipartial u_jmathbfe_i$. My question is how to derive this formula.







share|cite|improve this question























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    Let $(u_1,u_2,u_3)$ represent the three coordinates in a general curvilinear system in $mathbbR^3$, and let $mathbfe_i$ be the unit vector that points the direction of increasing $u_i$. Let $mathbfe_i cdot mathbfe_j=delta_ij$, and $mathbfe_itimesmathbfe_j=varepsilon_ijkmathbfe_k$ for $i,j,k=1,2,3$. For any $mathbfr$ in $mathbbR^3$, let $fracpartial mathbfrpartial u_i=h_imathbfe_i$, where $h_i$ is the scale vector. We then have $dr^2=(sum_i=1^3 h_idu_i)^2$. This is called orthogonal curvilinear coordinate system. Moreover, by making use of $nabla u_i=h_i^-1mathbfe_i$, we can write the operator $nabla$ as $nabla=sum_i=1^3 mathbfe_i h_i^-1fracpartialpartial u_i$. Then, the gradient formula for the orthogonal curvilinear system is obvious.



    We have some tricks to obtain the divergence and curl formulas in the orthognal curvilinear system. For example, we may use the relation $nablacdotleft(fracmathbfe_1h_2h_3right)=nablacdot(nabla mathbfe_2timesnablamathbfe_3)=0$ to obtain the divergence formula. However, we may consider a direct approach: Compute the derivative of a unit vector against a coordinate, i.e., compute the value of $fracpartial mathbfe_jpartial u_i$. If $i=j$, by noticing $fracpartial mathbfe_ipartial u_i=varepsilon_ijkfracpartial(mathbfe_jtimesmathbfe_k)partial u_i$, it suffices to compute $fracpartial mathbfe_jpartial u_i$ for $jneq i$. Actually, there is a simple formula about it: For $jneq i$, $fracpartial mathbfe_jpartial u_i=h_j^-1fracpartial h_ipartial u_jmathbfe_i$. My question is how to derive this formula.







    share|cite|improve this question





















      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      Let $(u_1,u_2,u_3)$ represent the three coordinates in a general curvilinear system in $mathbbR^3$, and let $mathbfe_i$ be the unit vector that points the direction of increasing $u_i$. Let $mathbfe_i cdot mathbfe_j=delta_ij$, and $mathbfe_itimesmathbfe_j=varepsilon_ijkmathbfe_k$ for $i,j,k=1,2,3$. For any $mathbfr$ in $mathbbR^3$, let $fracpartial mathbfrpartial u_i=h_imathbfe_i$, where $h_i$ is the scale vector. We then have $dr^2=(sum_i=1^3 h_idu_i)^2$. This is called orthogonal curvilinear coordinate system. Moreover, by making use of $nabla u_i=h_i^-1mathbfe_i$, we can write the operator $nabla$ as $nabla=sum_i=1^3 mathbfe_i h_i^-1fracpartialpartial u_i$. Then, the gradient formula for the orthogonal curvilinear system is obvious.



      We have some tricks to obtain the divergence and curl formulas in the orthognal curvilinear system. For example, we may use the relation $nablacdotleft(fracmathbfe_1h_2h_3right)=nablacdot(nabla mathbfe_2timesnablamathbfe_3)=0$ to obtain the divergence formula. However, we may consider a direct approach: Compute the derivative of a unit vector against a coordinate, i.e., compute the value of $fracpartial mathbfe_jpartial u_i$. If $i=j$, by noticing $fracpartial mathbfe_ipartial u_i=varepsilon_ijkfracpartial(mathbfe_jtimesmathbfe_k)partial u_i$, it suffices to compute $fracpartial mathbfe_jpartial u_i$ for $jneq i$. Actually, there is a simple formula about it: For $jneq i$, $fracpartial mathbfe_jpartial u_i=h_j^-1fracpartial h_ipartial u_jmathbfe_i$. My question is how to derive this formula.







      share|cite|improve this question











      Let $(u_1,u_2,u_3)$ represent the three coordinates in a general curvilinear system in $mathbbR^3$, and let $mathbfe_i$ be the unit vector that points the direction of increasing $u_i$. Let $mathbfe_i cdot mathbfe_j=delta_ij$, and $mathbfe_itimesmathbfe_j=varepsilon_ijkmathbfe_k$ for $i,j,k=1,2,3$. For any $mathbfr$ in $mathbbR^3$, let $fracpartial mathbfrpartial u_i=h_imathbfe_i$, where $h_i$ is the scale vector. We then have $dr^2=(sum_i=1^3 h_idu_i)^2$. This is called orthogonal curvilinear coordinate system. Moreover, by making use of $nabla u_i=h_i^-1mathbfe_i$, we can write the operator $nabla$ as $nabla=sum_i=1^3 mathbfe_i h_i^-1fracpartialpartial u_i$. Then, the gradient formula for the orthogonal curvilinear system is obvious.



      We have some tricks to obtain the divergence and curl formulas in the orthognal curvilinear system. For example, we may use the relation $nablacdotleft(fracmathbfe_1h_2h_3right)=nablacdot(nabla mathbfe_2timesnablamathbfe_3)=0$ to obtain the divergence formula. However, we may consider a direct approach: Compute the derivative of a unit vector against a coordinate, i.e., compute the value of $fracpartial mathbfe_jpartial u_i$. If $i=j$, by noticing $fracpartial mathbfe_ipartial u_i=varepsilon_ijkfracpartial(mathbfe_jtimesmathbfe_k)partial u_i$, it suffices to compute $fracpartial mathbfe_jpartial u_i$ for $jneq i$. Actually, there is a simple formula about it: For $jneq i$, $fracpartial mathbfe_jpartial u_i=h_j^-1fracpartial h_ipartial u_jmathbfe_i$. My question is how to derive this formula.









      share|cite|improve this question










      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question









      asked Aug 5 at 22:03









      user581944

      11




      11

























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );








           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2873391%2fa-formula-of-orthogonal-curvilinear-coordinate-systems%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest



































          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes










           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


























           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2873391%2fa-formula-of-orthogonal-curvilinear-coordinate-systems%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          Comments

          Popular posts from this blog

          What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

          Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

          Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?