[Integral][Please identify problem] $displaystyleint cfrac11+x^4>mathrmd x$

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
5
down vote

favorite
2












Here is my attempt. The result is not right. Please help identify the issue(s).



$displaystyle f(x)=intcfrac1x^4+1>mathrmdx$, let $x=tan t$, we have $ mathrmdx = sec^2 t>mathrmdt,> t=tan^-1 xinleft(-cfracpi2,cfracpi2right)$
beginalign
displaystyle f(tan t)&= intcfracsec^2 t> mathrmdt1+tan^4 t=intcfraccos^2 t> mathrmdtcos^4 t+sin^4 t=intcfraccfrac1+cos 2t2> mathrmdt(cos^2 t+sin^2 t)^2-2sin^2 tcos^2 t notag\
&=intcfrac1+cos 2t2-sin^2 2t >mathrmdt
=intcfracmathrmdt2-sin^2 2t + cfrac 12intcfracmathrmdsin 2t2-sin^2 2t notag\
&=intcfracsec^2 2t >mathrmdt2sec^2 2t-tan^2 2t + cfrac sqrt28intcfrac1sqrt2-sin 2t + cfrac1sqrt2+sin 2t>mathrmdsin 2t notag\
&=cfrac 12intcfracmathrmdtan 2t2+tan^2 2t +cfracsqrt28ln cfracsqrt2+sin 2tsqrt2-sin 2t notag\
&=cfrac sqrt24 tan^-1 cfractan 2tsqrt2 +cfracsqrt28ln cfracsqrt2+sin 2tsqrt2-sin 2t notag
endalign



As $tan 2t=cfrac2tan t1-tan^2 t=cfrac2x1-x^2, cfracsqrt2+sin 2tsqrt2-sin 2t=cfracsqrt2sec^2 t+tan tsqrt2sec^2 t-tan t=cfracsqrt2(x^2+1)+xsqrt2(x^2+1)-x,$



$f(x)=cfrac sqrt24 tan^-1 cfracsqrt2x1+x^2 +cfracsqrt28ln cfracsqrt2(x^2+1)+xsqrt2(x^2+1)-x+c$



If the above holds, $displaystyle int_0^infty cfracmathrmd x1+x^4$ would be $0$, which is impossible(Should be $cfrac sqrt2pi4$).







share|cite|improve this question





















  • If I recall correctly, this is one of those integrals best approaches with an integration by parts (with $dv=1$). From there a change of variables should be straightforward.
    – Robert Wolfe
    Aug 6 at 2:51






  • 4




    $x^4+1=x^4+2x^2+1-2x^2=(x^2+sqrt2x+1)(x^2-sqrt2+1)$ and you can use partial fractions
    – saulspatz
    Aug 6 at 2:55







  • 2




    Another approach is to use the fact that $$1/(x⁴+1)=frac1(x²+i)(x²-i)=frac1(x+sqrt-i)(x-sqrt-i)(x+sqrti)(x-sqrti)$$ and use partial fractions if you have the energy to work with ugly numbers
    – Holo
    Aug 6 at 2:58










  • @Holo but we should try to avoid complex no.s, right ?? I think it doesn't help in any way.
    – Anik Bhowmick
    Aug 6 at 3:27














up vote
5
down vote

favorite
2












Here is my attempt. The result is not right. Please help identify the issue(s).



$displaystyle f(x)=intcfrac1x^4+1>mathrmdx$, let $x=tan t$, we have $ mathrmdx = sec^2 t>mathrmdt,> t=tan^-1 xinleft(-cfracpi2,cfracpi2right)$
beginalign
displaystyle f(tan t)&= intcfracsec^2 t> mathrmdt1+tan^4 t=intcfraccos^2 t> mathrmdtcos^4 t+sin^4 t=intcfraccfrac1+cos 2t2> mathrmdt(cos^2 t+sin^2 t)^2-2sin^2 tcos^2 t notag\
&=intcfrac1+cos 2t2-sin^2 2t >mathrmdt
=intcfracmathrmdt2-sin^2 2t + cfrac 12intcfracmathrmdsin 2t2-sin^2 2t notag\
&=intcfracsec^2 2t >mathrmdt2sec^2 2t-tan^2 2t + cfrac sqrt28intcfrac1sqrt2-sin 2t + cfrac1sqrt2+sin 2t>mathrmdsin 2t notag\
&=cfrac 12intcfracmathrmdtan 2t2+tan^2 2t +cfracsqrt28ln cfracsqrt2+sin 2tsqrt2-sin 2t notag\
&=cfrac sqrt24 tan^-1 cfractan 2tsqrt2 +cfracsqrt28ln cfracsqrt2+sin 2tsqrt2-sin 2t notag
endalign



As $tan 2t=cfrac2tan t1-tan^2 t=cfrac2x1-x^2, cfracsqrt2+sin 2tsqrt2-sin 2t=cfracsqrt2sec^2 t+tan tsqrt2sec^2 t-tan t=cfracsqrt2(x^2+1)+xsqrt2(x^2+1)-x,$



$f(x)=cfrac sqrt24 tan^-1 cfracsqrt2x1+x^2 +cfracsqrt28ln cfracsqrt2(x^2+1)+xsqrt2(x^2+1)-x+c$



If the above holds, $displaystyle int_0^infty cfracmathrmd x1+x^4$ would be $0$, which is impossible(Should be $cfrac sqrt2pi4$).







share|cite|improve this question





















  • If I recall correctly, this is one of those integrals best approaches with an integration by parts (with $dv=1$). From there a change of variables should be straightforward.
    – Robert Wolfe
    Aug 6 at 2:51






  • 4




    $x^4+1=x^4+2x^2+1-2x^2=(x^2+sqrt2x+1)(x^2-sqrt2+1)$ and you can use partial fractions
    – saulspatz
    Aug 6 at 2:55







  • 2




    Another approach is to use the fact that $$1/(x⁴+1)=frac1(x²+i)(x²-i)=frac1(x+sqrt-i)(x-sqrt-i)(x+sqrti)(x-sqrti)$$ and use partial fractions if you have the energy to work with ugly numbers
    – Holo
    Aug 6 at 2:58










  • @Holo but we should try to avoid complex no.s, right ?? I think it doesn't help in any way.
    – Anik Bhowmick
    Aug 6 at 3:27












up vote
5
down vote

favorite
2









up vote
5
down vote

favorite
2






2





Here is my attempt. The result is not right. Please help identify the issue(s).



$displaystyle f(x)=intcfrac1x^4+1>mathrmdx$, let $x=tan t$, we have $ mathrmdx = sec^2 t>mathrmdt,> t=tan^-1 xinleft(-cfracpi2,cfracpi2right)$
beginalign
displaystyle f(tan t)&= intcfracsec^2 t> mathrmdt1+tan^4 t=intcfraccos^2 t> mathrmdtcos^4 t+sin^4 t=intcfraccfrac1+cos 2t2> mathrmdt(cos^2 t+sin^2 t)^2-2sin^2 tcos^2 t notag\
&=intcfrac1+cos 2t2-sin^2 2t >mathrmdt
=intcfracmathrmdt2-sin^2 2t + cfrac 12intcfracmathrmdsin 2t2-sin^2 2t notag\
&=intcfracsec^2 2t >mathrmdt2sec^2 2t-tan^2 2t + cfrac sqrt28intcfrac1sqrt2-sin 2t + cfrac1sqrt2+sin 2t>mathrmdsin 2t notag\
&=cfrac 12intcfracmathrmdtan 2t2+tan^2 2t +cfracsqrt28ln cfracsqrt2+sin 2tsqrt2-sin 2t notag\
&=cfrac sqrt24 tan^-1 cfractan 2tsqrt2 +cfracsqrt28ln cfracsqrt2+sin 2tsqrt2-sin 2t notag
endalign



As $tan 2t=cfrac2tan t1-tan^2 t=cfrac2x1-x^2, cfracsqrt2+sin 2tsqrt2-sin 2t=cfracsqrt2sec^2 t+tan tsqrt2sec^2 t-tan t=cfracsqrt2(x^2+1)+xsqrt2(x^2+1)-x,$



$f(x)=cfrac sqrt24 tan^-1 cfracsqrt2x1+x^2 +cfracsqrt28ln cfracsqrt2(x^2+1)+xsqrt2(x^2+1)-x+c$



If the above holds, $displaystyle int_0^infty cfracmathrmd x1+x^4$ would be $0$, which is impossible(Should be $cfrac sqrt2pi4$).







share|cite|improve this question













Here is my attempt. The result is not right. Please help identify the issue(s).



$displaystyle f(x)=intcfrac1x^4+1>mathrmdx$, let $x=tan t$, we have $ mathrmdx = sec^2 t>mathrmdt,> t=tan^-1 xinleft(-cfracpi2,cfracpi2right)$
beginalign
displaystyle f(tan t)&= intcfracsec^2 t> mathrmdt1+tan^4 t=intcfraccos^2 t> mathrmdtcos^4 t+sin^4 t=intcfraccfrac1+cos 2t2> mathrmdt(cos^2 t+sin^2 t)^2-2sin^2 tcos^2 t notag\
&=intcfrac1+cos 2t2-sin^2 2t >mathrmdt
=intcfracmathrmdt2-sin^2 2t + cfrac 12intcfracmathrmdsin 2t2-sin^2 2t notag\
&=intcfracsec^2 2t >mathrmdt2sec^2 2t-tan^2 2t + cfrac sqrt28intcfrac1sqrt2-sin 2t + cfrac1sqrt2+sin 2t>mathrmdsin 2t notag\
&=cfrac 12intcfracmathrmdtan 2t2+tan^2 2t +cfracsqrt28ln cfracsqrt2+sin 2tsqrt2-sin 2t notag\
&=cfrac sqrt24 tan^-1 cfractan 2tsqrt2 +cfracsqrt28ln cfracsqrt2+sin 2tsqrt2-sin 2t notag
endalign



As $tan 2t=cfrac2tan t1-tan^2 t=cfrac2x1-x^2, cfracsqrt2+sin 2tsqrt2-sin 2t=cfracsqrt2sec^2 t+tan tsqrt2sec^2 t-tan t=cfracsqrt2(x^2+1)+xsqrt2(x^2+1)-x,$



$f(x)=cfrac sqrt24 tan^-1 cfracsqrt2x1+x^2 +cfracsqrt28ln cfracsqrt2(x^2+1)+xsqrt2(x^2+1)-x+c$



If the above holds, $displaystyle int_0^infty cfracmathrmd x1+x^4$ would be $0$, which is impossible(Should be $cfrac sqrt2pi4$).









share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Aug 6 at 7:36









Bernard

110k635103




110k635103









asked Aug 6 at 2:37









Lance

30818




30818











  • If I recall correctly, this is one of those integrals best approaches with an integration by parts (with $dv=1$). From there a change of variables should be straightforward.
    – Robert Wolfe
    Aug 6 at 2:51






  • 4




    $x^4+1=x^4+2x^2+1-2x^2=(x^2+sqrt2x+1)(x^2-sqrt2+1)$ and you can use partial fractions
    – saulspatz
    Aug 6 at 2:55







  • 2




    Another approach is to use the fact that $$1/(x⁴+1)=frac1(x²+i)(x²-i)=frac1(x+sqrt-i)(x-sqrt-i)(x+sqrti)(x-sqrti)$$ and use partial fractions if you have the energy to work with ugly numbers
    – Holo
    Aug 6 at 2:58










  • @Holo but we should try to avoid complex no.s, right ?? I think it doesn't help in any way.
    – Anik Bhowmick
    Aug 6 at 3:27
















  • If I recall correctly, this is one of those integrals best approaches with an integration by parts (with $dv=1$). From there a change of variables should be straightforward.
    – Robert Wolfe
    Aug 6 at 2:51






  • 4




    $x^4+1=x^4+2x^2+1-2x^2=(x^2+sqrt2x+1)(x^2-sqrt2+1)$ and you can use partial fractions
    – saulspatz
    Aug 6 at 2:55







  • 2




    Another approach is to use the fact that $$1/(x⁴+1)=frac1(x²+i)(x²-i)=frac1(x+sqrt-i)(x-sqrt-i)(x+sqrti)(x-sqrti)$$ and use partial fractions if you have the energy to work with ugly numbers
    – Holo
    Aug 6 at 2:58










  • @Holo but we should try to avoid complex no.s, right ?? I think it doesn't help in any way.
    – Anik Bhowmick
    Aug 6 at 3:27















If I recall correctly, this is one of those integrals best approaches with an integration by parts (with $dv=1$). From there a change of variables should be straightforward.
– Robert Wolfe
Aug 6 at 2:51




If I recall correctly, this is one of those integrals best approaches with an integration by parts (with $dv=1$). From there a change of variables should be straightforward.
– Robert Wolfe
Aug 6 at 2:51




4




4




$x^4+1=x^4+2x^2+1-2x^2=(x^2+sqrt2x+1)(x^2-sqrt2+1)$ and you can use partial fractions
– saulspatz
Aug 6 at 2:55





$x^4+1=x^4+2x^2+1-2x^2=(x^2+sqrt2x+1)(x^2-sqrt2+1)$ and you can use partial fractions
– saulspatz
Aug 6 at 2:55





2




2




Another approach is to use the fact that $$1/(x⁴+1)=frac1(x²+i)(x²-i)=frac1(x+sqrt-i)(x-sqrt-i)(x+sqrti)(x-sqrti)$$ and use partial fractions if you have the energy to work with ugly numbers
– Holo
Aug 6 at 2:58




Another approach is to use the fact that $$1/(x⁴+1)=frac1(x²+i)(x²-i)=frac1(x+sqrt-i)(x-sqrt-i)(x+sqrti)(x-sqrti)$$ and use partial fractions if you have the energy to work with ugly numbers
– Holo
Aug 6 at 2:58












@Holo but we should try to avoid complex no.s, right ?? I think it doesn't help in any way.
– Anik Bhowmick
Aug 6 at 3:27




@Holo but we should try to avoid complex no.s, right ?? I think it doesn't help in any way.
– Anik Bhowmick
Aug 6 at 3:27










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










First of all, you made a typo in the final answer — the correct answer must be
$$f(x)=fracsqrt24tan^-1fracsqrt2x1colorred-x^2+fracsqrt28lnfracsqrt2(x^2+1)+xsqrt2(x^2+1)-x+C.$$



The next issue is the introduction of $sec(2t)$ and $tan(2t)$ when you switched to
$$intfracsec^2 2t,mathrmdt2sec^2 2t-tan^2 2t$$
(as part of an expression). Both $sec(2t)$ and $tan(2t)$ are undefined at some points within the domain $displaystyle tinleft(-fracpi2,fracpi2right)$, viz. at $displaystyle t=pmfracpi4$. Therefore, the antiderivative you find in terms of $t$ is in fact a piecewise-defined function:
$$f(x(t))=begincases
cfracsqrt24tan^-1cfractan2tsqrt2+cfracsqrt28lncfracsqrt2+sin 2tsqrt2-sin 2t+C_1, text if tinleft(-cfracpi2,-cfracpi4right); \
cfracsqrt24tan^-1cfractan2tsqrt2+cfracsqrt28lncfracsqrt2+sin 2tsqrt2-sin 2t+C_2, text if tinleft(-cfracpi4,cfracpi4right); \
cfracsqrt24tan^-1cfractan2tsqrt2+cfracsqrt28lncfracsqrt2+sin 2tsqrt2-sin 2t+C_3, text if tinleft(cfracpi4,cfracpi2right).
endcases$$



Switching back to $x$ still creates a piecewise-defined function:
$$f(x)=begincases
cfracsqrt24tan^-1cfracsqrt2x1colorred-x^2+cfracsqrt28lncfracsqrt2(x^2+1)+xsqrt2(x^2+1)-x+C_1, text if xin(-infty,-1); \
cfracsqrt24tan^-1cfracsqrt2x1colorred-x^2+cfracsqrt28lncfracsqrt2(x^2+1)+xsqrt2(x^2+1)-x+C_2, text if xin(-1,1); \
cfracsqrt24tan^-1cfracsqrt2x1colorred-x^2+cfracsqrt28lncfracsqrt2(x^2+1)+xsqrt2(x^2+1)-x+C_3, text if xin(1,+infty).
endcases$$



At the points $x=pm1$, these expressions are undefined, and so the corresponding integrals have to be treated as improper. In your case, the integral $displaystyle int_0^+infty$ has to be split at the discontinuity at $x=1$:
$$int_0^+inftycdots,mathrmdx=int_0^1cdots,mathrmdx+int_1^+inftycdots,mathrmdx,$$
and then, when evaluating the antiderivative that you found, you'll have to take the one-sided limits from the left and from the right at $x=1$, which are NOT equal to each other! And that's probably the source of your wrong answer.



More specifically:
$$lim_xto1^-fracsqrt2x1-x^2=+infty implies lim_xto1^-arctanfracsqrt2x1-x^2=fracpi2,$$
while
$$lim_xto1^+fracsqrt2x1-x^2=-infty implies lim_xto1^-arctanfracsqrt2x1-x^2=-fracpi2.$$






share|cite|improve this answer

















  • 1




    This problem of branch cuts can be fixed by writing $arctan(sqrt2x +1) + arctan(sqrt2x - 1)$ instead of $arctan[sqrt2x/(1-x^2)]$, which gives the correct function.
    – eyeballfrog
    Aug 6 at 4:32










  • @eyeballfrog: I agree. However, the OP's question wasn't asking for a different solution, but to help find out where the proposed solution went wrong. So I specifically limited my answer to an analysis of the proposed solution only.
    – zipirovich
    Aug 6 at 4:43











  • @zipirovich That's very considerate. I was having hard time to pick the "correct answer". Both of you pointed out my error. I chose yours over xbh's because you pointed out how the error is introduced. Thank you!
    – Lance
    Aug 6 at 13:47

















up vote
4
down vote













Comparing to the method I used in the following, maybe the issue occurs when computing
$$
int frac mathrm dt 2-sin^2(2t).
$$
Then from now on $t$ cannot take the value $pm pi /4$ if we want to devide the numerator and the denominator by $cos^2(2t)$. Now to compute the improper integral, we should take the limit $x to 1^-$ and $xto 1^+$ separately, since the result is discontinuous at $1$. Fundamental Theorem of Calculus may deduce the wrong result if we apply it to a discontinued antiderivative. So if we use the OP as the antiderivative, we should compute
$$
f(+infty) - f(1^+) + f(1^-) - f(0),
$$
which would give the right result $sqrt 2 pi/4$.



Conclusion: the computation in the OP is right, but when apply it to compute definite integral, we should split the interval at the point $1$.



Appendix



I'm here to give another approach. We would introduce a conjugate pair. Assume $x neq 0$.
beginalign*
int frac mathrm d x 1+x^4
&= frac 12 int frac 1-x^21+x^4 mathrm dx + int frac 1+x^21+x^4mathrm dx \
&= frac 12 int frac x^-2 - 1x^2+x^-2 mathrm dx + frac 12 int frac x^-2 + 1x^2+x^-2 mathrm dx\
&= -frac 12 int frac mathrm d (x + x^-1) (x+x^-1 )^2 -2 mathrm dx+frac 12 int frac mathrm d(x-x^-1) (x - x^-1)^2 +2\
&= -frac sqrt 28 int left( frac 1 x +x^-1-sqrt 2 - frac 1x+x^-1+ sqrt 2right)mathrm d(x+x^-1) \
&phantom==+frac sqrt24 int frac mathrm d(x - x^-1)/sqrt 2 ((x-x^-1)/sqrt 2)^2 +1 \
&= frac sqrt 28 log left( frac x + x^-1+sqrt 2 x +x^-1-sqrt 2right) + frac sqrt 24 mathrm arctanleft( frac x-x^-1 sqrt 2right) + C \
&= frac sqrt 28 log left(frac x^2 +sqrt 2 x + 1 x^2 - sqrt2 x +1right) +frac sqrt 24 mathrmarctan left(frac x^2 -1sqrt 2 xright) + C.
endalign*



If we use this as the result, then
$$
f(+infty) - f(0) = frac sqrt 2 4 left( frac pi 2 + frac pi 2right) = frac sqrt 24 pi.
$$



Also note that when $x neq 0$,
$$
arctan(x) + mathrmarccot (x) = mathrm sgn (x)frac pi 2 implies arctan (x) = mathrm sgn (x)frac pi 2 + arctan left(-frac 1xright),
$$
so the OP is correct.






share|cite|improve this answer























    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );








     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2873537%2fintegralplease-identify-problem-displaystyle-int-cfrac11x4-mathrm%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    1
    down vote



    accepted










    First of all, you made a typo in the final answer — the correct answer must be
    $$f(x)=fracsqrt24tan^-1fracsqrt2x1colorred-x^2+fracsqrt28lnfracsqrt2(x^2+1)+xsqrt2(x^2+1)-x+C.$$



    The next issue is the introduction of $sec(2t)$ and $tan(2t)$ when you switched to
    $$intfracsec^2 2t,mathrmdt2sec^2 2t-tan^2 2t$$
    (as part of an expression). Both $sec(2t)$ and $tan(2t)$ are undefined at some points within the domain $displaystyle tinleft(-fracpi2,fracpi2right)$, viz. at $displaystyle t=pmfracpi4$. Therefore, the antiderivative you find in terms of $t$ is in fact a piecewise-defined function:
    $$f(x(t))=begincases
    cfracsqrt24tan^-1cfractan2tsqrt2+cfracsqrt28lncfracsqrt2+sin 2tsqrt2-sin 2t+C_1, text if tinleft(-cfracpi2,-cfracpi4right); \
    cfracsqrt24tan^-1cfractan2tsqrt2+cfracsqrt28lncfracsqrt2+sin 2tsqrt2-sin 2t+C_2, text if tinleft(-cfracpi4,cfracpi4right); \
    cfracsqrt24tan^-1cfractan2tsqrt2+cfracsqrt28lncfracsqrt2+sin 2tsqrt2-sin 2t+C_3, text if tinleft(cfracpi4,cfracpi2right).
    endcases$$



    Switching back to $x$ still creates a piecewise-defined function:
    $$f(x)=begincases
    cfracsqrt24tan^-1cfracsqrt2x1colorred-x^2+cfracsqrt28lncfracsqrt2(x^2+1)+xsqrt2(x^2+1)-x+C_1, text if xin(-infty,-1); \
    cfracsqrt24tan^-1cfracsqrt2x1colorred-x^2+cfracsqrt28lncfracsqrt2(x^2+1)+xsqrt2(x^2+1)-x+C_2, text if xin(-1,1); \
    cfracsqrt24tan^-1cfracsqrt2x1colorred-x^2+cfracsqrt28lncfracsqrt2(x^2+1)+xsqrt2(x^2+1)-x+C_3, text if xin(1,+infty).
    endcases$$



    At the points $x=pm1$, these expressions are undefined, and so the corresponding integrals have to be treated as improper. In your case, the integral $displaystyle int_0^+infty$ has to be split at the discontinuity at $x=1$:
    $$int_0^+inftycdots,mathrmdx=int_0^1cdots,mathrmdx+int_1^+inftycdots,mathrmdx,$$
    and then, when evaluating the antiderivative that you found, you'll have to take the one-sided limits from the left and from the right at $x=1$, which are NOT equal to each other! And that's probably the source of your wrong answer.



    More specifically:
    $$lim_xto1^-fracsqrt2x1-x^2=+infty implies lim_xto1^-arctanfracsqrt2x1-x^2=fracpi2,$$
    while
    $$lim_xto1^+fracsqrt2x1-x^2=-infty implies lim_xto1^-arctanfracsqrt2x1-x^2=-fracpi2.$$






    share|cite|improve this answer

















    • 1




      This problem of branch cuts can be fixed by writing $arctan(sqrt2x +1) + arctan(sqrt2x - 1)$ instead of $arctan[sqrt2x/(1-x^2)]$, which gives the correct function.
      – eyeballfrog
      Aug 6 at 4:32










    • @eyeballfrog: I agree. However, the OP's question wasn't asking for a different solution, but to help find out where the proposed solution went wrong. So I specifically limited my answer to an analysis of the proposed solution only.
      – zipirovich
      Aug 6 at 4:43











    • @zipirovich That's very considerate. I was having hard time to pick the "correct answer". Both of you pointed out my error. I chose yours over xbh's because you pointed out how the error is introduced. Thank you!
      – Lance
      Aug 6 at 13:47














    up vote
    1
    down vote



    accepted










    First of all, you made a typo in the final answer — the correct answer must be
    $$f(x)=fracsqrt24tan^-1fracsqrt2x1colorred-x^2+fracsqrt28lnfracsqrt2(x^2+1)+xsqrt2(x^2+1)-x+C.$$



    The next issue is the introduction of $sec(2t)$ and $tan(2t)$ when you switched to
    $$intfracsec^2 2t,mathrmdt2sec^2 2t-tan^2 2t$$
    (as part of an expression). Both $sec(2t)$ and $tan(2t)$ are undefined at some points within the domain $displaystyle tinleft(-fracpi2,fracpi2right)$, viz. at $displaystyle t=pmfracpi4$. Therefore, the antiderivative you find in terms of $t$ is in fact a piecewise-defined function:
    $$f(x(t))=begincases
    cfracsqrt24tan^-1cfractan2tsqrt2+cfracsqrt28lncfracsqrt2+sin 2tsqrt2-sin 2t+C_1, text if tinleft(-cfracpi2,-cfracpi4right); \
    cfracsqrt24tan^-1cfractan2tsqrt2+cfracsqrt28lncfracsqrt2+sin 2tsqrt2-sin 2t+C_2, text if tinleft(-cfracpi4,cfracpi4right); \
    cfracsqrt24tan^-1cfractan2tsqrt2+cfracsqrt28lncfracsqrt2+sin 2tsqrt2-sin 2t+C_3, text if tinleft(cfracpi4,cfracpi2right).
    endcases$$



    Switching back to $x$ still creates a piecewise-defined function:
    $$f(x)=begincases
    cfracsqrt24tan^-1cfracsqrt2x1colorred-x^2+cfracsqrt28lncfracsqrt2(x^2+1)+xsqrt2(x^2+1)-x+C_1, text if xin(-infty,-1); \
    cfracsqrt24tan^-1cfracsqrt2x1colorred-x^2+cfracsqrt28lncfracsqrt2(x^2+1)+xsqrt2(x^2+1)-x+C_2, text if xin(-1,1); \
    cfracsqrt24tan^-1cfracsqrt2x1colorred-x^2+cfracsqrt28lncfracsqrt2(x^2+1)+xsqrt2(x^2+1)-x+C_3, text if xin(1,+infty).
    endcases$$



    At the points $x=pm1$, these expressions are undefined, and so the corresponding integrals have to be treated as improper. In your case, the integral $displaystyle int_0^+infty$ has to be split at the discontinuity at $x=1$:
    $$int_0^+inftycdots,mathrmdx=int_0^1cdots,mathrmdx+int_1^+inftycdots,mathrmdx,$$
    and then, when evaluating the antiderivative that you found, you'll have to take the one-sided limits from the left and from the right at $x=1$, which are NOT equal to each other! And that's probably the source of your wrong answer.



    More specifically:
    $$lim_xto1^-fracsqrt2x1-x^2=+infty implies lim_xto1^-arctanfracsqrt2x1-x^2=fracpi2,$$
    while
    $$lim_xto1^+fracsqrt2x1-x^2=-infty implies lim_xto1^-arctanfracsqrt2x1-x^2=-fracpi2.$$






    share|cite|improve this answer

















    • 1




      This problem of branch cuts can be fixed by writing $arctan(sqrt2x +1) + arctan(sqrt2x - 1)$ instead of $arctan[sqrt2x/(1-x^2)]$, which gives the correct function.
      – eyeballfrog
      Aug 6 at 4:32










    • @eyeballfrog: I agree. However, the OP's question wasn't asking for a different solution, but to help find out where the proposed solution went wrong. So I specifically limited my answer to an analysis of the proposed solution only.
      – zipirovich
      Aug 6 at 4:43











    • @zipirovich That's very considerate. I was having hard time to pick the "correct answer". Both of you pointed out my error. I chose yours over xbh's because you pointed out how the error is introduced. Thank you!
      – Lance
      Aug 6 at 13:47












    up vote
    1
    down vote



    accepted







    up vote
    1
    down vote



    accepted






    First of all, you made a typo in the final answer — the correct answer must be
    $$f(x)=fracsqrt24tan^-1fracsqrt2x1colorred-x^2+fracsqrt28lnfracsqrt2(x^2+1)+xsqrt2(x^2+1)-x+C.$$



    The next issue is the introduction of $sec(2t)$ and $tan(2t)$ when you switched to
    $$intfracsec^2 2t,mathrmdt2sec^2 2t-tan^2 2t$$
    (as part of an expression). Both $sec(2t)$ and $tan(2t)$ are undefined at some points within the domain $displaystyle tinleft(-fracpi2,fracpi2right)$, viz. at $displaystyle t=pmfracpi4$. Therefore, the antiderivative you find in terms of $t$ is in fact a piecewise-defined function:
    $$f(x(t))=begincases
    cfracsqrt24tan^-1cfractan2tsqrt2+cfracsqrt28lncfracsqrt2+sin 2tsqrt2-sin 2t+C_1, text if tinleft(-cfracpi2,-cfracpi4right); \
    cfracsqrt24tan^-1cfractan2tsqrt2+cfracsqrt28lncfracsqrt2+sin 2tsqrt2-sin 2t+C_2, text if tinleft(-cfracpi4,cfracpi4right); \
    cfracsqrt24tan^-1cfractan2tsqrt2+cfracsqrt28lncfracsqrt2+sin 2tsqrt2-sin 2t+C_3, text if tinleft(cfracpi4,cfracpi2right).
    endcases$$



    Switching back to $x$ still creates a piecewise-defined function:
    $$f(x)=begincases
    cfracsqrt24tan^-1cfracsqrt2x1colorred-x^2+cfracsqrt28lncfracsqrt2(x^2+1)+xsqrt2(x^2+1)-x+C_1, text if xin(-infty,-1); \
    cfracsqrt24tan^-1cfracsqrt2x1colorred-x^2+cfracsqrt28lncfracsqrt2(x^2+1)+xsqrt2(x^2+1)-x+C_2, text if xin(-1,1); \
    cfracsqrt24tan^-1cfracsqrt2x1colorred-x^2+cfracsqrt28lncfracsqrt2(x^2+1)+xsqrt2(x^2+1)-x+C_3, text if xin(1,+infty).
    endcases$$



    At the points $x=pm1$, these expressions are undefined, and so the corresponding integrals have to be treated as improper. In your case, the integral $displaystyle int_0^+infty$ has to be split at the discontinuity at $x=1$:
    $$int_0^+inftycdots,mathrmdx=int_0^1cdots,mathrmdx+int_1^+inftycdots,mathrmdx,$$
    and then, when evaluating the antiderivative that you found, you'll have to take the one-sided limits from the left and from the right at $x=1$, which are NOT equal to each other! And that's probably the source of your wrong answer.



    More specifically:
    $$lim_xto1^-fracsqrt2x1-x^2=+infty implies lim_xto1^-arctanfracsqrt2x1-x^2=fracpi2,$$
    while
    $$lim_xto1^+fracsqrt2x1-x^2=-infty implies lim_xto1^-arctanfracsqrt2x1-x^2=-fracpi2.$$






    share|cite|improve this answer













    First of all, you made a typo in the final answer — the correct answer must be
    $$f(x)=fracsqrt24tan^-1fracsqrt2x1colorred-x^2+fracsqrt28lnfracsqrt2(x^2+1)+xsqrt2(x^2+1)-x+C.$$



    The next issue is the introduction of $sec(2t)$ and $tan(2t)$ when you switched to
    $$intfracsec^2 2t,mathrmdt2sec^2 2t-tan^2 2t$$
    (as part of an expression). Both $sec(2t)$ and $tan(2t)$ are undefined at some points within the domain $displaystyle tinleft(-fracpi2,fracpi2right)$, viz. at $displaystyle t=pmfracpi4$. Therefore, the antiderivative you find in terms of $t$ is in fact a piecewise-defined function:
    $$f(x(t))=begincases
    cfracsqrt24tan^-1cfractan2tsqrt2+cfracsqrt28lncfracsqrt2+sin 2tsqrt2-sin 2t+C_1, text if tinleft(-cfracpi2,-cfracpi4right); \
    cfracsqrt24tan^-1cfractan2tsqrt2+cfracsqrt28lncfracsqrt2+sin 2tsqrt2-sin 2t+C_2, text if tinleft(-cfracpi4,cfracpi4right); \
    cfracsqrt24tan^-1cfractan2tsqrt2+cfracsqrt28lncfracsqrt2+sin 2tsqrt2-sin 2t+C_3, text if tinleft(cfracpi4,cfracpi2right).
    endcases$$



    Switching back to $x$ still creates a piecewise-defined function:
    $$f(x)=begincases
    cfracsqrt24tan^-1cfracsqrt2x1colorred-x^2+cfracsqrt28lncfracsqrt2(x^2+1)+xsqrt2(x^2+1)-x+C_1, text if xin(-infty,-1); \
    cfracsqrt24tan^-1cfracsqrt2x1colorred-x^2+cfracsqrt28lncfracsqrt2(x^2+1)+xsqrt2(x^2+1)-x+C_2, text if xin(-1,1); \
    cfracsqrt24tan^-1cfracsqrt2x1colorred-x^2+cfracsqrt28lncfracsqrt2(x^2+1)+xsqrt2(x^2+1)-x+C_3, text if xin(1,+infty).
    endcases$$



    At the points $x=pm1$, these expressions are undefined, and so the corresponding integrals have to be treated as improper. In your case, the integral $displaystyle int_0^+infty$ has to be split at the discontinuity at $x=1$:
    $$int_0^+inftycdots,mathrmdx=int_0^1cdots,mathrmdx+int_1^+inftycdots,mathrmdx,$$
    and then, when evaluating the antiderivative that you found, you'll have to take the one-sided limits from the left and from the right at $x=1$, which are NOT equal to each other! And that's probably the source of your wrong answer.



    More specifically:
    $$lim_xto1^-fracsqrt2x1-x^2=+infty implies lim_xto1^-arctanfracsqrt2x1-x^2=fracpi2,$$
    while
    $$lim_xto1^+fracsqrt2x1-x^2=-infty implies lim_xto1^-arctanfracsqrt2x1-x^2=-fracpi2.$$







    share|cite|improve this answer













    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer











    answered Aug 6 at 4:26









    zipirovich

    10.1k11630




    10.1k11630







    • 1




      This problem of branch cuts can be fixed by writing $arctan(sqrt2x +1) + arctan(sqrt2x - 1)$ instead of $arctan[sqrt2x/(1-x^2)]$, which gives the correct function.
      – eyeballfrog
      Aug 6 at 4:32










    • @eyeballfrog: I agree. However, the OP's question wasn't asking for a different solution, but to help find out where the proposed solution went wrong. So I specifically limited my answer to an analysis of the proposed solution only.
      – zipirovich
      Aug 6 at 4:43











    • @zipirovich That's very considerate. I was having hard time to pick the "correct answer". Both of you pointed out my error. I chose yours over xbh's because you pointed out how the error is introduced. Thank you!
      – Lance
      Aug 6 at 13:47












    • 1




      This problem of branch cuts can be fixed by writing $arctan(sqrt2x +1) + arctan(sqrt2x - 1)$ instead of $arctan[sqrt2x/(1-x^2)]$, which gives the correct function.
      – eyeballfrog
      Aug 6 at 4:32










    • @eyeballfrog: I agree. However, the OP's question wasn't asking for a different solution, but to help find out where the proposed solution went wrong. So I specifically limited my answer to an analysis of the proposed solution only.
      – zipirovich
      Aug 6 at 4:43











    • @zipirovich That's very considerate. I was having hard time to pick the "correct answer". Both of you pointed out my error. I chose yours over xbh's because you pointed out how the error is introduced. Thank you!
      – Lance
      Aug 6 at 13:47







    1




    1




    This problem of branch cuts can be fixed by writing $arctan(sqrt2x +1) + arctan(sqrt2x - 1)$ instead of $arctan[sqrt2x/(1-x^2)]$, which gives the correct function.
    – eyeballfrog
    Aug 6 at 4:32




    This problem of branch cuts can be fixed by writing $arctan(sqrt2x +1) + arctan(sqrt2x - 1)$ instead of $arctan[sqrt2x/(1-x^2)]$, which gives the correct function.
    – eyeballfrog
    Aug 6 at 4:32












    @eyeballfrog: I agree. However, the OP's question wasn't asking for a different solution, but to help find out where the proposed solution went wrong. So I specifically limited my answer to an analysis of the proposed solution only.
    – zipirovich
    Aug 6 at 4:43





    @eyeballfrog: I agree. However, the OP's question wasn't asking for a different solution, but to help find out where the proposed solution went wrong. So I specifically limited my answer to an analysis of the proposed solution only.
    – zipirovich
    Aug 6 at 4:43













    @zipirovich That's very considerate. I was having hard time to pick the "correct answer". Both of you pointed out my error. I chose yours over xbh's because you pointed out how the error is introduced. Thank you!
    – Lance
    Aug 6 at 13:47




    @zipirovich That's very considerate. I was having hard time to pick the "correct answer". Both of you pointed out my error. I chose yours over xbh's because you pointed out how the error is introduced. Thank you!
    – Lance
    Aug 6 at 13:47










    up vote
    4
    down vote













    Comparing to the method I used in the following, maybe the issue occurs when computing
    $$
    int frac mathrm dt 2-sin^2(2t).
    $$
    Then from now on $t$ cannot take the value $pm pi /4$ if we want to devide the numerator and the denominator by $cos^2(2t)$. Now to compute the improper integral, we should take the limit $x to 1^-$ and $xto 1^+$ separately, since the result is discontinuous at $1$. Fundamental Theorem of Calculus may deduce the wrong result if we apply it to a discontinued antiderivative. So if we use the OP as the antiderivative, we should compute
    $$
    f(+infty) - f(1^+) + f(1^-) - f(0),
    $$
    which would give the right result $sqrt 2 pi/4$.



    Conclusion: the computation in the OP is right, but when apply it to compute definite integral, we should split the interval at the point $1$.



    Appendix



    I'm here to give another approach. We would introduce a conjugate pair. Assume $x neq 0$.
    beginalign*
    int frac mathrm d x 1+x^4
    &= frac 12 int frac 1-x^21+x^4 mathrm dx + int frac 1+x^21+x^4mathrm dx \
    &= frac 12 int frac x^-2 - 1x^2+x^-2 mathrm dx + frac 12 int frac x^-2 + 1x^2+x^-2 mathrm dx\
    &= -frac 12 int frac mathrm d (x + x^-1) (x+x^-1 )^2 -2 mathrm dx+frac 12 int frac mathrm d(x-x^-1) (x - x^-1)^2 +2\
    &= -frac sqrt 28 int left( frac 1 x +x^-1-sqrt 2 - frac 1x+x^-1+ sqrt 2right)mathrm d(x+x^-1) \
    &phantom==+frac sqrt24 int frac mathrm d(x - x^-1)/sqrt 2 ((x-x^-1)/sqrt 2)^2 +1 \
    &= frac sqrt 28 log left( frac x + x^-1+sqrt 2 x +x^-1-sqrt 2right) + frac sqrt 24 mathrm arctanleft( frac x-x^-1 sqrt 2right) + C \
    &= frac sqrt 28 log left(frac x^2 +sqrt 2 x + 1 x^2 - sqrt2 x +1right) +frac sqrt 24 mathrmarctan left(frac x^2 -1sqrt 2 xright) + C.
    endalign*



    If we use this as the result, then
    $$
    f(+infty) - f(0) = frac sqrt 2 4 left( frac pi 2 + frac pi 2right) = frac sqrt 24 pi.
    $$



    Also note that when $x neq 0$,
    $$
    arctan(x) + mathrmarccot (x) = mathrm sgn (x)frac pi 2 implies arctan (x) = mathrm sgn (x)frac pi 2 + arctan left(-frac 1xright),
    $$
    so the OP is correct.






    share|cite|improve this answer



























      up vote
      4
      down vote













      Comparing to the method I used in the following, maybe the issue occurs when computing
      $$
      int frac mathrm dt 2-sin^2(2t).
      $$
      Then from now on $t$ cannot take the value $pm pi /4$ if we want to devide the numerator and the denominator by $cos^2(2t)$. Now to compute the improper integral, we should take the limit $x to 1^-$ and $xto 1^+$ separately, since the result is discontinuous at $1$. Fundamental Theorem of Calculus may deduce the wrong result if we apply it to a discontinued antiderivative. So if we use the OP as the antiderivative, we should compute
      $$
      f(+infty) - f(1^+) + f(1^-) - f(0),
      $$
      which would give the right result $sqrt 2 pi/4$.



      Conclusion: the computation in the OP is right, but when apply it to compute definite integral, we should split the interval at the point $1$.



      Appendix



      I'm here to give another approach. We would introduce a conjugate pair. Assume $x neq 0$.
      beginalign*
      int frac mathrm d x 1+x^4
      &= frac 12 int frac 1-x^21+x^4 mathrm dx + int frac 1+x^21+x^4mathrm dx \
      &= frac 12 int frac x^-2 - 1x^2+x^-2 mathrm dx + frac 12 int frac x^-2 + 1x^2+x^-2 mathrm dx\
      &= -frac 12 int frac mathrm d (x + x^-1) (x+x^-1 )^2 -2 mathrm dx+frac 12 int frac mathrm d(x-x^-1) (x - x^-1)^2 +2\
      &= -frac sqrt 28 int left( frac 1 x +x^-1-sqrt 2 - frac 1x+x^-1+ sqrt 2right)mathrm d(x+x^-1) \
      &phantom==+frac sqrt24 int frac mathrm d(x - x^-1)/sqrt 2 ((x-x^-1)/sqrt 2)^2 +1 \
      &= frac sqrt 28 log left( frac x + x^-1+sqrt 2 x +x^-1-sqrt 2right) + frac sqrt 24 mathrm arctanleft( frac x-x^-1 sqrt 2right) + C \
      &= frac sqrt 28 log left(frac x^2 +sqrt 2 x + 1 x^2 - sqrt2 x +1right) +frac sqrt 24 mathrmarctan left(frac x^2 -1sqrt 2 xright) + C.
      endalign*



      If we use this as the result, then
      $$
      f(+infty) - f(0) = frac sqrt 2 4 left( frac pi 2 + frac pi 2right) = frac sqrt 24 pi.
      $$



      Also note that when $x neq 0$,
      $$
      arctan(x) + mathrmarccot (x) = mathrm sgn (x)frac pi 2 implies arctan (x) = mathrm sgn (x)frac pi 2 + arctan left(-frac 1xright),
      $$
      so the OP is correct.






      share|cite|improve this answer

























        up vote
        4
        down vote










        up vote
        4
        down vote









        Comparing to the method I used in the following, maybe the issue occurs when computing
        $$
        int frac mathrm dt 2-sin^2(2t).
        $$
        Then from now on $t$ cannot take the value $pm pi /4$ if we want to devide the numerator and the denominator by $cos^2(2t)$. Now to compute the improper integral, we should take the limit $x to 1^-$ and $xto 1^+$ separately, since the result is discontinuous at $1$. Fundamental Theorem of Calculus may deduce the wrong result if we apply it to a discontinued antiderivative. So if we use the OP as the antiderivative, we should compute
        $$
        f(+infty) - f(1^+) + f(1^-) - f(0),
        $$
        which would give the right result $sqrt 2 pi/4$.



        Conclusion: the computation in the OP is right, but when apply it to compute definite integral, we should split the interval at the point $1$.



        Appendix



        I'm here to give another approach. We would introduce a conjugate pair. Assume $x neq 0$.
        beginalign*
        int frac mathrm d x 1+x^4
        &= frac 12 int frac 1-x^21+x^4 mathrm dx + int frac 1+x^21+x^4mathrm dx \
        &= frac 12 int frac x^-2 - 1x^2+x^-2 mathrm dx + frac 12 int frac x^-2 + 1x^2+x^-2 mathrm dx\
        &= -frac 12 int frac mathrm d (x + x^-1) (x+x^-1 )^2 -2 mathrm dx+frac 12 int frac mathrm d(x-x^-1) (x - x^-1)^2 +2\
        &= -frac sqrt 28 int left( frac 1 x +x^-1-sqrt 2 - frac 1x+x^-1+ sqrt 2right)mathrm d(x+x^-1) \
        &phantom==+frac sqrt24 int frac mathrm d(x - x^-1)/sqrt 2 ((x-x^-1)/sqrt 2)^2 +1 \
        &= frac sqrt 28 log left( frac x + x^-1+sqrt 2 x +x^-1-sqrt 2right) + frac sqrt 24 mathrm arctanleft( frac x-x^-1 sqrt 2right) + C \
        &= frac sqrt 28 log left(frac x^2 +sqrt 2 x + 1 x^2 - sqrt2 x +1right) +frac sqrt 24 mathrmarctan left(frac x^2 -1sqrt 2 xright) + C.
        endalign*



        If we use this as the result, then
        $$
        f(+infty) - f(0) = frac sqrt 2 4 left( frac pi 2 + frac pi 2right) = frac sqrt 24 pi.
        $$



        Also note that when $x neq 0$,
        $$
        arctan(x) + mathrmarccot (x) = mathrm sgn (x)frac pi 2 implies arctan (x) = mathrm sgn (x)frac pi 2 + arctan left(-frac 1xright),
        $$
        so the OP is correct.






        share|cite|improve this answer















        Comparing to the method I used in the following, maybe the issue occurs when computing
        $$
        int frac mathrm dt 2-sin^2(2t).
        $$
        Then from now on $t$ cannot take the value $pm pi /4$ if we want to devide the numerator and the denominator by $cos^2(2t)$. Now to compute the improper integral, we should take the limit $x to 1^-$ and $xto 1^+$ separately, since the result is discontinuous at $1$. Fundamental Theorem of Calculus may deduce the wrong result if we apply it to a discontinued antiderivative. So if we use the OP as the antiderivative, we should compute
        $$
        f(+infty) - f(1^+) + f(1^-) - f(0),
        $$
        which would give the right result $sqrt 2 pi/4$.



        Conclusion: the computation in the OP is right, but when apply it to compute definite integral, we should split the interval at the point $1$.



        Appendix



        I'm here to give another approach. We would introduce a conjugate pair. Assume $x neq 0$.
        beginalign*
        int frac mathrm d x 1+x^4
        &= frac 12 int frac 1-x^21+x^4 mathrm dx + int frac 1+x^21+x^4mathrm dx \
        &= frac 12 int frac x^-2 - 1x^2+x^-2 mathrm dx + frac 12 int frac x^-2 + 1x^2+x^-2 mathrm dx\
        &= -frac 12 int frac mathrm d (x + x^-1) (x+x^-1 )^2 -2 mathrm dx+frac 12 int frac mathrm d(x-x^-1) (x - x^-1)^2 +2\
        &= -frac sqrt 28 int left( frac 1 x +x^-1-sqrt 2 - frac 1x+x^-1+ sqrt 2right)mathrm d(x+x^-1) \
        &phantom==+frac sqrt24 int frac mathrm d(x - x^-1)/sqrt 2 ((x-x^-1)/sqrt 2)^2 +1 \
        &= frac sqrt 28 log left( frac x + x^-1+sqrt 2 x +x^-1-sqrt 2right) + frac sqrt 24 mathrm arctanleft( frac x-x^-1 sqrt 2right) + C \
        &= frac sqrt 28 log left(frac x^2 +sqrt 2 x + 1 x^2 - sqrt2 x +1right) +frac sqrt 24 mathrmarctan left(frac x^2 -1sqrt 2 xright) + C.
        endalign*



        If we use this as the result, then
        $$
        f(+infty) - f(0) = frac sqrt 2 4 left( frac pi 2 + frac pi 2right) = frac sqrt 24 pi.
        $$



        Also note that when $x neq 0$,
        $$
        arctan(x) + mathrmarccot (x) = mathrm sgn (x)frac pi 2 implies arctan (x) = mathrm sgn (x)frac pi 2 + arctan left(-frac 1xright),
        $$
        so the OP is correct.







        share|cite|improve this answer















        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Aug 6 at 4:10


























        answered Aug 6 at 3:27









        xbh

        1,6079




        1,6079






















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


























             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2873537%2fintegralplease-identify-problem-displaystyle-int-cfrac11x4-mathrm%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            Comments

            Popular posts from this blog

            What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

            Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

            Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?