How to compute $lim_x to 0 frac1x^2 int_0^x f(t)t space dt $?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
6
down vote

favorite
1












For a continuous function $f: R to R $ Define:
$$ lim_x to 0 frac1x^2 int_0^x f(t)t space dt $$
Since the function is continuous I can assume that it's also integrable since continuity implies integrability. I assume furthermore that there exists a function $F$ which is an antiderivative of $f$ for which the following are true:



$$int_a^b f(x) dx =F(b)-F(a) spacespacespacespacespace a,bin R space $$
$$ lim_x to x_0 fracF(x)-F(x_0)x-x_0=f(x)$$
And that for $f$
$$ lim_x to x_0 f(x)=f(x_0)$$



In order to find the limit, I used partial integration and ended up with:
$$ lim_x to 0 fracF(x)(x-1) +F(0)x^2$$
At this point, I tried to use L'Hôpital's rule and ended up with the value $fracf(0)2$ which seems totally wrong to me .
Any advice would be appreciated, I mainly think that my solution idea is wrong, but I am stuck.







share|cite|improve this question

























    up vote
    6
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    For a continuous function $f: R to R $ Define:
    $$ lim_x to 0 frac1x^2 int_0^x f(t)t space dt $$
    Since the function is continuous I can assume that it's also integrable since continuity implies integrability. I assume furthermore that there exists a function $F$ which is an antiderivative of $f$ for which the following are true:



    $$int_a^b f(x) dx =F(b)-F(a) spacespacespacespacespace a,bin R space $$
    $$ lim_x to x_0 fracF(x)-F(x_0)x-x_0=f(x)$$
    And that for $f$
    $$ lim_x to x_0 f(x)=f(x_0)$$



    In order to find the limit, I used partial integration and ended up with:
    $$ lim_x to 0 fracF(x)(x-1) +F(0)x^2$$
    At this point, I tried to use L'Hôpital's rule and ended up with the value $fracf(0)2$ which seems totally wrong to me .
    Any advice would be appreciated, I mainly think that my solution idea is wrong, but I am stuck.







    share|cite|improve this question























      up vote
      6
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      6
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      For a continuous function $f: R to R $ Define:
      $$ lim_x to 0 frac1x^2 int_0^x f(t)t space dt $$
      Since the function is continuous I can assume that it's also integrable since continuity implies integrability. I assume furthermore that there exists a function $F$ which is an antiderivative of $f$ for which the following are true:



      $$int_a^b f(x) dx =F(b)-F(a) spacespacespacespacespace a,bin R space $$
      $$ lim_x to x_0 fracF(x)-F(x_0)x-x_0=f(x)$$
      And that for $f$
      $$ lim_x to x_0 f(x)=f(x_0)$$



      In order to find the limit, I used partial integration and ended up with:
      $$ lim_x to 0 fracF(x)(x-1) +F(0)x^2$$
      At this point, I tried to use L'Hôpital's rule and ended up with the value $fracf(0)2$ which seems totally wrong to me .
      Any advice would be appreciated, I mainly think that my solution idea is wrong, but I am stuck.







      share|cite|improve this question













      For a continuous function $f: R to R $ Define:
      $$ lim_x to 0 frac1x^2 int_0^x f(t)t space dt $$
      Since the function is continuous I can assume that it's also integrable since continuity implies integrability. I assume furthermore that there exists a function $F$ which is an antiderivative of $f$ for which the following are true:



      $$int_a^b f(x) dx =F(b)-F(a) spacespacespacespacespace a,bin R space $$
      $$ lim_x to x_0 fracF(x)-F(x_0)x-x_0=f(x)$$
      And that for $f$
      $$ lim_x to x_0 f(x)=f(x_0)$$



      In order to find the limit, I used partial integration and ended up with:
      $$ lim_x to 0 fracF(x)(x-1) +F(0)x^2$$
      At this point, I tried to use L'Hôpital's rule and ended up with the value $fracf(0)2$ which seems totally wrong to me .
      Any advice would be appreciated, I mainly think that my solution idea is wrong, but I am stuck.









      share|cite|improve this question












      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Aug 6 at 6:40









      Asaf Karagila♦

      292k31403733




      292k31403733









      asked Aug 6 at 0:02









      Konstantinos Zafeiris

      1089




      1089




















          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          7
          down vote



          accepted










          By L'Hôpital's rule, this limit is equal to
          $$lim_xto 0 fracxf(x)2x = frac12lim_xto 0 f(x) = fracf(0)2.$$
          (Use the first Fundamental Theorem of Calculus to differentiate the integral, since the integrand is guaranteed continuous.) You were correct.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Even though I've found the correct answer, I still feel that I've taken a shortcut or a path that's not permitted. Is the limit (which I've stated) after I used partial integration correct or should I have handled the integration in another way in order to reach $ lim_xto0fracx,f(x)2x $ ?
            – Konstantinos Zafeiris
            Aug 6 at 0:56











          • You don't need to integrate. Use the part of the FTC that tells you how to differentiate $int_a^x g(t),dt$ when $g$ is continuous. I don't follow your solution. If you're going to use integration by parts, you'll need to integrate $int_0^x F(t),dt$, won't you?
            – Ted Shifrin
            Aug 6 at 0:59










          • Ok, now I see, thank you.
            – Konstantinos Zafeiris
            Aug 6 at 1:00

















          up vote
          5
          down vote













          The limit is indeed $f(0)/2$.
          L'Hôpital's Rule applies because the limit of the quotient of the derivatives of numerator and denominator exists. Thus
          $$
          lim_xto0frac1x^2int_0^x f(t),t,dt
          =lim_xto0fracx,f(x)2x=fracf(0)2
          $$






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • But if you use the antiderivative you get: $$lim_x to 0 frac1x^2 int_0^x f(t)t space dt = lim_x to 0 frac1x^2 (F(x)-F(0)) =\ lim_x to 0frac 1 x fracF(x)-F(0)x =bigg(lim_x to 0frac 1 xbigg)bigg( lim_x to 0 fracF(x)-F(0)xbigg) =\ pm infty cdot f(x)$$
            – Sudix
            Aug 6 at 0:43











          • @Sudix You get $lim_xto0fracF(x)-F(0)x^2$. You can only separate the limit as you did when the limit of the factors exist and some extra cases, but not in the case that one for the factors tends to $infty$ and the other to $0=f(0)cdot 0$ (not $f(x )$ as you wrote) as happens here.
            – user580373
            Aug 6 at 0:48











          • @spiralstotheleft You're right, I forgot about the case $f(0)=0$, but if $f(0) not = 0$, we can do this seperation, so something still is off
            – Sudix
            Aug 6 at 0:50










          • @Sudix The factor $lim_xto0fracF(x)-F(0)x$ is $(f(x)cdot x)|_x=0$, if $f(0)neq0$ the factor is still zero.
            – user580373
            Aug 6 at 0:52







          • 1




            @Sudix Inside the integral is $f(t)t$, not $f(t)$.
            – user580373
            Aug 6 at 0:59

















          up vote
          5
          down vote













          An approach not relying on L'Hopital's Rule.



          We have, for $xneq 0$ and with the change of variable $u=fractx$, $$
          frac1x^2int_0^x t f(t)dt
          = int_0^1 u f(xu) du
          $$
          Now, it is not hard to prove that
          $$
          lim_xto 0int_0^1 u f(xu) du
          = int_0^1 u lim_xto 0 f(xu) du
          = int_0^1 u f(0) du
          = f(0)left [fracx^22right]^1_0
          = fracf(0)2
          $$
          (where the swapping limit/integral can be justified e.g. by arguing about uniform convergence, using continuity of $f$).






          share|cite|improve this answer



















          • 2




            Nice approach. You don't even need to think about things like uniform convergence if you instead consider $left|int_0^1 uf(xu),du - int_0^1 uf(0),duright|le int_0^1 u|f(xu)-f(0)|du< epsilonint_0^1 u,du$ whenever $x<delta$ by continuity (since $xule x$ for all $0le ule 1$).
            – Ted Shifrin
            Aug 6 at 4:41











          • @TedShifrin: I used the same approach as you mention in your comment and I saw your comment later.
            – Paramanand Singh
            Aug 6 at 4:52










          • @TedShifrin Yes, good point.
            – Clement C.
            Aug 6 at 4:57

















          up vote
          1
          down vote













          Write $f(t) $ as $f(t) - f(0)+f(0)$ and then the desired limit is $$lim_xto 0frac1x^2int_0^xf(t)-f(0)t,dt+fracf(0)2tag1$$ Next we can show that the first limit above is $0$. Let $epsilon >0$ be given. Then by continuity we have a $delta>0$ such that $$|f(x) - f(0)|<epsilon $$ whenever $|x|<delta$. Thus we have $$left|int_0^xf(t)-f(0)t,dtright |leqint_0^x|f(t)-f(0)|t,dt<fracepsilon x^22$$ whenever $0<x<delta$. Similar inequality holds when $-delta <x<0$. It thus follows that the first limit in $(1)$ above is $0$. Thus the desired limit is $f(0)/2$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















            Your Answer




            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: false,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );








             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2873449%2fhow-to-compute-lim-x-to-0-frac1x2-int-0x-ftt-space-dt%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest






























            4 Answers
            4






            active

            oldest

            votes








            4 Answers
            4






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            7
            down vote



            accepted










            By L'Hôpital's rule, this limit is equal to
            $$lim_xto 0 fracxf(x)2x = frac12lim_xto 0 f(x) = fracf(0)2.$$
            (Use the first Fundamental Theorem of Calculus to differentiate the integral, since the integrand is guaranteed continuous.) You were correct.






            share|cite|improve this answer





















            • Even though I've found the correct answer, I still feel that I've taken a shortcut or a path that's not permitted. Is the limit (which I've stated) after I used partial integration correct or should I have handled the integration in another way in order to reach $ lim_xto0fracx,f(x)2x $ ?
              – Konstantinos Zafeiris
              Aug 6 at 0:56











            • You don't need to integrate. Use the part of the FTC that tells you how to differentiate $int_a^x g(t),dt$ when $g$ is continuous. I don't follow your solution. If you're going to use integration by parts, you'll need to integrate $int_0^x F(t),dt$, won't you?
              – Ted Shifrin
              Aug 6 at 0:59










            • Ok, now I see, thank you.
              – Konstantinos Zafeiris
              Aug 6 at 1:00














            up vote
            7
            down vote



            accepted










            By L'Hôpital's rule, this limit is equal to
            $$lim_xto 0 fracxf(x)2x = frac12lim_xto 0 f(x) = fracf(0)2.$$
            (Use the first Fundamental Theorem of Calculus to differentiate the integral, since the integrand is guaranteed continuous.) You were correct.






            share|cite|improve this answer





















            • Even though I've found the correct answer, I still feel that I've taken a shortcut or a path that's not permitted. Is the limit (which I've stated) after I used partial integration correct or should I have handled the integration in another way in order to reach $ lim_xto0fracx,f(x)2x $ ?
              – Konstantinos Zafeiris
              Aug 6 at 0:56











            • You don't need to integrate. Use the part of the FTC that tells you how to differentiate $int_a^x g(t),dt$ when $g$ is continuous. I don't follow your solution. If you're going to use integration by parts, you'll need to integrate $int_0^x F(t),dt$, won't you?
              – Ted Shifrin
              Aug 6 at 0:59










            • Ok, now I see, thank you.
              – Konstantinos Zafeiris
              Aug 6 at 1:00












            up vote
            7
            down vote



            accepted







            up vote
            7
            down vote



            accepted






            By L'Hôpital's rule, this limit is equal to
            $$lim_xto 0 fracxf(x)2x = frac12lim_xto 0 f(x) = fracf(0)2.$$
            (Use the first Fundamental Theorem of Calculus to differentiate the integral, since the integrand is guaranteed continuous.) You were correct.






            share|cite|improve this answer













            By L'Hôpital's rule, this limit is equal to
            $$lim_xto 0 fracxf(x)2x = frac12lim_xto 0 f(x) = fracf(0)2.$$
            (Use the first Fundamental Theorem of Calculus to differentiate the integral, since the integrand is guaranteed continuous.) You were correct.







            share|cite|improve this answer













            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer











            answered Aug 6 at 0:32









            Ted Shifrin

            59.6k44387




            59.6k44387











            • Even though I've found the correct answer, I still feel that I've taken a shortcut or a path that's not permitted. Is the limit (which I've stated) after I used partial integration correct or should I have handled the integration in another way in order to reach $ lim_xto0fracx,f(x)2x $ ?
              – Konstantinos Zafeiris
              Aug 6 at 0:56











            • You don't need to integrate. Use the part of the FTC that tells you how to differentiate $int_a^x g(t),dt$ when $g$ is continuous. I don't follow your solution. If you're going to use integration by parts, you'll need to integrate $int_0^x F(t),dt$, won't you?
              – Ted Shifrin
              Aug 6 at 0:59










            • Ok, now I see, thank you.
              – Konstantinos Zafeiris
              Aug 6 at 1:00
















            • Even though I've found the correct answer, I still feel that I've taken a shortcut or a path that's not permitted. Is the limit (which I've stated) after I used partial integration correct or should I have handled the integration in another way in order to reach $ lim_xto0fracx,f(x)2x $ ?
              – Konstantinos Zafeiris
              Aug 6 at 0:56











            • You don't need to integrate. Use the part of the FTC that tells you how to differentiate $int_a^x g(t),dt$ when $g$ is continuous. I don't follow your solution. If you're going to use integration by parts, you'll need to integrate $int_0^x F(t),dt$, won't you?
              – Ted Shifrin
              Aug 6 at 0:59










            • Ok, now I see, thank you.
              – Konstantinos Zafeiris
              Aug 6 at 1:00















            Even though I've found the correct answer, I still feel that I've taken a shortcut or a path that's not permitted. Is the limit (which I've stated) after I used partial integration correct or should I have handled the integration in another way in order to reach $ lim_xto0fracx,f(x)2x $ ?
            – Konstantinos Zafeiris
            Aug 6 at 0:56





            Even though I've found the correct answer, I still feel that I've taken a shortcut or a path that's not permitted. Is the limit (which I've stated) after I used partial integration correct or should I have handled the integration in another way in order to reach $ lim_xto0fracx,f(x)2x $ ?
            – Konstantinos Zafeiris
            Aug 6 at 0:56













            You don't need to integrate. Use the part of the FTC that tells you how to differentiate $int_a^x g(t),dt$ when $g$ is continuous. I don't follow your solution. If you're going to use integration by parts, you'll need to integrate $int_0^x F(t),dt$, won't you?
            – Ted Shifrin
            Aug 6 at 0:59




            You don't need to integrate. Use the part of the FTC that tells you how to differentiate $int_a^x g(t),dt$ when $g$ is continuous. I don't follow your solution. If you're going to use integration by parts, you'll need to integrate $int_0^x F(t),dt$, won't you?
            – Ted Shifrin
            Aug 6 at 0:59












            Ok, now I see, thank you.
            – Konstantinos Zafeiris
            Aug 6 at 1:00




            Ok, now I see, thank you.
            – Konstantinos Zafeiris
            Aug 6 at 1:00










            up vote
            5
            down vote













            The limit is indeed $f(0)/2$.
            L'Hôpital's Rule applies because the limit of the quotient of the derivatives of numerator and denominator exists. Thus
            $$
            lim_xto0frac1x^2int_0^x f(t),t,dt
            =lim_xto0fracx,f(x)2x=fracf(0)2
            $$






            share|cite|improve this answer





















            • But if you use the antiderivative you get: $$lim_x to 0 frac1x^2 int_0^x f(t)t space dt = lim_x to 0 frac1x^2 (F(x)-F(0)) =\ lim_x to 0frac 1 x fracF(x)-F(0)x =bigg(lim_x to 0frac 1 xbigg)bigg( lim_x to 0 fracF(x)-F(0)xbigg) =\ pm infty cdot f(x)$$
              – Sudix
              Aug 6 at 0:43











            • @Sudix You get $lim_xto0fracF(x)-F(0)x^2$. You can only separate the limit as you did when the limit of the factors exist and some extra cases, but not in the case that one for the factors tends to $infty$ and the other to $0=f(0)cdot 0$ (not $f(x )$ as you wrote) as happens here.
              – user580373
              Aug 6 at 0:48











            • @spiralstotheleft You're right, I forgot about the case $f(0)=0$, but if $f(0) not = 0$, we can do this seperation, so something still is off
              – Sudix
              Aug 6 at 0:50










            • @Sudix The factor $lim_xto0fracF(x)-F(0)x$ is $(f(x)cdot x)|_x=0$, if $f(0)neq0$ the factor is still zero.
              – user580373
              Aug 6 at 0:52







            • 1




              @Sudix Inside the integral is $f(t)t$, not $f(t)$.
              – user580373
              Aug 6 at 0:59














            up vote
            5
            down vote













            The limit is indeed $f(0)/2$.
            L'Hôpital's Rule applies because the limit of the quotient of the derivatives of numerator and denominator exists. Thus
            $$
            lim_xto0frac1x^2int_0^x f(t),t,dt
            =lim_xto0fracx,f(x)2x=fracf(0)2
            $$






            share|cite|improve this answer





















            • But if you use the antiderivative you get: $$lim_x to 0 frac1x^2 int_0^x f(t)t space dt = lim_x to 0 frac1x^2 (F(x)-F(0)) =\ lim_x to 0frac 1 x fracF(x)-F(0)x =bigg(lim_x to 0frac 1 xbigg)bigg( lim_x to 0 fracF(x)-F(0)xbigg) =\ pm infty cdot f(x)$$
              – Sudix
              Aug 6 at 0:43











            • @Sudix You get $lim_xto0fracF(x)-F(0)x^2$. You can only separate the limit as you did when the limit of the factors exist and some extra cases, but not in the case that one for the factors tends to $infty$ and the other to $0=f(0)cdot 0$ (not $f(x )$ as you wrote) as happens here.
              – user580373
              Aug 6 at 0:48











            • @spiralstotheleft You're right, I forgot about the case $f(0)=0$, but if $f(0) not = 0$, we can do this seperation, so something still is off
              – Sudix
              Aug 6 at 0:50










            • @Sudix The factor $lim_xto0fracF(x)-F(0)x$ is $(f(x)cdot x)|_x=0$, if $f(0)neq0$ the factor is still zero.
              – user580373
              Aug 6 at 0:52







            • 1




              @Sudix Inside the integral is $f(t)t$, not $f(t)$.
              – user580373
              Aug 6 at 0:59












            up vote
            5
            down vote










            up vote
            5
            down vote









            The limit is indeed $f(0)/2$.
            L'Hôpital's Rule applies because the limit of the quotient of the derivatives of numerator and denominator exists. Thus
            $$
            lim_xto0frac1x^2int_0^x f(t),t,dt
            =lim_xto0fracx,f(x)2x=fracf(0)2
            $$






            share|cite|improve this answer













            The limit is indeed $f(0)/2$.
            L'Hôpital's Rule applies because the limit of the quotient of the derivatives of numerator and denominator exists. Thus
            $$
            lim_xto0frac1x^2int_0^x f(t),t,dt
            =lim_xto0fracx,f(x)2x=fracf(0)2
            $$







            share|cite|improve this answer













            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer











            answered Aug 6 at 0:32









            Martin Argerami

            116k1071164




            116k1071164











            • But if you use the antiderivative you get: $$lim_x to 0 frac1x^2 int_0^x f(t)t space dt = lim_x to 0 frac1x^2 (F(x)-F(0)) =\ lim_x to 0frac 1 x fracF(x)-F(0)x =bigg(lim_x to 0frac 1 xbigg)bigg( lim_x to 0 fracF(x)-F(0)xbigg) =\ pm infty cdot f(x)$$
              – Sudix
              Aug 6 at 0:43











            • @Sudix You get $lim_xto0fracF(x)-F(0)x^2$. You can only separate the limit as you did when the limit of the factors exist and some extra cases, but not in the case that one for the factors tends to $infty$ and the other to $0=f(0)cdot 0$ (not $f(x )$ as you wrote) as happens here.
              – user580373
              Aug 6 at 0:48











            • @spiralstotheleft You're right, I forgot about the case $f(0)=0$, but if $f(0) not = 0$, we can do this seperation, so something still is off
              – Sudix
              Aug 6 at 0:50










            • @Sudix The factor $lim_xto0fracF(x)-F(0)x$ is $(f(x)cdot x)|_x=0$, if $f(0)neq0$ the factor is still zero.
              – user580373
              Aug 6 at 0:52







            • 1




              @Sudix Inside the integral is $f(t)t$, not $f(t)$.
              – user580373
              Aug 6 at 0:59
















            • But if you use the antiderivative you get: $$lim_x to 0 frac1x^2 int_0^x f(t)t space dt = lim_x to 0 frac1x^2 (F(x)-F(0)) =\ lim_x to 0frac 1 x fracF(x)-F(0)x =bigg(lim_x to 0frac 1 xbigg)bigg( lim_x to 0 fracF(x)-F(0)xbigg) =\ pm infty cdot f(x)$$
              – Sudix
              Aug 6 at 0:43











            • @Sudix You get $lim_xto0fracF(x)-F(0)x^2$. You can only separate the limit as you did when the limit of the factors exist and some extra cases, but not in the case that one for the factors tends to $infty$ and the other to $0=f(0)cdot 0$ (not $f(x )$ as you wrote) as happens here.
              – user580373
              Aug 6 at 0:48











            • @spiralstotheleft You're right, I forgot about the case $f(0)=0$, but if $f(0) not = 0$, we can do this seperation, so something still is off
              – Sudix
              Aug 6 at 0:50










            • @Sudix The factor $lim_xto0fracF(x)-F(0)x$ is $(f(x)cdot x)|_x=0$, if $f(0)neq0$ the factor is still zero.
              – user580373
              Aug 6 at 0:52







            • 1




              @Sudix Inside the integral is $f(t)t$, not $f(t)$.
              – user580373
              Aug 6 at 0:59















            But if you use the antiderivative you get: $$lim_x to 0 frac1x^2 int_0^x f(t)t space dt = lim_x to 0 frac1x^2 (F(x)-F(0)) =\ lim_x to 0frac 1 x fracF(x)-F(0)x =bigg(lim_x to 0frac 1 xbigg)bigg( lim_x to 0 fracF(x)-F(0)xbigg) =\ pm infty cdot f(x)$$
            – Sudix
            Aug 6 at 0:43





            But if you use the antiderivative you get: $$lim_x to 0 frac1x^2 int_0^x f(t)t space dt = lim_x to 0 frac1x^2 (F(x)-F(0)) =\ lim_x to 0frac 1 x fracF(x)-F(0)x =bigg(lim_x to 0frac 1 xbigg)bigg( lim_x to 0 fracF(x)-F(0)xbigg) =\ pm infty cdot f(x)$$
            – Sudix
            Aug 6 at 0:43













            @Sudix You get $lim_xto0fracF(x)-F(0)x^2$. You can only separate the limit as you did when the limit of the factors exist and some extra cases, but not in the case that one for the factors tends to $infty$ and the other to $0=f(0)cdot 0$ (not $f(x )$ as you wrote) as happens here.
            – user580373
            Aug 6 at 0:48





            @Sudix You get $lim_xto0fracF(x)-F(0)x^2$. You can only separate the limit as you did when the limit of the factors exist and some extra cases, but not in the case that one for the factors tends to $infty$ and the other to $0=f(0)cdot 0$ (not $f(x )$ as you wrote) as happens here.
            – user580373
            Aug 6 at 0:48













            @spiralstotheleft You're right, I forgot about the case $f(0)=0$, but if $f(0) not = 0$, we can do this seperation, so something still is off
            – Sudix
            Aug 6 at 0:50




            @spiralstotheleft You're right, I forgot about the case $f(0)=0$, but if $f(0) not = 0$, we can do this seperation, so something still is off
            – Sudix
            Aug 6 at 0:50












            @Sudix The factor $lim_xto0fracF(x)-F(0)x$ is $(f(x)cdot x)|_x=0$, if $f(0)neq0$ the factor is still zero.
            – user580373
            Aug 6 at 0:52





            @Sudix The factor $lim_xto0fracF(x)-F(0)x$ is $(f(x)cdot x)|_x=0$, if $f(0)neq0$ the factor is still zero.
            – user580373
            Aug 6 at 0:52





            1




            1




            @Sudix Inside the integral is $f(t)t$, not $f(t)$.
            – user580373
            Aug 6 at 0:59




            @Sudix Inside the integral is $f(t)t$, not $f(t)$.
            – user580373
            Aug 6 at 0:59










            up vote
            5
            down vote













            An approach not relying on L'Hopital's Rule.



            We have, for $xneq 0$ and with the change of variable $u=fractx$, $$
            frac1x^2int_0^x t f(t)dt
            = int_0^1 u f(xu) du
            $$
            Now, it is not hard to prove that
            $$
            lim_xto 0int_0^1 u f(xu) du
            = int_0^1 u lim_xto 0 f(xu) du
            = int_0^1 u f(0) du
            = f(0)left [fracx^22right]^1_0
            = fracf(0)2
            $$
            (where the swapping limit/integral can be justified e.g. by arguing about uniform convergence, using continuity of $f$).






            share|cite|improve this answer



















            • 2




              Nice approach. You don't even need to think about things like uniform convergence if you instead consider $left|int_0^1 uf(xu),du - int_0^1 uf(0),duright|le int_0^1 u|f(xu)-f(0)|du< epsilonint_0^1 u,du$ whenever $x<delta$ by continuity (since $xule x$ for all $0le ule 1$).
              – Ted Shifrin
              Aug 6 at 4:41











            • @TedShifrin: I used the same approach as you mention in your comment and I saw your comment later.
              – Paramanand Singh
              Aug 6 at 4:52










            • @TedShifrin Yes, good point.
              – Clement C.
              Aug 6 at 4:57














            up vote
            5
            down vote













            An approach not relying on L'Hopital's Rule.



            We have, for $xneq 0$ and with the change of variable $u=fractx$, $$
            frac1x^2int_0^x t f(t)dt
            = int_0^1 u f(xu) du
            $$
            Now, it is not hard to prove that
            $$
            lim_xto 0int_0^1 u f(xu) du
            = int_0^1 u lim_xto 0 f(xu) du
            = int_0^1 u f(0) du
            = f(0)left [fracx^22right]^1_0
            = fracf(0)2
            $$
            (where the swapping limit/integral can be justified e.g. by arguing about uniform convergence, using continuity of $f$).






            share|cite|improve this answer



















            • 2




              Nice approach. You don't even need to think about things like uniform convergence if you instead consider $left|int_0^1 uf(xu),du - int_0^1 uf(0),duright|le int_0^1 u|f(xu)-f(0)|du< epsilonint_0^1 u,du$ whenever $x<delta$ by continuity (since $xule x$ for all $0le ule 1$).
              – Ted Shifrin
              Aug 6 at 4:41











            • @TedShifrin: I used the same approach as you mention in your comment and I saw your comment later.
              – Paramanand Singh
              Aug 6 at 4:52










            • @TedShifrin Yes, good point.
              – Clement C.
              Aug 6 at 4:57












            up vote
            5
            down vote










            up vote
            5
            down vote









            An approach not relying on L'Hopital's Rule.



            We have, for $xneq 0$ and with the change of variable $u=fractx$, $$
            frac1x^2int_0^x t f(t)dt
            = int_0^1 u f(xu) du
            $$
            Now, it is not hard to prove that
            $$
            lim_xto 0int_0^1 u f(xu) du
            = int_0^1 u lim_xto 0 f(xu) du
            = int_0^1 u f(0) du
            = f(0)left [fracx^22right]^1_0
            = fracf(0)2
            $$
            (where the swapping limit/integral can be justified e.g. by arguing about uniform convergence, using continuity of $f$).






            share|cite|improve this answer















            An approach not relying on L'Hopital's Rule.



            We have, for $xneq 0$ and with the change of variable $u=fractx$, $$
            frac1x^2int_0^x t f(t)dt
            = int_0^1 u f(xu) du
            $$
            Now, it is not hard to prove that
            $$
            lim_xto 0int_0^1 u f(xu) du
            = int_0^1 u lim_xto 0 f(xu) du
            = int_0^1 u f(0) du
            = f(0)left [fracx^22right]^1_0
            = fracf(0)2
            $$
            (where the swapping limit/integral can be justified e.g. by arguing about uniform convergence, using continuity of $f$).







            share|cite|improve this answer















            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Aug 6 at 1:37


























            answered Aug 6 at 1:09









            Clement C.

            47.2k33682




            47.2k33682







            • 2




              Nice approach. You don't even need to think about things like uniform convergence if you instead consider $left|int_0^1 uf(xu),du - int_0^1 uf(0),duright|le int_0^1 u|f(xu)-f(0)|du< epsilonint_0^1 u,du$ whenever $x<delta$ by continuity (since $xule x$ for all $0le ule 1$).
              – Ted Shifrin
              Aug 6 at 4:41











            • @TedShifrin: I used the same approach as you mention in your comment and I saw your comment later.
              – Paramanand Singh
              Aug 6 at 4:52










            • @TedShifrin Yes, good point.
              – Clement C.
              Aug 6 at 4:57












            • 2




              Nice approach. You don't even need to think about things like uniform convergence if you instead consider $left|int_0^1 uf(xu),du - int_0^1 uf(0),duright|le int_0^1 u|f(xu)-f(0)|du< epsilonint_0^1 u,du$ whenever $x<delta$ by continuity (since $xule x$ for all $0le ule 1$).
              – Ted Shifrin
              Aug 6 at 4:41











            • @TedShifrin: I used the same approach as you mention in your comment and I saw your comment later.
              – Paramanand Singh
              Aug 6 at 4:52










            • @TedShifrin Yes, good point.
              – Clement C.
              Aug 6 at 4:57







            2




            2




            Nice approach. You don't even need to think about things like uniform convergence if you instead consider $left|int_0^1 uf(xu),du - int_0^1 uf(0),duright|le int_0^1 u|f(xu)-f(0)|du< epsilonint_0^1 u,du$ whenever $x<delta$ by continuity (since $xule x$ for all $0le ule 1$).
            – Ted Shifrin
            Aug 6 at 4:41





            Nice approach. You don't even need to think about things like uniform convergence if you instead consider $left|int_0^1 uf(xu),du - int_0^1 uf(0),duright|le int_0^1 u|f(xu)-f(0)|du< epsilonint_0^1 u,du$ whenever $x<delta$ by continuity (since $xule x$ for all $0le ule 1$).
            – Ted Shifrin
            Aug 6 at 4:41













            @TedShifrin: I used the same approach as you mention in your comment and I saw your comment later.
            – Paramanand Singh
            Aug 6 at 4:52




            @TedShifrin: I used the same approach as you mention in your comment and I saw your comment later.
            – Paramanand Singh
            Aug 6 at 4:52












            @TedShifrin Yes, good point.
            – Clement C.
            Aug 6 at 4:57




            @TedShifrin Yes, good point.
            – Clement C.
            Aug 6 at 4:57










            up vote
            1
            down vote













            Write $f(t) $ as $f(t) - f(0)+f(0)$ and then the desired limit is $$lim_xto 0frac1x^2int_0^xf(t)-f(0)t,dt+fracf(0)2tag1$$ Next we can show that the first limit above is $0$. Let $epsilon >0$ be given. Then by continuity we have a $delta>0$ such that $$|f(x) - f(0)|<epsilon $$ whenever $|x|<delta$. Thus we have $$left|int_0^xf(t)-f(0)t,dtright |leqint_0^x|f(t)-f(0)|t,dt<fracepsilon x^22$$ whenever $0<x<delta$. Similar inequality holds when $-delta <x<0$. It thus follows that the first limit in $(1)$ above is $0$. Thus the desired limit is $f(0)/2$.






            share|cite|improve this answer

























              up vote
              1
              down vote













              Write $f(t) $ as $f(t) - f(0)+f(0)$ and then the desired limit is $$lim_xto 0frac1x^2int_0^xf(t)-f(0)t,dt+fracf(0)2tag1$$ Next we can show that the first limit above is $0$. Let $epsilon >0$ be given. Then by continuity we have a $delta>0$ such that $$|f(x) - f(0)|<epsilon $$ whenever $|x|<delta$. Thus we have $$left|int_0^xf(t)-f(0)t,dtright |leqint_0^x|f(t)-f(0)|t,dt<fracepsilon x^22$$ whenever $0<x<delta$. Similar inequality holds when $-delta <x<0$. It thus follows that the first limit in $(1)$ above is $0$. Thus the desired limit is $f(0)/2$.






              share|cite|improve this answer























                up vote
                1
                down vote










                up vote
                1
                down vote









                Write $f(t) $ as $f(t) - f(0)+f(0)$ and then the desired limit is $$lim_xto 0frac1x^2int_0^xf(t)-f(0)t,dt+fracf(0)2tag1$$ Next we can show that the first limit above is $0$. Let $epsilon >0$ be given. Then by continuity we have a $delta>0$ such that $$|f(x) - f(0)|<epsilon $$ whenever $|x|<delta$. Thus we have $$left|int_0^xf(t)-f(0)t,dtright |leqint_0^x|f(t)-f(0)|t,dt<fracepsilon x^22$$ whenever $0<x<delta$. Similar inequality holds when $-delta <x<0$. It thus follows that the first limit in $(1)$ above is $0$. Thus the desired limit is $f(0)/2$.






                share|cite|improve this answer













                Write $f(t) $ as $f(t) - f(0)+f(0)$ and then the desired limit is $$lim_xto 0frac1x^2int_0^xf(t)-f(0)t,dt+fracf(0)2tag1$$ Next we can show that the first limit above is $0$. Let $epsilon >0$ be given. Then by continuity we have a $delta>0$ such that $$|f(x) - f(0)|<epsilon $$ whenever $|x|<delta$. Thus we have $$left|int_0^xf(t)-f(0)t,dtright |leqint_0^x|f(t)-f(0)|t,dt<fracepsilon x^22$$ whenever $0<x<delta$. Similar inequality holds when $-delta <x<0$. It thus follows that the first limit in $(1)$ above is $0$. Thus the desired limit is $f(0)/2$.







                share|cite|improve this answer













                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer











                answered Aug 6 at 4:47









                Paramanand Singh

                45.3k553142




                45.3k553142






















                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded


























                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2873449%2fhow-to-compute-lim-x-to-0-frac1x2-int-0x-ftt-space-dt%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest













































































                    Comments

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

                    Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?

                    Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon