A specific question about functions

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1












Let $Bbb R$ be the set of real numbers. Determine all functions $f : Bbb R toBbb R$ such that, for
all real numbers x and y,$$f(f(x)f(y))+f(x+y)=f(xy)$$My attempt: let's first find some partial answers. If this equation has some polynomial answers of degree $d$ then the coefficient of $x^d$ must be equal at both sides i.e. we must have $$maxd^2,d=d$$which leads to $$d=0,1$$ now let's take the general answer of polynomial kind as $$f(x)=ax+b$$ for some $a$ and $b$. Substituting this in the equation leads to $$f(a^2xy+b^2+abx+aby)+ax+ay+b=axy+b$$which leads to $$a^3xy+ab^2+a^2bx+a^2by+b+ax+ay=axy$$finally we obtain one trivial answer $a=b=0$ and two non-trivial answers $$a=-b=1\a=-b=-1$$therefore the only non-trivial polynomials satisfying the equation above are $$f(x)=x-1\f(x)=-x+1$$I believe these are the only answers of the question. Here turns out two questions:




  1. Are there any other answers except those I found?


  2. If so, what are they?








share|cite|improve this question





















  • Can we manipulate this to say that $f(0)in 0,pm 1$?
    – Mason
    2 days ago










  • I don't think so, or if is it this is not a strong background implication. How can you prove that for example $f(0)ne 2$?
    – Mostafa Ayaz
    2 days ago






  • 1




    imo-official.org/problems/IMO2017SL.pdf
    – greedoid
    2 days ago














up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1












Let $Bbb R$ be the set of real numbers. Determine all functions $f : Bbb R toBbb R$ such that, for
all real numbers x and y,$$f(f(x)f(y))+f(x+y)=f(xy)$$My attempt: let's first find some partial answers. If this equation has some polynomial answers of degree $d$ then the coefficient of $x^d$ must be equal at both sides i.e. we must have $$maxd^2,d=d$$which leads to $$d=0,1$$ now let's take the general answer of polynomial kind as $$f(x)=ax+b$$ for some $a$ and $b$. Substituting this in the equation leads to $$f(a^2xy+b^2+abx+aby)+ax+ay+b=axy+b$$which leads to $$a^3xy+ab^2+a^2bx+a^2by+b+ax+ay=axy$$finally we obtain one trivial answer $a=b=0$ and two non-trivial answers $$a=-b=1\a=-b=-1$$therefore the only non-trivial polynomials satisfying the equation above are $$f(x)=x-1\f(x)=-x+1$$I believe these are the only answers of the question. Here turns out two questions:




  1. Are there any other answers except those I found?


  2. If so, what are they?








share|cite|improve this question





















  • Can we manipulate this to say that $f(0)in 0,pm 1$?
    – Mason
    2 days ago










  • I don't think so, or if is it this is not a strong background implication. How can you prove that for example $f(0)ne 2$?
    – Mostafa Ayaz
    2 days ago






  • 1




    imo-official.org/problems/IMO2017SL.pdf
    – greedoid
    2 days ago












up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1






1





Let $Bbb R$ be the set of real numbers. Determine all functions $f : Bbb R toBbb R$ such that, for
all real numbers x and y,$$f(f(x)f(y))+f(x+y)=f(xy)$$My attempt: let's first find some partial answers. If this equation has some polynomial answers of degree $d$ then the coefficient of $x^d$ must be equal at both sides i.e. we must have $$maxd^2,d=d$$which leads to $$d=0,1$$ now let's take the general answer of polynomial kind as $$f(x)=ax+b$$ for some $a$ and $b$. Substituting this in the equation leads to $$f(a^2xy+b^2+abx+aby)+ax+ay+b=axy+b$$which leads to $$a^3xy+ab^2+a^2bx+a^2by+b+ax+ay=axy$$finally we obtain one trivial answer $a=b=0$ and two non-trivial answers $$a=-b=1\a=-b=-1$$therefore the only non-trivial polynomials satisfying the equation above are $$f(x)=x-1\f(x)=-x+1$$I believe these are the only answers of the question. Here turns out two questions:




  1. Are there any other answers except those I found?


  2. If so, what are they?








share|cite|improve this question













Let $Bbb R$ be the set of real numbers. Determine all functions $f : Bbb R toBbb R$ such that, for
all real numbers x and y,$$f(f(x)f(y))+f(x+y)=f(xy)$$My attempt: let's first find some partial answers. If this equation has some polynomial answers of degree $d$ then the coefficient of $x^d$ must be equal at both sides i.e. we must have $$maxd^2,d=d$$which leads to $$d=0,1$$ now let's take the general answer of polynomial kind as $$f(x)=ax+b$$ for some $a$ and $b$. Substituting this in the equation leads to $$f(a^2xy+b^2+abx+aby)+ax+ay+b=axy+b$$which leads to $$a^3xy+ab^2+a^2bx+a^2by+b+ax+ay=axy$$finally we obtain one trivial answer $a=b=0$ and two non-trivial answers $$a=-b=1\a=-b=-1$$therefore the only non-trivial polynomials satisfying the equation above are $$f(x)=x-1\f(x)=-x+1$$I believe these are the only answers of the question. Here turns out two questions:




  1. Are there any other answers except those I found?


  2. If so, what are they?










share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 2 days ago









Mason

1,1271223




1,1271223









asked 2 days ago









Mostafa Ayaz

8,5203530




8,5203530











  • Can we manipulate this to say that $f(0)in 0,pm 1$?
    – Mason
    2 days ago










  • I don't think so, or if is it this is not a strong background implication. How can you prove that for example $f(0)ne 2$?
    – Mostafa Ayaz
    2 days ago






  • 1




    imo-official.org/problems/IMO2017SL.pdf
    – greedoid
    2 days ago
















  • Can we manipulate this to say that $f(0)in 0,pm 1$?
    – Mason
    2 days ago










  • I don't think so, or if is it this is not a strong background implication. How can you prove that for example $f(0)ne 2$?
    – Mostafa Ayaz
    2 days ago






  • 1




    imo-official.org/problems/IMO2017SL.pdf
    – greedoid
    2 days ago















Can we manipulate this to say that $f(0)in 0,pm 1$?
– Mason
2 days ago




Can we manipulate this to say that $f(0)in 0,pm 1$?
– Mason
2 days ago












I don't think so, or if is it this is not a strong background implication. How can you prove that for example $f(0)ne 2$?
– Mostafa Ayaz
2 days ago




I don't think so, or if is it this is not a strong background implication. How can you prove that for example $f(0)ne 2$?
– Mostafa Ayaz
2 days ago




1




1




imo-official.org/problems/IMO2017SL.pdf
– greedoid
2 days ago




imo-official.org/problems/IMO2017SL.pdf
– greedoid
2 days ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote













If $f$ is continuous, then $0,-x+1$, and $x-1$ are the only possible functions.



Assume $b in mathbbR$ is such that $f(b) = 0$. Then $y=b implies f(0)+f(x+b) = f(xb)$ for all $x in mathbbR$. Now unless $b=1$, we can let $x = fracbb-1$ so that $x+b = xb$ and thus $f(0)=0$. But then $y=0 implies f(0)+f(x) = f(0)$ for all $x in mathbbR$, i.e. $f equiv 0$. Hence, we may assume $f(b) = 0 implies b=1$.



Now $x=y=0$ implies $f(0)^2 = 1$. Assume $f(0) = 1$. [The case $f(0) = -1$ follows from replacing $f$ by $-f$, which is a symmetry the main functional equation respects]. Then, $y=1 implies f(x+1) = f(x)-1$ for each $x in mathbbR$. Then $f(0) = 1 implies f(x) = -x+1$ for all $x in mathbbZ$.



Also, for each $x not = 1$, letting $y = fracxx-1$ gives that $f(f(x)f(fracxx-1)) = 0 implies f(x)f(fracxx-1) = 1$. Letting $x = frac12$ shows $f(frac12) = frac12$ and $f(x+1) = f(x)-1$ gives that $f(frack2) = -frack2+1$ for each $k in mathbbZ$. It's then an easy induction (on the size of denominator), using $f(x)f(fracxx-1) = 1$, to conclude that $f(fracpq) = -fracpq+1$ for each $p,q in mathbbZ, q not = 0$. [The point is that $fracxx-1$ at $x = fracpq$ is $fracpp-q$ which has denominator smaller than $q$ in absolute value.]



Hence, $f(x) = -x+1$ for each $x in mathbbQ$, and if $f$ is continuous, this extends to all $x in mathbbR$.






share|cite|improve this answer

















  • 1




    You haven't prove the existence of $b$.
    – greedoid
    2 days ago






  • 1




    Yes I have. $x=y=0$ implies $f(f(0)^2) = 0$. This is how I got $f(0)^2 = 1$.
    – mathworker21
    2 days ago







  • 1




    Also, I note that for each $x not = 1$, $f(f(x)f(fracxx-1)) = 0$. Am I missing something?
    – mathworker21
    2 days ago







  • 2




    @greedoid I don't see an issue. Right away you can take $x=y=0$ to see that $f(f(0)^2) = 0$. So that gives you the existence of some $b$ for which $f(b) = 0$. But anyways the paragraph starting with "Assume" is just the implication $f(b) = 0 implies b=1$.
    – mathworker21
    2 days ago







  • 1




    @mathworker21: Nice proof!
    – quasi
    15 hours ago










Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2871778%2fa-specific-question-about-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
3
down vote













If $f$ is continuous, then $0,-x+1$, and $x-1$ are the only possible functions.



Assume $b in mathbbR$ is such that $f(b) = 0$. Then $y=b implies f(0)+f(x+b) = f(xb)$ for all $x in mathbbR$. Now unless $b=1$, we can let $x = fracbb-1$ so that $x+b = xb$ and thus $f(0)=0$. But then $y=0 implies f(0)+f(x) = f(0)$ for all $x in mathbbR$, i.e. $f equiv 0$. Hence, we may assume $f(b) = 0 implies b=1$.



Now $x=y=0$ implies $f(0)^2 = 1$. Assume $f(0) = 1$. [The case $f(0) = -1$ follows from replacing $f$ by $-f$, which is a symmetry the main functional equation respects]. Then, $y=1 implies f(x+1) = f(x)-1$ for each $x in mathbbR$. Then $f(0) = 1 implies f(x) = -x+1$ for all $x in mathbbZ$.



Also, for each $x not = 1$, letting $y = fracxx-1$ gives that $f(f(x)f(fracxx-1)) = 0 implies f(x)f(fracxx-1) = 1$. Letting $x = frac12$ shows $f(frac12) = frac12$ and $f(x+1) = f(x)-1$ gives that $f(frack2) = -frack2+1$ for each $k in mathbbZ$. It's then an easy induction (on the size of denominator), using $f(x)f(fracxx-1) = 1$, to conclude that $f(fracpq) = -fracpq+1$ for each $p,q in mathbbZ, q not = 0$. [The point is that $fracxx-1$ at $x = fracpq$ is $fracpp-q$ which has denominator smaller than $q$ in absolute value.]



Hence, $f(x) = -x+1$ for each $x in mathbbQ$, and if $f$ is continuous, this extends to all $x in mathbbR$.






share|cite|improve this answer

















  • 1




    You haven't prove the existence of $b$.
    – greedoid
    2 days ago






  • 1




    Yes I have. $x=y=0$ implies $f(f(0)^2) = 0$. This is how I got $f(0)^2 = 1$.
    – mathworker21
    2 days ago







  • 1




    Also, I note that for each $x not = 1$, $f(f(x)f(fracxx-1)) = 0$. Am I missing something?
    – mathworker21
    2 days ago







  • 2




    @greedoid I don't see an issue. Right away you can take $x=y=0$ to see that $f(f(0)^2) = 0$. So that gives you the existence of some $b$ for which $f(b) = 0$. But anyways the paragraph starting with "Assume" is just the implication $f(b) = 0 implies b=1$.
    – mathworker21
    2 days ago







  • 1




    @mathworker21: Nice proof!
    – quasi
    15 hours ago














up vote
3
down vote













If $f$ is continuous, then $0,-x+1$, and $x-1$ are the only possible functions.



Assume $b in mathbbR$ is such that $f(b) = 0$. Then $y=b implies f(0)+f(x+b) = f(xb)$ for all $x in mathbbR$. Now unless $b=1$, we can let $x = fracbb-1$ so that $x+b = xb$ and thus $f(0)=0$. But then $y=0 implies f(0)+f(x) = f(0)$ for all $x in mathbbR$, i.e. $f equiv 0$. Hence, we may assume $f(b) = 0 implies b=1$.



Now $x=y=0$ implies $f(0)^2 = 1$. Assume $f(0) = 1$. [The case $f(0) = -1$ follows from replacing $f$ by $-f$, which is a symmetry the main functional equation respects]. Then, $y=1 implies f(x+1) = f(x)-1$ for each $x in mathbbR$. Then $f(0) = 1 implies f(x) = -x+1$ for all $x in mathbbZ$.



Also, for each $x not = 1$, letting $y = fracxx-1$ gives that $f(f(x)f(fracxx-1)) = 0 implies f(x)f(fracxx-1) = 1$. Letting $x = frac12$ shows $f(frac12) = frac12$ and $f(x+1) = f(x)-1$ gives that $f(frack2) = -frack2+1$ for each $k in mathbbZ$. It's then an easy induction (on the size of denominator), using $f(x)f(fracxx-1) = 1$, to conclude that $f(fracpq) = -fracpq+1$ for each $p,q in mathbbZ, q not = 0$. [The point is that $fracxx-1$ at $x = fracpq$ is $fracpp-q$ which has denominator smaller than $q$ in absolute value.]



Hence, $f(x) = -x+1$ for each $x in mathbbQ$, and if $f$ is continuous, this extends to all $x in mathbbR$.






share|cite|improve this answer

















  • 1




    You haven't prove the existence of $b$.
    – greedoid
    2 days ago






  • 1




    Yes I have. $x=y=0$ implies $f(f(0)^2) = 0$. This is how I got $f(0)^2 = 1$.
    – mathworker21
    2 days ago







  • 1




    Also, I note that for each $x not = 1$, $f(f(x)f(fracxx-1)) = 0$. Am I missing something?
    – mathworker21
    2 days ago







  • 2




    @greedoid I don't see an issue. Right away you can take $x=y=0$ to see that $f(f(0)^2) = 0$. So that gives you the existence of some $b$ for which $f(b) = 0$. But anyways the paragraph starting with "Assume" is just the implication $f(b) = 0 implies b=1$.
    – mathworker21
    2 days ago







  • 1




    @mathworker21: Nice proof!
    – quasi
    15 hours ago












up vote
3
down vote










up vote
3
down vote









If $f$ is continuous, then $0,-x+1$, and $x-1$ are the only possible functions.



Assume $b in mathbbR$ is such that $f(b) = 0$. Then $y=b implies f(0)+f(x+b) = f(xb)$ for all $x in mathbbR$. Now unless $b=1$, we can let $x = fracbb-1$ so that $x+b = xb$ and thus $f(0)=0$. But then $y=0 implies f(0)+f(x) = f(0)$ for all $x in mathbbR$, i.e. $f equiv 0$. Hence, we may assume $f(b) = 0 implies b=1$.



Now $x=y=0$ implies $f(0)^2 = 1$. Assume $f(0) = 1$. [The case $f(0) = -1$ follows from replacing $f$ by $-f$, which is a symmetry the main functional equation respects]. Then, $y=1 implies f(x+1) = f(x)-1$ for each $x in mathbbR$. Then $f(0) = 1 implies f(x) = -x+1$ for all $x in mathbbZ$.



Also, for each $x not = 1$, letting $y = fracxx-1$ gives that $f(f(x)f(fracxx-1)) = 0 implies f(x)f(fracxx-1) = 1$. Letting $x = frac12$ shows $f(frac12) = frac12$ and $f(x+1) = f(x)-1$ gives that $f(frack2) = -frack2+1$ for each $k in mathbbZ$. It's then an easy induction (on the size of denominator), using $f(x)f(fracxx-1) = 1$, to conclude that $f(fracpq) = -fracpq+1$ for each $p,q in mathbbZ, q not = 0$. [The point is that $fracxx-1$ at $x = fracpq$ is $fracpp-q$ which has denominator smaller than $q$ in absolute value.]



Hence, $f(x) = -x+1$ for each $x in mathbbQ$, and if $f$ is continuous, this extends to all $x in mathbbR$.






share|cite|improve this answer













If $f$ is continuous, then $0,-x+1$, and $x-1$ are the only possible functions.



Assume $b in mathbbR$ is such that $f(b) = 0$. Then $y=b implies f(0)+f(x+b) = f(xb)$ for all $x in mathbbR$. Now unless $b=1$, we can let $x = fracbb-1$ so that $x+b = xb$ and thus $f(0)=0$. But then $y=0 implies f(0)+f(x) = f(0)$ for all $x in mathbbR$, i.e. $f equiv 0$. Hence, we may assume $f(b) = 0 implies b=1$.



Now $x=y=0$ implies $f(0)^2 = 1$. Assume $f(0) = 1$. [The case $f(0) = -1$ follows from replacing $f$ by $-f$, which is a symmetry the main functional equation respects]. Then, $y=1 implies f(x+1) = f(x)-1$ for each $x in mathbbR$. Then $f(0) = 1 implies f(x) = -x+1$ for all $x in mathbbZ$.



Also, for each $x not = 1$, letting $y = fracxx-1$ gives that $f(f(x)f(fracxx-1)) = 0 implies f(x)f(fracxx-1) = 1$. Letting $x = frac12$ shows $f(frac12) = frac12$ and $f(x+1) = f(x)-1$ gives that $f(frack2) = -frack2+1$ for each $k in mathbbZ$. It's then an easy induction (on the size of denominator), using $f(x)f(fracxx-1) = 1$, to conclude that $f(fracpq) = -fracpq+1$ for each $p,q in mathbbZ, q not = 0$. [The point is that $fracxx-1$ at $x = fracpq$ is $fracpp-q$ which has denominator smaller than $q$ in absolute value.]



Hence, $f(x) = -x+1$ for each $x in mathbbQ$, and if $f$ is continuous, this extends to all $x in mathbbR$.







share|cite|improve this answer













share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer











answered 2 days ago









mathworker21

6,4231727




6,4231727







  • 1




    You haven't prove the existence of $b$.
    – greedoid
    2 days ago






  • 1




    Yes I have. $x=y=0$ implies $f(f(0)^2) = 0$. This is how I got $f(0)^2 = 1$.
    – mathworker21
    2 days ago







  • 1




    Also, I note that for each $x not = 1$, $f(f(x)f(fracxx-1)) = 0$. Am I missing something?
    – mathworker21
    2 days ago







  • 2




    @greedoid I don't see an issue. Right away you can take $x=y=0$ to see that $f(f(0)^2) = 0$. So that gives you the existence of some $b$ for which $f(b) = 0$. But anyways the paragraph starting with "Assume" is just the implication $f(b) = 0 implies b=1$.
    – mathworker21
    2 days ago







  • 1




    @mathworker21: Nice proof!
    – quasi
    15 hours ago












  • 1




    You haven't prove the existence of $b$.
    – greedoid
    2 days ago






  • 1




    Yes I have. $x=y=0$ implies $f(f(0)^2) = 0$. This is how I got $f(0)^2 = 1$.
    – mathworker21
    2 days ago







  • 1




    Also, I note that for each $x not = 1$, $f(f(x)f(fracxx-1)) = 0$. Am I missing something?
    – mathworker21
    2 days ago







  • 2




    @greedoid I don't see an issue. Right away you can take $x=y=0$ to see that $f(f(0)^2) = 0$. So that gives you the existence of some $b$ for which $f(b) = 0$. But anyways the paragraph starting with "Assume" is just the implication $f(b) = 0 implies b=1$.
    – mathworker21
    2 days ago







  • 1




    @mathworker21: Nice proof!
    – quasi
    15 hours ago







1




1




You haven't prove the existence of $b$.
– greedoid
2 days ago




You haven't prove the existence of $b$.
– greedoid
2 days ago




1




1




Yes I have. $x=y=0$ implies $f(f(0)^2) = 0$. This is how I got $f(0)^2 = 1$.
– mathworker21
2 days ago





Yes I have. $x=y=0$ implies $f(f(0)^2) = 0$. This is how I got $f(0)^2 = 1$.
– mathworker21
2 days ago





1




1




Also, I note that for each $x not = 1$, $f(f(x)f(fracxx-1)) = 0$. Am I missing something?
– mathworker21
2 days ago





Also, I note that for each $x not = 1$, $f(f(x)f(fracxx-1)) = 0$. Am I missing something?
– mathworker21
2 days ago





2




2




@greedoid I don't see an issue. Right away you can take $x=y=0$ to see that $f(f(0)^2) = 0$. So that gives you the existence of some $b$ for which $f(b) = 0$. But anyways the paragraph starting with "Assume" is just the implication $f(b) = 0 implies b=1$.
– mathworker21
2 days ago





@greedoid I don't see an issue. Right away you can take $x=y=0$ to see that $f(f(0)^2) = 0$. So that gives you the existence of some $b$ for which $f(b) = 0$. But anyways the paragraph starting with "Assume" is just the implication $f(b) = 0 implies b=1$.
– mathworker21
2 days ago





1




1




@mathworker21: Nice proof!
– quasi
15 hours ago




@mathworker21: Nice proof!
– quasi
15 hours ago












 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2871778%2fa-specific-question-about-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?